Tropical Storm Erick in the Pacific near southern Mexico is expected to become a hurricane

posted in: All news | 0

MIAMI (AP) — A hurricane warning was issued Tuesday for a portion of southern Mexico as Tropical Storm Erick gained strength in the Pacific Ocean, forecasters said.

The National Hurricane Center said Erick was expected to rapidly intensify and become a hurricane by late Tuesday or early Wednesday. The cyclone was centered about 265 miles southeast of Puerto Ángel, Mexico, on Tuesday morning.

Related Articles


US spies said Iran wasn’t building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment


Overnight Russian attack on Ukraine kills 15 and injures 156


Alert raised to the highest level after Indonesia’s Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki volcano erupts


Trump says the US knows where Iran’s Khamenei is hiding and urges Iran’s unconditional surrender


G7 leaders try to salvage their summit after Trump’s early exit effectively makes it the ‘G6’

The tropical storm had maximum sustained winds of 50 mph, the Miami-based center said. It was moving west-northwest at 9 mph and forecast to approach the coast by late Wednesday.

A hurricane warning was in effect from Puerto Ángel to Punta Maldonado in coastal southern Mexico. The hurricane watch stretches west of Punta Maldonado to Acapulco and east of Puerto Ángel to Bahías de Huatulco. A tropical storm watch was posted east of Puerto Ángel to Salina Cruz.

A hurricane warning means hurricane conditions are expected in the area, and preparations to protect life and property should be rushed to completion, according to the NHC advisory.

Heavy rainfall up to 20 inches was forecast for parts of Oaxaca and Guerrero with lighter amounts in Chiapas, Michoacan, Colima and Jalisco states.

The rainfall may produce flooding and mudslides, the center said, and storm surge could produce coastal flooding.

If US halted fluoride, kids’ cavities would grow by millions, study says

posted in: All news | 0

By Hunter Boyce, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Fluoride — it’s in your toothpaste, your drinking water and now the occasional legislative bill. Two U.S. states have already decided to stop adding it to their water supplies — a trend concerning local dental experts.

Related Articles


Abortion clinics are closing even in states where abortion is legal. More cuts could be coming


Second patient death reported with gene therapy for muscular dystrophy


Black dads go public with support for their kids with autism — and each other


‘Gas station heroin’ is technically illegal and widely available. Here are the facts


How expressing gratitude can transform your work and life

Now, a new study has discovered what banning the mineral on a larger scale could mean for children and their parents. The results? Billions in added dental bills and millions of new cavities. It’s one major toothache of a projection.

What would happen if the U.S. banned fluoride?

Researchers out of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine have completed a projection of what a nationwide fluoride ban could cost Americans in both dollars and tooth decay. The researchers used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the only nationwide survey to include oral health data from clinical examinations of U.S. adults and children.

Having analyzed survey data featuring 8,484 children, they predicted such a ban would increase dental costs across the U.S. by $9.8 billion within the first five years. According to Lending Tree, it already costs Georgia parents an average $201,058 to raise a single child from an infant to 18 years old. For every cavity that child gets, you can add another average $191 to the equation. And, in this projection, kids will be getting significantly more cavities.

Within the first five years of a nationwide fluoride ban, researchers estimate there would be 25.4 million more cavities reported in children. That represents about a 7.5% uptick in cases. A decade into having fluoride-free drinking water, however, those numbers could increase to $19.4 billion in additional costs and 53.8 million in cavities.

What would happen if fluoridation came to an end in Georgia? A local dentist previously spoke to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in April, issuing a grim warning.

“It will be amazing for our business,” said Sandy Springs dentist Cary Goldstein. “We will have so much work on our hands. We’ve almost put ourselves out of business because fluoride keeps decay down.”

According to the expert, it’s a matter of preventing more major oral health issues down the road. “That small cavity in childhood leads to serious dental work in adulthood,” he later said. “It’s like cancer — we are trying to prevent it before it happens.”

It’s been 80 years since Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first U.S. city to fluoridate its drinking water. By 1980, half the U.S. population was drinking water with fluoride. The Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls it “a cornerstone strategy for prevention of cavities in the U.S.” that is “a practical, cost-effective, and equitable way for communities to improve their residents’ oral health regardless of age, education, or income.”

It begs the question: Why do some people now want to ban it from drinking water?

Just last month, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a new measure prohibiting the addition of fluoride to the state’s drinking water. He’s not the first governor to do it, either. Utah became the first state to ever ban fluoride in public drinking water, with all statewide water systems having ceased fluoridation on May 7.

“We have other ways where people can get access to fluoride,” DeSantis said at a public event, as reported by The Associated Press. “When you do this in the water supply, you’re taking away a choice of someone who may not want to have overexposure to fluoride.”

Fluoride overexposure has become an increasingly common talking point in government. In April, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who has referred to fluoride as a “dangerous neurotoxin”announced plans to tell the CDC to stop recommending fluoridation nationwide.

Fluoride overexposure can lead to fluorosis — causing tooth discoloration. A 2019 review of cross-sectional studies concluded that it can potentially become neurotoxic to young children at high doses, leading to worsened cognitive function. Those doses averaged around 1 mg/L.

However, the CDC only recommends a maximum 0.7 mg/L fluoride concentration in drinking water — 30% less than the high doses observed in the study review. A 2020 study of over 38,000 wells across the U.S. determined that roughly 87% of all tested groundwater was below 0.7 mg/L in fluoride concentration. According to the new study, the current fluoride concentration recommendation is a safe one.

