5 ways to get on the path to lifetime income

posted in: All news | 0

By Rachel Christian, Bankrate.com

If you’re serious about financial security in retirement, you can’t rely on Social Security alone.

Related Articles


FAA extends ban on US commercial flights to Haiti’s capital because of risk from gangs


Stocks tick higher as Wall Street drifts near its record levels


Shortage of homebuyers forces many sellers to lower prices or walk away as sales slump drags on


Business People: Adair Mosley to lead GroundBreak Coalition


Real World Economics: Farmers always on the cutting edge

For most people, those checks cover only a fraction of their living expenses. According to the Social Security Administration, the average monthly benefit for retired workers as of July 2025 was about $2,000 a month. That barely covers rent in many cities, let alone food, health care and everything else you’ll need over decades in retirement.

The pension era is also over for most workers. Outside of government jobs, pensions have largely disappeared as companies shifted the onus of saving for retirement to employees via 401(k)s and IRAs. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 15% of private industry (non-government) workers had access to a pension in 2023. So for most Americans, their retirement income largely depends on how well they save, invest and structure their own portfolio.

That means you’ll likely need to piece together multiple sources if you want to create lifetime income — money you can rely on every month, no matter how long you live.

“Combining a variety of income streams with differing levels of growth potential, flexibility and guarantees will provide a solid balance for most retirees,” says Stephen Kates, CFP and financial analyst for Bankrate.

Here are five ways to get on the path to lifetime income so you can sustain cash flow for the long haul.

1. Buy a single premium immediate annuity (SPIA)

A single-premium immediate annuity, or SPIA, is the most straightforward version of an annuity. You give an insurance company a lump sum — say $100,000 — and in return, the insurer guarantees you a fixed monthly check for the rest of your life. Payments usually begin within one year of signing the annuity contract.

What sets SPIAs apart is their simplicity. Unlike variable annuities, which tie payouts to the performance of mutual fund–like subaccounts, or indexed annuities, which use formulas linked to stock market indexes, SPIAs aren’t linked to the market.

Instead, the insurer calculates your payment based on age, interest rates and life expectancy. Once the contract is signed, you know exactly what you’ll receive each month. That predictability makes them function almost like a self-funded pension.

They also stand out on fees. With SPIAs, you won’t see itemized costs eating into your payments each month. Instead, the insurance company builds its margin into the payout up front. That’s a noteworthy departure from other annuities, especially variable annuities with income riders, which can carry annual fees of 2 or 3%.

The trade-off is that once you commit, the money is locked up. You can’t dip back into the lump sum for emergencies. That’s why some financial advisors use SPIAs to cover a client’s fixed monthly needs, like housing and utilities, while using withdrawals from retirement plans and other income for other expenses.

“If your existing guaranteed income (like Social Security) doesn’t cover all necessary expenses, an annuity can help fill the gap,” says Kates.

2. Consider a longevity annuity

A longevity annuity is designed for the later years of retirement. Instead of paying right away, payouts start at age 75, 80 or even 85, helping protect you from outliving your savings.

A longevity annuity is simply a type of deferred income annuity. You pay the insurer a lump sum now, and they promise fixed monthly checks in the future. Because the insurer invests your money longer, the funds have room to grow into bigger payouts. The longer you defer, the less you need to invest up front to secure meaningful lifetime income.

One popular version is the Qualified Longevity Annuity Contract, or QLAC. You fund a QLAC using money from a traditional IRA or 401(k), and you can delay required minimum distributions (RMDs) on the money used to fund it.

Normally, the IRS forces you to begin RMDs at age 73, even if you don’t need the cash. With a QLAC, you can shield up to $210,000 in 2025 from those withdrawals, cutting your taxable income in your 70s while setting yourself up with guaranteed income later. However, payments from a QLAC must begin no later than age 85.

Like SPIAs, longevity annuities are simple and straightforward compared to many other annuity products. You don’t have to wade through participation rates, index crediting formulas or optional riders with extra charges. Costs aren’t broken out in an annual fee statement, but like SPIAs, they’re built into the calculation of your future payments.

The trade-off, of course, is you might not live long enough to reach the payout age. And if you die before payments begin, the insurer keeps the money unless you’ve purchased a special rider at an added cost.

However, for those who expect to live longer than average, longevity annuities can deliver peace of mind at a relatively low cost.

3. Create a bond ladder

If you want income without locking money away in an annuity, a bond ladder is a helpful tool.

