Movie review: Strong performances propel road trip dramedy ‘Ezra’

posted in: News | 0

Director Tony Goldwyn opens his family dramedy “Ezra” in the warm, collegial comfort of a comedy club. Max (Bobby Cannavale) perches on a stool, a handheld camera drifting closer and closer as he tells jokes about his life — including his autistic son — layering truths with punchlines, walking a tight-rope of tones. It’s an invitation from Goldwyn, and screenwriter Tony Spiridakis, to sit down and listen awhile as they unfurl this heartfelt, humorous and sometimes harrowing yarn.

It establishes right away that Max is the proud and loving father of Ezra (William A. Fitzgerald, an autistic actor making his film debut), who has no problem grappling with the realities of raising an autistic child. Throughout the events that follow, we never lose sight of that, because Max fiercely loves his son, and that understanding offers a sense of emotional safety as the plot that unfolds becomes increasingly high stakes.

It’s this place setting, as well as the strong lead performances, that allow Goldwyn to thread the needle on a story that could potentially go off the rails. “Ezra” is the story of a father, desperate to protect his son, who takes him on a cross-country road trip where they experience catharsis and healing. It’s a fairly traditional road movie formula with an autism twist. Also, the “road trip” is technically a “kidnapping,” since Max spirits Ezra out of bed from the home of ex-wife Jenna (Rose Byrne), and the film never shies away from that reality, in fact relying on this perceived danger to ramp up the dramatic tension and set characters in motion.

The kidnapping stems from a misunderstanding that spirals into an unfortunate accident, coupled with Max’s own traumatic triggers. It’s never fully explicated in the screenplay, but Max’s past mental health issues and possibly undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder are frequently alluded to, thrumming below the surface. His experience makes him an understanding father to Ezra, but also somewhat hampers his ability to properly parent his son. Upset that Ezra might be medicated with anti-psychotics and placed in a special education school, Max assesses that the doctors, pharmaceutical companies and the state are in collusion to keep himself and his son apart. He’s not necessarily wrong, but his desire to expose Ezra to the world and treat him like any other kid bumps up against Jenna’s wish to provide her son with every accommodation and suggested treatment.

Every character choice in “Ezra” is plausible because it comes from a place of emotional honesty, both in the script and performances. We understand why Max acts in the extreme, and also why Jenna is hesitant to call the authorities, but feels forced to do so, because their characters are well-established and perfectly performed.

It’s no surprise that longtime life partners Byrne and Cannavale have an easy chemistry, and Cannavale and Robert De Niro, who plays his gruff father, Stan, have sparkling, rapid-fire New York-accented rapport. While Cannavale holds the center as the complex Max, demonstrating his range, as well as his ability to lead a movie, De Niro, unsurprisingly, is magnetic. It’s not a huge role, but his performance is beautifully expressed.

Goldwyn has called in the big guns to set “Ezra” up for success, and in addition to Cannavale, Byrne and De Niro, he has cast supporting actors such as Vera Farmiga, Rainn Wilson, himself in a small role, and his “Ghost” co-star Whoopi Goldberg, who plays Max’s agent. She calls him when he’s on the road to Michigan to visit a friend (Wilson) at a summer camp, to let him know that he’s been booked on Jimmy Kimmel and needs to be in L.A. in a week, extending their trip even further across the country. Despite Ezra’s protestations, they head West, with Max convinced he needs his son as a good-luck charm for his set. Meanwhile, Stan and Jenna hit the road in hot pursuit, and “Ezra” becomes a dueling odd-couple road movie.

The film is an actor’s showcase, and it’s the performances that hold everything together, especially the young Fitzgerald, who is terrific as Ezra, a young man who communicates his preferences and boundaries clearly — he’s often the only character saying exactly what he means. But Goldwyn’s direction is sure-handed in navigating the complicated tone that tiptoes through comedy and pathos. He pushes his style with cinematographer Danny Moder, utilizing those handheld close-ups for more emotionally intense moments, and imparting a sense of gritty authenticity to a story that often requires a suspended disbelief.

“Ezra” could tip into melodrama, but Goldwyn sidesteps that with a rather facile ending, seemingly skipping a story beat in the denouement. You crave one more moment to wrap things up, but sometimes it’s better to leave us wanting more, avoiding the treacle and focusing on the heart — and the humor — of the matter.

