The Iran war has upended flights across the Middle East. Here’s what travelers should know

posted in: All news | 0

By WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS, AP Business Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. and Israel’s joint war against Iran has already upended travel across the Middle East, stranding hundreds of thousands of people. And the future is anything but certain.

Related Articles


A son of Iran’s late supreme leader is a possible candidate to replace his father as war rages


Supply chain disruptions from the Iran war could raise prices for drugs, electronics and more


Sri Lanka recovers 87 bodies from Iranian warship sunk off its coast by a US submarine


Hegseth says US ‘can’t stop everything’ that Iran fires even as he asserts air dominance


Cuba files terrorism charges against suspects over fatal US boat shooting

Experts stress that flights scheduled in the coming days and weeks could continue to see disruptions — causing ripple effects globally, especially as the war widens with retaliatory strikes in the Gulf states. Beyond the Middle East, airports in the Gulf serve as critical hubs connecting travelers going to Europe, Africa and Asia.

Amid airspace closures across the region, many carriers have been forced to either cancel flights or shift to longer routes. That’s straining operating costs and ticket prices, both of which could become more expensive if airlines have to pay more for fuel the longer the war drags on. In the near future, experts recommend postponing unnecessary travel if possible, checking refund or insurance policies and, most importantly, monitoring safety advisories.

“This is not a normal delay story. This is a conflict zone airspace story,” said Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of the Flight Safety Foundation — stressing that halted traffic and guidance from carriers, airports and governments may shift each day, if not by the hour. “Travelers should absolutely expect uncertainty.”

Here’s what travelers should know about upcoming trips.

Monitor advisories and other safety information

Since the U.S. and Israel launched attacks over the weekend, retaliatory strikes and other developments have unfolded rapidly. Iran says more than 1,000 people have been killed in the war so far. For travelers across the region, experts stress the importance of following safety guidance and updates from government officials.

A handful of governments have also issued travel advisories and emergency evacuation orders. The U.S. State Department Monday urged all U.S. citizens to immediately leave Iran and Israel, as well as Qatar, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, the Palestinian territories, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen using any available commercial transportation — and Secretary of State Marco Rubio pleaded for the media to publicize ways to help Americans evacuate. Meanwhile, countries like China, Italy, France and Germany moved to organize evacuation efforts for their citizens.

Experts like Shahidi say travelers should monitor these travel advisories from governments and embassies to make sure they have the latest information. And because so many people are still stranded amid swaths of cancellations and airspace closures, he added that it’s wise to reconsider or rebook upcoming trips, if possible.

“If travel is optional, consider postponing it,” Shahidi said. “But if it’s necessary, then make sure that you get refundable or changeable fares.”

Travelers should also monitor updates from airports and airlines. Long-haul carriers Etihad Airways and Emirates, based in Abu Dhabi and Dubai, along with Doha-based Qatar Airways all temporarily suspended certain routes — citing airspace closures and safety requirements.

Passengers whose flights were canceled wait at the departure terminal of Rafik Hariri International Airport in Beirut, Lebanon, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026, as many airlines canceled flights due to the conflict involving the United States, Israel and Iran. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

Read the fine print of refunds and insurance

Many airlines are taking refund requests or offering free rebooking — but such options are often limited to specific dates or routes, so it’s important for travelers to check carriers’ individual websites for more information. For future trips, buying refundable tickets now may provide more flexibility.

Beyond what individual airlines can offer, some may also be seeking travel insurance. But it’s important to read the fine print, particularly the exclusions listed under specific policies.

“Acts of war and civil unrest are typically excluded because they’re unpredictable,” said Suzanne Morrow, CEO of travel insurance agency InsureMyTrip. Consumers could still buy coverage for delays, she added, but travel insurance is “designed to make you whole,” and if an airline does everything to rebook you or offers a refund, you may not have an added claim.

Christina Tunnah, of World Nomads Travel Insurance, reiterates that the majority of her firm’s policies excludes coverage for losses resulting from acts of war, although someone might be able to get compensation in certain scenarios — such as if they purchase a “cancel for any reason” plan. Still, the traveler would have to cancel within a certain time frame.

