“In the last four years, much has changed about Latino voting trends, shaped by Donald Trump’s re-emergence, the aftermath of COVID, the exodus of many Latinos and the arrival of others, and dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party.”

Photo by Adi Talwar.

Four years ago, I wrote a series for Gotham Gazette on the all-important Latino vote in New York City and the 2021 citywide elections. I am grateful to City Limits for the opportunity to provide a new series on how Latinos can shape the 2025 races.

In the last four years, much has changed about Latino voting trends, shaped by Donald Trump’s re-emergence, the aftermath of COVID, the exodus of many Latinos and the arrival of others, and dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party. No doubt new developments and insights about Latino voting patterns will emerge in the run up to, and the results of, the 2025 municipal elections.

The 2024 elections were instructive. Support for Trump among Latinos increased, though not at the scale some have suggested. The largest increase in Trump support came from Latinos in Queens. Voter registration numbers have declined among Latinos over the last few years, and voter participation likewise since 2018.

What this is likely to mean for the 2025 citywide elections is not only a guess. We already know that:

With over 1 million of us registered in the City of New York, Latinos comprise 23 percent of the entire voting population.

Within the Democratic Party, Latinos now exceed 700,000 voters.

Despite diminishing voting participation, Latinos may constitute 18 percent of the possible primary electorate this June. In the 2021 mayoral election, Latinos comprised 17 percent of the primary electorate, and it was my contention that Latinos helped get Eric Adams over the top in a multiple field race.  

In specific Council districts, Latinos can help increase Latino political representation.

Latinos could make the difference in the Bronx borough president’s race.

In the following weeks and months, I welcome your company, questions, and comments as I explore these dynamics in this series on the Latino vote in the 2025 municipal elections.

Have questions about the Latino vote in NYC’s elections this year? Send them to editor@citylimits.org with the subject line “Latino Vote 2025.” 

Eli Valentin is a former Gotham Gazette contributor and currently serves as assistant dean of graduate and leadership studies at Virginia Union University. He lives in New York with his family.

The post New Series on the Latino Vote & the 2025 NYC Elections appeared first on City Limits.

A former legislative aide to St. Paul City Council Member Anika Bowie who was fired after five months on the job is suing Bowie and the city based on a highly critical email she circulated to 11 city officials after he was quickly rehired by another council member.

Jon Berry filed his lawsuit on Monday in Hennepin County District Court, and the case was assigned Tuesday to Judge Susan Burke. He is being represented by the Minneapolis law firm of Gustafson Gluek.

In the 16-page civil filing, he accuses the city of violating the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act by illegally disclosing his private personnel data, and he accuses both defendants — Bowie and the city — of a single count of defamation and a single count of negligence.

The city council met behind closed doors in January to consider Berry’s suit, when it was still deemed pending litigation, but the city has yet to file a formal legal response.

Bowie and other city officials did not immediately return calls for comment on the lawsuit Wednesday.

Hired last May

Bowie hired Berry last May as her legislative aide, a position that paid $42 per hour, or more than $92,000 annually. He maintains he received “positive feedback from various city staff” about his job performance but was still let go by Bowie on Oct. 2, with the sole reason given being that he was “not a good fit” for the position, according to the lawsuit.

On Oct. 21, St. Paul Council Member Cheniqua Johnson hired Berry back to City Hall for a 10-week part-time communications position in her office, a job that paid $17 per hour.

After his rehiring, Bowie sent a two-page email that same day to 11 city officials, including Johnson, Berry, the city attorney, a deputy city attorney, officials with Human Resources and others who work in city finances. In that email, she “illegally disclosed private personnel data” about him and made four defamatory statements, according to the lawsuit.

Berry maintains that much of the information Bowie shared by email was not true, but even misinformation can be characterized as private data under the law.

