By MICHELLE L. PRICE and LISA MASCARO

WASHINGTON (AP) — The children’s savings program included in President Donald Trump’s tax break-and-spending cut law “is a back door for privatizing Social Security,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday.

Related Articles

Former Vice President Kamala Harris says she will not run for California governor in 2026

US sanctions Brazil’s Supreme Court justice overseeing case against Bolsonaro

Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

Trump administration freezes $108M at Duke amid inquiry into alleged racial discrimination

Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged even as Trump demands cuts

Bessent’s remark, which he made at a forum hosted by Breitbart News, was striking after Trump’s repeated promises that he would not cut Social Security. Democrats quickly seized on the comment as a sign the GOP wants to revive a dormant but unpopular push to privatize the long-running retirement program.

“Donald Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just said the quiet part out loud: The administration is scheming to privatize Social Security,” Tim Hogan, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, said in a statement.

The White House did not immediately respond to a message about Bessent’s remarks.

The GOP’s “big, beautiful bill,” as the law is called, created a new children’s savings program, Trump Accounts, which can be created for babies born in the U.S. and come with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury.

The accounts can grow over time, much the way college savings plans or other accounts do, and the accumulated funds can eventually be tapped in adulthood.

But Bessent on Wednesday allowed for another option for the accounts.

“In a way, it is a back door for privatizing Social Security,” Bessent said while speaking about the program.

Bessent’s comments were striking for his casual revival of a polarizing issue.

Ever since the George W. Bush administration considered proposals to privatize Social Security more than 20 years ago, Republicans have publicly moved away from talking about the issue that proved politically unpopular and was swiftly abandoned.

Democrats at the time used GOP plans to privatize Social Security in the run-up to the 2006 midterm elections and won back control of both House and Senate in Congress.

The Democrats warned Wednesday that Republicans are again trying to dismantle the long-running retirement program.

“It wasn’t enough to kick millions of people off their health care and take food away from hungry kids. Trump is now coming after American seniors with a ‘backdoor’ scam to take away the benefits they earned,” Hogan at the DNC said in the statement.

By MICHAEL R. BLOOD, AP Political Writer

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Former Vice President Kamala Harris will not run for California governor next year, leaving open the possibility that she could mount a third run for the White House in 2028.

Related Articles

US sanctions Brazil’s Supreme Court justice overseeing case against Bolsonaro

Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

Trump administration freezes $108M at Duke amid inquiry into alleged racial discrimination

Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged even as Trump demands cuts

Texas Republicans propose new US House map with more winnable GOP seats

“Over the past six months, I have spent time reflecting on this moment in our nation’s history and the best way for me to continue fighting for the American people and advancing the values and ideals I hold dear,” Harris said in a statement released by her office Wednesday.

“I have given serious thought to asking the people of California for the privilege to serve as their governor. I love this state, its people and its promise. It is my home. But after deep reflection, I’ve decided that I will not run for Governor in this election,” she said.

Harris’ decision extends a guessing game about her political future that started after she lost last year’s presidential election to Donald Trump. Harris spent months privately considering whether to run for governor, stage another run for the White House or step away from electoral politics altogether after her bruising defeat by Trump.

She has not ruled out another run for president, after unsuccessful bids in 2020 and 2024. It’s not known when she will make that decision.

In her statement, Harris never mentions Trump directly but said “our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis.”

“For now, my leadership — and public service — will not be in elected office. I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans,” Harris added.

“In the United States of America, power must lie with the people. And We, the People must use our power to fight for freedom, opportunity, fairness and the dignity of all. I will remain in that fight,” the statement said.

Harris would have entered the crowded contest to replace term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom as a front-runner given her widespread name recognition, fundraising prowess and track record of winning statewide elections. Before serving as U.S. senator and vice president, she was elected state attorney general and district attorney in San Francisco.

But after years in Washington on the national and international stage, it was never clear if Harris was interested in returning to the less-glamorous world of statehouse politics in Sacramento.

Outside California, Harris’ political career has been marked by historic firsts but also disappointments.

Harris sought the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, but dropped out of the race before the leadoff Iowa caucuses — the first defeat of her political career. After Joe Biden chose her as his running mate, she made history as the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. In 2024, Harris became the Democratic presidential nominee after Biden left the race months before Election Day and endorsed her. She lost that race to Trump, who won every swing state.

Harris faces some uncertainty if she chooses to make another White House run.

Harris would have to convince national Democrats that she’s the face of the party’s future, despite losing to Trump last fall. She also carries the baggage of being tied to Biden, whom Democrats have increasingly criticized for seeking a second term rather than stepping aside. Biden’s legacy was tarnished as he left office, and since then new questions have swirled about his physical and mental abilities as his term ended.

The 2028 presidential contest is expected to attract a large field, which could potentially include Newsom. Any candidate will have to unify a fractious Democratic Party with low approval ratings that is struggling to slow Trump’s agenda in Washington.

In her most extensive public remarks since leaving office in January, Harris said in a San Francisco speech that Trump’s leadership represented a “ wholesale abandonment ” of American ideals.

Harris’ decision not to seek the governorship keeps the contest to replace Newsom wide open. The Democratic field includes former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, former Biden administration health secretary Xavier Becerra and a handful of state officeholders.

By JAMES BROOKS, Associated Press

COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — Facing complex bureaucracy at home in Poland, Magdalena Kujawińska and her Colombian fiancé Heinner Valenzuela traveled to Copenhagen to become husband and wife.

“We realized that it’s not that easy to get married in Poland,” the 30-year-old Kujawińska said as the couple waited for their 10-minute ceremony at the Danish capital’s 19th-century City Hall.

