Could This State Senate Runoff be a Tipping Point for Tarrant County? 

posted in: All news | 0

Even some of his most passionate supporters were surprised by the number of votes Democrat Taylor Rehmet received in the November special election for Texas Senate District 9. 

His competitors, Republicans Leigh Wambsganss and John Huffman, each had mountains of cash and the backing of major PACs and political players across Texas. Even so, Rehmet, an Air Force Veteran and president of the state’s International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers chapter, won nearly 48 percent of the vote—nearly enough for an outright win.

The Tarrant County seat, which covers the suburbs of Keller, North Richland Hills, and Southlake, and part of Fort Worth, was left open by longtime Republican state Senator Kelly Hancock, who resigned earlier this year to become the acting state comptroller. Last year, President Trump won that same district by 17 points. 

“That is not something you might’ve seen as recently as two cycles ago,” said Jason Villalba, a former North Texas Republican legislator who now runs a think tank focused on Latino voters, citing the area’s growing diversity. Backlash to the right-wing Republican candidates was another reason, experts say. 

Now, the January 31 runoff pits Rehmet against Wambsganss, a conservative activist and executive with Patriot Mobile, the Christian nationalist cell phone carrier in North Texas. It’s a race that encapsulates the most turbulent political storylines in Tarrant County, statewide and nationally. The special election in a solid red district is the sort of off-cycle contest that, in the Trump era, have served as bellwether for the national political climate. That’s especially so in this district, smack dab in the largest battleground county in Texas.  

“As Tarrant County goes, so goes Texas,” former Trump consigliere Steve Bannon, who is stumping for Wambsganss, recently said on his podcast. “And as Texas goes, so goes the world.”

EJ Carrion, a progressive activist based in Fort Worth, was chilled by those words from the onetime Trump strategist. He was also motivated. “If Tarrant County is the battleground for a democracy, then Fort Worth is the front lines,” he said. 

It would be difficult to find a more far-right candidate than Wambsganss, who was an architect of the Southlake ISD school board takeover. (Wambsganss’ campaign did not respond to the Observer’s questions for this story.)  

In 2020, she co-founded Southlake Families PAC, which funded school board candidates who killed the school district’s anti-racism plans. Patriot Mobile, the conservative Christian wireless provider where Wambsganss works as chief communications officer, has a PAC that also bankrolled right-wing school board candidates in Southlake, Grapevine, Keller, and Mansfield. 

Wambsganss’ politics are part of an increasingly powerful hardline faction in Tarrant County Republican politics, which has long been a hotbed for right-wingers. In the November election, she bested Southlake Mayor John Huffman, who had backing from more establishment elements of the state GOP as well as with big-money casino interests. The True Texas Project, whose endorsement Wambsganss lists on her website, is an influential Tarrant County-based organization that once claimed there is a “war on white America.”

Brian Mayes, a local Republican strategist, said Wambsganss’ failure to best Rehmet and secure the 50 percent necessary to avoid a runoff shows that people, including some GOP voters, are fed up with the school board controversies that have dominated North Texas politics in recent years. Candidates backed by Patriot Mobile’s PAC suffered big losses in May 2025 elections, Mayes pointed out.  

“I think their policies were so extreme, they caused so much trouble on the school board, that in just a short time period, voters were like, ‘Okay, yeah, we’ve seen enough. We’re done,’” Mayes said. 

Rehmet agrees that he couldn’t have done as well as he did in the November race without some Republican voters casting ballots for him. In an interview with the Texas Observer, Rehmet said that his opponent’s background creates a stark contrast in the runoff. “This is about values. If you look at me and you look at my opponent, we have totally different values. It’s about who’s going to answer to donors and who’s going to answer to the people.”

Still, Rehmet heads into the runoff at a significant monetary disadvantage, according to the last campaign finance reports from November. He raised $160,000—with his largest contribution coming from the Machinist union’s PAC at $15,000—and ended with less than $47,000. 

As of that same date, Wambsganss had spent over $1.3 million and received a total of $2.2 million. (The next campaign reports are not due until a week before the special election). 

Her top donor is Texans United for a Conservative Majority, which is financed by far-right megadonors Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks and provided over $400,000 to her campaign. She also received more than $350,000 from a PAC funded in part by Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, and another $300,000 from the Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC.