A bond ladder is a strategy in which you buy a series of bonds that mature at different times — such as one-year, three-year, five-year and 10-year Treasury bonds. As each bond matures, you collect the principal and can either reinvest the money or spend it.

The benefit of this setup is steady, predictable cash flow and reduced interest rate risk. Instead of putting everything into one long-term bond (and getting stuck with a low rate), you spread out maturities. That way, when rates rise, you can reinvest in new bonds with higher yields.

But building a bond ladder on your own can be confusing.

“DIY investors who are familiar with building CD ladders at their local bank may find bonds to be a more complex undertaking,” says Kates.

You’ll need to select the right mix of maturities, know how to buy Treasurys or corporate bonds, and manage rollover decisions. That’s why Kates says bringing in a financial advisor to structure and monitor the ladder can be a prudent move.

“Otherwise, sticking with CDs or bond ETFs may be a better option,” he says.

4. Invest in dividend stocks

Dividend-paying stocks are another vehicle retirees use to generate income. Shares of these companies regularly return a portion of profits to shareholders, often quarterly. For example, household names like Coca-Cola (KO) or Procter & Gamble (PG) have a long history of paying reliable dividends.

The advantage is twofold: You get regular cash flow and the potential for your stock value to increase over time.

But here’s the trade-off and the risk: Dividends aren’t guaranteed. Companies can slash or eliminate payouts at any time and for any reason.

Despite the risk, retirees often use dividend stocks to supplement their income. Purchasing a dividend stock ETF, which spreads your money across multiple companies and sectors, can help lower the risk of relying too heavily on one company’s payout. Some investors also focus on what are known as Dividend Aristocrats, or companies that have paid and raised their dividends for at least 25 straight years.

5. Own a rental property

Real estate is another classic income source for retirees. A rental property can provide monthly cash flow while also appreciating in value over time. In retirement, that steady income can feel like a second paycheck.

Of course, being a landlord isn’t for everyone. Dealing with repairs, tenant headaches and vacancies can be stressful. Property managers can take some of that hassle off your plate, but they also eat into profits. And unlike an annuity, rental income isn’t guaranteed — tenants might move out and unexpected costs can pile up.

Still, real estate is a tangible asset, which gives it a unique edge. Unlike other investments, property is something you can live in, pass down or sell if needed.

Bottom line

Everyone loves the idea of lifetime income, but it doesn’t happen on its own. You need a plan that blends different sources. Annuities are the only tool aside from Social Security that can guarantee income, making them an important consideration. But beyond that, bond ladders, dividend stocks and real estate can all play supporting roles. A good financial advisor can help you sort through these options, weigh the trade-offs and build a strategy that fits your needs.

Key takeaways

Social Security likely won’t cover all of your expenses in retirement, and the prevalence of pensions is dwindling. This leaves those planning for retirement to piece together how they will create lifetime income for themselves during their golden years.
Annuities are the only product that can provide guaranteed lifetime income, but other tools — like bonds, dividend stocks and real estate — can add stability and flexibility.
There’s no universal formula for creating lifetime income. The right approach depends on your risk tolerance, resources and retirement goals.

©2025 Bankrate.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Prince Harry visits late queen’s grave as UK visit fuels speculation about meeting with King Charles

posted in: All news | 0

By DANICA KIRKA

LONDON (AP) — Prince Harry arrived in the U.K. on Monday leading to speculation about whether he will meet with his father, King Charles III, for the first time in 19 months.

Related Articles


Israel bombs another Gaza City high-rise as US advances a new ceasefire proposal


New Banksy mural of a judge beating a protester to be removed from outside London court


Train collision with bus in Mexico kills at least 8 people, authorities say


Palestinian gunmen kill 6 people in attack on Jerusalem bus stop


Ukraine shows diplomats damage after Russia’s largest aerial attack since invasion

Amid signs of a thaw in the frigid relationship between Harry and the rest of the royal family, British media suggest that the prince’s trip to London on Monday’s third anniversary of the death of Queen Elizabeth II provides an opening for a long-overdue rapprochement between Charles, 76, and his estranged son. Harry visited the monarch’s grave in Windsor to offer his respects and lay flowers.

Harry has had little contact with his father and elder brother, Prince William, since he and his wife, the former Meghan Markle, gave up royal duties and moved to California in 2020. The relationship became even frostier after the couple bared their grievances with Buckingham Palace in a tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey, a Netflix series and Harry’s memoir, “Spare.”

A frosty relationship

The last time Harry and Charles met was in February 2024, when the prince flew to London after receiving news that his father had been diagnosed with cancer. Harry spent about 45 minutes with Charles before the king flew to his Sandringham country estate to recuperate from his treatment.

