Literary calendar for week of Feb. 15

posted in: All news | 0

MARGUERITE HOLLOWAY: Discusses “Take to the Trees: A Story of Hope, Science, and Self-Discovery in America’s Imperiled Forests.” 7 p.m. Wednesday, Magers & Quinn, 3038 Hennepin Ave. S., Mpls.

Lori Rader-Day

MINNESOTA MYSTERY NIGHT: Welcomes bestselling Chicago-based writer Lori Rader-Day discussing, with St. Paul professional book reviewer Kate Malmon, how and why books become bestsellers. Rader-Day has written eight novels, including “The Lucky One” and “Under a Dark Sky.” 7 p.m. Monday, Lucky’s 13 Pub, 1352 Sibley Memorial Highway, Mendota. $13 reservation charge that includes $5 gift certificate. Reservations at: buytickets.at/minnesotamysterynight/2031381.

GEOFF PECK: Discusses his novel “City of Clans,” which follows a community college student struggling with his identity and sexuality on the eve of the 2009 G20 Summit protests, presented by SubText Books. 7 p.m. Tuesday, University Club, 420 Summit Ave., St. Paul.

POETRY NIGHT: With Lindsay Stuart Hill, Jolene Brink and Peter Campion. 6 p.m. Thursday, Next Chapter Booksellers, 38 S. Snelling Ave., St. Paul.

READINGS BY WRITERS: Host Tim Nolan welcomes writers Renee Gilmore, John Reinhard, Francine Conley and Anthony Ceballos. 7 p.m. Tuesday, University Club, 420 Summit Ave., St. Paul.

MK ZARIEL: Presents the poetry chapbook “Boy Apparition,” about being a transmasculine butch. 7 p.m. Monday, Magers & Quinn, 3038 Hennepin Ave. S., Mpls.

What else is going on

(Courtesy of Calumet Editions/Afton Press)

An “emergency anthology” of Minnesota writers, “Ice Out: Minnesota Writers Rising Up,” which bears witness to the Minnesota ICE surge, is announced via Facebook by Ian Graham Leask, publisher at Afton Press and Calumet Editions, joint sponsors of the book scheduled to be available in Kindle and paperback editions and in bookstores. “Thanks to all the generous writers who responded to our call to write against a tight deadline and compose potentially the most important work of their lives,” Leask writes.

Adam B. Perry, a Minneapolis resident, is featured in the current issue of “Kaleidoscope: Exploring the Experience of Disability through Literature and the Fine Arts.” His creative nonfiction essay “Falling Forward” appears in Issue 92, themed “Seasons.” The work was selected from more than 400 submissions considered for the award-winning publication from United Disability Services. Perry’s essay explores how he overcomes fear when lost or stumbling over the unseen because of blindness. He views disability as an alternative life experience filled with challenge and reward.

Related Articles


9 romance novel recommendations to spice up your Valentine’s Day


Q&A: Roxy Music’s Phil Manzanera shares stories from the Cuban Revolution to stardom


Readers and writers: A treasure for young readers (and something for adults, too)


Literary calendar for week of Feb. 8


What’s like got to do with it? Sara Levine on the art of ‘difficult’ women

Jonathan Zimmerman: Epstein files reveal affirmative action for the rich and powerful

posted in: All news | 0

In 1995, a retired insurance executive named Walter Kaye recommended a friend’s daughter for an unpaid internship at the White House. You will remember her name: Monica Lewinsky.

But you probably don’t remember Kaye, who had contributed about $350,000 to the Democratic National Committee. He had advised Bill Clinton on how to use his personal insurance policies to pay his legal expenses in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. Kaye had been an overnight guest at the White House. And he was“very tight’ with Hillary Clinton, a former Clinton administration official said.

He was also close to Lewinsky’s mother, who asked him to put in a good word for her 21-year-old daughter. Lewinsky would later have a scandalous affair with Bill Clinton, who was impeached for lying about it. Nobody batted any eye at an otherwise unremarkable young woman getting a plum Washington internship simply because of her connections to the rich and powerful.

I’ve been thinking about that history amid recent news that Jeffrey Epstein helped filmmaker Woody Allen get his daughter into Bard College. Wealthy people get an unfair advantage in college admissions and everything else. Let’s call it what it is: affirmative action for the rich.

