Wild rice harvesters come across ancient remains on shores of Leech Lake

posted in: Adventure | 0

People gathering wild rice from Minnesota’s third-largest lake have stumbled across human skeletal remains that are believed to be several hundred years old.

Authorities suspect erosion caused the remains of at least three people to surface on the shores of Leech Lake, where they were discovered Saturday. Covering more than 100,000 acres, the lake is located mainly within the Leech Lake Indian Reservation in the north-central part of the state.

Several tribes have called the area home, most recently the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, and remains periodically are found in the area, said the tribe’s police chief, Ken Washington.

“They’ll just arise like that just through natural erosion of the water coming up on shorelines,” he said.

Cass County Sheriff Bryan Welk said the rice harvesters called after spotting the remains up on land. Harvesters usually use a canoe with a push pole or paddles to collect the rice, which is considered spiritually, culturally, nutritionally and economically significant to Ojibwe, Dakota and other tribal communities, according to the state’s Department of Natural Resources.

Deputies responded, determined the remains were ancient and then contacted the Leech Lake Heritage Sites program, which conducts archeological research in the area.

The Minnesota Indian Affairs Council was also called to assist, with the goal of handling the remains in “culturally appropriate manner,” the tribal and county law enforcement explained in a joint statement.

Welk said in an interview that besides erosion, remains also are unearthed through construction projects.

“It has happened a couple times a year, but then they can go several years in between,” Welk said. “It just depends.”

Authorities urged people to contact law enforcement if they encounter suspected human remains and not to disturb the area.

“In doing so, this ensures vital evidence is preserved, along with being respectful of those who were here before us,” the statement said.

Related Articles

Local News |


K.C. Chiefs ‘superfan’ gets 17½ years in prison for string of bank stick-ups in U.S., including 2 in Twin Cities

Local News |


With attendance topping 1.9 million, this year’s State Fair was busiest since pre-pandemic

Local News |


Walz unharmed after some of the vehicles near the back of his motorcade crash in Milwaukee

Local News |


Rochester charter school ordered closed by governing body after investigation

Local News |


2 Minnesota turkeys will head to the White House in November

Viking receiver Jordan Addison vows to be play in season opener

posted in: News | 0

Never mind that receiver Jordan Addison was technically listed as a limited participant in practice on Thursday afternoon. He has no doubt that he’s going to be playing for the Vikings on Sunday afternoon at MetLife Stadium in the season opener against the New York Giants.

“Yeah,” Addison said. “No question.”

After being carted off the field last month during joint practices against the Cleveland Browns, Addison has been slowly working his way back into the mix. He suffered a high ankle sprain, and while he knew it would take some time for him to get back on the field, he was never worried about missing the season opener.

“I’ve had them plenty of times,” Addison said. “As soon as it happened, I’m like, ‘I already know what it is. It ain’t no biggie.’ I already knew I was going to be back for Week 1. It wasn’t nothing serious.”

The fact that Addison claims he’ll be available for the season opener lines up with what head coach Kevin O’Connell said earlier this week.

“I think Jordan is in a good spot,” O’Connell said. “I feel pretty good about him making the game.”

The presence of Addison will be a big boost for the Vikings. He plays an important role in the offense lining up alongside star receiver Justin Jefferson. If the Giants want to throw double coverage at Jefferson, they run the risk of leaving Addison in single coverage elsewhere on the field.

The fact that Addison has gotten more comfortable with the playbook this season allows him to play more freely on the field.

“I know what I’ve got to do,” Addison said. “Instead of thinking about what I’ve got I can focus on the defense and see what they’re doing and react.”

It remains to be seen if the Vikings list Addison with an injury designation on Friday afternoon. Not that it will change much for him.

“I’m feeling great,” Addison said. “I’m 100 percent.”

Related Articles

Minnesota Vikings |


Jordan Addison and Jalen Nailor pop up on Vikings injury report

Minnesota Vikings |


Sam Darnold can resurrect his career with Vikings. Will he be the next Baker Mayfield or the next Marcus Mariota?