Among the claims that Berry maintains constitute private data, Bowie accused him of a “misappropriation of travel funds” and unauthorized expenses during a Sept. 10 to Sept. 13 work trip. She noted he “consistently failed to meet the needs of the office, demonstrating a lack of organization and preparation for community meetings,” and she said he was terminated based on her decision to forego an investigation into the misappropriation of funds.

Bowie said Berry was issued an employee improvement plan on Aug. 12, and he failed to meet expectations.

“This statement is false and defamatory,” reads the lawsuit. “Mr. Berry was never issued an improvement plan by Councilmember Bowie. Accordingly, he never failed to meet any such improvement plan.”

She also wrote in her email that there were rumors of a prior intimate relationship between Berry and Johnson, and that the relationship had been mentioned to her “by mutual acquaintances in Councilmember Johnson’s presence.”

“No such conversation, in the presence of Councilmember Johnson, took place and, more importantly, Councilmember Johnson and Mr. Berry never had an intimate relationship,” reads the lawsuit.

Email mailed out

In what the lawsuit describes as yet another breach of state data privacy laws, someone anonymously mailed a printed copy of Bowie’s Oct. 2 email to the St. Paul Pioneer Press, which published a front-page article about the internal council dispute in December after attempting to confirm details and interview individuals involved. Given that the email had initially been shared with city personnel, Berry maintains that it must have been a city employee who leaked it to the media.

On Dec. 11, two days after the article was published, an independent investigator hired by the city substantiated a workplace conduct complaint against Bowie, which had been filed by Johnson in response to the Oct. 2 email. The investigator, who reviewed city records and conducted multiple interviews, found that Bowie violated city policy, defied state data privacy law and “potentially” defamed Berry.

“The investigator concluded that Councilmember Bowie had ‘no objectively valid or productive business reason’ to ‘publicly disseminate the email to … 11 recipients,” states the lawsuit.

Berry is seeking attorney’s fees and damages for an amount to be proven at trial.

Related Articles

St. Paul mayor declares state of emergency on trash collection

St. Paul City Council convenes but doesn’t appoint new Ward 4 member

Divided St. Paul City Council recommends new Ward 4 appointee for Friday vote

Jason Adkins: Measuring the economic impact of the Catholic Church in Minnesota

St. Paul mayor says council has ‘plunged the city into crisis’ by blocking garbage truck yard

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has released new breakthrough findings on one of science’s biggest mysteries — one that Albert Einstein once called his “biggest blunder.”

In March, Berkeley Lab researchers presented data gathered from 14 million galaxies at the American Physical Society’s Global Physics Summit in Anaheim, which has ignited new theories on dark energy – once thought to be a universal constant like gravity – as an evolving form of matter linked to the accelerating expansion of the universe.

While both dark energy and the better-known dark matter are still theoretical concepts, they are distinctly different. While the latter is thought to be a form of matter that interacts with gravity and serves as a cosmic “glue” that holds galaxies together, dark energy is the mysterious repulsive force hypothesized to counteract gravity that’s pushing the universe apart.

“’Dark energy’ is a label that we put on what is causing this acceleration,” said Andrei Cuceu, a Berkeley Lab researcher and member of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) team that is working to create the largest-ever three-dimensional map of the universe. Managed by the Berkeley Lab, DESI is made up of nearly 1000 researchers from more than 70 institutions around the world. “The goal with this experiment is to try to shine some light in this space to figure out which of these classes of theories are much more likely to be correct.”

The DESI survey is being conducted at the Mayall Telescope on top of Kitt Peak in the Sonoran Desert, about 55 miles south of Tucson, Ariz. Measurements from the device create a three-dimensional map of the universe that researchers can use to track its expansion over the last 12 billion years, which is measured by the distance between galaxies.

If dark energy were a universal constant, then the separation between galaxies would be uniform over time. But the latest findings show a strong indication that dark energy is weakening and causing expansion to slow, according to DESI researchers.