And it’s on rich display in the Epstein files. In 2016, Epstein emailed Bard President Leon Botstein and asked him to coordinate a visit to the campus for Soon-Yi Previn, Woody Allen’s wife. A frequent correspondent with Epstein, Botstein wrote back and said he was “delighted to help.”

The same day, Previn sent a note to Botstein. “Thank you so much for your offer to help our daughter, Bechet Allen, get into Bard College,” Previn wrote. “I will take you up on the offer.:)”

In a statement last week, Bard College said that Bechet Allen “was accepted on the merits of her own qualifications for admission.” Perhaps so. But it’s a whole lot easier to display your merits when a billionaire financier is vouching for you.

All of this comes amid attacks by the administration of President Donald Trump of race-based affirmative action and its pledges to return to the ideal of merit. “We believe that whether you are a doctor, an accountant, a lawyer, or an air traffic controller, you should be hired and promoted based on skill and competence,” Trump told Congress back in March. “You should be hired based on merit.”

That rings hollow coming from the same administration that recently sent out a recruiting message seeking prosecutors for the Department of Justice who“support President Trump.” That’s affirmative action based on ideology, not race. No Democrats or Never-Trump Republicans need apply.

Despite its insistence upon“merit-based admissions policies” at universities, meanwhile, the White House hasn’t moved to challenge the most obvious form of affirmative action for the rich: legacy preferences. Over 500 institutions still give you a leg up if your mom or dad went there. But we haven’t heard a peep about that from Trump.

Maybe that’s because three of Trump’s own children attended the University of Pennsylvania, where Trump went (and where I teach).

Trump’s brother, Fred Trump Jr., was an old friend of a Penn admissions officer. In 1966, Trump Jr. called his buddy and told him Donald Trump wanted to transfer to Penn from Fordham. Shortly after that, Donald came down to speak with his brother’s friend. And he was accompanied at the interview by his father, the real estate mogul Fred Trump Sr.

Would Trump have gotten into Penn without the boost he received from his moneyed connections? We don’t know. But here’s what we do know: Affirmative action for rich people makes all of our institutions poorer.

Just ask Walter Kaye. In 1998, he told a grand jury that he regretted helping Lewinsky get her internship at the White House.

Bill Clinton bears the primary responsibility for their affair and everything that came after it. The reality is that Lewinsky wouldn’t have been at the White House without affirmative action for the rich. It happens every day. And that should be a scandal, too.

Jonathan Zimmerman teaches history and education at the University of Pennsylvania. He serves on the advisory board of the Albert Lepage Center for History in the Public Interest. He wrote this column for Tribune News Service.

Related Articles


Letters: The pillars of my civic faith — the Constitution and voting — are under fire


David M. Drucker: How Trump squandered his most potent political asset


Abby McCloskey: The Heritage Foundation sees the family crisis — but not the fix


Joe Palaggi: What ‘Star Trek’ understood about division — and why we keep falling for it


Nicholas Kristof: These 3 red states are the best hope in schooling

Editorial: ACA fraud is real. It’s time to get serious about fixing it

posted in: All news | 0

In a series of YouTube ads viewed more than 195 million times, a red-lipped Taylor Swift tells viewers about a “new thing” in Florida: Just visit a website, answer two questions and the state will send you a $6,400 stimulus check.

Sound too good to be true? It was — and the narrator wasn’t Swift but an AI deepfake. The ads, since taken down, were part of an elaborate scheme to fraudulently enroll people in Obamacare.

For years, insurance brokers have exploited lax controls on HealthCare.gov, the federal website for Affordable Care Act plans, to boost their commissions. Yet complaints of improper and fraudulent enrollment have surged since the pandemic. Although the scale is hard to quantify, one (much contested) estimate suggests as many as 6 million enrollees are ineligible.

Republicans cited such figures when they let COVID-era subsidies lapse in December, and experts agree that fraud is real and costly. Millions of well-meaning Americans nevertheless could become uninsured without the credits. For many, bigger health-insurance bills have already started accumulating. Although Congress has been scrambling in recent weeks to negotiate a deal that would restore the subsidies, prospects look grim. If any compromise does emerge, it should also involve a more aggressive approach to tackling fraud.