Tunnah adds that once an event is known, it’s unlikely to be covered. So if a consumer has not already purchased traveler insurance, many insurers may have added restrictions to impacted destinations.

Emirates airplanes are parked at the Dubai International Airport after its closure in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Altaf Qadri)

Brace for longer flights and higher ticket prices

Beyond cancellations, many carriers are now taking longer routes to avoid closed airspace. Shahidi noted that includes not only closures stemming from this current war but also previous conflicts worldwide.

Navigating these different conflict zones has become increasingly difficult for airlines, because longer routes can be more expensive. It’s industry standard for carriers to pay “overflight fees” when flying through other countries’ airspace — which there could be more of now. And, of course, longer flights need more fuel.

“Those costs will be passed on to the passengers,” explained Bryan Terry, managing director at Alton Aviation Consultancy. If the conflict continues, he said, travelers should “anticipate that some carriers will likely impose fuel surcharges” or increase existing fees.

Passengers have already reported seeing sky-high ticket prices. Experts say those immediate hikes more likely reflect supply and demand as thousands of flights were canceled in recent days. But the costs of those longer routes — paired with oil prices that have already spiked since the U.S. and Israel launched their attacks — could trickle down to consumers further ahead.

The price of crude oil is a key component for jet fuel, which accounted for about 30% of airlines’ operating costs as of 2024, according to research from the International Air Transport Association.

Many routes within the next week are completely sold out or have exorbitant prices for last remaining seats. The market currently shows those costs, while still elevated, are lower for trips booked further out, Terry notes — but, again, if the war drags on or worsens, “those conditions could change at a moment’s notice.”

US maternal deaths fell in 2024 and may have dropped again last year, government data shows

posted in: All news | 0

By MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — Fewer U.S. women died around the time of childbirth in 2024, a government analysis shows, and provisional data suggests the trend may have continued last year.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Wednesday reported that 649 mothers died in 2024 during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. That is down from 669 deaths in 2023, and a continued drop from 2022 and 2021 — when it was the highest level in more than 50 years.

Related Articles


Sprawling investigation finds decades of sexual abuse among Catholic priests in Rhode Island


Cuba files terrorism charges against suspects over fatal US boat shooting


US stocks rise after encouraging economic updates and an easing of oil prices


Today in History: March 4, Lennon’s ‘We’re more popular than Jesus now’ comment draws backlash


US soldiers who died in Iran war remembered as devoted parents and reservists

Available preliminary data suggests the trend continued in 2025, said Eugene Declercq, a Boston University researcher who studies federal data.

But he warned that there can be changes between the provisional and final numbers, with the tally either rising as late death records arrive or falling as some initials reports are removed upon review because they do not meet inclusion guidelines. That happened with the 2024 numbers, which at the provisional stage were higher than the 2023 count.

“All you could reasonably say is that the provisional 2025 data look promising,” Declercq said in an email.

The CDC counts women who die while pregnant, during childbirth and up to 42 days after birth from conditions related to pregnancy. Excessive bleeding, blood vessel blockages and infections are leading causes. The new report did not detail how many of the 2024 deaths died from particular causes.

Maternal deaths spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic because the coronavirus was particularly dangerous to pregnant women and burned-out physicians may have ignored pregnant women’s worries.

The waning of COVID-19 was a major reason for the declines in deaths since 2021, Declercq said. Some of the improvement may also reflect successful efforts to improve care, he added.

The new CDC report found that the maternal mortality rate in 2024 was about 18 deaths per 100,000 live births, which was not significantly lower than the year before.

“The declines are welcome, but they are small and only bring us back to where we were six years ago” before the COVID-19 surge, Declercq said, adding there is a need for more attention to the problem.

The U.S. has one of the highest maternal mortality rate among wealthy nations. Past research has found wide racial disparities in such deaths, with Black women dying at a far higher rate than white women.

The new report found the Black maternal death rate in 2024 was more than three times that of the white and Hispanic rates. It also showed that the death rate for women age 40 and older was more than three times greater than it was for younger women.

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

To Lead Blue Backlash, Texas Dems Turn to Austin

posted in: All news | 0

I mean the headline of this article in three ways. 