Minnesota Vikings |


The Loop Fantasy Football Report: Week 1

Minnesota Vikings |


X factor for the Vikings on defense? The positionless Josh Metellus

Minnesota Vikings |


Vikings will use running back Ty Chandler as primary kick returner

Trump suggests tariffs can help solve rising child care costs in a major economic speech

posted in: Politics | 0

By JILL COLVIN, ADRIANA GOMEZ LICON and JOSH BOAK, Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump suggested to business leaders Thursday that his plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports would solve seemingly unrelated challenges such as the rising cost of child care in the U.S.

The GOP presidential nominee promised to lead what he called a “national economic renaissance” by increasing tariffs, slashing regulations to boost energy production and drastically cutting government spending as well as corporate taxes for companies that produce in the U.S.

Trump was asked at his appearance before the Economic Club of New York about his plans to drive down child care costs to help more women join the workforce.

“Child care is child care, it’s something you have to have in this country. You have to have it,” he said. Then, he said his plans to tax imports from foreign nations at higher levels would “take care” of such problems.

“We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s — relatively speaking — not very expensive, compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in,” he said.

Trump has embraced tariffs as he appeals to working-class voters who oppose free-trade deals and the outsourcing of factories and jobs. But in his speech Thursday and his economic plans as a whole, Trump made what a broader — to some, implausible — promise on tariffs: that they can raise trillions of dollars to fund his agenda without those costs being passed along to consumers in the form of higher prices.

His campaign attacks Democratic nominee Kamala Harris’ proposals to increase corporate tax rates by saying they would ultimately be borne by workers in the form of fewer jobs and lower incomes. Yet taxes on foreign imports would have a similar effect with businesses and consumers having to absorb those costs in the form of higher prices.

The United States had $3.8 trillion worth of imports last year, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Trump in the past has talked about universal tariffs of at least 10%, if not higher, though he has not spelled out details about how these taxes would be implemented.

Kimberly Clausing, an economist at the University of California, Los Angeles, has repeatedly warned in economic analyses about the likely damage to people’s finances from Trump’s tariffs. She noted that Trump wants tariffs to pay for everything, even though they can’t.

“I believe Trump has already spent this revenue, to pay for his tax cuts (which it doesn’t), or to perhaps end the income tax (which it cannot),” she said in an email. ” “It is unclear how there would be any revenues left over to fund child care.”

Trump was asked to talk about child care

Child care is unaffordable for many Americans and financially precarious for many day care operators and their employees. Democrats in Congress have long argued the child care industry is in crisis and requires a drastic increase in federal aid — and some Republicans have joined them. Trump pointed to his tariff ideas as well as efforts he announced to reduce what he described as “waste and fraud.”

“I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just told you about,” he said.

Trump’s running mate JD Vance was also asked about proposals to lower day care costs earlier this week, and he suggested making it easier for families to keep the kids at home with a grandparent or another relative.

“Make it so that, maybe like grandma or grandpa wants to help out a little bit more,” he said. “If that happens, you relieve some of the pressure on all the resources that we are spending on day care.”

Vance also suggested training more people to work in day cares, and said some states required what he called “ridiculous certification that has nothing to do with taking care of kids.”

Trump laid out a series of economic proposals

In his speech, Trump said he would immediately issue “a national emergency declaration” to achieve a massive increase in the domestic energy supply and eliminate 10 current regulations for every new regulation the government adopts. He said Tesla and Space X CEO Elon Musk has agreed to head a commission to perform a financial audit of the federal government that would save trillions of dollars.

“My plan will rapidly defeat inflation, quickly bring down prices and reignite explosive economic growth,” Trump claimed.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Disability rights activist pushes government to let him participate in society

National Politics |


Nutrition programs for older adults face service cuts

National Politics |


Analysis: 7 US House races shift on divided battlefield

National Politics |


Trump tax cuts would cost more than almost all federal agencies

National Politics |


‘Defund police’ or reimagine safety? Kamala Harris’ record on a historic American issue

Trump has previously floated the idea of chopping the corporate tax rate to 15%, but on Thursday clarified that would be solely for companies that produce in the U.S. The corporate rate had been 35% when he became president in 2017, and he later signed a bill lowering it.

