Robbinsdale park homicide victim ID’d as North St. Paul woman

posted in: All news | 0

A woman killed in a double shooting last week at a Robbinsdale park has been identified as a 19-year-old from North St. Paul.

Amarie Cashayla-Marie Alowonle died at North Memorial Health Hospital in Robbinsdale on Sunday, eight days after she was shot in the head at Sanborn Park, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office said Thursday.

The second victim, a man in his 20s, was treated at Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis with injuries police described as serious.

Police have not announced any arrests.

Police said officers were in the area of County Road 81 and 40th Avenue North when they heard gunshots to the east about 9:20 p.m. Callers to 911 immediately reported a shooting at Sanborn Park, located in the 4200 block of Drew Avenue North, just north of Crystal Lake.

Officers arrived at a “very chaotic scene” and found Alowonle, who was taken by ambulance to North Memorial with “grave injuries,” police said.

Many people were at the scene, but they shared little information with officers, police said.

No additional victims were located by officers, who cordoned off a large area to secure evidence.

Just after 10 p.m., police were told that the 20-year-old man had shown up to Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park with a gunshot wound. He was transported by ambulance to HCMC.

Investigators with Robbinsdale police and the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office continue to look for suspects and are asking anyone with security video in the area to review footage between 8:30 p.m. and 9:45 p.m. the night of the shooting. Information and video can be emailed to robbinsdalepolice@robbinsdalemn.gov.

Related Articles


West Seventh restaurant windows broken; man accused of swinging stick at one owner


Former Tartan band director admits to sexually assaulting DeLaSalle student


DoorDash delivery driver pleads guilty to stealing $2.5 million in deliveries scam


Witnesses put suspected drunk driver’s speed at 90-100 mph before fatal St. Paul crash


Man shot by St. Paul officer during search after sex assault gets 35-year sentence

Those who’ve worked with Pope Leo XIV are optimistic he’ll elevate women’s roles — with limits

posted in: All news | 0

By NICOLE WINFIELD

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Before becoming Pope Leo XIV, Cardinal Robert Prevost presided over one of the most revolutionary reforms of Pope Francis’ pontificate by having women serve on the Vatican board that vets nominations for bishops.

Related Articles


European Union accuses TikTok of breaching digital rules with lack of transparency on ads


Trump’s sanctions on ICC prosecutor have halted tribunal’s work


54 people killed in overnight airstrikes on southern Gaza city, hospital says


Putin spurns Zelenskyy meeting but lower-level Ukraine-Russia talks are still on


Trump says the US and Iran have ‘sort of’ agreed on the terms for a nuclear deal

But he also has said decisively that women cannot be ordained as priests, and despite having worked for years in Peru where women often lead church communities, seems noncommittal on whether women could ever serve in any ministerial capacity.

Nevertheless, the women who have worked closely with Prevost in recent years have praised his leadership style, ability to listen and respect for their opinions. In interviews with The Associated Press, they say they expect that as pope, Leo will continue to promote women in church governance positions, albeit with limits.

Maria Lia Zervino was among the three women Francis appointed to the Dicastery for Bishops in 2022 to review possible appointments. It was a job previously held by cardinals and bishops, an old boy’s club that has jealously guarded the secret process behind the appointment of bishops.

Zervino rejoiced when Prevost was elected pope, saying the respect he showed for her and other women on the board and their opinions gave them faith in him as a leader.

Maria Lia Zervino, chosen by Pope Francis to be on the Dicastery for Bishops, is interviewed by The Associated Press in Rome on Friday, May 9, 2025. (AP Photo/Andrea Rosa)

“I’m convinced that he doesn’t need to learn how to work (with women), how to let them speak, to listen to them, to have them participate in decisions, because that’s what he does anyway,” said Zervino, the Argentine former head of the World Union of Catholic Women’s Organizations.

Zervino said she expected Leo would continue Francis’ reform processes, albeit in his own style.

“He’s a simple man, serene, always with that smile that we saw that seems to come from an interior peace,” she said in an interview. “So when you see someone who is balanced, peaceful and respectful and who welcomes what you say and is always ready to hear the other, you have faith in him.”

A 2023 comment on women as priests

At a 2023 gathering of bishops on the future of the Catholic Church, Prevost was asked at a news conference about women in church leadership positions. He said it was “a work in progress” and that there would be a “continuing recognition of the fact that women can add a great deal to the life of the church on many different levels.”

But he drew some very clear lines.

