Movie review: ‘Bugonia’ is often uncomfortable and darkly funny

posted in: All news | 0

It’s the end of the world and our auteurs are making movies about it. From “One Battle After Another” to “Eddington” to “A House of Dynamite,” existential annihilation and how to face it are on the brain. And our favorite Greek director of feel-weird cinema, Yorgos Lanthimos, has the starkest and darkest take, with his alien invasion conspiracy freakout picture “Bugonia.”

“Bugonia” marks the filmmaker’s fourth collaboration with star Emma Stone, who levied her Oscar clout post “La La Land” to start making daring cinematic experiments with Lanthimos. She earned her second Oscar for their film “Poor Things” and effectively established a mandate on their outré oeuvre. In the past few years, Stone and Lanthimos have created a troupe of players with whom they have collaborated frequently, including the actors Jesse Plemons and Margaret Qualley, writers Tony McNamara and Efthimis Filippou (who has been writing with Lanthimos from the start) and composer Jerskin Fendrix.

Lanthimos’ films written with Filippou are dark, odd and abrasive, but unpredictable and anarchic in a strangely enchanting way. McNamara’s screenplays are equally strange and enchanting, but also florid, absurd and randy. With “Bugonia,” they bring a new player into the company, writer Will Tracy (who co-wrote “The Menu”).

Tracy’s script for “Bugonia” blends humor, tragedy and absurdism in the way most Lanthimos films do, but this is more of a biting contemporary social critique, drenched in sorrow. Rather than worlds of fantasy, period settings or outrageous schemes, “Bugonia” hits close to home. It is, in a way, despairing, which is a new register for this master of tone.

It’s remarkable how far Stone is willing to push audiences with her characters, showcasing sharper, more unpleasant sides of range. This is perhaps her most unlikable character yet, and she spends the majority of the movie with a shaved head, covered in white grease paint.

Stone stars as Michelle, a self-optimization-obsessed girlboss CEO of a large biomedical company. We meet her through the eyes of her enemy, Teddy (Jesse Plemons), a lowly employee in the shipping division of Michelle’s company, who is convinced she’s an alien.

Specifically, Teddy believes Michelle to be an Andromedon, plotting to create a kind of “colony collapse disorder” (as in honeybees) among human beings on Earth; queen dead, worker bees blown to the wind, atomized, isolated, buzzing alone, without purpose. Teddy has been doing a lot of reading online, you see. He’s blasted through an array of political ideologies and now remains focused on his purpose of saving the planet by vanquishing—or at least negotiating with—the Andromedons. The first thing he has to do is kidnap Michelle.

It becomes immediately clear that Teddy is a man in crisis. He’s suffered traumas both recent and as a child, and his mother (Alicia Silverstone) is in a coma, the result of a drug trial orchestrated by Michelle’s company. His only companion is his cousin Don (Aidan Delbis), a young innocent who just wants to help Teddy, who serves as a Greek chorus/audience surrogate (and a representative of Lanthimos’ interest in childlike adults). As Teddy explains his plans to Don, he explains them to us, the audience, while Don asks the obvious questions and offers sympathy to the tortured Teddy.

Once the pair have Michelle in their lair, the film becomes a chamber piece, confined to Teddy and Don’s claustrophobic home. It’s like a play, as two titans of acting, Stone and Plemons, go toe-to-toe in the basement. Michelle is more cunning, figuring out how to play these two to her whims, while Teddy struggles to prove her extraterrestrial origins. He is a paranoid lunatic, but to Stone’s credit, we waffle on if she is an Andromedon or not.

Locked in with these two, “Bugonia” is often uncomfortable and darkly funny, and the film plays an uneasy game of cat-and-mouse with its twists and turns. It shocks but it also proceeds the only way it can go, and somehow ends up in a profoundly goofy place. For the majority of the run time, “Bugonia” is the kind of film you respect more than you enjoy, as the archness and absurdity of Stone’s character is too dissonant with the sincerity of Teddy’s sadness at the core of this story.

But there is a bigger intelligence at play here, of course. It’s not until the final moments of the film, in a series of truly Lanthimos-ian tableaus, that everything snaps into crystal clear focus and it all makes sense. While the end he imagines is starkly shocking, it’s also weirdly kind, perhaps the best version of the end that anyone could possibly imagine. In Yorgos Lanthimos’ end of the world as we know it, it just might be fine.

‘Bugonia’

2 1/2 stars out of 4

Running time: 2 hours

Rated R for bloody violent content including a suicide, grisly images and language.