Harris calls for raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%. Her policy proposals this week have been geared toward promoting more entrepreneurship, a bet that making it easier to start new companies will increase middle-class prosperity.

On Thursday, Trump attacked Harris’ proposals on banning price gouging and accused her of embracing Marxism and communism.

“She wants four more years to enforce the radical left agenda that poses a fundamental threat to the prosperity of every American family and America itself,” he said.

He also vowed to end what he called Harris’ “anti-energy crusade,” promising that energy prices would be cut in half, although energy prices are often driven by international fluctuations. He said an emergency declaration would help with rapid approvals for new drilling projects, pipelines, refineries, power plants and reactors, where local opposition is generally fierce.

And he also said he would ask Congress to pass legislation to ban the spending of taxpayer money on people who have entered the country illegally. He specifically said he would bar them from obtaining mortgages in California, targeting a bill passed in that state last week. Throughout his campaign, Trump has railed against the economic impact of the influx of migrants that have entered the country in recent years and their strain on some government services.

The Harris campaign issued a memo accusing Trump of wanting to hurt the middle class, arguing his ideas would expand the national debt and shrink economic growth and job creation.

“He wants our economy to serve billionaires and big corporations,” the campaign said in a statement.

Their dueling economic proposals are likely to be central to the upcoming presidential debate on Tuesday. Harris arrived Thursday in downtown Pittsburgh to devote the next several days to preparing for the debate. She intentionally picked a key part of the battleground state of Pennsylvania to hone her ideas ahead of their showdown.

Trump plans to rely heavily on tariffs

In June, the right-leaning Tax Foundation estimated that Trump’s proposed tariffs would amount to a $524 billion yearly tax hike that would shrink the economy and cost the equivalent of 684,000 jobs. After Trump floated tariffs as high as 20% in August, the Harris campaign seized on an analysis suggesting that figure would raise a typical family’s expenses by almost $4,000 annually.

The money raised by tariffs would not be enough to offset the cost of his various income tax cuts, including a plan to whittle the corporate rate to 15% from 21%. The Penn Wharton Budget Model put the price tag on that at $5.8 trillion over 10 years.

Economists have warned about Trump’s plans to impose tariffs that he says would return manufacturing jobs to the U.S. Some have said such taxes on imports could worsen inflation, though he is vowing to cut down costs. Inflation peaked in 2022 at 9.1% but has since eased to 2.9% as of last month.

“Some might say it’s economic nationalism. I call it common sense. I call it America First,” he said on Thursday.

___

Gomez Licon reported from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and Boak reported from Pittsburgh. Associated Press writers Moriah Balingit and Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux in Washington contributed to this report.

‘Stop Evicting Children’: Rally Calls to End Shelter Deadlines for Migrants As New School Year Starts

posted in: Society | 0

As of Aug. 18, the city had issued 60-day deadlines to 12,689 families with children, including 18,348 children under 18, officials said. Critics say frequent shelter moves are disruptive to kids’ ability to learn.

Gerardo Romo / NYC Council Media Unit

“Nobody leaves their home country, the things and the roots that they know, to come and struggle in another country unless there is no other option available to them,” Councilmember Carmen De La Rosa said at Wednesday’s rally.

A day before public schools reopened in New York City, elected officials, advocates, and community members gathered to protest Mayor Eric Adams’ policy that evicts migrants and asylum-seeking families—including school-going children—from the city’s homeless shelters every 30 or 60 days.

Limiting the stays of asylum seekers in shelters disrupts the lives of students, is financially wasteful, and reflects xenophobia, the group charged. As of Aug. 18, the city had issued 60-day deadlines to 12,689 families with children, including 18,348 children under 18, according to New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who cited his office’s investigation on the implementation of the policy.

Those numbers represent families staying in shelters run by agencies other than the Department of Homeless Services. The city recently sought and received permission from the state to begin issuing the time notices to migrant families with kids in DHS shelters as well—more than 30,000 people at the end of June—who were previously exempt from the policy. 