Mayes, the Republican strategist, said he expects even more money to pour into both sides of the race during the runoff—especially in its final weeks. “I think their plan is to not change any policy positions and to just double down on the spending,” Mayes said of the Wambsganss camp. With their spending, he added, the goal will be “to overwhelm the Democrat opponent with door knockers, texting, phone calls, the usual stuff you need to do in a runoff to get to vote, vote. And I think she’ll go even more negative.”

Meanwhile, Alexander Montalvo, a longtime grassroots organizer in Tarrant County, says “people power”—local organizing and get-out-the-vote messaging, for instance —was the key to Rehmet’s first victory. It’s the key to the runoff, too. 

“The most powerful thing that we will ever have is people,” he said. “I mean, our vote is powerful. Our dollars are powerful. All these assets we have that we can utilize are powerful, but nothing’s more powerful than just people.” 

Rehmet also emphasized how eager he is to reach across partisan lines. He’s spent months canvassing and making phone calls with voters, he said, and that means regular conversations with conservatives and registered Republicans. “I couldn’t have gotten 48 percent if I didn’t have conservatives believe in wanting something different,” he said. 

During her campaign, Wambsganss has largely focused on two issues: property taxes and public safety. In a November interview with CBS, she talked at length about giving Texans “property tax relief” and increasing the homestead exemption. Wambsganss’ website says she wants to ensure public schools are fully funded; it also touts her role in “one of the most impactful fights against Critical Race Theory in the country, advancing parental rights and transparency in education.” On election night in November, Wambsganss told the local CBS News affiliate: “My message has been consistent. I have over thirty years of fighting for faith, family and freedom.”

She added, “Texans are really, really sick and tired of being taxed out of their homes. Texans want secure borders. They want to support their first responders. And all parents in Texas want a good education for their kids. And the Republican message and the conservative policies and laws are good for all Texans.”

For his part, Rehmet told the Observer that he wants to increase teacher pay and hire more teaching assistants, as well as crack down on corporate price gouging and expand access to affordable healthcare and childcare. But first, he’ll have to win the January 31 runoff, then be elected once again later in 2026 before beginning a full state Senate term the following year.

Supporters like Carrion know they’re in for a difficult fight in the weeks ahead, especially since powerful right-wing political machines—at the local, state, and national level—are lining up behind Wambsganss. Carrion finds it particularly frustrating that the Fort Worth Professional Firefighters Association, a labor union, endorsed Wambsganss instead of the candidate with strong union bona fides. 

“They endorsed the book ban lady,” he said. “Like Fahrenheit 451. Do we remember what firefighters did? They burned books. It’s a little too real.” 

The post Could This State Senate Runoff be a Tipping Point for Tarrant County?  appeared first on The Texas Observer.

MN audit finds weak oversight, fraud risk in Human Service grants

posted in: All news | 0

The Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor says a program run within the state Department of Human Services does not have appropriate oversight of funds it is disbursing.

The report presented to a committee of lawmakers earlier this week found that the Behavioral Health Administration did not comply with certain requirements and did not have adequate internal control over grant funds.

The Behavioral Health Administration is a division of Human Services responsible for administering grants to programs meant to help children and adults treat different mental health conditions and substance abuse disorders. BHA partners with counties, providers and tribes to deliver services. The division has more than 200 employees.

During OLA’s audit, which spanned from July 2022 to December 2024, auditors visited different program sites, reviewed finances and spoke to BHA staff members. Within that time period, BHA managed 830 unique grant agreements that received $426 million in state and federal funding.

Key findings

Key findings include:

• BHA paid nearly $1 million to grantees for work performed before BHA completed its grant agreements.

• A majority of the grant recipients surveyed had missing or past-due progress reports.

• One grantee could not provide OLA with detailed invoices or data to support a payment of nearly $700,000 from BHA for a single month of work. The BHA grant manager who approved the payment left the agency a few days after approving the grant. The former BHA grant manager now works for the same grant recipient for whom they approved the nearly $700,000 grant.

• In a survey, the majority of staff said they did not receive sufficient training to manage grants.

• BHA paid nearly $300,000 to 11 grantees for unsupported costs and reimbursement requests with errors.

• BHA was not able to demonstrate that it had conducted required site visits to monitor how grant funding was disbursed.

‘It is frankly unacceptable’

Judy Randall, the state’s legislative auditor, noted that her team identified a number of documents BHA either backdated or created after the audit began. Because of this, OLA said they could not fully rely on documentation provided by the department.

“It is frankly unacceptable for the agencies we audit to do this type of activity,” Randall said. “In the 27 years I’ve been with OLA, I have never seen this before.”

