PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia on Monday filed a lawsuit in bankruptcy court seeking to block the sale of personal genetic data by 23andMe without customer consent. The lawsuit comes as a biotechnology company seeks the court’s approval to buy the struggling firm.

Related Articles

Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public

Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public

Crypto’s hottest new trend: publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin

Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement

Video game performers on strike for almost a year over AI issues reach a tentative deal

Biological samples, DNA data, health-related traits and medical records are too sensitive to be sold without each person’s express, informed consent, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a news release about the lawsuit. Customers should have the right to control such deeply personal information and it cannot be sold like ordinary property, it said.

23andMe customers use saliva-based DNA testing kits to learn about their ancestry and find long-lost relatives. Founded in 2006, the company also conducted health research and drug development. But it struggled to find a profitable business model since going public in 2021. In March it laid off 40% of its staff and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the Eastern District of Missouri, raising concerns about the safety of customer data.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals said last month it aimed to buy the company for $256 million. Regeneron said it would comply with 23andMe’s privacy policies and applicable law. It said it would process all customer personal data in accordance with the consents, privacy policies and statements, terms of service, and notices currently in effect and have security controls in place designed to protect such data.

A court-appointed, independent consumer privacy ombudsman was due to examine the proposed sale and how it might affect consumer privacy and report to the court by Tuesday.

By JENNIFER PELTZ

NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors in Harvey Weinsteinn’ssex crimes retrial appear to be moving past some interpersonal tensions and focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretch into a fourth day Tuesday.

At the end of Monday’s session, jurors requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein.

During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein’s lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she “compartmentalized” the pain he caused her.

Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he’s accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola.

Weinstein didn’t testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers.

Weinstein was one of the movie industry’s most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges.

The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times.

One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Monday began with two jurors giving contrasting takes on the atmosphere in the deliberation room.

First, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were “pushing” others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein’s past and going beyond the charges.

The foreperson didn’t specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017.

Related Articles

Dozens of states sue to block the sale of 23andMe personal genetic data without customer consent

Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public

Crypto’s hottest new trend: publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin

Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement

Video game performers on strike for almost a year over AI issues reach a tentative deal

Another juror soon asked to speak to the court. In her estimation, things were “going well” and jurors were ”making headway.” By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was “making good progress.”

Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola’s allegation was added last year, after New York state’s highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial.

Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles.

The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.

By JENNIFER PELTZ

NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors in Harvey Weinsteinn’ssex crimes retrial appear to be moving past some interpersonal tensions and focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretch into a fourth day Tuesday.

At the end of Monday’s session, jurors requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein.

During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein’s lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she “compartmentalized” the pain he caused her.

Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he’s accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola.

Weinstein didn’t testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers.

Weinstein was one of the movie industry’s most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges.

The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times.

One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Monday began with two jurors giving contrasting takes on the atmosphere in the deliberation room.

First, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were “pushing” others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein’s past and going beyond the charges.

The foreperson didn’t specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017.

Related Articles

Dozens of states sue to block the sale of 23andMe personal genetic data without customer consent

Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public

Crypto’s hottest new trend: publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin

Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement

Video game performers on strike for almost a year over AI issues reach a tentative deal

Another juror soon asked to speak to the court. In her estimation, things were “going well” and jurors were ”making headway.” By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was “making good progress.”

Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola’s allegation was added last year, after New York state’s highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial.

Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles.

The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.

Though he still might not be a household name, tight end Josh Oliver fills an important role for the Vikings.

That explains why the Vikings announced on Tuesday morning that they had signed Oliver to a lucrative contract extension that keeps him around through 2028.

The decision to extend Oliver helps the Vikings maintain another key piece of their core. It’s reportedly a 3-year, $23.25 million contract extension for Oliver that has a max value of $27.5 million.

It’s a fair deal for Oliver, among the best blocking tight ends in NFL, who also is starting to establish himself as proven pass catcher.

In total, the Oliver finished last season with 22 catches for 258 yards and 3 touchdowns last season, doing most of his damage while filling in for fellow tight end T.J. Hockenson. Together, Oliver and Hockenson give the Vikings a dynamic duo at tight end for the foreseeable future.

Related Articles

What does Vikings depth chart look like ahead of mandatory minicamp?

When remembering Vikings legend Jim Marshall, everybody has a favorite story

Alan Page’s foundation honors Jim Marshall with expansion of scholarship

Sam Darnold is learning a new city and offense with plenty of support

Vikings legend Jim Marshall dies at age of 87