By DAVE COLLINS

Newly released police video shows former WWE CEO Vince McMahon’s high-speed car crash in Connecticut last summer and reveals that a state trooper was trying to catch up to him to pull him over at the time.

Related Articles

NASA’s Mike Fincke identifies himself as the ailing astronaut who prompted space station evacuation

Sondra Lee, a veteran Broadway dancer with roles in ‘Peter Pan’ and ‘Hello Dolly!’ dies at 97

Bill Gates ‘spoke candidly’ about Epstein ties at a Gates Foundation meeting, spokesperson says

Harvey Weinstein hires Luigi Mangione and Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ lawyers as his 3rd NY trial looms

Judge says he will order Greenpeace to pay an expected $345 million in oil pipeline protest case

McMahon, now 80, was driving his 2024 Bentley Continental GT on the Merritt Parkway in Westport on July 24 — coincidentally, the same day that WWE legend Hulk Hogan died of a heart attack in Florida. State police said the Bentley, which can cost over $300,000, was going 100 mph or more.

“Why were you driving all over 100 mph?” state police Detective Maxwell Robins asks McMahon after the crash, according to police bodycam video. McMahon replies, “I got my granddaughter’s birthday” and explains he was on his way to see her.

Robins’ dashcam video shows McMahon driving northbound in the right lane when he approaches a BMW in the same lane, appears to hit the brakes and swerves into the left lane at the last second. The Bentley clipped the rear of the other car before smashing into the left lane guardrail and careening back onto the highway, creating a cloud of dirt and car parts. McMahon then stops in the right shoulder.

No one was seriously injured in the crash, police said. Besides damage to the rear of the BMW, another vehicle driving on the opposite side of the parkway was struck by flying debris. The driver of that third car happened to be wearing a WWE shirt.

McMahon was cited for reckless driving and following too closely. A state judge in October allowed McMahon to enter a pretrial probation program that will result in the charges being erased from his record next October if he successfully completes the program. He was also ordered to make a $1,000 charitable contribution.

In an image taken from Connecticut State Police police dashcam video, Vince McMahon’s car, center left, collides with another car after on July 24, 2025, in Westport, Conn. (Connecticut State Police via AP)

State police said Robins was trying to catch up to McMahon on the parkway and clock his speed before pulling him over. They said the incident was not a pursuit, which happens when police chase someone trying to flee officers. They said it did not appear McMahon was trying to escape the trooper.

Police video shows Robins telling McMahon about his efforts to catch up to McMahon. “I’m trying to catch up to you and you keep taking off,” Robins says. “No, no no. I’m not trying to outrun you,” McMahon says.

An accident information summary provided to the media shortly after the crash did not mention that a trooper was following McMahon.

The Associated Press obtained the videos Wednesday through a public records request. They were first obtained by The Sun newspaper.

Police body cameras recorded troopers’ interactions with McMahon on the side of the highway.

Robins tells McMahon that he doesn’t understand why McMahon didn’t change lanes sooner to avoid the crash and asks whether he was looking at his phone. McMahon denies looking at his phone and adds that he hadn’t driven his car in a long time.

McMahon later gives Robins his car registration and curses at himself, the video shows. After Robins tells McMahon that his car is fast, McMahon replies, “Yeah, too (expletive) fast.”

In an image taken from Connecticut State Police police dashcam video, Vince McMahon’s car, left, strikes the median after colliding with another car after on July 24, 2025, in Westport, Conn. (Connecticut State Police via AP)

The videos also show McMahon talking to the driver whose car he rear-ended. Barbara Doran, of New York City, told the AP last summer that McMahon expressed his concern for her and was glad she was OK. She said she was heading to a ferry to Martha’s Vineyard at the time of the crash.

After McMahon was given the traffic summons, he shook hands with Robins and another trooper and they wished him well.

McMahon’s lawyer, Mark Sherman, said the crash was just an accident.

“Not every car accident is a crime,” Sherman said. “Vince’s primary concern during this case was for the other drivers and is appreciative that the court saw this more of an accident than a crime that needed to be prosecuted.”