During the hearing, temporary commissioner Shireen Gandhi said DHS is working to implement recommendations presented by OLA.

“The findings provide us with a roadmap for our focus going forward to continue strengthening oversight and integrity of behavioral health grants,” she said. “I take the report seriously, I accept responsibility for the findings.”

Gandhi could not answer specifically whether all BHA grantees were providing services to people who need it, but said DHS has the authority to cancel any contracts suspected of being fraudulent.

“The work that we’re doing now to shore up the internal controls is going to give me much greater confidence in the future in answering that question,” she said. “I think we strive to always achieve outcomes, and we are putting in tighter internal controls so that we can, with more confidence, tell you that we are achieving that with the dollars we’re spending.”

Questions on MN social service programs

The findings in the OLA come amid questions surrounding the integrity of Minnesota’s social service programs. On Monday, Gov. Tim Walz announced he would not seek a third term as allegations of fraud in child care centers garnered national attention.

Some members of the Legislative Audit Commission signaled the audit findings could be indicative of more fraud in another program run by DHS.

Related Articles


MN Republican lawmakers to testify on fraud before U.S. House panel


What will keep the Minnesota’s paid leave program free of fraud?


With Tim Walz bowing out of the 2026 governor’s race, what comes next?


Gov. Walz ends reelection bid amid pressure on fraud; Amy Klobuchar considers run


Nearly 12,000 apply for Minnesota’s paid leave program in first days

“We have another rogue agency that is acting not in the spirit and manner of the law but is rogue and working outside of the law,” said Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa. ”I just can’t believe what we have in this state government in the state of Minnesota.”

Last March, the Department of Human Services lost nearly $30 million in grant funding through Trump administration federal funding cuts. The grants included drug prevention programs in schools, treatment and recovery programs for mental health and substance use, and harm reduction strategies amid the nation’s opioid epidemic.

Pine Needles residency program refocuses as next group of artists and writers sought

posted in: All news | 0

The St. Croix Watershed Research Station in Marine on St. Croix is changing its focus this year for the Artist at Pine Needles residency program.

Only emerging artists and writers whose work explores the intersection of art, science and the natural world will be considered for this year’s residency program, which runs from May through October. Established artists are not eligible.

“This temporary focus reflects a strategic investment in early-career artists, providing them with time, resources and direct engagement with scientists to advance their creative work rooted in art-science inquiry,” said Alaina Fedie, senior operations manager for the St. Croix Watershed Research Station.

Applicants, who must be 21 or older, must have fewer than six years of exhibit and/or publication history in their medium, demonstrate clear artistic achievement in their work, and not be widely recognized as established artists by other artists, curators, critics or arts administrators, according to the application form.

Since 2002, more than 80 artists and writers have been offered residencies in the Pine Needles cabin, which was previously owned by James Taylor Dunn, a noted historian of the St. Croix River Valley. Dunn wanted the property to be used as a scholarly and artistic retreat.

A scientific illustrator, a mapmaker and a storyteller were among the artists selected last summer.

The selected artists must design and lead a community outreach project, such as a workshop, lecture or demonstration, and donate an original piece inspired by their residency experience to the St. Croix Watershed Research Station within one year of their residency.

Each artist will receive a stipend of $650/week while in residency and up to $600 in additional travel support.

Application packets are available from the research station, which is a department of the Science Museum of Minnesota, or at https://smm.org/scwrs/pine-needles/. The deadline is Feb. 22; decisions will be announced by March 31.

For more information, contact Alaina Fedie at 651-433-5953, staff ext. 12, or researchstation@smm.org.

Related Articles


Forest Lake man who authorities say posed as teen indicted for child pornography


Washington County Board plans response to rumored Woodbury immigrant detention center


Gen. Patton’s chaplain to be honored at Afton ham-radio event


Overnight rain leads to slick roads, school delays and closures


Stillwater man sentenced for sexually assaulting vulnerable adult

Trump threats against Greenland pose new, potentially unprecedented challenge to NATO

posted in: All news | 0

By LORNE COOK

BRUSSELS (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest threats against Greenland pose a new and potentially unprecedented challenge to NATO, perhaps even an existential one, for an alliance focused on external threats that could now face an armed confrontation involving its most powerful member.

The White House says the administration is weighing “options” that could include military action to take control of the strategically located and mineral-rich island, which is a semi-autonomous region that is part of NATO ally Denmark.

Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland could put at risk the entire future of NATO, which was founded in 1949 to counter the threat to European security posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The alliance is normally focused on threats such as those from Russia or international terror groups. It would not function without U.S. leadership and firepower.

NATO, the world’s biggest security organization, was built on a “Three Musketeers”-like vow that an attack on anyone in its ranks will be met with a response from all of them. That security guarantee, enshrined in Article 5 of its founding treaty, has kept Russia away from allied territory for decades.

But in an organization that operates on unanimity, Article 5 does not function if one member targets another.

Uneasy allies and neighbors Greece and Turkey have harassed each other’s military forces and disputed borders for decades. But past internal clashes have never posed the kind of threat to NATO unity that would arise from an American seizure of Greenland.

In a post on social media Wednesday, Trump said that “RUSSIA AND CHINA HAVE ZERO FEAR OF NATO WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES.” But he added: “We will always be there for NATO, even if they won’t be there for us.”

A White House warning

The White House took its threats toward Greenland to a new level Tuesday, issuing an official statement that insisted Greenland is “a national security priority” and refusing to rule out the use of military force.

“The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. military is always an option at the commander in chief’s disposal,” it said.

Ian Lesser, distinguished fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States think tank and an expert on NATO, described the White House statement as “very striking.”

“It’s a low-probability, high-consequence event if it were to happen. But the odds have changed, and so it becomes more difficult to simply dismiss this as bluster from the White House,” he said.

The statement came after the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain defended the sovereignty of Greenland, along with Denmark, whose right to the island was recognized by the U.S. government at the beginning of the 20th century.

“It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the leaders said Tuesday in a joint statement. Canada, which sits off the western coast of an island that has been crucial to the defense of North America since World War II, expressed its support as well.

NATO itself remains reluctant to say anything that might annoy its leading member.

Related Articles


US military action in Venezuela is seen as both a blessing and a curse for Russia’s Putin


US seizes 2 sanctioned oil tankers linked to Venezuela in the North Atlantic and the Caribbean


Philippines evacuates 3,000 villagers after volcano activity raises alert level


Trump leaves Venezuela’s opposition sidelined and Maduro’s party in power


Iran army chief threatens preemptive attack over ‘rhetoric’ targeting country after Trump’s comments

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has warned that the U.S. threat must be taken seriously, particularly after Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in a nighttime raid, and that any U.S. attempt to take control of the island could mean the end of NATO.

Asked whether Frederiksen was right when she said that an American attack on another NATO country means that “everything stops,” an official at the alliance said: “NATO does not speculate on hypotheticals.”

The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because NATO protocol forbids the use of their name, preferred to note Greenland’s strategic significance.

“The Arctic is an important region for our collective security, and NATO has a clear interest in preserving security, stability and cooperation in the high north,” the official said. “Together we make sure that the whole of the alliance is protected.”

Trump’s interest in Greenland also threatens to destabilize the alliance at the moment when the U.S.-led efforts to end the war in Ukraine enter a pivotal stage, distracting its members from their efforts to support Kyiv and provide it with security guarantees.

Maria Martisiute, a defense analyst at the European Policy Center think tank, warned that NATO’s credibility is on the line.

When a leading alliance member undermines another member, it hurts “NATO’s cohesion and credibility, and it serves only our adversaries such as Russia and China,” she said.

Tension comes after NATO leaders agreed to Trump’s demands

Last summer, NATO leaders rallied behind Trump’s demand that they increase defense spending. Apart from Spain, they agreed to invest as much per capita as the United States does, within a decade.

Just before Christmas, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte hailed Trump as a savior.

“I believe fundamentally that thanks to Donald J. Trump, NATO is stronger than it ever was,” Rutte told BBC radio. “NATO has never been as strong as this moment since the fall of the Berlin Wall.”

Yet in a year-end address in Germany meant to rally to European citizens behind defense spending, Rutte warned that Russia might attack elsewhere in Europe within a few years should it win in Ukraine.

“Conflict is at our door,” the former Dutch prime minister said. “Russia has brought war back to Europe, and we must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured.”

Lesser said it’s difficult to reconcile Trump’s defense spending victory with his designs on Greenland.

“What good is it to have revived NATO capability if it’s no longer a functional political alliance” afterwards? he asked. If that breakdown occurs, “it’s a gift to Moscow, and it’s a gift to Beijing.”

Associated Press journalist Mark Carlson in Brussels contributed to this report.