‘Ezra’

3 stars (out of 4)

MPA rating: R (for language, some sexual references and drug use)

Running time: 1:40

How to watch: In theaters on Friday, May 31

Related Articles

Entertainment |


‘Couples Therapy’ review: The least cynical reality show on TV. This time there’s a throuple.

Entertainment |


Walker Art Center’s free Art Fest 2024 celebrates Keith Haring

Entertainment |


New information about the mystery of Janet Halverson, book design icon, surfaces

Entertainment |


Column: Cannes we not? This year’s film festival left a sour taste

Entertainment |


All eyes are on Milwaukee this summer. Here’s what to do beyond the Republican National Convention

Other voices: Fix America’s cruel and unusual tax code

posted in: News | 0

The Internal Revenue Service recently piloted a program to help Americans cope with their notoriously complex tax system. Direct File was meant to help taxpayers in 12 states prepare and submit their returns electronically. Some 19 million people were eligible to use it. Thanks partly to a rollout late in the tax-preparation season, fewer than 1% of them actually did.

The IRS was pleased with the results nonetheless: Taxpayers who used the system said they liked it, according to a survey, and the idea all along was to “start small, make sure it works and then build from there.” Fine. So what about next steps? “No decision has been made about the future of Direct File at this time,” the agency says.

Dull as the topic of tax administration might seem, it demands far more ambition and urgency. Each year Americans spend roughly 2 billion hours and more than $30 billion on personal tax-preparation fees. This compliance burden falls disproportionately on the less well-off. The system’s complexity also means that credits often go unclaimed; again, in relative terms, the lower-paid suffer the biggest losses. At the top of the income scale, in contrast, complications yield loopholes — and every loophole dictates higher taxes for the rest.

A working Direct File system would be a start, but it’s the least of what’s required to disentangle the mess Congress has created. Next year, legislators will have to think about tax reform as changes in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire. They should use the moment to simplify the system and follow the example of many other advanced economies: Spare taxpayers the need to fill out any return at all.

Two complementary strategies would make this feasible.

First, go one better than Direct File by tasking the IRS to pre-populate the main tax form for most taxpayers. The agency already has much, and in many cases all, of the information it needs. According to one recent study, roughly 70 million returns — upward of 40% of the total — could be accurately pre-filled.

Second, simplify the code. This is desirable in its own right, because endless accretion of complexities is self-defeating. (Each new incentive or accommodation confounds the others.) In addition, a simpler code would allow more comprehensive use of pre-filled returns. A recent report from the Brookings Institution suggests some options. To be sure, even the least ambitious of these ideas is radical by contemporary standards. It would repeal itemized deductions, preferential rates for capital gains and dividends, head-of-household filing status and the alternative minimum tax, and replace existing personal credits with refundable ones of $1,000 for each family member and a work-related credit that phases out as income rises.

A tall order, politically speaking — yet consider the benefits. By design, it would be both revenue-neutral and fairer than the current code. It would also be vastly easier for the IRS to administer and for taxpayers to understand and endure. With such a system, pre-populated returns could be standard practice.

As it stands, the U.S. system delights the tax-prep industry but imposes enormous avoidable costs on the country’s citizens. It’s abysmal by international standards and violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Next year, changes to the tax code will be unavoidable. For once, maybe Congress can come up with a reform worth the name.

— The Bloomberg Opinion editorial board

Related Articles

Opinion |


Pamela Paul: What flies on campus won’t necessarily fly in the bigger world off campus

Opinion |


Other voices: China embraced electric vehicles. The U.S. didn’t. Now we’re paying the price

Opinion |


Robert Pearl: Medical malpractice in the age of AI: Who will bear the blame?

Opinion |


Jacobson, Jokela: What should we fear with AI in medicine?

Opinion |


F.D. Flam: Fake scientific studies are a problem that’s getting harder to solve

In new Grand Ave window displays, 30 years of festive Circus Juventas costumes

posted in: News | 0

To mark its 30th anniversary, the youth circus school Circus Juventas is displaying more than 30 costumes from past shows in windows on Grand Avenue.

The window displays, themed with props and descriptive cards, are along the corner of Grand and Victoria Street, in the former Pottery Barn store that closed earlier this year.

Costumes from previous Circus Juventas shows, as well as other pieces of youth circus memorabilia, are shown in window displays on May 29, 2024. The displays, in the former Pottery Barn store on the corner of Grand Avenue and Victoria Street, are set to remain in place until June 15. (Jared Kaufman / Pioneer Press)

The Circus Juventas costumes are currently scheduled to be on display until June 15, but the show could be extended further into the summer pending the approval of the building’s owner, the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio.