Where to watch: in theaters Friday, Oct. 24

Related Articles


Review: Tessa Thompson is the ultimate restless housewife in a viciously updated ‘Hedda’


At Twin Cities Jewish Film Festival, local and global voices bring Jewish stories to the screen


North Oaks girl represents Minnesota at Miss Teen USA pageant


What to stream: Music biopics


Movie review: ‘Springsteen’ is more character study than biopic

The Loop NFL Picks: Week 8

posted in: All news | 0

Packers at Steelers (+3½)
Estranged quarterback Aaron Rodgers is back at Lambeau Field to face his old team. Green Bay moving on from its QB in favor of young Jordan Love may be the greatest example of addition by subtraction since Jennifer Lopez dumped Alex Rodriguez.
Pick: Packers by 7

(L-R) Jennifer Lopez and Alex Rodriguez attend the 26th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at The Shrine Auditorium on Jan. 19, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

Titans at Colts (-14½)
Former Minnesota backup Daniel Jones has Indianapolis at an NFL-leading 6-1. It’s a stark reminder that the 2024 Vikings had two quarterbacks much better than J.J. McCarthy and Carson Wentz.
Pick: Colts by 17

Indianapolis Colts quarterback Daniel Jones (17) scores a touchdown during the second half of an NFL football game against the Miami Dolphins on Sunday, Sept. 7, 2025, in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

49ers at Texans (+1½)
The Niners this week cut veteran receiver Marques Valdez-Scantling. If this is the end of the road for the former Packers wideout, he ends his career with 209 receptions and the NFL record for Scrabble name score.
Pick: 49ers by 10

Marquez Valdes-Scantling..#83 of the San Francisco 49ers reacts in front of Tykee Smith #23 of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers during the second quarter in the game at Raymond James Stadium on Oct. 12, 2025 in Tampa, Florida. (Photo by Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)

Dolphins at Falcons (-7½)
Donald Trump reportedly is considering a pardon of Diddy after commuting the prison sentence of former GOP representative George Santos. Despite the president’s newfound affection for clemency, he has no plans to pardon Miami’s criminally bad coach, general manager or quarterback.
Pick: Falcons by 21

Head coach Mike McDaniel of the Miami Dolphins looks on prior to a game against the Cleveland Browns at Huntington Bank Field on Oct. 19, 2025 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Nick Cammett/Getty Images)

Buccaneers at Saints (+5½)
Tampa Bay is tied for the NFC lead despite losing in Detroit on Monday night. The Bucs’ schedule is so favorable the rest of the season that they might be able to clinch a playoff berth before Ghislaine Maxwell’s Christmas Eve pardon.
Pick: Buccaneers by 7

Baker Mayfield #6 of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers throws a pass against the Seattle Seahawks during the first half at Lumen Field on Oct. 05, 2025 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Soobum Im/Getty Images)

Commanders at Chiefs (-10½)
Kansas City’s Andy Reid is coming off the first regular-season shutout of his NFL career. The Chiefs’ coach, though, is much more proud of never getting shut out at Pizza Ranch.
Pick: Chiefs by 9

Head coach Andy Reid of the Kansas City Chiefs talks with an official during the second quarter against the Las Vegas Raiders in the game at Arrowhead Stadium on Oct. 19, 2025 in Kansas City, Missouri. (Photo by David Eulitt/Getty Images)

Bills at Panthers (+7½)
Carolina is a surprising 4-3 thanks, in large part, to an easy early schedule. Tar Heel State fans will no doubt start paying more attention to the young Panthers once they get bored with making fun of Bill Belichick.
Pick: Bills by 11

Head coach Bill Belichick of the North Carolina Tar Heels and Jordon Hudson look on prior to the game against the Richmond Spiders at Kenan Memorial Stadium on Sept. 13, 2025 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. (Photo by Lance King/Getty Images)

Cowboys at Broncos (-3½)
Former Denver quarterback Russell Wilson called Sean Payton “classless” after his postgame comments last Sunday. While Wilson made his point, it had little effect on the Denver coach who, in the fourth quarter against Wilson’s Giants, made 33 points.
Pick: Broncos by 7

Denver Broncos head coach Sean Payton talks with Denver Broncos quarterback Russell Wilson (3) during a preseason NFL football game against the Los Angeles Rams Saturday, Aug. 26, 2023, in Denver. (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey)

Giants at Eagles (-7½)
New Jersey’s own Bruce Springsteen is the subject of a new biopic opening this week. The film about the rock legend lasts about 120 minutes, which is enough time for the Meadowlands Giants to give up 264 points.
Pick: Eagles by 17

Jeremy Allen White and Bruce Springsteen attend the “Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere” Headline Gala at the 69th BFI London Film Festival at The Royal Festival Hall on Oct. 15, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Stuart C. Wilson/Getty Images for BFI)

Browns at Patriots (-7½)
Cleveland routed Miami last week thanks to another big game from rookie running back Quinshon Judkins. It’s looking increasingly likely that the Browns’ Most Valuable Player this season will be Judkins’ lawyer.
Pick: Patriots by 11