On Tuesday night, Lone Star State Democrats selected two liberal Austin state representatives, James Talarico and Gina Hinojosa, for the top-ballot slots in this likely blue-wave year. And for lieutenant governor, a third liberal Austin state representative, Vikki Goodwin, came in comfortably first but is headed to a May 26 runoff, meaning three of the top four ballot spots could all be held by Austin state reps come the November election. (Yet another liberal Austin state legislator, Sarah Eckhardt, also won the nomination for state comptroller). 

For attorney general, Dallas state Senator Nathan Johnson nearly won outright but will also head to a runoff, in turn meaning that all four of the top nominees might be sitting state legislators—folks who carry out their part-time jobs in the capital city.

And, in the race that most of the nation cared about last night, Talarico relied heavily on his home base to secure his win over Dallas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett. It’s true that, like Bernie Sanders in the 2020 primary, Talarico appears to have been favored by Latino primary voters—he won Bexar County (San Antonio) and the major border counties handily—and it’s likely true that Dems as a whole are strategic to nominate the candidate seemingly preferred by the state’s Hispanic plurality. It’s also fair to say that, outside of Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and Greater East Texas, Talarico carried the state map.

But Austin is what really locked down Talarico’s outright, roughly 7 point win Tuesday. As I write this Wednesday morning, more than 90 percent of votes are in and Talarico is up by about 150,000 votes. He carried Travis County (Austin) and neighboring Williamson and Hays counties by a combined margin of about 150,000 votes.

By election night, Talarico’s win felt like the predictable outcome. After favoring Crockett for months, the final polls broke for the Austin state rep, and his fundraising and spending had lapped her. The congresswoman also had unforced errors, recently including Atlantic-gate (which, along with The Colin Allred Incident, I shall leave undefined here for the blissful ignorance of future readers). 

Talarico had also received, starting quite early on and for reasons that still feel somewhat opaque, a glowing rising-star treatment from D.C. and New York media. As early as September—two months after Allred launched his later-abandoned Senate bid and three months before Crockett joined the race, which is to say with the field firmly in flux—the aforementioned Atlantic wondered if he was “Texas’s Pete [Buttigieg].” Soon, a New York Times columnist asked: “Is He the Savior Democrats Have Been Waiting For?” And not too much later, the Times’ star podcaster Ezra Klein taped a 1.5-hour delicately delivered softball with the state rep in which Klein mentioned Crockett’s existence one time at the top.

Much of the middle-brow journalistic fluffing centered on Talarico’s religiosity, which was always something both new and not new. As a Presbyterian seminarian, Talarico deploys liberal Christianity with greater regularity and fluency than most Democratic politicians, but there’s nothing really so unusual about being both a Dem politician and a follower of Jesus. Crockett herself came up in Black Baptist churches and is a pastor’s daughter. And as was brought up somewhere amid The Colin Allred Incident, the media treatment of Talarico sometimes seemed to imply that an actual U.S. senator and actual pastor in Raphael Warnock was comparatively less relevant to a conversation about religion in liberalism.

How much the national press’ active intervention or any of the tawdry social media affairs mattered is unclear. Overall, rank-and-file Democratic voters seemed to continue liking both candidates; in the end, Talarico managed to overcome Crockett’s name recognition advantage, assembling a slightly larger and broader coalition.

Although the primary never centered on matters of substantive policy, it found its way into a sort of bizarro left-vs-moderate groove based on vibes and stated intent, with Talarico as the “moderate.” Essentially, he was more even-keeled, and he said he planned to win the sort of voters who will back Governor Greg Abbott in November but may balk at the GOP’s Senate nominee. He also hopes—as much of the press attention hinged on—to persuade Christians to his side (though this was oddly undermined in his longform New Yorker treatment, where he shrugged off the idea that he could persuade Evangelicals, the largest American Christian grouping).

The racially fraught key word here, of course, is “electable.” Talarico was largely granted the label this primary and now gets the chance to test the case. For the record, though, it should be noted that at least until primary night this was almost entirely a vibes-based theory. Talarico likes to tout that he flipped a red Williamson County state House seat in 2018—but in that blue-wave year Talarico’s margin of victory was 9 points fewer than that of Democratic Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke in the same district. Talarico also underperformed Joe Biden there in 2020. Come 2022—in the Travis County seat Talarico switched into after redistricting—he once again underperformed O’Rourke. 

