The St. Paul and Minnesota Foundation announced Tuesday that its board of directors has selected a new leader for the organization.

Chanda Smith Baker will take over as the next president and CEO of the Saint Paul and Minnesota Foundation, the organization announced July 15, 2025. (Courtesy of the Saint Paul and Minnesota Foundation)

After a national search, the board has selected Chanda Smith Baker to serve as its next president and CEO, the foundation announced.

“I am deeply honored and humbled by the opportunity to serve as President and CEO of the St. Paul and Minnesota Foundation,” Smith Baker said in the announcement. “As someone whose family roots run deep in Minnesota, this moment feels both personal and profound. What has always moved me about the Foundation is its unwavering commitment to listening — with compassion, humility and intention.”

Smith Baker has served on several boards and previously held roles including chief impact officer at the Minneapolis Foundation and CEO of Pillsbury United Communities, per the release. She also helped launch the Black Collective Foundation MN, the state’s first Black community foundation, and North Market, a full-service community grocery store and wellness center in Minneapolis.

Most recently she led her own leadership company, called Smith Baker, that offers business solutions like executive coaching, strategic consulting and community engagement initiatives.

Past clients of Smith Baker include Treasure Island Resort and Casino, the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which seeks to end discriminatory jailing and pays pre-trial bail and immigration bonds for those who can’t afford it, and the St. Paul-based Sanneh Foundation, which aims to empower youth through access to education, programming and resources.

Since its inception in 1940 following the Great Depression, the St. Paul and Minnesota Foundation has given out nearly $2 billion and last year distributed over 9,500 grants, making it the largest community foundation in the state.

The foundation has also been at the forefront of initiatives like GiveMN, a first-of-its-kind website that launched in 2009 that gave Minnesotans a simple way to donate to their favorite causes.

Eric J. Jolly, the current president of the foundation, announced his retirement earlier this year after a decade at the helm of the foundation.

Related Articles

Beacon Interfaith weighs in on Bimosedaa, Kimball Court homeless housing

Ramsey County investigating alleged role of 2 directors in hotel business caring for homeless

Science Museum of Minnesota to end its popular summer camps

‘Stuff the Bus’ collects school supplies for Stillwater area students

Science Museum of Minnesota lets go 43 people, downsizes by $7 million

Jolly oversaw the merger between the St. Paul Foundation and the Minnesota Community Foundation and said he focused on generosity, advancing equity and investing in community-led solutions.

“The Foundation’s vital work will not just continue, it will undoubtedly flourish under Chanda’s leadership,” Jolly said in the release. “I’ve long admired her ability to work in collaboration with a broad range of stakeholders to create enduring solutions and outcomes. Her distinguished career, bridging sectors and geographies, illustrates her embodiment of the Foundation’s central value: Community is our compass.”

Jolly plans to remain in Minnesota once retired and will continue to serve the community through his involvement with organizations including Augsburg College, National Academy of Engineering and Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, according to his retirement announcement.

Smith Baker is expected to begin her new role Aug. 25.

AUBURN, Calif. (AP) — Retired MLB pitcher Daniel Serafini has been convicted of first-degree murder and attempted murder in the shootings of his wife’s parents during a burglary at their home four years ago near Lake Tahoe in California.

Related Articles

A Florida county leads the way with a high-tech 911 system that improves emergency response

‘What if we stay in Mexico?’ With chances in the US dashed, migrants make new lives south of border

From ‘No Nukes’ to Nuclear Now: The progressive energy flip

Chicago father becomes face of lawsuit against ICE as judge hears challenge to warrantless arrests

Murder trial begins for Colorado dentist accused of poisoning wife’s protein shakes

A Placer County jury on Monday found the 51-year-old guilty of killing his father-in-law, Gary Spohr, and severely wounding his mother-in-law, Wendy Wood, on June 5, 2021, at their home on the lake’s west shore. Wood received extensive rehabilitation but died a year after the shooting.

Serafini also was convicted of first-degree burglary.

Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney Richard Miller, who prosecuted the case, told jurors that Serafini hated his wife’s wealthy parents and was heard saying he was willing to pay $20,000 to have them killed, the Sacramento Bee reported.

A left-hander, Serafini was drafted in 1992 by the Minnesota Twins. He also played for the Chicago Cubs, San Diego Padres, Pittsburgh Pirates, Cincinnati Reds and Colorado Rockies.