Quinshon Judkins #10 of the Cleveland Browns rushes for a touchdown against the Miami Dolphins during the fourth quarter of the game at Huntington Bank Field on Oct. 19, 2025 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)

Other games

Jets at Bengals (-6½)
Pick: Bengals by 7

Bears at Ravens (-6½)
Pick: Ravens by 3

Bye week

Cardinals, Lions, Jaguars, L.A. Rams, Raiders, Seahawks

Record

Week 7
11-4 straight up
10-5 vs. spread

Season
65-42-1 straight up (.607)
55-53 vs. spread (.509)

All-time (2003-25)
3884-2143-15 straight up (.644)
2965-2932-145 vs spread (.503)

You can hear Kevin Cusick on Thursdays on Bob Sansevere’s “BS Show” podcast on iTunes. You can follow Kevin on X– @theloopnow. He can be reached at kcusick@pioneerpress.com.

Related Articles


The Loop Fantasy Football Report Week 8: Big bye week strikes


The Loop Fantasy Football Update Week 7: Last-minute moves


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 7


The Loop Fantasy Football Update Week 6: Last-minute moves


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 6

Editorial: Trump’s Santos commutation is typically contemptuous of ‘law and order’

posted in: All news | 0

The pantheon of problematic presidential pardons has always cut across partisan lines.

Former President Joe Biden’s pre-emptive pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, was among the most brazen examples ever of a president putting family loyalty above presidential duty. Barack Obama’s commutation of the prison sentence of Army private and document-leaker Chelsea Manning was widely condemned as a live threat to national security. Bill Clinton’s pardon of major Democratic donor Marc Green was so suspect that it spawned a federal investigation.

As is so often the case in the Trump era, our current president has managed to take one of the most historically abused elements of presidential power and turn it up to 11. Then to 12, then to 13.

President Donald Trump’s commutation last week of the prison sentence of former U.S. congressman and prodigious fraudster George Santos is by no means this president’s most appalling abuse of clemency. But it does stand as yet another reminder that to Trump, the old Republican mantle of “law and order” means nothing — that slavish fealty to Trump’s political movement, and to himself personally, is all that matters.

Santos was the Republican political novice who shocked everyone by winning a House seat in a traditionally Democratic New York district — and who was then promptly revealed as having fabricated virtually his entire personal, educational and business history.

No, Santos wasn’t a wealthy real estate mogul. No, he didn’t work at top-flight Wall Street banking firms. No, his parents didn’t flee the Holocaust. No, his mother didn’t die as a result of the 9/11 attacks. And, yes, this compulsive fabulist did in fact embezzle campaign funds from his own donors to fund a lavish lifestyle, did commit identity theft and did fraudulently collect pandemic unemployment benefits.

After being expelled from the House on a strongly bipartisan vote, Santos pleaded guilty to defrauding his donors. He was sentenced to more than seven years in prison. Case closed.

Or it should have been. Trump on Friday commuted Santos’ sentence with what included bluntly, crassly partisan reasoning.

Don’t take our word for it. The president’s announcement on Truth Social specified that part of his rationale was that Santos “had the Courage, Conviction, and Intelligence to ALWAYS VOTE REPUBLICAN!” As if one’s party affiliation should be a factor in whether one stays incarcerated.

Presidential pardons have at times been used in noble ways: Jimmy Carter’s mass pardons of Vietnam War draft evaders come to mind, as does Obama’s mass pardon of nonviolent drug offenders. Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon was controversial, but its stated purpose of helping America move on from the national trauma of Watergate wasn’t unreasonable.

Contrast that with Trump’s blanket pardon of the more than 1,500 supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Many of them physically attacked police officers and directly threatened members of Congress; all of them were attempting to prevent the peaceful transfer of presidential power.

This was undoubtedly the most deplorable abuse of presidential pardon power in America’s history.

Trump’s use of that power was typically corrupt even before that grotesque stunt. From cronies like Roger Stone, Steve Bannon and Paul Manafort to fellow shysters like former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (a self-described “Trump-o-crat”), the lengthy list of mercy from Trump reads like a who’s-who of the worst in American politics.

Trump’s mercy extends not just to political supporters but to those who share his most dehumanizing instincts. They include former Arizona Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, best known for tormenting Latinos in his jurisdiction, and four U.S. service members convicted in relation to the killing of 14 unarmed Iraqi civilians.

In the case of Santos, Trump’s misdirected mercy will be expensive for Santos’ fraud victims. Trump’s order specifies that Santos will no longer have to make restitution — meaning he’s off the hook for some $370,000 the courts had ordered him to pay up.

