Record snow drought in Western US raises concern for a spring of water shortages and wildfires

posted in: All news | 0

By DORANY PINEDA and SETH BORENSTEIN

A record snow drought with unprecedented heat is hitting most of the American West, depleting future water supplies, making it more vulnerable to wildfires and hurting winter tourism and recreation.

Related Articles


Trump set to gut US climate change policy and environmental regulations: White House official


In the Arctic, the major climate threat of black carbon is overshadowed by geopolitical tensions


Olympic town warms up as climate change puts Winter Games on thin ice


The consumer-friendly Energy Star program survived Trump. What about other efficiency efforts?


Oregon, Washington and tribes head back to court after Trump pulls out of deal to recover salmon

Scientists say snow cover and snow depth are both at the lowest levels they’ve seen in decades, while at least 67 Western weather stations have measured their warmest December through early February on record. Normal snow cover this time of year should be about 460,000 square miles — about the size of California, Utah, Idaho and Montana — but this year it’s only California-sized, about 155,000 square miles, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

“I have not seen a winter like this before,” said center director Mark Serreze, who has been in Colorado almost 40 years. “This pattern that we’re in is so darned persistent.”

The snowpack — measured by how much water is trapped inside — in Oregon is not only record low, but 30% lower than the previous record, said Jason Gerlich, regional drought early warning system coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Much of the U.S. east of the Rockies is snowbound and enduring more than two weeks of bone-chilling abnormal cold, but in West Jordan, Utah, a suburb of Salt Lake City, Trevor Stephens went to the store last week in gym shorts and a T-shirt.

“Right now there’s no snow on the ground,” he said in a video interview, looking out his window and lamenting the lack of snowboarding opportunities. “I’d definitely rather have icy roads and snow than whatever is going on out here right now.”

Concerns over water supply and wildfires

Ski resorts had already been struggling through a difficult season, but the lack of snow has been persistent enough that concerns are growing about wider effects.

Oregon, Colorado and Utah have reported their lowest statewide snowpack since the early 1980s, as far back as records go.

A dry January has meant most states have received half their average precipitation or even less. Along with sunny days and higher-than-average temperatures, that’s meant little snow buildup in a month that historically gets a lot of snow accumulation across much of the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies. Because of heavy rains in December, California is in better shape than the other states, scientists said.

As of Monday, it had been 327 days since Salt Lake City International Airport got 1 inch of snow, making it the longest stretch since 1890-91, according to the National Weather Service.

The meager snow in Colorado and Utah has put the Upper Colorado River Basin at the heart of the snow drought, said Gerlich.

A robust mountain snowpack that slowly melts as winter warms to spring provides a steady flow of water into creeks and rivers. That helps ensure there’s enough water later in the year for agriculture, cities, hydropower electric systems and more.

But lack of snow or a too-fast melt means less water will replenish rivers like the Colorado later in the season.

“This is a pretty big problem for the Colorado basin,” said Daniel Swain of the University of California’s Water Resources Institute.

Experts said the snow drought could also kick-start an early wildfire season. Snow disappearing earlier than average leaves the ground exposed to warmer weather in the spring and summer that dries soils and vegetation quicker, said Daniel McEvoy, researcher with the Western Regional Climate Center.

Too warm to snow

While it’s been dry, the record-low snowpack is mostly due to how warm the West has been, which is connected to climate change from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas, several scientists said. Since Dec. 1, there have been more than 8,500 daily high temperature records broken or tied in the West, according to NOAA data.

Much of the precipitation that would normally fall as snow and stay in the mountains for months is instead falling as rain, which runs off quicker, Swain and other scientists said. It’s a problem scientists have warned about with climate change.

Going snowless happens from time to time, but it’s the warmth that has been so extreme, which is easier to tie to climate change, said Russ Schumacher, professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University and Colorado State Climatologist.

“It was so warm, especially in December, that the snow was only falling at the highest parts of the mountains,” McEvoy said. “And then we moved into January and it got really dry almost everywhere for the last three to four weeks and stayed warm.”

Wetter, cooler weather is coming

Meteorologists expect wetter, cooler weather across the West this week with some snow so this may be the peak of the snow drought. But it’ll still be warmer than usual in many areas, and scientists aren’t optimistic the snow will be enough.

