BELVEDERE, Calif. — Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who leaped onto the back of President John F. Kennedy’s limousine after the president was shot, then was forced to retire early because he remained haunted by memories of the assassination, died Friday. He was 93.

Hill died at home in Belvedere, California, according to his publisher, Gallery Books, an imprint of Simon & Schuster. A cause of death was not given.

Although few may recognize his name, the footage of Hill, captured on Abraham Zapruder’s chilling home movie of the assassination, provided some of the most indelible images of Kennedy’s assassination in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963.

Hill received Secret Service awards and was promoted for his actions that day, but for decades blamed himself for Kennedy’s death, saying he didn’t react quickly enough and would gladly have given his life to save the president.

“If I had reacted just a little bit quicker. And I could have, I guess,” a weeping Hill told Mike Wallace on CBS’ 60 Minutes in 1975, shortly after he retired at age 43 at the urging of his doctors. “And I’ll live with that to my grave.”

Related Articles

Roberta Flack, Grammy-winning ‘Killing Me Softly’ singer with an intimate style, dies at 88

Some Trump Officials Push Back Against Musk’s Ultimatum to Workers

Musk’s cost-cutting team is laying off workers at the auto safety agency overseeing his car company

One of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ attorneys wants to quit his defense team

AP sues 3 Trump administration officials, citing freedom of speech

It was only in recent years that Hill said he was able to finally start putting the assassination behind him and accept what happened.

On the day of the assassination, Hill was assigned to protect first lady Jacqueline Kennedy, and was riding on the left running board of the follow-up car directly behind the presidential limousine as it made its way through Dealey Plaza.

Hill told the Warren Commission that he reacted after hearing a shot and seeing the president slump in his seat. The president was struck by a fatal headshot before Hill was able to make it to the limousine.

Zapruder’s film captured Hill as he leaped from the Secret Service car, grabbed a handle on the limousine’s trunk and pulled himself onto it as the driver accelerated. He forced Mrs. Kennedy, who had crawled onto the trunk, back into her seat as the limousine sped off.

Hill later became the agent in charge of the White House protective detail and eventually an assistant director of the Secret Service, retiring because of what he characterized as deep depression and recurring memories of the assassination.

The 1993 Clint Eastwood thriller “In the Line of Fire,” about a former Secret Service agent scarred by the JFK assassination, was inspired in part by Hill.

Hill was born in 1932 and grew up in Washburn, North Dakota. He attended Concordia College in Moorhead, Minnesota, served in the Army and worked as a railroad agent before joining the Secret Service in 1958. He worked in the agency’s Denver office for about a year, before joining the elite group of agents assigned to protect the president and first family.

Since his retirement, Hill has spoken publicly about the assassination only a handful of times, but the most poignant was his 1975 interview with Wallace, during which Hill broke down several times.

“If I had reacted about five-tenths of a second faster, maybe a second faster, I wouldn’t be here today,” Hill said.

“You mean you would have gotten there and you would have taken the shot?” Wallace asked.

“The third shot, yes, sir,” Hill said.

“And that would have been all right with you?”

“That would have been fine with me,” Hill responded.

In his 2005 memoir, “Between You and Me,” Wallace recalled his interview with Hill as one of the most moving of his career.

In 2006, Wallace and Hill reunited on CNN’s “Larry King Live,” where Hill credited that first 60 Minutes interview with helping him finally start the healing process.

“I have to thank Mike for asking me to do that interview and then thank him more because he’s what caused me to finally come to terms with things and bring the emotions out where they surfaced,” he said. “It was because of his questions and the things he asked that I started to recover.”

Decades after the assassination, Hill co-authored several books — including “Mrs. Kennedy and Me” and “Five Presidents” — about his Secret Service years with Lisa McCubbin Hill, whom he married in 2021.

“We had that once-in-a-lifetime love that everyone hopes for,” McCubbin Hill said in a statement. “We were soulmates.”

Clint Hill also became a speaker and gave interviews about his experience in Dallas. In 2018, he was given the state of North Dakota’s highest civilian honor, the Theodore Roosevelt Rough Rider Award. A portrait of Hill adorns a Capitol gallery of fellow honorees.

A private funeral service will be held in Washington, D.C., on a future date.

 

With egg prices at a record high, shoppers know the pain of trying to buy eggs and finding only empty shelves or horrifying prices. But do you know how it’s hitting your favorite weekend breakfast spot?