“I think we’re all familiar with the very significant and long tradition of the church, and that the apostolic tradition is something that has been spelled out very clearly, especially if you want to talk about the question of women’s ordination to the priesthood,” he said in the Oct. 25, 2023, briefing.

Catholic women do much of the church’s work in schools and hospitals and are usually responsible for passing the faith to the next generation. But they have long complained of second-class status in an institution that reserves the priesthood for men.

Prevost acknowledged Francis had created two commissions to study whether women could be made deacons, who perform many of the same functions as priests. While he said the issue was still open, he warned that turning women into clerics “doesn’t necessarily solve a problem, it might make a new problem.”

Just because a woman in society can be president doesn’t mean there’s an “immediate parallel” in the church, he argued.

“It isn’t as simple as saying that at this stage we’re going to change, if you will, the tradition of the church after 2,000 years on any one of those points,” he said.

Deacons are ordained ministers who preside at weddings, baptisms and funerals. They can preach but cannot celebrate Mass. Married men can be ordained as deacons while women cannot, although historians say women served as deacons in the early Christian church.

A prudent and private listener

Karlijn Demasure, emeritus professor of practical theology at St. Paul University in Ottawa, served on a Vatican commission with Prevost proposing reforms to the authority of bishops and how they are selected. She said Prevost was absolutely convinced of the need to involve lay people and nuns in the selection of bishops, at least at an initial level.

“He listens well,” Demasure said. “He hears what has been said, and if he doesn’t agree, he says it but in a nice way: ‘I wouldn’t say it like this, or I wouldn’t do it like that.’”

She said Prevost was quiet, “prudent and private.” She wonders, though, what will happen with the work of the commission, one of 10 groups that are studying particularly thorny questions, such as the role of women, and were due to report back to the pope by July.

Sister Nathalie Becquart, one of the highest-ranking women at the Vatican, worked with Prevost during Francis’ meeting, known as a synod, on the future of the church. She also happens to be his neighbor, living in the same Palazzo Sant’Uffizio inside the Vatican gates, and was among the well-wishers who greeted Leo when he came home the night of his May 8 election.

Sister Nathalie Becquart walks inside the General Secretariat of the Synod in Rome on Saturday, May 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Bernat Armangue)

Becquart posted a joyous selfie with the pope in the courtyard in one of the first private moments after his election. “I had time to greet him, not just as a neighbor,” she said.

The women’s diaconate

Becquart recalled that she had been at a conference of the 900 nuns who run the world’s female religious orders when the white smoke came out of the Sistine Chapel chimney. It didn’t bother her that the nuns had no vote in the conclave, since the cardinals “could see that the church is the people of God.”

“Synodality is about feeling we are from the same body, we are interdependent, we have a deep inner connection, and for me that was a deep spiritual experience I could never imagine before,” she said.

Also during the conclave, advocates for women’s ordination set off pink smoke flares over the Vatican to protest their exclusion from the priesthood and the election process.

“The discrimination and exclusion of women is a sin, and we’re here to say the next pope will inherit this question and needs to work quickly to correct it,” said Kate McElwee, executive director of the Women’s Ordination Conference.

Hofstra University researcher Phyllis Zagano, who was on Francis’ first Vatican commission on women deacons, remains optimistic. She pointed to Prevost’s acknowledgement that the deacon issue was still open and that he ministered in Peru, a region that has pushed for years for the church to recognize women as ministerial deacons to help offset the priest shortage.

In a column for Religion News Service, Zagano noted that a recent proposal for a new Amazonian liturgical rite, published last month by the Amazonian bishops conference, contained explicit recommendations for women to be ordained as deacons. When Francis in 2020 considered official requests from Amazonian bishops for female deacons, he dodged the issue.

“Women deserve the ordained diaconal ministry of women,” she said in an interview.

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

A New Rumble in the Bronx: Battle for the Borough Presidency

posted in: All news | 0

Rafael Salamanca, currently a councilman and chair of the Council’s powerful Land Use Committee, is challenging the incumbent borough president, Vanessa Gibson. Several dynamics make this a race worth watching.

Current Borough President Vanessa Gibson, right. Her challenger, City Councilmember Rafael Salamanca, right. (Flickr/Office of the Bronx Borough President, William Alatriste/NYC Council Media Unit)

This analysis is part of a series exploring the role of the Latino vote in the city’s 2025 municipal elections. Read more about it here.