The jury was shown transcripts of angry emails and text messages between Serafini and his in-laws in which they were involved in a heated, ongoing dispute over a $1.3 million loan to help fund his wife’s fledgling horse ranch business, the Bee reported.

Defense attorney David Dratman argued that there was no physical evidence linking Serafini to the crime scene, noting that security camera footage showed a masked intruder entering the couple’s home who appeared to be younger with a smaller body frame than the former baseball player.

Dratman told the jury that although his client had a rocky relationship with his in-laws, the couple was generous with Serafini and his wife, loaning them money and treating them to lavish vacations. “Does that provide a motive for murder? That’s killing the golden goose,” Dratman said in his closing argument.

Dratman declined to comment about the verdict.

Serafini faces a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole when he is sentenced Aug. 18.

In a letter addressed to the state’s Department of Transportation, Bronx residents called adding a mile-long stretch to the Cross Bronx Expressway a “dangerous and unacceptable” solution to renovating some of its aging infrastructure.

A rendering of the one of the possibilities under consideration, which would build a traffic diversion “connector” road with a series of sub-options for its uses (NYSDOT)

A proposal to repair five Cross Bronx Expressway (CBE) bridges along Interstate 95, that could involve building a mile-long, highway-like structure over the Bronx River and Starlight Park to bypass traffic, is shaking up members of the Bronx community.

More than two dozen community organizations delivered a letter to the state’s Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) last week urging the department to skip the added structure and repair the bridges instead with minimal impact to the community. 

Adding to the expressway, which is already considered one of the most congested roads in the nation, could amp up pollution in a neighborhood where children face higher rates of asthma-related hospital visits than any other borough.

“I have real fears. I know many kids in our neighborhood have asthma and are getting sent to the hospital on a regular basis. I don’t want that for my kid,” said Victoria Toro, a Bronx-born and raised outreach manager at the non-profit Bronx River Alliance.

The NYSDOT has presented two possible solutions to modernize the bridges that are still up for discussion. One includes building a so-called traffic diversion “connector” road with a series of sub-options for its uses—including the possibility of a bike and pedestrian path—while the second solution skips the connector road and suggests standard bridge repairs instead.

But officials argued that construction plans would be reduced by two years with option one, and the state has already been awarded a $150 million federal grant to build the connector road, spreading fears among residents that the DOT will choose that approach.

“The project is not an expansion of the expressway and a number of options are being considered to accommodate existing expressway traffic and improve bike/pedestrian connectivity,” a DOT spokesperson said in an email. 

“The NYSDOT is committed to robust community engagement at every step in the process and the selection of an option will be informed by public input.”

Option 1 would build a “traffic diversion structure” adjacent to the expressway. (NYSDOT)

Community members have already offered criticism for the current proposal. Especially since the traffic diversion structure in option one would pass right by Bronx River Houses, a public housing complex that over 3,000 residents call home. 

“Currently, the air pollution from the Cross Bronx Expressway is so toxic that those of us who live in Bronx River Houses cannot open our windows. Ever,” Norma Saunders, president of the Tenant Association for Bronx River Houses, said in a press release.

“The idea that the State wants to make it wider to add traffic and bring it even closer to our homes is like a death threat,” she added.

Option one or option two?

Constructed between 1947 and 1958, the CBE’s five corroding bridges are nearing the end of their service life as many of their steel and concrete parts are deteriorating.

To tackle the problem, DOT is working on an environmental assessment that analyzes the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of two possible solutions.

A draft of the assessment will be published sometime later this year, according to the DOT. And after a public comment period concludes, it will release a final draft with a decision on which solution was chosen. The timeline for construction will be determined when this process wraps, the department says.

Option one includes building a “connector road” to divert traffic between Boston Road and Rosedale Avenue, which officials say will be necessary to allow cars to bypass construction while bridge renovations are underway. After construction wraps, however, DOT suggests keeping the structure and converting it into a permanent road. 

Those who oppose the addition of the connector road fear that it would harm the Bronx River beneath it and contribute to poorer air quality in the neighborhood.  

The letter delivered by Bronx community groups to the DOT calls option one “dangerous and unacceptable.” Adding the parallel roadway will increase heat to the river habitat, they argue, and increase the need to manage stormwater “which is currently not properly controlled from existing highway infrastructure.”