“I don’t think there’s any way we’re going to go back up to, you know, average or anywhere close to that,” said Schumacher. “But at least we can chip away at those deficits a little bit if it does get more active.”

The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment

Pleas from Savannah Guthrie’s family to finding missing mom turn from hopeful to desperate

posted in: All news | 0

By TY O’NEIL and JOHN SEEWER

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — The heart-breaking messages made by “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie and her family have shifted from hopeful to desperate as they plead with the apparent kidnappers to hand over their missing mother.

More than a week into the search for Nancy Guthrie, there are more questions than answers about who abducted the 84-year-old from her home in Arizona and whether she is still alive.

Authorities have released few details, leaving it unclear if ransom notes demanding money with deadlines already passed were authentic and whether the Guthrie family has had any contact with the abductors.

Guthrie and her family have posted a series of videos over the past week, each striking a different tone. The latest message from Savannah Guthrie, in which she appeared alone, was more bleak.

“We are at an hour of desperation,” she said Monday, telling the public “We need your help.”

Authorities believe Nancy Guthrie was taken against her will from her house just outside Tucson. She was last seen there Jan. 31 and reported missing the next day after not attending church. DNA tests showed blood on Nancy Guthrie’s front porch was a match to her, and a doorbell camera was disconnected in the early hours of Sunday morning, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has said.

Adding to the urgency is that authorities say Nancy Guthrie needs daily medication because she is said to have high blood pressure and heart issues, including a pacemaker.

Investigators were in her neighborhood several times over the past few days and plan to keep working Tuesday as they expand the search and follow up on new leads, the sheriff’s department said.

Three days after the search began, Savannah Guthrie and her two siblings sent their first public appeal to the kidnappers, telling them “we want to hear from you and we are ready to listen.”

In the recorded video, Guthrie said her family was aware of media reports about a ransom letter, but they first wanted proof their mother was alive. “Please reach out to us,” they said.

Law enforcement officials declined to say whether the letters sent to several media outlets were credible but said all tips were being investigated seriously.

The next day, Savannah Guthrie’s brother again told the kidnappers to reach out “so we can move forward.”

“Whoever is out there holding our mother, we want to hear from you. We haven’t heard anything directly,” Camron Guthrie said.

Related Articles


Record snow drought in Western US raises concern for a spring of water shortages and wildfires


US immigration court blocks deportation of Tufts graduate student from Turkey, her attorneys say


US stocks flirt with records as Hasbro soars but Coca-Cola slips


Retail sales unchanged in December from November, closing out year on a lackluster tone


Social media ‘addicting the brains of children,’ plaintiff’s lawyer argues in landmark trial

Then over the past weekend the family posted another a video — one that was more cryptic and generated even more speculation about Nancy Guthrie’s fate.

“We received your message, and we understand. We beg you now to return our mother to us so that we can celebrate with her,” said Savannah Guthrie, flanked by her siblings. “This is the only way we will have peace. This is very valuable to us, and we will pay.”

Up to that point, the family’s first three videos addressed the kidnappers directly.

But just ahead of Monday’s deadline spelled out in a purported note, Savannah Guthrie urged people nationwide to be on the lookout “no matter where you are, even if you’re far from Tucson, if you see anything, if you hear anything.”

Her turn to the public comes as much of the nation is closely following the dramatic twists and turns involving the longtime anchor of NBC’s morning show.

The FBI this week began posting digital billboards in major cities from Texas to California.

Connor Hagan, a spokesperson for the FBI, said Monday that the agency wasn’t aware of ongoing communication between Guthrie’s family and the suspected kidnappers. Authorities also had not identified any suspects or persons of interest, he said.

“Someone has that one piece of information that can help us bring Nancy home,” he said.

Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio.

US ski resorts turn to drones to make it snow amid dire drought

posted in: All news | 0

By Kyle Stock, Bloomberg News

Despite a barren start to Colorado’s ski season, Winter Park Resort opened on Halloween and served up holiday powder.