McMahon stepped down as WWE’s CEO in 2022 amid a company investigation into sexual misconduct allegations. He also resigned as executive chairman of the board of directors of TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of WWE, in 2024, a day after a former WWE employee filed a sexual abuse lawsuit against him. McMahon has denied the allegations. The lawsuit remains pending.

McMahon bought what was then the World Wrestling Federation in 1982 and transformed it from a regional wrestling company into a worldwide phenomenon. Besides running the company with his wife, Linda, who is now the U.S. education secretary, he also performed at WWE events as himself.

USA Hockey had a good couple of weeks at the Winter Olympic Games in Milan, Italy. Both the men’s and women’s teams won overtime games against archrival Canada to win gold medals, the first time each team had won gold in the same Games.

The respect between the teams there was mutual, the Minnesota Frost’s Olympians said Wednesday as the team reconvened to finish the PWHL season. The U.S. men and women attended one another’s games, and the teams shared a medical room in the Olympic Village.

United States’ Kelly Pannek (12) celebrates after a women’s ice hockey gold medal game between the United States and Canada at the 2026 Winter Olympics, in Milan, Italy, Thursday, Feb. 19, 2026. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

“I didn’t meet a single one of them who wasn’t very kind and asking us how we’re doing, how the Games were going,” Frost forward Britta Curl-Salemme said Tuesday after a practice at TRIA Rink. “They were watching and supporting, so it was really cool to meet them.”

“We did feel their respect,” former Gopher and two-time Olympian Grace Zumwinkle said. “And having been in the Village as well was a good experience.”

That doesn’t mean they appreciated the men’s team laughing at a joke by President Donald Trump that minimized the women’s achievement.

Not long after the U.S. men beat Canada on Jack Hughes’ overtime goal on Sunday, the president spoke to the team via cell phone and invited the team to Tuesday night’s State of the Union address.

After the team — still celebrating in the locker room — eagerly accepted the invitation, the president added, “I must tell you, we’re going to have to bring the women’s team, you do know that.”

Most of the men’s team laughed.

“I think the video is what it is,” three-time Olympian and former Gopher Kelly Pannek said Wednesday. “You’d have to ask them about their feelings on it, but I think there’s also elements to it, with the phone call specifically, (that) is not that surprising, to be frank. So I don’t know why we expect differently.”

The women’s team officially declined the president’s invitation to the State of the Union on Monday.

Curl-Salemme and former Gophers center Taylor Heise said several U.S. men’s players have reached out to the women’s team collectively and the players individually to apologize for their behavior captured by the video.

“(Was) that the perfect response? Is it an appropriate comment or joke to make? No, I don’t think so,” Curl said. “I just go back to the way they treated us, and the support they gave us.

“They were happy as anyone to see us succeed, and the same for us with them. So that’s what I’m focusing more on.”

With PWHL action resuming this weekend — the Frost are at Montreal on Sunday afternoon — players are hoping the focus can shift to the fact that USA Hockey swept the hockey tournaments with undefeated records.

It was the third gold medal for each team. The women won it all in 1998, 2018 and 2026.

“It really was such a special feeling being there, and even being able to spend some time with them after their win, and the respect they were showing us,” Pannek said.

Said Zumwinkle: “It’s the first time in history that’s happened, and it’s super exciting to take part in that.”

“But I think it goes so much further than just a gold medal,” she added. “We see the grassroots, and we see 1980 and what the Miracle on Ice did for so many younger people, and I think the women’s team and the men’s team, we can continue to do that for generations to come.”

Minnesota Frost wing Grace Zumwinkle models the team’s new uniforms, unveiled Thursday, Nov. 7, 2024. (Courtesy of PWHL)
Minnesota Frost center Taylor Heise models the team’s new home uniforms, unveiled Thursday, Nov. 7, 2024.

Related Articles

Canada enters women’s Olympic hockey quarterfinals beating Finland, rebounding from loss to US

Finally, Taylor Heise, Grace Zumwinkle are Olympic teammates

Meet the Minnesotans competing in the 2026 Winter Olympics

Frost overpower Goldeneyes

More sports figures speak out on ICE actions in Minnesota

Addressing widespread fraud in state government is a central issue this year at the Minnesota Legislature. But while both parties have said they’re committed to fighting the problem, disagreement over the particulars continues to threaten progress in the state House.