Harry was last in London in April, when the Court of Appeal rejected his bid to restore a police protection detail that was canceled after he stopped being a working royal. Charles was on a state visit to Italy at the time, so a meeting was impossible.

That case was itself an impediment to improved relations because it involved Harry criticizing the king’s government in the courts. But once it was over, change became possible.

Immediately after the case ended, Harry said he would “love reconciliation with my family.”

“There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore,” he told the BBC on the day the court case was resolved. “Life is precious. I don’t know how much longer my father has.”

Despite that olive branch, Harry struck a combative tone that might torpedo hopes of repairing the family breach. The prince repeatedly said that the decision to withdraw his security was made at the direction of the royal household in an effort to control him and his wife while putting their safety at risk.

“What I’m struggling to forgive, and what I will probably always struggle to forgive, is the decision that was made in 2020 that affects my every single day and that is knowingly putting me and my family in harm’s way,” Harry said.

Change of tone

But with the lawsuit out of the way, the mood music coming from Charles and Harry’s supporters seemed to change.

In July, the new team handling Harry and Meghan’s communications, headed by Los Angeles-based Meredith Maines, was seen on the balcony of a private members’ club in London speaking with Tobyn Andreae, the king’s press representative. The Mail on Sunday was on hand to snap a photo of what the paper called: “The secret Harry peace summit.”

Regardless of who tipped off the paper, it showed a change of tone since the meeting wouldn’t have happened if the so-called principals hadn’t given their tacit consent.

Celebrating the bravery of ill children

And now comes Harry’s appearance at the WellChild Awards on Monday night in London.

The event, which celebrates the bravery of seriously ill children and those who care for them, is sponsored by a charity Harry has long supported. It is a reminder that not so long ago, Harry was one of the star attractions of the royal family’s effort to reach out to younger, more diverse Britons.

“For 20 years these Awards have highlighted the courage of young people living with complex health needs and shone a light on the devoted caregivers — family and professionals — who support them every step of the way,’’ the prince said in a statement put out by the charity. “Their stories remind us of the power of compassion, connection and community.”

But it will be hard to undo the damage caused by Harry and Meghan’s allegations of insensitivity, conflict and racism within the royal household.

Memoir overshadows reconciliation

Harry’s explosive memoir, “Spare,” shattered the veneer of unity the royals present to the public, depicting them as scheming rivals who use a cozy relationship with the media to jockey for public favor.

It also revealed the details of private conversations, including one between the king and his sons, which was held in a graveyard in hopes of hiding it from the press.

“Please, boys,’’ Harry quotes Charles as saying. “Don’t make my final years a misery.’’

But Charles may have an incentive to let bygones be bygones.

Now approaching his 77th birthday and continuing to undergo cancer treatment, the king may want to get more time with his grandchildren, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4, who was born after her parents moved to the wealthy Southern California enclave of Montecito.

Harry put the responsibility for any rapprochement on his family.

In his interview with the BBC, Harry said he believes that you can’t have reconciliation without truth, and his lawsuit over police protection revealed the truth about his battle with the palace.

“It would be nice to have that reconciliation part now,” he said. “If they don’t want that, that’s entirely up to them.”

Norway votes in a closely fought election with the future of a wealth tax in focus

posted in: All news | 0

By KOSTYA MANENKOV

OSLO, Norway (AP) — Norwegians headed to the polls Monday in the main day of voting for a new parliament, after a campaign in which the future of a wealth tax that dates to the late 19th century has been a central issue.

Related Articles


Israel bombs another Gaza City high-rise as US advances a new ceasefire proposal


New Banksy mural of a judge beating a protester to be removed from outside London court


Train collision with bus in Mexico kills at least 8 people, authorities say


Palestinian gunmen kill 6 people in attack on Jerusalem bus stop


Ukraine shows diplomats damage after Russia’s largest aerial attack since invasion

About 4.3 million people in the Scandinavian nation are eligible to vote for the new 169-member parliament, or Storting. A close outcome is expected between a center-left bloc led by the Labor Party of Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre and a right-wing bloc.

Official results are expected Tuesday, and they are likely to be followed by weeks of negotiations to build a coalition and agree on Cabinet positions before King Harald can swear in a new government.

The result isn’t likely to have major implications for Norway’s foreign policy. The country is a stalwart member of NATO and a strong supporter of Ukraine’s defense against Russia, with which it has a border in the Arctic north. It isn’t a member of the European Union but has close economic ties with the 27-nation bloc.