Related Articles

Apple announces $500 billion investment in US amid tariff threats that could affect the iPhone

Robinhood says SEC has closed its investigation into the company

Fired federal workers hunt for new jobs but struggle to replace their old ones

Starbucks lays off 1,100 corporate employees as coffee chain streamlines

Business People: 3M CEO Bill Brown named chairman, amid other board moves

In a move demonstrating just how impactful the ups-and-downs of egg prices have become, Waffle House recently announced it added a 50-cents-per-egg surcharge to customers’ bills. The Georgia-based chain told CNN that it is watching egg prices and will “adjust or remove” the extra charge based on market conditions.

“The continuing egg shortage caused by HPAI (bird flu) has caused a dramatic increase in egg prices,” Waffle House told the news network. “Customers and restaurants are being forced to make difficult decisions.”

And it really is a hard decision for restaurant owners to make, says Bo Davis, CEO and co-founder of MarginEdge, a restaurant management platform that helps clients track expenses and adjust to price changes.

On the one hand, egg-centric restaurants already operating on thin margins are dealing with an unworkable math problem, Davis says. During the week of Feb. 3, the median price for a dozen eggs was $7.55 nationally (that’s wholesale), according to MarginEdge data collected from its 10,000-plus restaurant clients.

But on the other hand, customers are tired of high prices after years of inflation and will go somewhere else if their favorite diner becomes too pricey.

“At the end of the day, it’s just hard,” Davis says. “Your profitability is going to get wiped out until this gets fixed. You can’t charge enough money to make a healthy profit on eggs at that price if you are an egg concept or a breakfast concept.”

NerdWallet spoke with Davis about what customers might like to know about how restaurants adjust to price spikes. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

NerdWallet: For restaurants, how big a deal is it when the price of a single ingredient becomes this volatile?

Davis: We have a fair number of clients that are breakfast places. And for them it’s really, really challenging and borderline devastating.

In the traditional sort of menu planning, a restaurant expects 25 to 30% of the costs that they’re charging a client to be their food costs. And there’s another 30% that’s basically labor. And then there’s about 20 to 30% that are other costs. And typically, you’ve got about a 10% margin at the end of it. So if you think about that math: $0.30 on the dollar going to food, with a 10% profit margin, means that if that food item goes up 33%, you’re broke.

If you take something like an omelet where the cost is almost entirely eggs, and the price triples — it doesn’t go up 33%, it triples — then you go from a 30% plate cost to a 90% plate cost. You have the same labor, you have the same rent, you have the same, you know, cleaning supplies and packaged goods and all the other things the restaurant needs. But now you’re minus 50 or 60% on that omelet. You can see how even a 50-cent up-charge would struggle to cover that cost.

NerdWallet: How do restaurants cope with high egg prices?

Davis: The first thing you do is you try to drive customers to a different menu item. The next thing you can do is adjust operations to just make sure that you’re running it as efficiently as possible — that no eggs are getting lost.

The next thing you can do is raise prices. That’s really hard when you see a price like this spike as high as it is. The Waffle House example of 50 cents on an egg — that’s tough to do and it’s tough to fully recapture the cost.

The other thing you can do is lower the quantity you put on a plate, which is also hard, right? How small of an omelet will a customer accept before it just doesn’t work any more?

I guess the last one I would also say is you can trade down quality. So if you’re using cage-free eggs, you can trade to the less expensive non-organic eggs. If you’re using those, you can trade to liquid eggs, where you’re getting them at a lower cost.

NerdWallet: Using Waffle House as an example, why apply a surcharge instead of raising your menu price?

Davis: They believe it’s temporary. With menu prices, you do your very best to adjust them as slowly as possible because it’s the easiest way to push customers away.

I would imagine they also train their servers to tell people, “Look, you know how you’re having a hard time getting eggs? So are we. We have to do this for a minute. We’re hoping it’ll go away soon.” And that would, I think, dramatically minimize the impact of it on a customer or at least not make a customer change their permanent buying decisions.

The surcharge is unusual. And I think it is because this is such an anomaly. What’s interesting with eggs is that because the price move is so intense, if you’re an egg concept, that change is so dramatic that even if other food prices were bouncing down, they’re just not going to offset it.

NerdWallet: Are restaurant-goers going to see more surcharges like the one at Waffle House, do you think?

Davis: Yes. When we saw supply-chain issues and spiked prices around the COVID-19 stuff, it was very clear what had happened, and they were temporary, and the supply chain existed, it just was frozen for a minute.

This isn’t that. This isn’t some boats got stuck or whatever. The chickens are gone. You have to grow new chickens, and the bird flu’s not gone. So it does feel like this is not going away in the near term. I would expect that the surcharges would continue, but you’d also just see more and more restaurants trying to find ways to get customers to eat substitute products. Because it’s hard to just charge more and more and more.

And honestly consumers are getting hammered with it, right? You are. I am. And then going out to eat, and that being more expensive at the same time. I think there’s going to be a continued push on substitute products to the extent you can.

