Authorities arrested a 34-year-old man Thursday in connection with the fatal shootings of three people in South Minneapolis, and the city’s police chief said it’s likely another person was killed the next day in retaliation.

Police have said that the four people killed and two others seriously wounded in the multiple shootings were Native American, and authorities strongly suspect the shootings were gang-related. However, Police Chief Brian O’Hara said during a news conference Thursday that authorities are still investigating the motives behind the shootings.

The shootings shook a large Indigenous community south of downtown Minneapolis. A 20-year-old woman, a 17-year-old boy and a 27-year-old man were killed in Tuesday’s shootings in the 1500 block of East 25th Street, and a 28-year-old man and a 20-year-old woman were taken to a hospital with life-threatening injuries. A 30-year-old man died in Wednesday’s shooting in the 2100 block of Cedar Avenue South.

The first shooting took place just before midnight Tuesday. O’Hara said it’s “entirely probable” that the second shooting with a single victim was a response to the three deaths, and he said someone else was responsible. It occurred about 1 p.m. Wednesday a little more than a mile to the northeast outside an apartment building housing the Minneapolis offices of the Red Lake Nation tribe.

“But beyond that, I can’t speculate further about some ongoing beef,” O’Hara said.

The police chief said investigators believe the shootings are gang related based on the “lived experience” of the people in the area.

The U.S. Marshals Service said its local fugitive task force and an FBI SWAT team arrested the suspect Thursday afternoon. He was being held in the Hennepin County jail and had not been charged as of Thursday evening.

Meanwhile, police are investigating a fifth homicide that occurred within 24 hours. Shortly before 8 p.m. Wednesday, officers were alerted to gunfire in the 3000 block of 15th Avenue South. A man in his 50s was found with life-threatening gunshot wounds. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.

The violence shattered a relative peace in Minneapolis. The city recently went two months without a homicide until a man was shot to death April 19. It was the city’s longest period without a homicide in a decade, according to police.

Related Articles

St. Paul police plan to encrypt dispatches, as have Minneapolis, other agencies

Police suspect 2 shootings that left 4 dead in Minneapolis were connected and gang related

Tickets for the ‘Purple Rain’ musical go on sale May 9

Theater review: Guthrie’s ‘Nacirema Society’ turns out to be all about love and laughter

Concert review: Charli XCX was all style, no substance at Target Center

By MATT O’BRIEN, AP Technology Writer

BOSTON (AP) — Tariffs weren’t on the agenda of this week’s Robotics Summit, where thousands of tech industry workers mingled with humanoid and other robot varieties and talked about how to build and sell a new generation of increasingly autonomous machines.

Not on the official agenda, at least.

“Jump up to the microphones,” said keynote speaker Aaron Saunders, chief technology officer of Boston Dynamics, inviting a standing-room-only crowd to ask him questions. “And I’m the CTO, so don’t ask me about tariffs.”

The crowd laughed and complied. But as they streamed onto the show floor at Boston’s convention center, greeted by a remote-controlled humanoid made by Chinese company Unitree, it was hard to ignore the shadow of President Donald Trump’s far-reaching global tariffs and retaliatory measures from Trump’s biggest target, China.

Tariffs are the “No. 1 topic that we’re discussing in the hallways and at the water cooler with people that I’ve known for a long time,” said event organizer Steve Crowe, chair of the annual Robotics Summit & Expo. “I think it’s definitely top of mind, because there’s so much uncertainty about what is going to come.”

That concern is rooted in a robot’s complex anatomy of motors and actuators to move their limbs, computers to power their artificial intelligence, and sensing devices to help them react to their surroundings. Sensors, semiconductors, batteries and rare earth magnets are among the array of components most sensitive to global trade disputes.

Tesla CEO and billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk warned investors last week that China’s countermeasures restricting shipments of rare earth magnets will delay Tesla’s development of its Optimus humanoid robots.

At the summit on Wednesday and Thursday, some humanoid makers were looking at a potential bright side to the geopolitical shifts as American businesses look harder for domestic supplies of parts and the development of U.S.-based robots that can automate factories and warehouses.

“It’s added some inconveniences to our own supply chain. But it’s also opened up opportunities,” said Pras Velagapudi, chief technology officer at Oregon-based Agility Robotics, in an interview. The company is starting to deploy its humanoid robot, called Digit, at a U.S. plant run by German manufacturer Schaeffler, a maker of ball bearings and other components key to the auto industry.

Al Makke, a director of engineering for Schaeffler’s chassis systems, said tariffs could push many companies toward onshoring production of a variety of items in the U.S.

“And if that does happen, then local companies have to deal with high labor costs and a shortage of labor and so automation gets pushed further,” Makke said. “And one of those faces of automation is humanoids.”

Most of the big industrial robots employed in the U.S. are used to help make cars, and are imported from countries such as Japan, Germany or South Korea.