Democratic-Farmer-Labor House members on Wednesday unveiled a package of fraud proposals for the 2026 legislative session that includes measures to boost Medicaid fraud enforcement at the attorney general’s office, modernize state computer systems and increase the number of provider audits and in-person site visits.

DFLers also say they want to reverse a decades-long trend of privatizing government services, which they blame for greater vulnerability to fraud in state programs. House DFL Leader Zack Stephenson said the universal free school meals program created by his party in 2023 has had no fraud scandal because its structure doesn’t allow for it.

“That program does not have fraud, because lunch ladies don’t commit fraud, right?” he told reporters at the Capitol on Wednesday. “When you have that public program with direct accountability, you close the opportunity for fraud that exists, as we are finding when you have a privatization model that allows for other layers to be in there.”

Debate over how to protect programs

Lawmakers continue to debate how to strengthen protections in government programs amid allegations of hundreds of millions of dollars of fraud at the Department of Human Services and Department of Education, and speculation that fraud could reach the billions. Federal prosecutors have charged dozens in schemes exploiting programs like housing support for people with addiction and disabilities, autism support programs and a pandemic-era meal program for children.

One of the major changes DFLers are proposing is a significant boost in staffing at the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit in the Attorney General’s Office. Federal prosecutions by the U.S. Attorney’s Office had been the primary engine for accountability in recent fraud scandals, but many staff there resigned last month — reportedly in protest of the Trump administration’s actions during last month’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota.

Rep. Matt Norris, DFL-Blaine and Sen. Ann Johnson Stewart, DFL-Minnetonka, are backing a bill to add 18 people at the state level to handle Medicaid fraud, boosting staff at the office to 50. It would cost around $1.2 million a year.

The House DFL’s fraud plan has a dozen or so bills and superficially bears similarity to Republican proposals. Though key disagreements have stalled progress in the tied House, where both parties have 67 members.

Republican proposals

Republicans have a slate of proposals aimed at fighting fraud, including creating criminal penalties for state employees who falsify paperwork during audits. However, a bill to create a statewide independent watchdog office — the office of inspector general — continues to fail committee votes as House DFLers continue attempting to modify the bill to remove the office’s enforcement capacity or allow the governor to directly appoint its head.

Republicans have continually rejected those changes, and noted that DFLers in the Senate had backed the inspector general bill last year. In 2025, the original bill, sponsored by Sen. Heather Gustafson, DFL-Vadnais Heights, passed 60-7 in the Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support, but never got a vote in the House.

House DFLers are now saying an enforcement division at the inspector general would be “redundant” since there’s already an anti-fraud enforcement at the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

A version of the bill carried by Norris also allows the governor to directly appoint the inspector general rather than pick one from a field of candidates selected by a bipartisan commission of state lawmakers.

Stephenson said he believes Republicans had placed too much emphasis that the inspector general bill, when addressing fraud, would require action on multiple fronts.

“One of the problems about this debate, particularly this year, though, to be honest with you, has been that it’s too focused on the idea that there’s one bill that’s going to solve this problem,” he said.

In a joint statement Wednesday afternoon, Republican House leadership accused DFLers of continued delaying action on fraud — pointing to the inspector general bill’s repeated failure to pass committee votes.

“The culture of fraud that has taken root in Minnesota didn’t happen overnight, and it didn’t happen by accident,” House Speaker Lisa Demuth and Republican Floor Leader Harry Niska, said. “It happened because of the lack of action from Minnesota Democrats. Period. Now that fraud has become a political liability, Democrats are talking tough and trying to rebrand themselves as reformers, but Minnesotans aren’t buying it.”

‘It’s stalled, but it’s not dead’

Meanwhile, some Republicans remain optimistic that there could be a compromise on fraud legislation.

Sen. Michael Kreun, R-Blaine, who carried the Senate version of the inspector general bill with Gustafson, said last week that “it’s stalled, but it’s not dead.”