Related Articles


Italy gets creative as it works to make art accessible for blind people


The worst (and best) US airports for flight disruptions


A historic house in Serbia’s capital hangs on with intimate theatrical productions


Super Bowl week sightseeing and adventure goes well beyond football in the Bay Area


Trevi Fountain fee goes into effect as Rome seeks to manage tourist flow at celebrated water feature

The ski area’s secret is a contraption a few miles upwind of the chairlifts that looks like a meat smoker strapped to the top of a ladder. When weather conditions are just right, a Winter Park contractor fires up the machine, burning a fine dust of silver iodide into the sky — a process known as cloud seeding. Ideally, the particles disappear into a cloud that is cold enough and wet enough to produce snow, but may need a nudge. The silver iodide becomes the nuclei for water droplets, like iron filings to a magnet. Those droplets freeze and fall from the sky as snowflakes, freshening up the slopes of the resort as it tries to lure the Gore-Tex-clad masses between Denver and larger, showier ski destinations further west.

Doug Laraby, who has helped run Winter Park for nearly four decades, says the resort leaned heavily on its cloud seeding equipment over the Christmas holiday, sprinkling the skies as fresh powder fell days before the critical New Years weekend. At the moment, Winter Park has more snow than Breckenridge, Keystone and a host of bigger resorts nearby.

“For us,” Laraby explains, “that was a million-dollar storm.”

Resorts are increasingly seeking solutions to freshen up the brown slopes spanning the American West this winter, even as the East Coast grapples with back-to-back storms. Last month, Vail Resorts Inc. — which owns nearly 50 resorts across the U.S. and Canada — said it would miss revenue projections due to subpar snowfall this season. The dramatic lack of precipitation in the Rockies “limited our ability to open terrain” and, in turn, crimped spending by both locals and destination guests, Chief Executive Officer Rob Katz said in a statement.

In a battle to improve — or at least maintain — snowpack in the face of rising temperatures and drought, Winter Park, operated by Vail rival Alterra Mountain Co., is one of a growing number of groups in the American West doubling down on cloud seeding, from state governments and ski hills to utilities and watershed management agencies.

Desperate for water — ideally snow — they’re banking on the strategy to buoy the $6 billion U.S. ski industry, while keeping rivers and reservoirs at healthy levels come spring. Despite the promise, though, companies are still trying to amass data showing the technology can actually deliver appreciable amounts of powder. And scientists studying cloud seeding have cast doubt on just how effective it is.

Katja Friedrich, an atmospheric science professor at the University of Colorado, concedes that cloud seeding works in a lab. “But out there,” she says, gesturing to cirrus clouds sweeping over the Front Range outside of her office, “it’s a totally different business.”

Storms are volatile, complex and unforgiving places to gather data. “The application is so far ahead of what the science actually shows,” Friedrich explains. “Usually, it’s the other way around.”

The idea of cloud seeding dates back to the 19th century, and it got an unexpected boost thanks to research at General Electric in the wake of World War II. DRI, a nonprofit research institute in Nevada, started cloud seeding in the 1960s. Putting particles in clouds to create precipitation gained traction in recent years as waves of drought hit the U.S., tallying $14 billion in damages in 2023 alone.

DRI now runs cloud-seeding operations all over the West, including the program at Winter Park. In 2023, the Winter Park generators burned for the equivalent of five straight days, planting an estimated 24 inches of powder on the slopes that wouldn’t have been there otherwise, according to DRI. That equates to 13% of what would have fallen naturally.

“The main driver [for our clients] is water resources,” says Frank McDonough, a DRI research scientist. But, he notes, “we can help the entire mountain economy.”

Private companies are also playing a growing role, most notably Rainmaker Technology Corp., a startup that is now the lead cloud seeding contractor for Utah, which has built one of the most aggressive programs in the American West. From a warehouse in Salt Lake City, founder Augustus Doricko, a 25-year-old with a resplendent mullet that belies his Connecticut childhood, manages a crew of 120, mostly young people working to make it snow on mountains they might otherwise be climbing or skiing.

When the weather looks right, Rainmaker crews pile into 12 pickups, each loaded with two drones, and convoy up the canyons of the Wasatch Mountains. They send half of the drones whirring into the soup of clouds and spray silver iodide for about an hour. When the machines come down to recharge, the team launches the second wave. The cycle is repeated until the clouds move on or get too warm.