“This is shameful,” Councilmember Shahana Hanif said at Wednesday’s rally, held in Audubon Park in Washington Heights. “Children should be focused on their education, not on whether they have roofs over their heads or be able to stay in their school.” 

While families with children can reapply for a new placement after their time runs out, Hanif said that the process of eviction, re-application, and moving to another shelter every two months could repeat up to five times in a single school year.

“This policy undermines educational outcomes, disrupts family stability and raises serious concerns about the risk of children experiencing street homelessness,” she said. In March, Hanif introduced the Intro. 210, which would prohibit city agencies from imposing such time limits. 

Similarly, at the state level, Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal has also sponsored a bill prohibiting the same at homeless shelters operated by state agencies.

“Do we really want to see more children riding the subways during the school day, selling candy with their parents because they have no place to go, because they have no resources to use?” said Sen. Hoylman-Sigal at the protest. 

Another councilmember flagged how the deadlines could impact funding for schools, as students who transfer throughout the year as they move between shelters. The city’s public schools get funding largely based on the number of students they enroll. An enrollment tally is taken each year on Oct. 31, and schools that lose or see an influx of new students after that date may struggle to right-size their budgets, some have warned.

“For God’s sake, do not, Mr. Mayor, move families before first [of] November. You know what’s going to happen. Those schools are going to lose money,” said Councilmember Gale A. Brewer.

Gerardo Romo / NYC Council Media Unit

Manhattan Councilmember Gale Brewer speaking at Wednesday’s rally.

Advocates also brought up the practical challenges of navigating New York City as a newcomer, and how frequent shelter moves can exacerbate those hardships. 

“Maybe they already knew which train they need to take in order to take this kid to school,” Valeria Paz Reyes from New York Immigration Coalition said at the rally. “And again, they don’t speak the language, they don’t understand the subway system, they don’t understand the education system.”

“Imagine someone that just came a couple months ago that is trying over here to create their new home, so it’s just creating unnecessary challenges and obstacles that don’t help anyone in the community,” she added. 

Michelle Ferreira from the nonprofit Housing Works said one of her clients was relocated from Bowery Residents Committee to another shelter in Brooklyn because of the 60-day policy. Ferreira is now working with the client to set up their mental healthcare and primary care providers closer to their home.

“When they move you from place to place, everything has to start all over again,” she said, recalling her own experience in the shelter system as a parent of young kids 25 years ago.

“That was a very big hard burden with a 3-year-old and two little ones. I had to get up at six o’clock and take them to school [in the Bronx]. It was so, so hard but I had to make it work because that’s my kids,” she said.

Echoing similar concerns, Councilmember Carmen De La Rosa said she is also the daughter of immigrants. Had it not been for public education in the U.S., her parents would have never migrated from the Dominican Republic.

“Nobody leaves their home country, the things and the roots that they know, to come and struggle in another country unless there is no other option available to them,” she said.

Responding to these criticisms, the mayor’s office said it has served over 214,600 migrants over the last two years, including assisting 70,000 individuals apply for asylum, Temporary Protected Status, and work authorization.

“Thanks to our measured approach, not a single family with children has been forced to sleep on the streets, and our 30- and 60-day policies have allowed us to manage this crisis in a compassionate and fiscally responsible way,” City Hall said in the statement. 

“We continue to intensify our case management and assist migrants in their resettlement process, and we will continue to support all students and their families and ensure there is no gap in services—whether they transition to a new school community or choose to stay in their current school.” 

Between Aug. 26 and Sept. 1, more than 700 migrants entered the city’s care, and more than 900 left during the same period, according to City Hall.

Gerardo Romo / NYC Council Media Unit

A protestor holds a sign condemning the shelter deadlines policy at a rally in Manhattan on Sept. 4, 2024.

Also speaking at the protest was a single mother, Lily Burd. Her two children went to Castle Bridge school in Washington Heights, where many of their classmates’ families  were affected by the 30- and 60-day policy. As a parent, Burd said routines have helped her family become successful.

“If we can’t have a routine, if that changes every 30 days, we’re always disoriented, discombobulated, and it becomes really difficult to thrive and to then attend to the real moments with your children,” she said.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Subeksha@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.