As lawmakers continued to negotiate fraud proposals this week, a report released Monday described longstanding vulnerabilities dating back to the 1970s and repeated inaction by state leaders despite nearly a half-century of warnings.

Earlier this week, Gov. Tim Walz’s director of Program Integrity, Tim O’Malley, released what he described as a “roadmap” to address those vulnerabilities, which he said were driven in large part by a culture in state agencies “more based on compassion than compliance.”

Related Articles

DFLers, Annunciation families call for gun control, but prospects still dim

Gov. Tim Walz fraud czar: ‘Inadequate accountability’ fed problem for decades

Fraud, immigration enforcement bills face early snags at MN Capitol

Minnesota Capitol rally calls for state aid following immigration crackdown

Data center foes bring swelling opposition to Minnesota Capitol

By STEVEN SLOAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — For some of their conservative critics, this is the scandal that could finally topple them. Their resistance to testifying proved futile. And now, staring down another epic fight, they’re harnessing their considerable political skills to try and turn the table on their accusers.

Related Articles

Bill Gates ‘spoke candidly’ about Epstein ties at a Gates Foundation meeting, spokesperson says

Vance says administration is pausing some Medicaid funding to Minnesota because of fraud concerns

Trump’s pick to lead new Justice Department unit scrutinized as president declares ‘war on fraud’

Trump’s portrayal of ‘golden age’ is out of sync with how Americans see economy

The hotly contested Texas Senate race is setting spending records ahead of Tuesday’s primary

For Bill and Hillary Clinton, the 1990s are back.

The Clintons are slated to testify Thursday and Friday in a House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, part of a deal with Republicans after it became clear that Congress — with the help of some Democrats — was on track to hold them in contempt if they refused to cooperate. For the battle-hardened couple, it amounts to one more Washington brawl. And like so many of the battles that came before, this one is another mix of questionable judgment, sexual impropriety, money and power.

During his 1992 campaign, Bill Clinton pitched his candidacy as “two for the price of one,” previewing a presidential marriage like none that had come before, with a spouse whose professional credentials rivaled his. In the years since, that partnership helped the Clintons weather repeated scandals, including those so personal that many other relationships would have shattered. When his political career was ending, hers was ascending when she was elected to the U.S. Senate from New York, then served as secretary of state before becoming the Democratic nominee for president in 2016.

For those who have long watched the Clintons, this moment is a reminder that the couple — weaned on the politics of the Vietnam War and Watergate — has never been far from the heat of a cultural fight. And with the Epstein case unfolding unpredictably around the world, the Clintons are once again ensnared in the scandal of the moment.

“It’s kind of a sad but fitting coda to extraordinary political lives,” said David Maraniss, who has written two biographies of Bill Clinton.

There’s no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of either Clinton when it comes to Epstein, a convicted sex offender who committed suicide in 2019 while he was in jail awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

But Epstein had ties to Bill Clinton for years, visiting the White House multiple times in the 1990s, according to visitor logs. After Clinton left office, Epstein was involved in his philanthropy and the former president flew multiple times on his private jet.

“Traveling on Epstein’s plane was not worth the years of questioning afterward,” Bill Clinton wrote in his 2024 memoir. “I wish I had never met him.”

Bill Clinton’s ties to Epstein

By last summer, the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee issued subpoenas for the Clintons. For months, Bill Clinton, 79, and Hillary Clinton, 78, largely ignored the matter in public but that became harder to sustain in December when the former president was featured prominently in the first batch of Epstein files.

Among thousands of documents made public, some photos showed him on a private plane, including one with a woman, whose face is redacted, seated alongside him with her arm around him. Another showed Bill Clinton in a pool with Epstein’s longtime confidant, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, and a person whose face was redacted. Yet another photo portrayed Bill Clinton in a hot tub with a woman whose face was redacted.

The oversight panel’s chairman, Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they didn’t comply with the subpoenas, a historic move considering a former president has never been compelled to appear before Congress. Between his first and second terms, Donald Trump invoked that precedent to fend off a subpoena from the committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

While there was no context surrounding the photos of Bill Clinton, they underscored how his political promise has always been tempered by personal indiscretions.