Doricko says his company is creating a fresh supply of water with no ecological impact; silver iodide is inorganic and even if ingested, won’t dissolve in the human body.

This year, the state of Utah will pay Rainmaker $7.5 million, part of a cloud seeding blitz that began three years ago. With the Great Salt Lake at historic low levels, Utah lawmakers approved a tenfold increase in funding, committing at least $5 million a year to operations and another $12 million to upgrade and expand a fleet of almost 200 cloud seeding machines on the ground.

Rainmaker is charged with generating enough snow to help partially refill the lake. The company also has a contract with Snowbird Resort, located to the east of Salt Lake City, and much of its seeding will happen near Powder Mountain and Snowbasin resorts, located further north, although neither ski area is a client.

“Anything we can do to increase water levels is going to be well worth the funding,” says Jonathan Jennings, a meteorologist with the Utah Department of Natural Resources.

The list of stakeholders clamoring for more water in the American West is long, ranging from ski resorts to wildfire fighters, reservoir managers to farmers.

“Every state in the West is either cloud seeding or thinking of cloud seeding,” says Friedrich, the University of Colorado researcher.

It’s also popular, in part, because it’s cheap. Jennings estimates that it costs about $30 to produce 325,000 gallons of water, or what experts call an acre-foot of water. Recycling or desalinating a similar amount would cost somewhere around $1,000. Snowmaking, meanwhile, is more expensive and uses more water than it produces.

When Doricko visits potential customers, be they utilities, ski resorts or state agencies, his sales script is simple: “It’s the only way you can bring new water supply to the Rocky Mountain West.”

More often than not these days, the pitch lands. Idaho has also hired Rainmaker this winter, eager to fill its reservoirs and keep farmers happy. All told, the company has about 100 drones flying across Western skies.

In Colorado, where arid conditions have exacerbated wildfires, officials are curious about the capabilities of Rainmaker’s drones while waiting to see this winter’s snow tallies from Utah. In the meantime, they’re working to replace decades-old, ground-based seeding machines with ones that can be switched on remotely. Without the need of a human to light the burner, the new units can be tucked into more remote places and at higher elevations that are colder for longer, improving the odds for snow.

“We feel comfortable saying we can get an additional eight to 12% of precipitation per storm,” says Andrew Rickert, a weather modification program manager with the Colorado Water Conservation Board. “And if we have a great winter in Colorado, there are 30 to 35 storms we can seed.”

Friedrich isn’t so sure about that estimate, despite being regarded as a bit of a rockstar in the cloud seeding field. In 2017, her research team zig-zagged a plane rigged with seed flares through a cloud in Wyoming that wasn’t producing snow. Sure enough, snow fell in the same pattern as the flight, results that fueled much of the recent seeding boom.

However, Friedrich points out, there wasn’t that much snow. And she notes that much remains unknown, like how wind affects the amount of silver iodide that gets into a cloud, and whether the particles trigger much precipitation beyond what would occur naturally.

“I understand why people are buying it, because they’re so desperate,” she says. “But if you ask me, there’s no scientific proof” that it produces a meaningful amount of water. Friedrich is working on a new study to try to figure out how effective ground-based cloud seeding can be and the best operating conditions.

Cloud seeding has also faced pushback from conspiracy theorists who say it works too well. Despite no evidence, Rainmaker was inaccurately implicated in last summer’s deadly Texas floods, and bills to ban weather modification have been filed in dozens of statehouses across the U.S., including those of Colorado and Utah. Former Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene also introduced a federal cloud-seeding ban in Congress in the wake of last July’s floods.

Doricko, at Rainmaker, has been working to convince lawmakers that cloud seeding does no harm and, on the other front, win over skeptical scientists like Freidrich. Rainmaker spent much of the spring and summer building its own radar system and deploying a layer of on-the-ground weather stations to measure results. It’s also working with independent researchers to provided peer-reviewed validation. As Friedrich did years ago, Rainmaker tries to spray silver-iodide in zig-zag patterns, so its results are more visible on radar — a so-called “seeding signature.”