Automakers in the U.S. installed 9.6% more robots in their plants than a year before, according to new data from the International Federation of Robotics, a trade group.

For now, humanoids are still a niche but one that invites intense curiosity, in part thanks to popular science fiction. Saunders, of Hyundai-owned Boston Dynamics, presented an update Wednesday on the development of its Atlas humanoid robot but didn’t bring a physical prototype, instead showing off a more familiar pack of its four-legged Spot robots contained in a pen on the show floor.

Related Articles

Trump says it’s Biden’s economy, but businesses and economists beg to differ

Apple posts stronger-than-expected Q2 results, says majority of US iPhones sold will come from India

Amazon posts solid first quarter earnings growth, but outlook is tempered by tariff uncertainty

She’s in charge: At the F1 Miami Grand Prix, many top executive roles are held by women

Cheap parcels from China will no longer be duty-free. Here’s what it means for buyers and sellers

The sole humanoid at the conference was Unitree’s G1. Marketed for $16,000 and remote-controlled by an employee standing nearby, the robot fluidly shook hands, waved back at people and walked around the show floor, but it won’t be moving totes or working in a factory anytime soon.

Its main customers outside China are academic researchers and some social media influencers, and Trump’s current tariffs totaling 145% on China would raise its cost to American buyers to roughly $40,000, said Tony Yang, a Unitree vice president of business development who manages its North American sales. Nevertheless, Unitree’s strategy to rapidly develop its hardware and software is a long-term one.

“It’s still a very narrow market, but I think there’s still a huge potential market on the industry side, like for manufacturing and factory and even home use,” Yang said.

At a full pickleball court on the show floor, some conference attendees took a break to grab a racket and swing at balls tossed by a wheeled robot. Asked to describe what’s inside the Tennibot robot, its maker also had tariffs on the mind.

“Injection molded parts, rivets, screws, nuts, wheels, motors, batteries,” said Haitham Eletrabi, co-founder and CEO of Tennibot, based in Auburn, Alabama. “The supply chain gets very complex. We get parts from all over the world. Tariffs are adding a lot of uncertainty.”

It’s not just the U.S.-China trade rivalry that was weighing on some attendees. Francesca Torsiello, of the recruitment firm Adapt Talent, said she’s also hearing more wariness from Canadian robotics and engineering candidates about taking jobs in the U.S. amid a tense political environment.

“In the past, people in Canada found it attractive to come and work for U.S. companies; right now they’re being very hesitant,” Torsiello said.

AP video journalist Rodrique Ngowi contributed to this report.

By DAVID BAUDER, AP Media Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — During a contentious exchange about deportations in his interview with ABC News’ Terry Moran this week, President Donald Trump brought up — from his perspective — how Moran had gotten into the White House in the first place.

“They’re giving you the break of a lifetime, you know,” Trump said in Tuesday’s prime-time broadcast. “You’re doing the interview. I picked you because, frankly, I never heard of you, but that’s OK.”

Emphasizing again that it was his choice that Moran was there, the president scolded, “You’re not being very nice.”

From an ethics perspective, it’s considered a breach for a news organization to let a newsmaker dictate who will conduct an interview. In the real world of competitive journalism, things aren’t always so simple.

Did ABC News let President Trump decide who would do the interview?

We don’t know. ABC on Thursday would not talk publicly about what arrangements were discussed after Trump agreed to speak to the network about the first 100 days of his administration. ABC privately pushes back against the notion that Trump was given a list of potential interviewers, but it’s unclear whether other names came up.

On its face, Moran would seem an unexpected choice. At 65, he’s been with the network since 1997 and was chief White House correspondent during George W. Bush’s first term. He had nine one-on-one interviews with Barack Obama.

But his profile at ABC News has diminished. He’s an anchor for the “ABC News Live” streaming service and covers the Supreme Court for the network.

Related Articles

Army plans for a potential parade on Trump’s birthday call for 6,600 soldiers, AP learns

Hegseth orders Army to cut costs by merging some commands and slashing jobs

Trump says it’s Biden’s economy, but businesses and economists beg to differ

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to strip legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelan migrants

Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions

There would seem to be more obvious alternatives, like “World News Tonight” anchor David Muir, effectively the face of the news division. Mary Bruce is the current chief White House correspondent. Jonathan Karl has written three books about Trump and rotates as a host of the “This Week” Sunday show with Martha Raddatz.

Only George Stephanopoulos would seem off the table, since Trump sued him for defamation in a case settled last December.

Why would a news organization not want to cede the choice of an interviewer to the president? “It undermines our independence as journalists,” said Kelly McBride, a media ethics expert and senior vice president at the Poynter Institute. “When we make decisions of what questions are going to be asked, who’s doing the interview and how we edit the interview, we do it in service to the audience.”

“If we let the powerful person that we are attempting to get information from choose who does the interview or select the questions, we’re breaking our promise to the audience that we would be acting on their behalf,” she said.