FILE – President Clinton makes a statement as first lady Hillary Clinton looks on at the White House, Dec. 19, 1998 in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, file)

The 1992 campaign that represented the emerging preeminence of the Baby Boom generation was the same one dogged by rumors of an affair with Gennifer Flowers. A presidency largely defined by economic prosperity was nearly derailed when Clinton was impeached in 1998 for lying under oath and obstructing justice when he denied engaging in a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

Each time, many Republicans thought they finally found leverage over the Clintons. But each time, the Clintons found a way out of the vise.

Asa Hutchinson, the former Republican congressman from Arkansas who was a House manager during Clinton’s impeachment trial, described the couple as “a smart lawyer and brilliant communicator.”

The Clinton playbook: fight back fiercely

As each crisis surfaced, a pattern emerged: the Clintons fiercely denied the allegations and often dismissed women who came forward with claims. They villainized the GOP and re-centered the public’s attention on more favorable themes like the booming economy of the era.

FILE – President Clinton sits with first lady Hillary Clinton during a campaign rally in San Antonio, Nov. 2, 1996. (AP Photo/Greg Gibson, file)

Bill Clinton, who famously told voters “I feel your pain,” always managed to stay connected with the public. Indeed, he enjoyed some of the highest approval numbers of his presidency during his impeachment inquiry and trial, when about 7 in 10 U.S. adults approved of the way he was handling his job.

Hillary Clinton similarly dispatched Republicans who sensed an opening in her handling of a 2012 attack on a compound in Libya that killed four Americans. She came out of an 11-hour televised congressional hearing in 2015 appearing poised. Even the Republican chair of the committee probing the attack said he wasn’t sure she revealed anything new about an issue many in his party considered a scandal.

FILE – An attendee holds up a “Lock Her Up” sign before the arrival of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at a campaign rally, Nov. 4, 2016, in Wilmington, Ohio. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, file)

That experience has informed how the Clintons are approaching this week’s testimony. Hillary Clinton has been especially vocal in calling for the proceedings to happen in public, rather than in private as Comer currently plans.

“We have nothing to hide,” she told the BBC earlier this month.

Bill Clinton’s communication operation has taken a sharper tone, recalling the political “war room” popularized during the 1992 campaign to respond to negative storylines.

One release accused Comer of “lying in every appearance he’s made this week.” Another mocked GOP Reps. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania and Andy Biggs of Arizona with a “hypocrisy award of the day,” noting how the Oversight committee members defied subpoenas from the Jan. 6 panel.

Meanwhile, the Clintons released a four-page letter to Comer on social media defiantly belittling a process they said was “literally designed to result in our imprisonment.”

FILE – President Clinton and wife Hillary share a moment during an East Room ceremony at the White House in Washington, July 17, 1996. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, file)

Much as they tried to refocus attention during the 1990s, the letter hit the White House for dismantling institutions, imposing a harsh immigration crackdown and pardoning those involved in the Capitol riot.

Conservative attacks on the Clintons

The Clintons’ rise to power paralleled the explosion of talk radio as a political force, with Rush Limbaugh using his daily show as a platform to constantly berate the White House. Today, conservative podcasters like Benny Johnson have filled Limbuagh’s space and were gleeful after the House panel moved last month to hold the couple in contempt.

“Do you understand Donald Trump made good on his oldest promise arguably which is he told all of us 10 years ago that Hillary Clinton would be going to jail?” Johnson said last month.

Still, some dynamics have changed.

The lockstep support the Clintons enjoyed among congressional Democrats has eroded as a new generation of lawmakers has taken office — nine Democrats joined with Republicans on the House committee to advance the contempt resolution. Trump, who has faced scrutiny over his own ties to Epstein and may be uncomfortable with the precedent of forcing a former president to testify, has expressed rare concern for the Clintons.

He told NBC News that it “bothers me that somebody is going after Bill Clinton.” He has described Hillary Clinton as a “very capable woman.”

Even Hutchinson, who helped make the case for Bill Clinton’s impeachment, expressed sympathy for the couple.

“It’s frustrating and disappointing that President Clinton and Secretary Clinton are having to go through this fact-finding ordeal,” he said. “That’s difficult for them.”