With all eyes on the race for the mayoralty, fewer New York City voters have yet glanced north to the Bronx, where a rumble of its own is shaping up. Rafael Salamanca, currently a councilman and chair of the Council’s powerful Land Use Committee, is challenging the incumbent borough president, Vanessa Gibson. Several dynamics make this a race worth watching.

Having won office four years ago, Gibson has one term left. Taking on an incumbent, who in this case is fairly well liked across the Bronx, does not happen often. But Salamanca has made the bold move, and might actually give Gibson a run for her money.

As a councilman with years of experience under his belt, Salamanca is no ordinary insurgent. Not only does he bring to the race the claim of city legislative experience (which Gibson has as well, from her previous Council experience and her current borough presidential role), he also comes to the race having raised a whopping $653,987, double the amount the incumbent Gibson has. At least in terms of fundraising, Salamanca clearly has not been hampered by the typical insurgent woes.

The chart above shows that Gibson has received over $184,557 more than Salamanca in public matching money. Yet Salamanca’s massive fundraising haul in private donations, and a lower spend up to this point in the campaign, has left him with a $300,000-plus spending advantage heading into the last six weeks of the race. At least when it comes to money, Salamanca has an edge.

But money isn’t everything, at least not in this race. Salamanca is taking on a well-liked incumbent in Gibson. She has the backing of the Bronx Democratic Party, the powerful union 1199, the Working Families Party, and numerous elected officials (many of whom are Latino) across the Bronx. For most insurgents, taking on an incumbent with this level of support usually spells trouble. Can Salamanca defy the odds?

He has certainly removed the usual fundraising advantage that most incumbents enjoy. But what about other factors? Does Salamanca have a path given that the Bronx is the only Latino-majority borough? According to the most recent voter file, Latinos comprise 46 percent of all registered Bronx Democrats. The next largest group, based on excellent data from the firm L2,  is Black voters at 35 percent.

This may seem to suggest an advantage for Salamanca. However, things are a bit more complicated in the Bronx for anyone considering the Latino vote as an exclusive path to victory (this is not to say that this is Salamanca’s strategy). For one, the Latino vote alone is not enough to give any candidate the win. Moreover, Latino voting participation in the Bronx, as in other places, lags behind other groups.

Let’s take a look at numbers from the last municipal election in the Bronx in 2021, when Gibson was first elected as borough president.

Several elements are important to understand here. First, only 20 percent of eligible Bronx voters came out to the polls in the 2021 election. In Manhattan, 34 percent of eligible voters went to the polls. In Brooklyn, it was 29 percent. Similar rates applied in Queens and Staten Island. The Bronx is the borough with the lowest voting participation rates in the city—for reasons I won’t address here.

Moreover, not only is voting participation low borough-wide, it’s particularly low among Latinos. Only 15 percent of eligible Latino Democratic voters participated in the 2021 election. By comparison, 24 percent of eligible Black voters went to the polls, as did 29 percent of (the considerably fewer) eligible white voters.

When it comes to Latino voting participation the question remains: What is holding Latinos back from participating in elections? Unfortunately, many Latino elected officials in the borough are neglecting to engage the question.

All this notwithstanding, Salamanca will need to win the lion’s share of the Latino vote to make this a competitive race. If Gibson manages to pull enough Latinos to her column, which is not impossible for her to do, Salamanca will have a very long night on election day.

If this race comes down to voters making choices by fealty to race and ethnicity, my eyes will be glued to results in neighborhoods that are mostly non-Black and Latino. Almost half of these voters are in Riverdale, where a key Gibson supporter, Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, has his base.

Another 21 percent of these voters reside in Morris Park, City Island, and Pelham Bay, areas represented by another Gibson backer, Assemblyman Michael Benedetto. Both Dinowitz and Benedetto have long been party stalwarts, and their support for Gibson will be critical in this race. In addition to pulling out the Latino vote, Salamanca’s chances will depend on how many of these voters he’ll be able to convince.

Clearly much is at stake for both candidates. Gibson is the only incumbent borough president facing a serious challenge. And Salamanca aspires to be the fifth Latino borough president of the Condado de la Salsa. One thing is for sure: with fewer than six weeks to go, this rumble in the Bronx will become more contentious before it is over.

Eli Valentin is a former Gotham Gazette contributor and currently serves as assistant dean of graduate and leadership studies at Virginia Union University. He lives in New York with his family.

The post A New Rumble in the Bronx: Battle for the Borough Presidency appeared first on City Limits.