In the best of times, ACA enrollment is unusually error-prone. The size of the tax credit is determined by income, with lower earners eligible for bigger subsidies. The law thus requires consumers to estimate their future earnings. Credits are then “reconciled” at tax time. If an enrollee lowballs their income and gets a larger subsidy than earned, they must repay the difference to the Internal Revenue Service.

This design creates two problems. First, the ACA’s target population — the self-employed, gig workers and so on — has unsteady income. Many earn poverty-level wages and bounce between eligibility for Medicaid and Obamacare. Estimating earnings with reasonable accuracy is challenging, to say the least.

Second, ACA subsidies are designed as “advance” tax credits, meaning they’re paid directly to insurers. Enrollees who misestimate their income don’t get extra cash. Rather, insurers get paid more generously than they should, while brokers pocket their commissions. Consumers bear the consequences.

It isn’t hard to see how unscrupulous brokers exploit this situation. In many states, enrollment requires only a name, Social Security number and address — data easily culled from fake ads like the ones in Florida, unsolicited calls or other deceptive means. A recent report by the Government Accountability Office found that a third of tax credits paid on behalf of enrollees with a Social Security number couldn’t be reconciled with IRS data. Likely among these mystery beneficiaries are hundreds of improperly enrolled homeless and almost 60,000 dead people. Health officials, for their part, logged 275,000 complaints of unauthorized enrollments and plan changes in the first eight months of 2024 alone.

Distinguishing between improper payments and fraud is difficult for any government program. When it comes to the ACA, however, basic IT safeguards have been ignored for years. And while last year’s budget bill tightened eligibility checks, the goal should’ve been stopping bad behavior, not penalizing consumers.

To that end, regulators need to be more diligent in rooting out scams. In 2024, some 850 brokers were suspended for “reasonable suspicion” of fraud, yet many were reinstated the following year with little evidence they’d improved their practices. Too few criminal investigations have taken place. At a minimum, brokers and insurers found to have acted in bad faith should be banned from marketplaces and subject to clawbacks. More regular audits are also needed.

Flawed oversight has left a critical health program vulnerable to scammers while taxpayers foot the bill. American health care has many intractable problems; this shouldn’t be one of them.

— The Bloomberg Opinion Editorial Board

Related Articles


Ken Silverstein: When liberty shows cracks


Jonathan Zimmerman: Epstein files reveal affirmative action for the rich and powerful


Letters: The pillars of my civic faith — the Constitution and voting — are under fire


Epstein’s girlfriend married a woman, showing how he gamed immigration


Criticism by Winter Olympic athletes of Trump policies mirror reaction to iconic 1968 protest

Letters: The pillars of my civic faith — the Constitution and voting — are under fire

posted in: All news | 0

The pillars of my civic faith are under fire

I have sympathy for my long-suffering civics teachers who had tried unsuccessfully to help me understand things like strong versus weak mayors or unicameral and bicameral (and no, that’s not one-hump or two-hump camels). But I have been able to distill my civics down to two unalterable truths that I depend on:

One, I have the right of the vote, and two, I trust in the protections of the Constitution.

Now we have had our share of scalawags and misfits in positions of power, but our institutions remain strong due to the guide rails of our Constitution and the corrective power of the ballot.

But these pillars of my civic faith are now under fire.

I see an unchecked masked militia operating with a total disregard of the Bill of Rights and I hear of a credible threat to our free and fair elections. The threat is of intimidation at polling sites by the same militia now violating our civil rights. All under the spurious guise of protecting us from voting fraud. I’m a worried man.

Bob Emery, Mendota Heights

 

We’ll not forget what we have seen

The recent article describing life in the Twin Cities two months into the federal immigration crackdown should unsettle every Minnesotan, regardless of political affiliation. What was being described is not simply a policy dispute — it is a humanitarian and civic crisis unfolding in our neighborhoods, schools, workplaces and places of worship.

As a longtime Minnesotan, I recognize the strain our state has carried before. But the fear, grief and hypervigilance voiced by residents in this article — including U.S. citizens, legal immigrants, and lifelong community members — signal a troubling breakdown of trust between government power and the people it serves. When parents are afraid to send children to school, when workers with legal status disappear from jobs, when neighbors organize warning systems just to feel safe leaving their homes, something fundamental has gone wrong.