The power of a president

Practically speaking, however, a president has a great deal of power in these dynamics.

Whatever the well-established challenges inherent in interviewing Trump, news organizations prize an exclusive interview with the president, any president. At any given moment, his press office likely has many requests for interviews, usually with a specific journalist’s name attached. He already has choices.

The Trump administration has made no secret of its desire to wield more control over who questions the president. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has invited new, mostly friendly, journalists into the White House briefing room and talked about further changes in who is allowed there. The administration sparked a court fight with The Associated Press over access to the Oval Office.

When he worked as a news executive at CNN and NBC News, Mark Whitaker said he would discuss interviews with the White House involving certain journalists, but “the idea of giving a choice is not something I ever saw.” he said.

Andrew Heyward, a former CBS News president, said he understands the principle of not ceding the decision of who asks the questions, “but as a practical matter, it’s often a negotiation.” Heyward stressed he had no inside information about what happened with ABC News this week.

The ‘Wild West’ days of competition for celebrity interviews

In some cases, the importance of landing an interview ahead of a competitor can take precedence over the principle of controlling who does the asking. Its value is illustrated in the ratings: nearly 4 million people watched Moran’s interview with Trump on Tuesday, the largest audience of anything on television that night, the Nielsen company said.

There was even more at stake during the “Wild West” days of television networks competing for big celebrity interviews, primarily at the end of the last century.

“Shamefully, the interviewee was in the driver’s seat whenever it came to the flavor-of-the-week or the most sought-after new interview,” said veteran broadcast journalist Connie Chung. “It was one of the reasons why I despised getting the so-called ‘get.’ It was a matter of who could grovel better.”

On many of those occasions, news organizations didn’t always speak with one voice; Diane Sawyer and Barbara Walters often competed fiercely for the same interviews when they both worked at ABC News. In 2001, Chung recalled that Walters was designated by ABC to interview scandal-scarred U.S. Rep. Gary Condit, but the congressman’s representative said they were going to another network unless Chung did the story. Chung got the interview.

So what if the day’s big celebrity is the president of the United States?

“It is a bit of a gray area,” Heyward said.

David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.

CLEVELAND — It’s starting to feel like Progressive Field has become a house of horrors for the Minnesota Twins. Over the past few years, they’ve been treated to a myriad of frustrating, disappointing close losses, many of the walk-off variety.

The Twins were walked off on Thursday in the series finale for the second time in three games, falling 4-3 to the Cleveland Guardians in 10 innings following a pair of rain delays that kept them at the park for most of the day.

The Twins came into Cleveland riding high after winning five of six games at Target Field last week, playing some of their best baseball. After blowing out the Guardians on Monday, they faltered, scoring a combined six runs across the next three games, all losses.

“The Guardians push you in different ways,” manager Rocco Baldelli said. “They play a certain brand of baseball and you end up in those types of games. You’ve got to find your way through these games and find ways to score and win.”

The Twins had a glimmer of hope late on Thursday when Mickey Gasper scored the go-ahead run on Jonah Bride’s sacrifice fly in the top of the 10th inning, giving them their first lead of the day. It didn’t last long.

Guardians star José Ramírez brought home the team’s automatic runner, singling off reliever Justin Topa. He then swiped second and came around to score the game-winning run on an Angel Martínez single.

The Twins outhit the Guardians 13-6 on the day, but were unable to make the most of their opportunities, finishing the day 3 for 14 with runners in scoring position and leaving 12 runners on base.

“Opportunities were abundant today,” Baldelli said. “We were on the bases basically the whole day and we’ve been here all day. … Of course it’s going to get a little frustrating at times when you’re not bringing them home.”

The Twins (13-19) were blanked by Guardians (18-13) starter Ben Lively, who lasted 5 2/3 innings. It wasn’t until the seventh inning, after the first rain delay of the game — this one just 17 minutes — that their offense broke through.

Harrison Bader’s infield single sparked a game-tying rally. Catcher Christian Vázquez singled him in and hits from Edouard Julien and Carlos Correa followed, helping produce the team’s second run of the game.

The Twins had another good opportunity in the eighth inning putting two runners on before the rain really started coming down. When the game resumed after a lengthy delay, Ryan Jeffers walked to load the bases before shortstop Correa popped up to end the threat.

The loss marked the 10th time that the Twins have gotten walked off in Cleveland over the last five seasons.

“It just seems like we keep falling short playing here,” Correa said. “We know they’ve got a great team and we know every time we come here there’s going to be close games. We’re failing to play just good enough to close them out and get the win.”

Related Articles

Twins center fielder Byron Buxton joins exclusive company with latest feat

Pablo López’s strong start spoiled late as Twins fall to Guardians

Twins reliever Griffin Jax won’t let two weeks define his season

Twins walked off after extended weather delay — and little rain

Twins win fourth straight as offense goes off against Guardians