“You need a certificate that you are not married,” she said. “We tried to get it from Colombia, but it’s only valid for three months, and it couldn’t get to Poland from Colombia in three months. It was just impossible for us.”

The couple, who live in Krakow, had been engaged for more than three years when Kujawińska heard about Denmark’s relatively relaxed marriage laws from a colleague. Working with an online wedding planner, the couple prepared the necessary documents.

“And in four days, we had the decision that the marriage could be done here,” a smiling Kujawińska said.

Newlyweds Magdalena Kujawińska, right, from Poland and Heinner Valenzuela from Colombia pose for photos at the Copenhagen City Hall in Copenhagen, Denmark. Wednesday 9 July 2025. (AP Photo/James Brooks)

Copenhagen attracts couples from around the world

Couples who don’t live in Denmark, both mixed- and same-sex, are increasingly getting married in the Scandinavian country — prompting some to dub Copenhagen the “Las Vegas of Europe.”

The head of the marriage office at Copenhagen City Hall, Anita Okkels Birk Thomsen, said that about 8,000 wedding ceremonies were performed there last year. Of those, some 5,400 of them were for couples in which neither partner was a Danish resident.

“That’s almost double what we saw five years ago,” she said. “They come from all over the world.”

City wants to ensure room for locals

But the city sees a downside to that: demand for ceremonies at City Hall now far exceeds the number of slots available.

Mia Nyegaard, the Copenhagen official in charge of culture and leisure, said in a statement to The Associated Press that the “significant rise” in the number of foreign couples getting married in the capital “poses challenges for Copenhagen-based couples wishing to get married.”

Local authorities plan to take action. Nyegaard said about 40% of wedding slots available at City Hall will be reserved for Copenhagen residents starting from the end of October. While booking a slot there is the most obvious way to get married in the city, arranging a ceremony with a private registrar is also an option, and that won’t be affected.

Copenhagen lawmakers will look after the summer break at what else they can do to relieve overall pressure on wedding capacity in the city.

People gather in front of the Copenhagen City Hall in Copenhagen, Denmark. Friday 18 July 2025. (AP Photo/James Brooks)

Liberal laws

Denmark’s marriage laws are liberal in several ways. In 1989, the country became the world’s first to allow the registration of same-sex civil unions. The legalization of same-sex marriage followed in 2012.

For unions of all kinds, Denmark — unlike many other European countries — doesn’t require a birth certificate or proof of single status to obtain a certificate that grants the right to get married in Denmark within four months. Officials might, in cases where divorce papers don’t show clearly that a divorce has been finalized, ask for a civil status certificate.

Applications to Denmark’s agency of family law cost 2,100 kroner ($326), and couples are issued with a certificate within five working days if they satisfy the requirements.

Non-resident couples can travel to Denmark and get married with just a valid passport and, if required, a tourist visa.

Related Articles

US sanctions Brazil’s Supreme Court justice overseeing case against Bolsonaro

Russian missiles hit a Ukrainian army training ground, killing at least 3 soldiers

US-imposed tariffs spelled disaster for this factory that exported clothes to American stores

Pope marks 50th anniversary of Cold War-era deal on security and human rights

Dozens of Palestinians killed by Israeli fire in Gaza, officials say, as hunger crisis grinds on

“We get that thing like, ‘Are you sure we do not need a birth certificate?’ And we go, ‘Yes,’” said Rasmus Clarck Sørensen, director of Getting Married in Denmark.

Clarck Sørensen, a Dane, began the wedding planning business with his British wife back in 2014.

“In the last 20, 30 years, people just meet more across borders,” he said. “Marriage rules are often made for two people of the same country getting married.”

“They kind of piled on patches onto marriage law, and a lot of people get trapped in those patches,” he added.

His online company’s “Complete Service” package, priced at 875 euros ($1,014), includes help gathering all the necessary documents, processing the certificate application and organizing the date of the ceremony.

The business says it helped over 2,600 couples last year.

Copenhagen, easily Denmark’s biggest city with the country’s best transport links, is the most popular location and so far appears to be the only one struggling with demand.

Any changes to the city’s rules will come too late to bother newlyweds Kujawińska and Valenzuela, who are now busy planning a celebration in Poland with family and friends.

“It means a lot for us because we’ve been waiting a lot for this,” Kujawińska said. “We’re really happy.”

By ELÉONORE HUGHES

RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — The U.S. Treasury Department said Wednesday it was imposing sanctions on Brazil’s Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes over alleged suppression of freedom of expression and the ongoing trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro.

Related Articles

Russian missiles hit a Ukrainian army training ground, killing at least 3 soldiers

As Trump’s tariff deadline looms, a clothing factory in the tiny African nation of Lesotho goes dark

Pope marks 50th anniversary of Cold War-era deal on security and human rights

Dozens of Palestinians killed by Israeli fire in Gaza, officials say, as hunger crisis grinds on

Birmingham gives an emotional farewell to Ozzy Osbourne as tearful family lead tributes

Bolsonaro is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat to current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Moraes oversees that case.

“De Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions — including against former President Jair Bolsonaro,” U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement.

The decision orders the freezing of any assets or property de Moraes may have in the U.S.

Brazil’s Supreme Court and the Presidential Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wednesday’s announcement follows the U.S. State Department’s announcement of visa restrictions on Brazilian judicial officials, including de Moraes, on July 18.

It also comes after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on Brazilian imported goods that is set to come into effect on Friday. In a letter announcing the tariff on July 9, Trump explicitly linked the import tax to what he called the “witch hunt” trial of Bolsonaro currently underway in Brazil.

Bolsonaro, a Trump ally, was hosted by the then-U.S. President at his Mar-a-Lago resort when both were in power in 2020.

Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america