Norway is one of the richest countries in the world. It has a generous welfare state, sits on billions of barrels of oil and gas, and has one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, worth around 20 trillion kroner ($2 trillion). Gross domestic product per person is the sixth-highest in the world, one place above the U.S., according to the International Monetary Fund.

It is also one of the world’s most egalitarian countries, sharing its wealth much more evenly than many others.

Labor wants to keep the wealth tax that has been a mainstay of Norwegian policy since 1892 — a levy of up to 1.1% on assets and shares worth more than 1.76 million kroner (around $176,000), though there are various reductions and discounts. Labor says that scrapping it would cost 34 billion kroner ($3.3 billion) per year.

Of its rivals on the right, the Conservatives want it reduced and the Progress Party of Sylvi Listhaug, which calls for lower taxes and more immigration controls, wants it scrapped.

Polls have shown Listhaug’s party ahead of the Conservatives, led by former Prime Minister Erna Solberg, who were the senior partner in the last center-right government from 2013 to 2021. The Progress Party has been bolstered by an energetic social media campaign, driven by youthful influencers who have inspired younger voters against the wealth tax.

“I think it is fair that the most wealthy among us pay their contribution,” Gahr Støre said after he voted on Monday. “It’s been the parties of the right who wanted to take that entirely away, benefiting 1% of the population.”

“I think that goes against the deep sense of fairness and solidarity from Norwegians,” he said.

Supreme Court lifts restrictions on LA immigration stops set after agents swept up US citizens

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for federal agents to conduct sweeping immigration operations in Los Angeles, the latest victory for President Donald Trump’s administration at the high court.

The conservative majority lifted a restraining order from a judge who found that “roving patrols” were conducting indiscriminate arrests in LA. The order had barred agents from stopping people solely based on their race, language, job or location.

Related Articles


Thune says Senate will change the rules to push through Trump’s blocked nominees


Chief justice lets Trump remove member of Federal Trade Commission for now


Appeals court upholds E. Jean Carroll’s $83.3 million defamation judgment against President Trump


Trump asks Supreme Court for emergency order to keep billions of dollars in foreign aid frozen


Noem says roundup of Koreans at Hyundai plant in Georgia won’t deter investment in the US

Trump’s Republican administration argued the order wrongly restricted agents carrying out its widespread crackdown on illegal immigration.

U.S. District Judge Maame E. Frimpong in Los Angeles had found a “mountain of evidence” that enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. The plaintiffs included U.S. citizens swept up in immigration stops. An appeals court had left Frimpong’s ruling in place.

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision comes as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents also step up enforcement in Washington amid Trump’s unprecedented federal takeover of the capital city’s law enforcement and deployment of the National Guard.

The lawsuit will now continue to unfold in California. It was filed by immigrant advocacy groups that accused Trump’s administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people during his administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration in the Los Angeles area.

Department of Homeland Security attorneys have said immigration officers target people based on illegal presence in the U.S., not skin color, race or ethnicity. Even so, the Justice Department argued that the order wrongly restricted the factors that ICE agents can use when deciding who to stop.

The Los Angeles region has been a battleground for the Trump administration after its hard-line immigration strategy spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines. The number of immigration raids in the LA area appeared to slow shortly after Frimpong’s order came down in July, but recently they have become more frequent again, including an operation in which agents jumped out of the back of a rented box truck and made arrests at an LA Home Depot store.

The plaintiffs argued that her order only prevents federal agents from making stops without reasonable suspicion, something that aligns with the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent.

“Numerous U.S. citizens and others who are lawfully present in this country have been subjected to significant intrusions on their liberty,” the plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote. “Many have been physically injured; at least two were taken to a holding facility.”

The Trump administration said the order is too restrictive, “threatening agents with sanctions if the court disbelieves that they relied on additional factors in making any particular stop.”

Solicitor General D. John Sauer also argued the order can’t stand under the high court’s recent decision restricting universal injunctions, though the plaintiffs disagreed.

The order from Frimpong, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, barred authorities from using factors like apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone’s occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion for detention. Its covered a combined population of nearly 20 million people, nearly half of whom identify as Hispanic or Latino.

Plaintiffs included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens. One of the citizens was Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a June 13 video being seized by federal agents as he yelled, “I was born here in the States. East LA, bro!”

Gavidia was released about 20 minutes later after showing agents his identification, as was another citizen stopped at a car wash, according to the lawsuit.

Associated Press writer Jaimie Ding in Los Angeles and Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report.