That company, a pension fund based in Columbus, has been the subject of some criticism over rising vacancy rates among its Grand Avenue real estate holdings. The company has been quite receptive to the costume display project, though, said Carolyn Will, a Circus Juventas spokesperson who helped coordinate the show.

And the timing of the exhibition coincides with Grand Old Day, the recently revived annual street festival that’s set to take place this year on Sunday, June 2. This year’s Grand Old Day will stretch from Snelling Avenue to Dale Street, a smaller footprint than in years past, but will include a parade, several music stages and live wrestling.

St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter, City Council member Rebecca Noecker and Grand Avenue Business Association president Chris Jensen spoke at an unveiling event for the window displays Wednesday morning.

A centerpiece of the exhibition is a pair of costumes Circus Juventas founders Dan and Betty Butler wore during their own circus performing careers; the couple met as teenagers at the Sailor Circus in Sarasota, Fla.

Last fall, the Butlers passed the St. Paul youth circus to new leaders: Rob Dawson, a Cirque du Soleil alum, became executive director, and the Butlers’ daughter, Rachel Butler-Norris — who, for the past 15 years, has been the assistant artistic director alongside her mother — took on the artistic director role in her own right.

Circus Juventas executive director Rob Dawson, right, and artistic director Rachel Butler-Norris smile in front of window displays of past Circus Juventas costumes on May 29, 2024. Dawson and Butler-Norris took over their roles from Circus Juventas founders Dan and Betty Butler in fall 2023. (Photo courtesy Gabrielle Ripley)

“Taking over from them has been surreal, and I’m trying to honor their legacy always, but this 30th year especially,” Butler-Norris said after the unveiling event. “And I’m really happy and proud to be able to see their costumes.”

Because many performers are able to keep their costumes after Circus Juventas shows close, tracking them down was a logistical challenge, Butler-Norris said.

And currently, the school’s costume designers are busy creating pieces for Circus Juventas’s summer show, “Jangala,” The annual show, which tells a new story each year, highlights the school’s top performers with professional-grade production value.

“Jangala” runs for 15 performances between July 26 and Aug. 11. Tickets go on sale June 10 at circusjuventas.org.

Related Articles

Arts |


Russell’s Bar and Grill to open in Tavern on Grand space

Arts |


Nacho mania: Seven of our favorite plates of chips, cheese and more in the east metro

Arts |


Spring and summer arts and entertainment: 20+ family-friendly community festivals and celebrations worth checking out in 2024

Arts |


St. Paul’s Grand Old Day set to return on Sunday, June 2

Arts |


Literary pick for week of March 10: ‘Oskar’s Voyage’

Pamela Paul: What flies on campus won’t necessarily fly in the bigger world off campus

posted in: Adventure | 0

The encampments have been cleared; campuses have emptied; protester and counterprotester alike have moved on to internships, summer gigs and in some cases, the start of their postgraduate careers.

Leaving aside what impact, if any, the protests had on global events, let’s consider the more granular effect the protests will have on the protesters’ job prospects and future careers.

Certainly, that matters, too. After all, this generation is notable for its high levels of ambition and pre-professionalism. They have tuition price tags to justify and loans to repay. A 2023 survey of Princeton University seniors found that nearly 60% took jobs in finance, consulting, tech and engineering, up from 53% in 2016.

A desire to protect future professional plans no doubt factored into the protesters’ cloaking themselves in masks and kaffiyehs. According to a recent report in The New York Times, “The fear of long-term professional consequences has also been a theme among pro-Palestine protesters since the beginning of the war.”

Activism has played a big part of many of these young people’s lives and academic success. From the children’s books they read (“The Hate U Give,” “I Am Malala”), to the young role models that were honored, (Greta Thunberg, David Hogg), to the social justice movements that were praised (Black Lives Matter, MeToo, climate justice), Gen Z has been told it’s on them to clean up the boomers’ mess. Resist!

College application essays regularly ask students to describe their relationship with social justice, their leadership experience and their pet causes. “Where are you on your journey of engaging with or fighting for social justice?” asked one essay prompt Tufts University offered applicants in 2022. What are you doing to ensure the planet’s future?

Across the curriculum, from the social sciences to the humanities, courses are steeped in social justice theory and calls to action. Cornell University’s library publishes a study guide to a 1969 building occupation in which students armed themselves. Harvard University offers a social justice graduate certificate. “Universities spent years saying that activism is not just welcome but encouraged on their campuses,” Tyler Austin Harper noted recently in The Atlantic. “Students took them at their word.”