“These findings suggest that, despite the potential harms of excessive fluoride exposure, fluoridation at safe levels offers both individual and societal benefits that would be at risk,” the study concluded.

©2025 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Visit at ajc.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Toy company challenges Trump’s tariffs before the Supreme Court in long shot bid for quick decision

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — An Illinois toy company challenged President Donald Trump’s tariffs in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday in a long shot bid to press the justices to quickly decide whether they are legal.

Learning Resources Inc. filed an appeal asking the Supreme Court to take up the case soon rather than let it continue to play out in lower courts. The company argues the Republican president illegally imposed tariffs under an emergency powers law rather than getting approval from Congress.

While the company won an early victory in a lower court, the order is on hold as an appeals court considers a similar ruling putting a broader block on Trump’s tariffs. The appeals court has allowed Trump to continue collecting tariffs under the emergency powers law ahead of arguments set for late July.

The company argued in court documents the case can’t wait that long, “in light of the tariffs’ massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims.”

President Donald Trump walks away following the family photograph during the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Monday, June 16, 2025. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press via AP)

The Supreme Court is typically reluctant to take up cases before appeals courts have decided them, lowering the odds that the justices will agree to hear it as quickly as the company is asking.

Still, Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said tariffs and uncertainty are taking a major toll now. He’s looking ahead to the back-to-school and holiday seasons, when the company usually makes most of its sales for the year.

“All the people that are raising their prices are doing it with a sense of dread,” Woldenberg told The Associated Press. But, “we do not have a choice. We absolutely do not have a choice.”

The company’s attorneys suggested the court could hear arguments in late summer or early fall.

Related Articles


FDA to offer faster drug reviews to companies promoting ‘national priorities’


US spies said Iran wasn’t building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment


40 hours of violence and fear as gunman stalks Minnesota politicians


Newsom v. Trump: A defining moment for America or the California governor’s shot at presidency?


Trump says the US knows where Iran’s Khamenei is hiding and urges Iran’s unconditional surrender

The Trump administration has defended the tariffs by arguing that the emergency powers law gives the president the authority to regulate imports during national emergencies and that the country’s longtime trade deficit qualifies as a national emergency.

Trump has framed tariffs as a tool to lure factories back to America, raise money for the Treasury Department and strike more favorable trade agreements with other countries.

Woldenberg said he’s putting “enormous resources” into shifting his company’s supply base but the process is time-consuming and uncertain.

“I think that our case raises uniquely important questions that this administration won’t accept unless the Supreme Court rules on them,” he said.

Based in Vernon Hills, Illinois, the family-owned company’s products include the Pretend & Play Calculator Cash Register for $43.99 and Botley the Coding Robot for $57.99.

Tom Cruise is finally getting an Oscar — as will Dolly Parton, Debbie Allen and Wynn Thomas

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSEY BAHR, Associated Press

Twenty-five years after Tom Cruise received his first Oscar nomination, he’s finally getting a trophy. It’s not for his death-defying stunts, either. At least, not exclusively.

Cruise, choreographer Debbie Allen and “Do The Right Thing” production designer Wynn Thomas have all been selected to receive honorary Oscar statuettes at the annual Governors Awards, the film academy said Tuesday. Dolly Parton will also be recognized with the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award for her decades-long charitable work in literacy and education.

“This year’s Governors Awards will celebrate four legendary individuals whose extraordinary careers and commitment to our filmmaking community continue to leave a lasting impact,” Academy President Janet Yang said in a statement.

Most recipients of the prize historically have not yet won a competitive Oscar themselves. Cruise, 62, has been nominated four times, twice for best actor in “Born on the Fourth of July” and “Jerry Maguire,” once for supporting actor in “Magnolia” and once for best picture with “Top Gun: Maverick.” He’s also championed theatrical moviegoing and big-scale Hollywood production through the coronavirus pandemic.

Yang spotlighted Cruise’s “incredible commitment to our filmmaking community, to the theatrical experience, and to the stunts community.”

Related Articles


In Oklahoma, Juneteenth highlights tribal slavery descendants’ fight for recognition and citizenship


Brad Lander, NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate, is arrested outside immigration court


Butterflies are disappearing. Here’s how community scientists are working to save them.


Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs probably won’t testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days


US stocks drift lower as oil prices return to rising

Allen, 75, has never been nominated for an Oscar. But the multi-hyphenate entertainer — she also acts and produces — has played an integral role in the Oscars show, having choreographed seven ceremonies over the years. Four of those were nominated for prime-time Emmy awards.

A nomination had also eluded Thomas, a leading production designer whose films have often gone on to best picture nominations and even one win, for Ron Howard’s “A Beautiful Mind.” Thomas is most known for his long-term collaboration with filmmaker Spike Lee, from “She’s Gotta Have It” and “Malcolm X” through “Da 5 Bloods.”

Parton has been nominated twice for best original song, for “9 to 5” and, in 2006, “Travelin’ Thru” from the film “Transamerica.” But her honor celebrates her humanitarian efforts over the years, through organizations like the Dollywood Foundation and the literary program “Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library.”

Yang said Parton “exemplifies the spirit” of the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award.

The awards will be handed out during an untelevised ceremony on Nov. 16 at the Ray Dolby Ballroom in Los Angeles. Last year’s recipients included the late Quincy Jones, Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, filmmaker Richard Curtis and casting director Juliet Taylor.

Recipients of the prizes, which honor lifetime achievement, contributions to the state of motion picture arts and sciences and service to the academy are selected by the film academy’s board of governors.