And, of course, Texas Democrats haven’t won statewide in three decades. For all we know, the prototypical winning Dem here might be the first living soul you can manage to find along a road somewhere in Loving County.

All that, plus the fact that Democrats’ rising hopes this year seem to depend in part on scandal-plagued Attorney General Ken Paxton winning the Senate nod on the GOP side of the ledger. On Tuesday, Big and Probably-Not-As-Bad-As-Paxton John Cornyn held his ground better than expected, and the two now head for a May runoff that could go either way—with each surely jockeying desperately for Trump’s still-withheld imprimatur.

And so, Godspeed to us all. Or, as Talarico circa 2021 might put it, “holy mystery”-speed to us all. Or, as I imagine we may soon hear him saying on the campaign trail with Bobby Pulido, in decent gringo Spanish, Dios nos cuide y nos proteja. For November cometh.

In downballot Democratic news, a Houston Congressional fight over age and cryptocurrency is headed for a runoff, as Christian Menefee and Al Green each failed to crack 50 percent Tuesday. (Amanda Edwards pulled about 8 percentage points despite having dropped out.) 

Allred, in The Incident’s wake, came in first in a four-way primary for a deep-blue Dallas congressional seat but will need to prevail in a runoff with Congresswoman Julie Johnson, a messy situation created by the GOP’s mid-decade redistricting and Allred’s aborted Senate bid.

U.S. Representative Sylvia Garcia, of Houston, easily fended off a challenge from former state House representative Jarvis Johnson, while Pulido—the Tejano singer-turned politician—doubled up his opponent and won the chance to try to unseat Rio Grande Valley-based GOP Congresswoman Monica De La Cruz.

It was a mixed night for union-affiliated new candidates, who entered the evening as something of a wave with Texas AFL-CIO backing following the recent state Senate victory of labor candidate Taylor Rehmet. Marcos Vélez, a Gulf Coast union leader, came in a distant second for lieutenant governor but did make a runoff with Goodwin. 

Jose Loya, a United Steelworkers organizer from the Panhandle, lost his bid for the land commissioner nomination to Bay City Council member Benjamin Flores. LiUNA laborers union leader Jeremy Hendricks came in a very distant second in the race to fill Talarico’s state House seat, but former Texas AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Montserrat Garibay did lead the pack in the contest to represent Hinojosa’s Austin House district and now heads to a runoff.

The post To Lead Blue Backlash, Texas Dems Turn to Austin appeared first on The Texas Observer.

A son of Iran’s late supreme leader is a possible candidate to replace his father as war rages

posted in: All news | 0

By JON GAMBRELL

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Mojtaba Khamenei, a son of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has long been considered a contender to the post of the country’s next paramount ruler — even before an Israeli strike killed his father at the start of the war last week and despite the fact he’s has never been elected or appointed to a government position.

A secretive figure within the Islamic Republic, Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen publicly since Saturday, when the Israeli airstrike targeting the supreme leader’s offices killed his 86-year-old father. Also killed were the younger Khamenei’s wife, Zahra Haddad Adel, who came from a family long associated with the country’s theocracy.

Khamenei is believed to still be alive and has likely has gone into hiding as American and Israeli airstrikes continue to pound Iran, though state-run Iranian media have not reported on his whereabouts.

Profile of Khamenei’s son rises after airstrike

Mojtaba Khamenei’s name continues to circulate as a possible candidate to replace his father, something that had been criticized in the past as potentially creating a theocratic version of Iran’s former hereditary monarchy.

But now with his father and wife considered by hard-liners as martyrs in the war against America and Israel, Khamenei’s stock likely has risen with the aging clerics of the 88-seat Assembly of Experts who will select the country’s next supreme leader.

Whoever becomes the leader will gain control of an Iranian military now at war and a stockpile of highly enriched uranium that could be used to build a nuclear weapon — should he choose to decree it.