Imagine the surprise of one freshman who was expelled at Vanderbilt University after students forced their way into an administrative building. As he told The Associated Press, protesting in high school was what helped get him into college in the first place; he wrote his admissions essay on organizing walkouts, and got a scholarship for activists and organizers.

Things could still work out well for many of these kids. Some professions — academia, politics, community organizing, nonprofit work — are well served by a resume brimming with activism. But a lot has changed socially and economically since boomer activists marched from the streets to the workplace, many of them building solid middle-class lives as teachers, creatives and professionals, without crushing anxiety about student debt. In a demanding and rapidly changing economy, today’s students yearn for the security of high-paying employment.

Not all employers will look kindly on an encampment stint. When a group of Harvard student organizations signed an open letter blaming Israel for Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks, billionaire Bill Ackman requested on the social platform X that Harvard release the names of the students involved “so as to insure that none of us inadvertently hire any of their members.” Soon after, a conservative watchdog group posted names and photos of the students on a truck circling Harvard Square.

Calling students out for their political beliefs is admittedly creepy. But Palestinian protests lacked the moral clarity of the anti-apartheid demonstrations. Along with protesters demanding that Israel stop killing civilians in the Gaza Strip, others stirred fears of antisemitism by justifying the Oct. 7 massacre, tearing down posters of kidnapped Israelis, shoving “Zionists” out of encampments and calling for “globalizing the intifada” and making Palestine “free from the river to the sea.”

In November, two dozen leading law firms wrote to top law schools implying that students who participated in what they called antisemitic activities, including calling for “the elimination of the state of Israel,” would not be hired. More than 100 firms have since signed on. One of those law firms, Davis Polk, rescinded job offers to students whose organizations had signed the letter Ackman criticized. Davis Polk said those sentiments were contrary to the firm’s values. Another major firm withdrew an offer to a student at New York University who also blamed Israel for the Oct. 7 attack. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law urged employers to not hire those of his students he said were antisemitic.

Two partners at corporate law firms, who asked to speak anonymously since other partners didn’t want them to talk to the media, said that participating in this year’s protests, especially if it involves an arrest, could easily foreclose opportunities at their firm. At one of those firms, hiring managers scan applicants’ social media histories for problems. (Well before Oct. 7, students had keyed into this possibility, scrubbing campus activism from their resumes.)

Also, employers generally want to hire people who can get along and fit into their company culture, rather than trying to agitate for change. They don’t want politics disrupting the workplace.

“There is no right answer,” Steve Cohen, a partner at a boutique litigation firm, Pollock Cohen, said when I asked if protesting might count against an applicant. “But if I sense they are not tolerant of opinions that differ from their own, it’s not going to be a good fit.” (That matches my experience with Cohen, who had worked on Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign and hired me, a die-hard liberal, as an editorial assistant back in 1994.)

Corporate America is fundamentally risk-averse. As The Wall Street Journal reported, companies are drawing “a red line on office activists.” Numerous employers, including Amazon, are cracking down on political activism in the workplace, the Journal reported. Google recently fired 28 people.

For decades, employers used elite colleges as a kind of human resources proxy to vet potential candidates and make their jobs easier by doing a first cut. Given that those same elite schools were hotbeds of activism this year, that calculus may no longer prove as reliable. Forbes reported that employers are beginning to sour on the Ivy League. “The perception of what those graduates bring has changed. And I think it’s more related to what they’re actually teaching and what they walk away with,” an architectural firm told Forbes.

The American university has long been seen as a refuge from the real world, a sealed community unto its own. The outsize protests this past year showed that in a social media-infused, cable-news-covered world, the barrier has become more porous. What flies on campus doesn’t necessarily pass in the real world.

The toughest lesson for young people of this generation may be that while they’ve been raised to believe in their right to change the world, the rest of the world may neither share nor be ready to indulge their particular vision.

Pamela Paul writes a column for the New York Times.

Related Articles

Opinion |


Other voices: China embraced electric vehicles. The U.S. didn’t. Now we’re paying the price

Opinion |


Robert Pearl: Medical malpractice in the age of AI: Who will bear the blame?

Opinion |


Marc Champion: Yes, Israel is being held to a different standard. But …

Opinion |


Jacobson, Jokela: What should we fear with AI in medicine?

Opinion |


F.D. Flam: Fake scientific studies are a problem that’s getting harder to solve