Taryn Phaneuf writes for NerdWallet. Email: tphaneuf@nerdwallet.com.

The article Cage-Free Egg Supply Takes Outsized Hit As Bird Flu Surges originally appeared on NerdWallet.

By YAYAN ZAMZAMI

BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (AP) — An Islamic Shariah court in Indonesia’s conservative Aceh province on Monday sentenced two men to public caning for having gay sex.

Related Articles

Trump’s abrupt change of US policy on Ukraine raises questions about Taiwan support

UN rejects US resolution urging an end to the war in Ukraine without noting Russian aggression

The biggest takeaways from Germany’s election, which will bring change to the EU’s leading power

Trump meets with French President Macron as uncertainty grows about US ties to Europe and Ukraine

Western leaders visit Kyiv and pledge military support against Russia on the war’s 3rd anniversary

The couple, aged 24 and 18, were arrested on Nov. 7, after neighborhood vigilantes in the provincial capital, Banda Aceh, suspected them of being gay and broke into their rented room to catch them naked and hugging each other.

The lead judge said that the two college students were “legally and convincingly” proven to have had gay sex and would receive 85 and 80 strokes respectively.

“During the trial it was proven that the defendants committed illicit acts, including kissing and having sex.“ said the judge, Sakwanah, who goes by a single name like many Indonesians. ”As Muslims, the defendants should uphold the Shariah law that prevails in Aceh,” she added.

She said the three-judge panel decided against imposing the maximum sentence of 100 lashes because the men were outstanding students who were polite in court, cooperated with authorities and had no previous convictions.

Prosecutors previously demanded each get 80 strokes, but the judges decided on a harsher punishment for the older man because they believed that he was the one who had encouraged and provided a place for sexual relations.

Both prosecutors and the lawyers for the two men said they accepted the sentence and will not appeal.

Aceh is considered more devout than other areas of Muslim-majority Indonesia and is the only province allowed to observe a version of Islamic Shariah law.

Indonesia’s secular central government granted Aceh the right to implement Islamic Shariah law in 2006 as part of a peace deal to end a separatist war. A religious police and court system have been established, and the new law is a significant strengthening of Shariah in the region. Each year since then, more than 100 people have been publicly caned.

Aceh implemented an expansion of Islamic bylaws and criminal code in 2015 that extended Shariah law to the province’s non-Muslims, who account for about 1% of the population, and allows up to 100 lashes for morality offenses including gay sex and sex between unmarried people. This will be the third time that Aceh has caned people for homosexuality.

Caning is also a punishment in Aceh for gambling, drinking alcohol, women who wear tight clothes and men who skip Friday prayers.

Human rights groups have criticized the law, saying it violates international treaties signed by Indonesia protecting the rights of minorities.

Indonesia’s national criminal code doesn’t regulate homosexuality, and the central government doesn’t have the power to strike down Shariah law in Aceh. However, an earlier version of the law that called for people to be stoned to death for adultery was dropped because of pressure from the central government.

Associated Press writer Niniek Karmini in Jakarta, Indonesia, contributed to this report.

Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — Apple announced Monday that it plans to invest more than $500 billion in the United States over the next four years, including plans to hire 20,000 people and build a new server factory in Texas.

Related Articles

Fired federal workers hunt for new jobs but struggle to replace their old ones

Starbucks lays off 1,100 corporate employees as coffee chain streamlines

Business People: 3M CEO Bill Brown named chairman, amid other board moves

Musk’s cost-cutting team is laying off workers at the auto safety agency overseeing his car company

Working Strategies: Weighing the buyout offer Part 2, personal considerations

The move comes just days after President Donald Trump said Apple CEO Tim Cook promised him that the tech giant’s manufacturing would shift from Mexico to the U.S. Trump noted the company was doing so to avoid paying tariffs. That pledge, coupled with Monday’s investment commitment, came as Trump continues to threaten to impose tariffs that could drive up the cost of iPhones made in China.

“We are bullish on the future of American innovation, and we’re proud to build on our long-standing U.S. investments with this $500 billion commitment to our country’s future,” Cook said in a company blog post.

Apple outlined several concrete moves in its announcement, the most significant of which is the construction of a new factory in Houston — slated to open in 2026 — that will produce servers to power Apple Intelligence, its suite of AI features. The company claims this factory will create “thousands of jobs.”

The announcement is similar to one Apple made in early 2018 — during the first Trump administration — that promised to create 20,000 new jobs as part of a $350 billion spend in the U.S. Trump was also mulling a tariff then that could have affected iPhones at the time, but he didn’t end up targeting those devices during his first administration.