A key issue in clemency for those who are clearly guilty of their crimes should be whether they are contrite. In Santos’ case, that question was answered starkly when he was asked whether he would attempt to make restitution anyway: “If it’s required of me by the law, yes,” Santos told CNN. “If it’s not, then, no.” Meaning, thanks to Trump, Santos’ victims won’t be getting one red cent.

Even some of Trump’s GOP congressional supporters are voicing disappointment at Santos’ commutation — but don’t expect more than a little grumbling. That they are willing, again and again, to accept this politicized abuse of mercy and move on should banish them forever from uttering the phrase “law and order.”

— The St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Related Articles


Virginia Democrats will try to reshape US House districts in counter to Trump’s redistricting push


What lawmakers are saying about Trump’s demolition of the East Wing


Watch those texts! Smartphones emerging as a new way for public figures to get into hot water


Deadly semitrailer crash in California renews federal criticism of immigrant truck drivers


Some furloughed workers will return to manage health insurance open enrollment as shutdown drags on

Lionel Laurent: Louvre robbery gang used a brazen new criminal blueprint

posted in: All news | 0

A ladder truck, an angle-grinder, a maxi-scooter and seven minutes. That appears to be all it took for thieves to nab priceless jewelry from the Louvre, the world’s most-visited museum. The vulnerability of this cornerstone of French soft power adds to the country’s sense of malaise, and fingers are being pointed over apparent security flaws.

But it speaks to something much broader, too: Criminals’ boundless hunger for gold and other precious metals and gems — not fine art — as the value of these commodities soars.

Museum raids are becoming ever more audacious as the gold price has doubled in a year — and jumped tenfold in two decades. A stampede of investors fleeing erstwhile safe assets such as government bonds is making real stuff you can keep in safes or vaults hugely desirable. The smash and grabbers are taking note. Just last month thieves used a blow torch and an angle-grinder to steal $699,000 worth of gold nuggets from the Paris Natural History Museum.

And back in November four masked men brazenly smashed display cases in the Cognacq-Jay Museum in the French capital and made off with seven 18th-century snuff boxes. Five of the seven have been recovered, according to Paris’s museum association, but people working in this corner of the art world are in a state of perpetual anxiety.

Is France a soft touch? Three heists in the space of a year does start to look careless. Louvre employees have warned about staff shortages before and they went on strike in June. But nowhere looks secure. In January robbers blew up the door to the Drents Museum in the Netherlands to loot artifacts including a gold helmet from around 450 BC.

Some thieves have started to break down stolen gold in the getaway van, ready for smelting, according to accounts from the art-dealing fraternity. A $6 million gold toilet was ripped out of England’s Blenheim Palace a few years back, ostensibly for its metal value.

The shambolic nature of the Louvre caper suggests a new level of boldness for even the lower reaches of organized crime as they look for a slice of a booming market for illicit art and antiquities, estimated at $2 billion-$6 billion.

Like cybercrime and digital currency scams, it’s all an unhappy byproduct of our increasingly cashless existence. With fewer banks to rob and less money held in shop registers, those who like to do their thieving in the real world have been turning to newly loaded cryptocurrency entrepreneurs or looking for easily lifted items like top-end watches. Art exhibits now find themselves at the more rarefied end of this unpleasant business.

This will only add to the misery of small museums, three out of five of whom say they’re worried about their future as footfall declines and costs rise. How can they fund extra security in that environment? What makes the Louvre a “slap in the face” for all museums, as art detective Christopher Marinello puts it, is that if it can happen to the grand old lady of such establishments, what hope do others have? It has already been slated to receive a lavish $900 million-plus makeover. The less exalted won’t be so lucky.

What happens next? The entire French state has been put into gear to track down the miscreants. The tiaras, brooch, necklaces and earrings from the collection of Empress Eugénie and assorted royals may be difficult to launder even if they’re broken apart and sold in hard-to-identify pieces. Security measures will be beefed up. The art community is on red alert.

But what can it do to stop the next band of chancers? Museums will need to be far more careful about crudely luring visitors with the value of their exhibits, as will collectors. Magistrates will be under pressure to hand down tough sentences to deter copycats.

And outsiders are not the only threat. The British Museum sacked a staff member in 2023 after about 2,000 treasures were reported missing, stolen or damaged. It’s all very different from the epoch-defining theft of the Mona Lisa from the Louvre a century ago, which ended up inflating its legend. With today’s Arsene Lupins having their eye squarely on shiny metals and not Da Vincis, it looks like the gold boom has made philistines of us all.

Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.

Related Articles


John M. Crisp: How do you know when you’ve become an autocracy?


Allison Schrager: The era of the illiquid millionaire is here


Nafees Alam: The post-Trump GOP — potentially the party of the sensible center


Bret Stephens: Why Mamdani frightens Jews like me


Ross Douthat: Amy Coney Barrett is looking beyond the Trump era