NATO weighs a US demand to massively hike defense spending as some struggle to meet the current goal

posted in: All news | 0

By MATTHEW LEE, LORNE COOK and SUZAN FRASER

ANTALYA, Turkey (AP) — NATO foreign ministers on Thursday debated an American demand to massively ramp up defense investment to 5% of gross domestic product over the next seven years, as the U.S. focuses on security challenges outside of Europe.

Related Articles


European Union accuses TikTok of breaching digital rules with lack of transparency on ads


Trump’s sanctions on ICC prosecutor have halted tribunal’s work


54 people killed in overnight airstrikes on southern Gaza city, hospital says


Putin spurns Zelenskyy meeting but lower-level Ukraine-Russia talks are still on


Trump says the US and Iran have ‘sort of’ agreed on the terms for a nuclear deal

At talks in Antalya, Turkey, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said that more investment and military equipment are needed to deal with the threat posed by Russia and terrorism, but also by China which has become the focus of U.S. concern.

“When it comes to the core defense spending, we need to do much, much more,” Rutte told reporters. He underlined that once the war in Ukraine is over, Russia could reconstitute its armed forces within three to five years.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio underlined that “the alliance is only as strong as its weakest link.” He insisted that the U.S. investment demand is about “spending money on the capabilities that are needed for the threats of the 21st century.”

The debate on defense spending is heating up ahead of a summit of U.S. President Donald Trump and his NATO counterparts in the Netherlands on June 24-25. It’s a high-level gathering that will set the course for future European security, including that of Ukraine.

In 2023, as Russia’s full-scale war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defense budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so.

The new spending plan under consideration is for all allies to aim for 3.5% of GDP on their defense budgets by 2032, plus an extra 1.5% on potentially defense-related things like infrastructure — roads, bridges, airports and seaports.

While the two figures add up to 5%, factoring in infrastructure and cybersecurity would change the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defense spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance’s usual standards.

NATO foreign ministers pose for a group photo during their informal meeting in Antalya, southern Turkey, Thursday, May 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)

Rutte refused to confirm the numbers under consideration, but he acknowledged the importance of including infrastructure in the equation, “for example to make sure that bridges, yes, are there for you and me to drive our cars but also if necessary to make sure that the bridge will hold a tank. So all these expenditures have to be taken into account.”

But he didn’t signal any progress on narrowing the numbers down after the meeting, which came as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy waited, apparently in vain, in the Turkish capital Ankara for Russian President President Vladimir to hold face-to-face talks on ending their 3-year-old war.

It’s difficult to see how many members would reach a new 3.5% goal. Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain are not even spending 2% yet, although Spain does expect to reach that goal in 2025, a year past the deadline.

The U.S. demand would require investment at an unprecedented scale, but Trump has cast doubt over whether the U.S. would defend allies that spend too little, and this remains an incentive to do more, even as European allies realize that they must match the threat posed by Russia.

Europe-wide, industry leaders and experts have pointed out challenges the continent must overcome to be a truly self-sufficient military power, chiefly its decades-long reliance on the U.S. as well as its fragmented defense industry.

“There is a lot at stake for us,” Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys said. He urged his NATO partners to meet the investment goals faster than the 2032 target “because we see the tempo and the speed, how Russia generates its forces now as we speak.”

British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said his country should reach 2.5% by 2027, and then 3% by the next U.K. elections planned for 2029.

Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, center, talks to British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, right, next to Germany’s Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, left, as they wait for a group photo during a NATO’s informal meeting of foreign ministers in Antalya, southern Turkey, Thursday, May 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)

“It’s hugely important that we recommit to Europe’s defense and that we step up alongside our U.S. partners in this challenging geopolitical moment where there are so many precious across the world, and particularly in the Indo-Pacific,” he said.

As an organization, NATO plays no direct security role in Asia, and it remains unclear what demands the Trump administration might make of the allies as it turns its attention to China. The last NATO security operation outside the Euro-Atlantic area, its 18-year stay in Afghanistan, ended in chaos.

Asked after the meeting about whether the next summit communique will underline that still Russia poses the greatest threat to all NATO allies, Rutte refused to be drawn: “We will see what is the best way to play that,” he said.

Question marks also hang over the way the leaders will frame NATO’s commitment to Ukraine. The war there has dominated recent summits, with envoys struggling to find language that would further anchor the country to the alliance without actually allowing it to join.

But this year, the United States has taken Ukraine’s membership off the table. Trump has shown impatience with Zelenskyy and remains unclear whether he will be invited to the meeting in The Hague.

Cook reported from Brussels, and Fraser from Ankara, Turkey.