A hot bed for industrial activity since the 1800s, the Bronx River already receives 455 million gallons of untreated sewage a year, and residents fear it will face more pollution with new construction. 

The Bronx River runs underneath the Cross Bronx Expressway, prompting local concerns about the impact of construction on the local waterway. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

Industrial warehouses and traffic congestion also contribute to elevated levels of air pollution in the region. One recent study that tracked air pollution throughout the course of a day found that “the Bronx has the worst air quality of any New York City borough”.

To ease concerns raised by the community, DOT told City Limits that the Bronx River would be protected via appropriate soil erosion and sediment control measures. And the agency promised to conduct an air quality analysis as part of its environmental assessment to evaluate the potential impacts of traffic pattern changes to air quality. 

Plus, option one includes a series of possible uses for the connector once construction is completed that could allow for less traffic congestion. DOT’s menu of alternate uses for the road include a mix of approaches, from having a four lane highway with general traffic lanes alongside a bus corridor to a smaller bike- and pedestrian-only path.

Still, community members aren’t convinced. They explain in their letter to the DOT that option two, which doesn’t include the traffic diversion structure, is a better alternative. 

The second option would include instead a series of standard repairs to the deteriorating bridges like the Boston Road Bridge. And it would add some smaller structures, like a new ramp from the southbound Bronx River Parkway to the westbound Cross Bronx Expressway, plus a new roundabout on Sheridan Boulevard.

The letter does, however, take issue with some aspects of that option as well. Residents don’t like that it includes the construction of a shared-use path along the CBE that would connect the Bronx River Greenway to local streets. 

The path “would be unusable due to its isolation and proximity to the Cross Bronx traffic,” the letter says. By adding this extra stretch, the state would be saddling themselves with “an additional maintenance burden” that would only “further widen the Expressway’s mainline” and leave it “vulnerable to future use by private vehicles.”

Option 2 would include instead a series of standard repairs to the deteriorating bridges. And it would add some smaller structures, like a new ramp from the southbound Bronx River Parkway to the westbound Cross Bronx Expressway, plus a new roundabout on Sheridan Boulevard. (NYSDOT)

Making the connection 

On the other hand, the state argues that the neighborhood needs to be better connected so that people and goods can get from east to west with more ease.  

A disconnected and irregular street grid, plus the fact that Bronx subway lines only run north to south, contribute to the problem. 

But community and environmental advocates say there are other ways to get people and goods from east to west without adding more highways. 

The Bronx River Alliance, for one, is cooking up a list of granular recommendations for the DOT on how to enhance east-to-west connectivity for commuters by improving current streets and adding new pedestrian and bike routes.

They also point out that the surrounding waterways should be used more as an alternate route to moving commercial goods around the area. They urge the city to invest more in its Blue Highway program, which encourages waterborne freight transportation by private companies.

Environmental advocates also note that the city should be thinking of the bridge repairs as a chance to come up with new, creative solutions to the city’s larger congestion problem.

“We support prioritizing safety by replacing the bridges,” said Tiffany-Ann Taylor, vice president for transportation at the Regional Plan Association. 

“But in the same vein, this is an opportunity to think about how we are moving goods and people in our region, and if our policies align with our future goals of reducing our dependency on roadway infrastructure,” she added.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Mariana@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post ‘I Have Real Fears’: Bronx Community Members Blast Proposal to Add More Road to Cross Bronx Expressway appeared first on City Limits.

By TIA GOLDENBERG

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government suffered a serious blow on Tuesday when an ultra-Orthodox party announced it was bolting the coalition.

Related Articles

EU ministers request more detail from Israel on aid deal for Gaza

Israeli strikes kill at least 31 in Gaza as UN agencies warn of fuel crisis

A recap of the trial over the Trump administration’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus protesters

Europe unveils deal for more food and fuel for Gaza. Israeli strike kills 15 waiting outside clinic

What to know as Yemen’s Houthi rebels launch new, more violent attacks on ships in the Red Sea

While this doesn’t immediately threaten Netanyahu’s rule, it could set in motion his government’s demise, although that could still be months away. It also could complicate efforts to halt the war in Gaza.

United Torah Judaism’s two factions said they were leaving the government because of disagreements over a proposed law that would end broad exemptions for religious students from enlistment into the military.

Military service is compulsory for most Jewish Israelis, and the issue of exemptions has long divided the country. Those rifts have only widened since the start of the war in Gaza as demand for military manpower has grown and hundreds of soldiers have been killed.