Many Minnesotans hold nuanced views: Borders matter, laws matter, and violent crime must be addressed. But sweeping enforcement tactics that rely on fear, racial profiling and overwhelming force are neither just nor effective. Public safety is undermined, not strengthened, when enforcement itself becomes a source of trauma.

What struck me most was how widely this pain is felt — across race, class and political identity — and how familiar it feels to those who have lived through other moments when Minnesota was forced to confront the consequences of unchecked authority. We should not need another death, another vigil or another investigation to remember that human dignity and the rule of law are not opposing values.

Leadership is tested not by how forcefully it acts, but by whether it listens, corrects course and reduces harm while protecting communities. Minnesotans are paying close attention. And we will not forget what we have been witnessing.

Jane White Schneeweis, Mahtomedi

 

Hard to believe, this behavior

I commend the hard-hitting journalism of Jack Brook, Michael Blessecker, Jim Mustian and Cedar Attanasio in their article Sunday, Feb. 8, “His skull was broken…” presenting Alberto Castaneda Mondragon’s horrifying treatment at the hands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. I wept at this story because I cannot believe that members of our federal police would beat and permanently harm a man who, as it turned out, had no reason to be arrested in the first place.

One cannot turn away from the truth of what has been happening with some of our neighbors who have been traumatized, ill treated, beaten and even killed. I cannot believe that Donald Trump, Kristi Noem and Kash Patel would allow these atrocities against people in our country. We cannot turn away from what is happening in our America today, so tragically reminiscent of Germany during the rise of Hitler and the Nazis.

Donna Isaac, Inver Grove Heights

 

His legacy

At the annual National Prayer Breakfast keynote speaker Donald Trump exposed himself for his lack of Christian conviction. He chose to pass on sincere prayer for others and the country, choosing to use the forum for a political rally. He mocked individuals, told lies, minimized Speaker of the House Mike Johnson’s religious conviction and made light of meal-time devotions. Though we might expect more of a president, one sincere prayer would be nice, we know Donald Trump as a narcissist who wishes to be served by religion rather than practice its principles. After all, he uses the Bible as a prop when convenient, sells them to grift Americans and has little understanding of the contents.

To the point, Donald Trump has proven through his words and actions to be the antithesis of the Good Samaritan by berating third-world countries, mercilessly trashing immigrants and eliminating humanitarian relief. His cuts to Medicaid and SNAP reduce essential benefits to millions. Sending 3,000 federal agents to Minnesota, Operation Metro Surge was simply his fulfilled promise of revenge and retribution, hateful and definitely un-Christian. This will be his legacy.

Pete Boelter, North Branch

 

Choices

The Minnesota Vikings got rid of QB Sam Darnold and kept play-by-play radio announcer Paul Allen. Huh?

M.L. Kluznik, Mendota Heights

 

Where has our decency gone?

Donald Trump makes a racial post about a former president and says, “I didn’t make a mistake.” Fifteen years ago (before the first Trump term), any person in any position anywhere in the country would get fired for such a public display.

Where has our decency gone? Trump has made this type of behavior acceptable in nearly all our society. He must be removed from office now, before our country degrades even further.

Mark Nelson, St. Croix Falls

 

Proud to have lived among you

As a journalism vagabond, I have lived in too many cities to mention. My 11-year stint as editor of the Pioneer Press during the ‘90s was my longest. My wife and I were native southerners who arrived in the Twin Cities with some trepidation. The Midwest was new territory.

Pretty quickly, we felt at home (except for the winter).

Twin Citizens were honest and open, friendly and, most important for an editor, well read. We didn’t know you were brave because there was no need. Life was normal.

As I have watched you on TV and the Internet these past few weeks, I have seen how brave you are. I am proud I once lived among you.

You should be aware America is watching and cheering. You are standing up to the most powerful man on Earth and you are winning. You, my former readers, are the best of America.

Walker Lundy, East Bay, California

Related Articles


David M. Drucker: How Trump squandered his most potent political asset


Abby McCloskey: The Heritage Foundation sees the family crisis — but not the fix


Joe Palaggi: What ‘Star Trek’ understood about division — and why we keep falling for it


Nicholas Kristof: These 3 red states are the best hope in schooling


David French: A movie about America broke my heart