Doricko acknowledges the challenge of teasing out the exact influence of manmade cloud seeding — which he jokingly refers to as “magic beans” — from natural precipitation. “Our fundamental research on now at Rainmaker is all about what kitchen sink of sensors can we throw at this problem to actually validate” our work, he says.

Vail abandoned its cloud seeding program in 2020, shifting its resources to invest heavily in machines that use water to spray artificial snow. The newest snow guns monitor weather in real time and can be programmed remotely.

“This technology means that Vail can make the most of every moment that conditions allow for snowmaking,” says spokeswoman Michelle Dallal. Still, the resort is feeling the pinch of an abnormally dry winter.

State officials are trying to get Vail back on board. Cloud seeding, they argue, can be cheaper than snowmaking, both in terms of cost and carbon, and it adds water to the ecosystem, rather than taking a share of it away. The state is also trying to get other ski areas to buy in: This year, Colorado positioned a ground system to seed clouds on the slopes of Aspen, in hopes that the resort will help fund future programs.

Meanwhile, Winter Park has emerged as one of the state’s biggest cloud seeding cheerleaders. Laraby says only 10% of the mountain is covered by snowmaking gear, and there are no plans to install more. And yet, when the storms rolled through the state Dec. 28, Winter Park says its cloud-seeding efforts conjured 12 inches of snow, triple what fell on Vail.

“If you ask me, it enhances the efficiency of these storms,” Laraby says. “I think it’s awesome.”

©2026 Bloomberg News. Visit at bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Local Environmental Groups Are Still Reeling from Trump’s DOGE Cuts 

posted in: All news | 0

Toward the end of last February, as a chilly Dallas winter began to warm into a balmy Texas spring, Caleb Roberts hopped online to transfer federal funds to a local bank account. Roberts is the executive director of Downwinders at Risk, a Dallas-based nonprofit devoted to clean air advocacy. After eight months of bureaucratic red tape, the organization finally had access to the half-a-million dollars in federal grant funding they had been awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—or so they thought.

When Roberts reached the federal website used to access the money, he couldn’t log in. In the coming weeks, that story would repeat over and over with no explanation until they were told late last March that their grant had been suspended. On May 1, it was officially terminated. 

Downwinders wasn’t alone. Just over $118 million in environmental grants previously awarded to several Texas organizations were terminated by the EPA in the first three and a half months of Trump’s second presidential administration, according to documents obtained by the Texas Observer through an open records request with the EPA. Nonprofits that had built that funding into their budgets suddenly had to reverse course, canceling programs related to environmental education, air quality, waste contamination, and flood monitoring.

Many of the grants were initially appropriated by Congress under the Inflation Reduction Act, which was narrowly passed into law in 2022 during the Biden administration. The cancellations came at the direction of President Trump, who issued an executive order on inauguration day ordering that all federal IRA disbursements be halted. Democratic members of Congress and state attorneys general have called the action illegal. The grant cancellations are currently the subject of multiple pending lawsuits. 

At Downwinders, the money was earmarked to fund air monitoring systems in nine communities across the Metroplex—including in Arlington and Fort Worth. But after the termination, the group had to cancel the expansion and even pause maintenance on its existing stations.

The air quality data they’ve previously collected “has helped change some of the policy around environmental justice, around where industry should [develop] all throughout Dallas,” Roberts said.“To have $500,000 canceled and us not receive a dime of it … it ruins a bunch of the plans that these communities had to be able to advocate for themselves.”  

Roberts said that in the wake of the grant termination, fundraising efforts have been difficult to replicate, made worse by the uncertainty and lack of communication from the EPA.

“Where else do you find a large entity that will support the type of science that we’re looking to do?” Roberts said. “Without this, that information is gone, and now when people complain about things in their community, city council says they don’t have the information. They don’t have the data. They don’t know. And that’s just too convenient of a cop out for what should have been a conversation with tons and tons of data available.”

The canceled grants range from $50,000 to $60 million and impact causes in nearly every region of the Lone Star State. A $425,000 grant given to the Children’s Environmental Literacy Foundation (CELF) was being used to fund a three-year program for a cohort of Houston-area teachers to run a civic science project, taking students to research air and water quality along the Houston Ship Channel. Just a year into the initiative, CELF had to downsize its plans and are still searching for alternative funds.