“We expected to get a better measure of that accelerated expansion, and it’s not at all what we found,” said Claire Poppett, a research physicist with UC Berkeley’s Space Science Laboratory working on DESI in Santiago, Chile. “It confirms, even more strongly, that dark energy is changing with time.”

The study of dark energy began in the 1990s, when researchers studying supernovae sought to identify the rate of the universe’s expansion and found it was actually getting faster over time. That breakthrough earned them the Nobel Prize, Poppett said. But it presented new questions for cosmologists on what force could be strong enough to cause the universe to expand more quickly. Lacking an answer, they called this phenomenon dark energy.

Scientists believe dark energy makes up about 68 percent of the energy density of the universe, but the journey to understanding how it works has been one of trial and error.

When the DESI project launched in 2021, Poppet and other researchers wondered if the data they collected would only reduce the margin of error from past theories. By triangulating DESI measurements with the datasets from supernovae and light left over from the “Big Bang” at the beginning of the universe, they found they could not find a simple explanation for the discrepancies they identified.

Poppett said she initially believed they had done something wrong in their analysis, but the team of researchers was actually on the course of discovery. Cuceu’s review of the data in comparison with the best available models showed a changing pace of growth over the past 12 billion years.

“When we compare this behavior with the behavior that would be predicted if dark energy were a constant, they don’t quite agree. This essentially implies that maybe dark energy is not a constant. It’s evolving somehow,” Cuceu said. “The expansion of the universe is still accelerating, but this acceleration has started to slow down today.”

While the DESI project is not complete — a few million more galaxies are still to be scanned — the team is getting closer to the “gold standard” of discovery in particle physics known as “5 sigma,” an evidence threshold at which scientists declare there is an almost certain likelihood that unexpected data findings are the result of a new phenomenon, and not just a statistical fluctuation.

The current findings are between 2.8 and 4.2 sigma, yet each new round of data brings the DESI team closer to rewriting the understanding of dark energy and sending cosmologists back to their blackboards to invent new theories about the laws of the universe.

“It shows that the more powerful instruments you can build, even when you think you know what the answer is going to be, you actually don’t,” Poppett said. “There’s still so many secrets that we don’t know about.”

By AAMER MADHANI

WASHINGTON (AP) — Amazon has put in a bid to purchase TikTok, a Trump administration official said Wednesday, in an eleventh-hour pitch as a U.S. ban on the platform is set to go into effect Saturday.

The official, who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the Amazon offer was made in a letter to Vice President JD Vance and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

The New York Times first reported on the bid.

President Donald Trump on Inauguration Day gave the platform a reprieve, barreling past a law that had been upheld unanimously by the Supreme Court, which said the ban was necessary for national security.

Under the law, TikTok’s Chinese-owned parent company ByteDance is required to sell the platform to an approved buyer or take it offline in the United States. Trump has suggested he could further extend the pause on the ban, but he has also said he expects a deal to be forged by Saturday.

Amazon declined to comment.

Related Articles

Wall Street swings in final hours of trading before Trump’s tariff announcement

Tesla sales tumble 13% as Musk backlash, competition and aging lineup turn off buyers

Trump is set to announce new tariffs as he takes a political and financial gamble

Why no one is challenging Trump’s executive order that keeps TikTok running

Automakers report stellar sales ahead of Trump’s tariffs taking effect

The existence of an Amazon bid surfaced as Trump was scheduled on Wednesday to meet with senior officials to discuss the coming deadline for a TikTok sale.

Both the FBI and the Federal Communications Commission have warned that ByteDance could share user data — such as browsing history, location and biometric identifiers — with China’s authoritarian government. TikTok said it has never done that and would not do so if asked. The U.S. government has not provided evidence of that happening.

Trump has millions of followers on TikTok and has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters.

During his first term, he took a more skeptical view of TikTok and issued executive orders banning dealings with ByteDance as well as the owners of the Chinese messaging app WeChat.