Khamenei had occupied a similar role to that of Ahmad Khomeini, a son of Iran’s first Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini — “a combination of aide-de-camp, confidant, gatekeeper and power broker,” according to United Against Nuclear Iran, a U.S.-based pressure group.

FILE – Mojtaba, son of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, attends the annual Quds, or Jerusalem Day rally in Tehran, Iran, on May 31, 2019. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)

Born into dissent

Born in 1969 in the city of Mashhad, some 10 years before the 1979 Islamic Revolution that would sweep Iran, Khamenei grew up as his father agitated against Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

An official biography on Ali Khamenei’s life recounts one moment when the shah’s secret police, the SAVAK, broke into their home and beat the cleric. Woken up after, Mojtaba and the rest of Khamenei’s children were told their father was going on vacation.

“But I told them, ‘There is no need to lie.’ I told them the truth,” the elder Khamenei was quoted as saying.

After the fall of the shah, Khamenei’s family moved to Tehran, Iran’s capital. Khamenei would go on to fight in the Iran-Iraq war with the Habib ibn Mazahir Battalion, a division of Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard that would see several of its members ascend to powerful intelligence positions within the force — likely with the backing of the Khamenei family.

His father became supreme leader in 1989 — and soon Mojtaba Khamenei and his family had access to the billions of dollars and business assets spread across Iran’s many bonyads, or foundations funded from state industries and other wealth once held by the shah.

Power rises with his father’s

His own power rose alongside his father’s, working within his offices in downtown Tehran. U.S. diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks in the late 2000s began referring to the younger Khamenei as “the power behind the robes.” One recounted an allegation that Khamenei actually tapped his own father’s phone, served as his “principal gatekeeper” and had been forming his own power base within the country.

Related Articles


The Iran war has upended flights across the Middle East. Here’s what travelers should know


Supply chain disruptions from the Iran war could raise prices for drugs, electronics and more


Sri Lanka recovers 87 bodies from Iranian warship sunk off its coast by a US submarine


Hegseth says US ‘can’t stop everything’ that Iran fires even as he asserts air dominance


Cuba files terrorism charges against suspects over fatal US boat shooting

Khamenei “is widely viewed within the regime as a capable and forceful leader and manager who may someday succeed to at least a share of national leadership; his father may also see him in that light,” a 2008 cable read, also noting his lack of theological qualifications and age.

“Mojtaba is, however, due to his skills, wealth, and unmatched alliances, reportedly seen by a number of regime insiders as a plausible candidate for shared leadership of Iran upon his father’s demise, whether that demise is soon or years in the future,” it said.

Khamenei has worked closely with Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, both with commanders of its expeditionary Quds Force and its all-volunteer Basij that violently suppressed nationwide protests in January, the U.S. Treasury has said.

The United States sanctioned him in 2019 during the first term of U.S President Donald Trump over working to “advance his father’s destabilizing regional ambitions and oppressive domestic objectives.”

That includes allegations that Khamenei from behind the scenes supported the election of hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2005 and his disputed re-election in 2009 that sparked the Green Movement protests.

Mahdi Karroubi, who was a presidential candidate in 2005 and 2009, denounced Khamenei as “a master’s son” and alleged he interfered in both votes. His father reportedly at the time said Khamenei was “a master himself, not a master’s son.”

Powers of supreme leader at stake

There has been only one other transfer of power in the office of supreme leader of Iran, the paramount decision-maker since the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini died at age 86 after being the figurehead of the revolution and leading Iran through its eight-year war with Iraq.

Now the new leader will come on board after the 12-day war with Israel and as a U.S.-Israeli war with Iran is seeking to eliminate Iran’s nuclear threat and military power, hoping also the Iranian people will rise up against the Iranian theocracy.

The supreme leader is at the heart of Iran’s complex power-sharing Shiite theocracy and has final say over all matters of state. He also serves as the commander-in-chief of the country’s military and the Guard, a paramilitary force that the United States designated a terrorist organization in 2019, and which his father empowered during his rule.

The Guard, which has led the self-described “Axis of Resistance,” a series of militant groups and allies across the Middle East meant to counter the U.S. and Israel, also has extensive wealth and holdings in Iran. It also controls the country’s ballistic missile arsenal.