“​​We get a lot of really great feedback from our teachers. I mean, that’s what puts the wind in our sails. We have teachers tell us all the time, ‘this is the best professional development I’ve ever been to,’” said Tara Stafford Ocansey, executive director of CELF, a nationwide organization dedicated to environmental education with one of two home bases in Houston. “The kind of work that we’re doing, it’s not partisan, it’s not political. It’s making sure that students feel a sense of belonging.”

CELF was left high and dry, waiting months after the grant termination for the EPA to reimburse expenses CELF had already accrued and unable to pay back their partner organization, the Galveston Bay Foundation.

CELF and others have appealed the cancellations in court though decisions are still pending; the EPA has cited President Trump’s executive orders as their legal justification for the grant terminations.

The EPA did not respond to requests for comment. Lee Zeldin, the EPA administrator, said in a March 2025 press release that the Agency’s grant terminations targeted “wasteful spending,” including on programs “related to DEI and environmental justice.”

Earthjustice, a nationwide environmental advocacy nonprofit, is helping lead the legal fight against the grant cancellations specifically, including one case that represents Downwinders, Air Alliance Houston, and 21 other organizations from across the country with canceled funds. That case is currently being appealed in the D.C. Circuit after a district court judge dismissed the challenge.

“They didn’t like this program because it was focused on environmental justice issues and communities that were disproportionately affected by climate change, and so they decided they wanted to eliminate it,” said Hana Vizcarra, a senior attorney at Earthjustice. “We contend that they don’t have the power to do so, that Congress created and appropriated this program. You can’t just ignore the will of Congress.”

Earthjustice claims that the terminations were made based on the communities they benefit and the causes they address. “When agencies make decisions, when they take action … it cannot be arbitrary and capricious,” Vizcarra said. “They have to consider the impacts that it will have and they have to be done based on reasoned decision making.”

One of the plaintiffs in the case, Air Alliance Houston, had received roughly $3 million in federal grants for endeavors along the Gulf Coast. Being based in the nation’s fourth most populated city and near one of the busiest ports in America makes the group’s work all the more critical, says its executive director Jennifer Hadayia. The region houses 49 percent of the country’s petroleum refining capacity and ranks in the top 10 worst cities for smog and particulate matter.

With those federal funds, the group’s goal was to expand an existing project called Air Mail, which currently works to engage Harris County residents in environmental permitting decisions, to nine additional counties along the Gulf through partnerships with local organizations. Now, after losing access to those federal funds, the group says those plans had to be put on hold. 

“Our contract, literally, the words written to which I put signature to paper, has conditions under which we can be legally canceled,” Hadayia told the Observer. “Anti-DEI and pro-fossil fuel policies were not there. Those aren’t allowable reasons to terminate the contract.”

Still, Air Alliance has been raising funds to reinstate the program without federal support, and upon the one-year anniversary of the termination, says it will be able to fund efforts in seven of the nine counties in which it was originally planning to expand. 

“We got this money legally. We passed all the hurdles. We passed the tests. We didn’t do anything to warrant a cancellation, except have a new president, to be frank,” Hadayia said. “We are going to bring this important service to the Texas Gulf Coast, with or without the EPA.”

Other groups that lost funding, however, may not be able to do the same. The City of Dallas said in an emailed statement that they had to terminate an air quality initiative when they lost $425,000. The City of Houston lost $21 million for flood control and pollution mitigation. The Big Bend Conservation Alliance, based in Presidio, was hit with $12.7 million in cuts for air quality monitoring and projects; Texas Southern University, a public historically black university, saw cuts of $60 million that would have been distributed across hundreds of hyper-local organizations; and Mission Waco lost $18.7 million for a broad range of projects across Central Texas. 

“These projects were on the ground, working to help communities be prepared for the next storm, to respond to increasing heat in their communities and to put people to work,” Vizcarra said. “It’s just amazing, when you dig into the projects that were in process, how many wonderful things were happening around the country.”

The post Local Environmental Groups Are Still Reeling from Trump’s DOGE Cuts  appeared first on The Texas Observer.