The threat to the government “looks more serious than ever,” said Shuki Friedman, vice president of the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank.

Netanyahu is on trial for alleged corruption, and critics say he wants to hang on to power so that he can use his office as a bully pulpit to rally supporters and lash out against prosecutors and judges. That makes him all the more vulnerable to the whims of his coalition allies.

Here is a look at Netanyahu’s political predicament and some potential scenarios:

The ultra-Orthodox are key partners

Netanyahu, Israel’s longest serving leader, has long relied on the ultra-Orthodox parties to prop up his governments.

Without UTJ, his coalition holds just 61 out of parliament’s 120 seats. That means Netanyahu will be more susceptible to pressure from other elements within his government, especially far-right parties who strongly oppose ending the war in Gaza.

The political shake up isn’t likely to completely derail ceasefire talks, but it could complicate how flexible Netanyahu can be in his concessions to Hamas, which has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada and the European Union.

A second ultra-Orthodox party is also considering bolting the government over the draft issue. That would give Netanyahu a minority in parliament and make governing almost impossible.

The ultra-Orthodox military exemptions have divided Israel

A decades-old arrangement by Israel’s first prime minister granted hundreds of ultra-Orthodox men exemptions from compulsory Israeli service. Over the years, those exemptions ballooned into the thousands and created deep divisions in Israel.

The ultra-Orthodox say their men are serving the country by studying sacred Jewish texts and preserving centuries’ old tradition. They fear that mandatory enlistment will dilute adherents’ connection to the faith.

But most Jewish Israelis see the exemption as unfair, as well as the generous government stipends granted to many ultra-Orthodox men who study instead of work throughout adulthood. That bitterness has only worsened during nearly two years of war.

The politically powerful ultra-Orthodox parties have long had outsize influence in Israel’s fragmented political system and used that status to extract major concessions for their constituents.

But a court last year ruled Netanyahu’s government must enlist the ultra-Orthodox so long as there is no new law codifying the exemptions.

Netanyahu’s coalition has been trying to find a path forward on a new law. But his base is largely opposed to granting sweeping draft exemptions and a key lawmaker has stood in the way of giving the ultra-Orthodox a law they can get behind, prompting their exit.

The political shake up comes during Gaza ceasefire talks

The resignations don’t take effect for 48 hours, so Netanyahu will likely spend the next two days seeking a compromise. But that won’t be easy because the Supreme Court has said the old system of exemptions amounts to discrimination against the secular majority.

That does not mean the government will collapse.

Netanyahu’s opponents cannot submit a motion to dissolve parliament until the end of the year because of procedural reasons. And with parliament’s summer recess beginning later this month, the parties could use that time to find a compromise and return to the government.

Cabinet Minister Miki Zohar, from Netanyahu’s Likud party, said he was hopeful the religious party could be coaxed back to the coalition. “God willing, everything will be fine,” he said. A Likud spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Once the departures become official, Netanyahu will have a razor-thin majority. The far-right parties within it could threaten to leave the coalition, further weakening him, if he gives in to too many of Hamas’ demands.

Hamas wants a permanent end to the war as part of any ceasefire deal. Netanyahu’s hard-line partners are open to a temporary truce, but say the war cannot end until Hamas is destroyed.

If they or any other party leave the coalition, Netanyahu will have a minority government, and that will make it almost impossible to govern and likely lead to its collapse. But he could still find ways to approve a ceasefire deal, including with support from the political opposition.

Israel may be on the path toward early elections

Netanyahu could seek to shore up his coalition by appeasing the far-right and agreeing for now to just a partial, 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, promising his governing partners that he can still resume the war once it expires.

But Netanyahu is balancing those political constraints with pressure from the Trump administration, which is pressing Israel to wrap up the war.

Gayil Talshir, a political scientist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said she expects Netanyahu to work during those 60 days to shift the narrative away from the draft exemptions and the war in Gaza, toward something that could potentially give him an electoral boost – like an expansion of U.S.-led normalization deals between Israel and Arab or Muslim countries.

Once the 60-day ceasefire is up, Netanyahu could bend to U.S. pressure to end the war and bring home the remaining hostages in Gaza — a move most Israelis would support.

Elections are currently scheduled for October 2026. But if Netanyahu feels like he has improved his political standing, he may want to call elections before then.