The US is preparing criminal charges in Iran hack targeting Trump, AP sources say

posted in: Politics | 0

By ERIC TUCKER

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department is preparing criminal charges in connection with an Iranian hack that targeted Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in a bid to shape the outcome of the November election, two people familiar with the matter said Thursday.

It was not immediately clear when the charges might be announced or whom precisely they will target, but they are the result of an FBI investigation into an intrusion that investigators across multiple agencies quickly linked to an Iranian effort to influence American politics.

The prospect of criminal charges comes as the Justice Department has raised alarms about aggressive efforts by countries including Russia and Iran to meddle in the presidential election between Trump and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, including by hacking and covert social media campaigns designed to shape public opinion.

Iran “is making a greater effort to influence this year’s election than it has in prior election cycles and that Iranian activity is growing increasingly aggressive as this election nears,” Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen, the Justice Department’s top national security official, said in a speech Thursday in New York City.

“Iran perceives this year’s elections to be particularly consequential in impacting Iran’s national security interests, increasing Tehran’s inclination to try to shape the outcome,” he added.

The Trump campaign disclosed on Aug. 10 that it had been hacked and said Iranian actors had stolen and distributed sensitive internal documents. At least three news outlets — Politico, The New York Times and The Washington Post — were leaked confidential material from inside the Trump campaign. So far, each has refused to reveal any details about what it received.

Politico reported that it began receiving emails on July 22 from an anonymous account. The source — an AOL email account identified only as “Robert” — passed along what appeared to be a research dossier that the campaign had apparently done on the Republican vice presidential nominee, Ohio Sen. JD Vance. The document was dated Feb. 23, almost five months before Trump selected Vance as his running mate.

The FBI, the office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency subsequently blamed that hack, as well as an attempted breach of the Biden-Harris campaign, on Iran.

Those agencies issued a statement saying that the hacking and similar activities were meant to sow discord, exploit divisions within American society and influence the outcome of elections.

The statement did not identify whether Iran has a preferred candidate, though Tehran has long appeared determined to seek retaliation for a 2020 strike Trump ordered as president that killed an Iranian general.

The two people who discussed the looming criminal charges spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press because they were not authorized to speak publicly about a case that had not yet been unsealed.

The Washington Post first reported that charges were being prepared.

Justice Department officials have been working to publicly call out and counter election interference efforts. The response is a contrast to 2016, when Obama administration officials were far more circumspect about Russian interference they were watching that was designed to boost Trump’s campaign.

“We have learned that transparency about what we are seeing is critical,” Olsen, the Justice Department official, said Thursday.

“It helps ensure that our citizens are aware of the attempts of foreign government to sow discord and spread falsehoods — all of which promotes resilience within our electorate,” he added. “It provides warnings to our private sector so they can better protect their networks. And it sends an unmistakable message to our adversaries — we’ve gained insight into your networks, we know what you’re doing, and we are determined to hold you accountable.”

Last week, in an effort to combat disinformation ahead of the election, the Justice Department charged two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, with covertly funneling a Tennessee-based content creation company nearly $10 million to publish English-language videos on social media platforms with messages in favor of the Russia government’s interests and agenda.

St. Paul man found guilty in niece’s shooting of 11-year-old boy

posted in: News | 0

A Ramsey County judge has found a St. Paul man guilty of two gun crimes after his 13-year-old niece accidentally shot an 11-year-old boy in the head inside his apartment in March.

Martinez Castillo Lloyd, 34, was convicted Monday of felony possession of a firearm by a person convicted of a crime of violence and gross misdemeanor negligent storage of a firearm where a child is likely to gain access. He’s scheduled for a Nov. 6 sentencing.

Martinez Castillo Lloyd (Courtesy of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office)

Children were playing with Lloyd’s guns on March 29 when a gun went off and the boy was shot. He was transported to the hospital, where he underwent multiple surgeries.

Lloyd waived his right to a jury trial, electing to have Judge John Guthmann decide the verdict. A court trial was held July 23-24.

Officers responded to the Frogtown apartment building where Lloyd lives on a report of a shooting. They arrived just before 9 p.m. to apartments on Pierce Butler Route and Victoria Street and “a chaotic scene” with numerous juveniles, where they found the 11-year-old lying at the top of the stairs inside the building, according to the criminal complaint filed against Lloyd.

Several juveniles said a girl picked up a firearm and said, “I won’t shoot him” before shooting the boy in the head and running away.

Police determined the 13-year-old girl lives on Charles Avenue and arrested her in the 100 block of Charles Avenue. As police were taking her into custody, she said, “I accidently shot somebody” and “I didn’t know the gun was loaded,” the complaint said. Police arrested her on suspicion of assault.

In the apartment, police found a loaded Smith & Wesson revolver under a couch cushion and a spent bullet beneath a sofa. On the top shelf of a built-in dresser/shelving unit, which had unlocked doors, police located a loaded Springfield Hellcat 9mm semiautomatic pistol. No gun safe or any other form of locked cabinet was in the apartment.

The girl testified that she regularly visited her uncle’s apartment to see her cousins. About a year before the shooting, they found the Smith & Wesson revolver on the top shelf of the dresser unit in the bedroom. They later found the Hellcat pistol in the same spot. They had to climb up the dresser unit to reach the guns.

The children held the revolver and took pictures with it. They played with the guns more than 10 times, she testified, according to Guthmann’s ruling.

On two occasions, Lloyd caught the children with a firearm and told them to “put it back and stop touching stuff,” she testified. He showed them how to put the Hellcat on safety and to “treat every gun like it is loaded.” She knew that the revolver could not be put on safety.

They continued playing with the guns even after being warned not to. They were always in the same place and they were never in any kind of locked cabinet.

On the night of the shooting, Lloyd told them he was going to the store. After he left, Lloyd’s son got the Hellcat and began playing with it. While one of the kids was waving it around, the girl asked if it was loaded and the child said “yes.” The girl said to put it back so he exchanged it for the Smith & Wesson revolver. While she was holding the gun, it just “went off” and the boy was shot.

In an interview with police, Lloyd said he kept the guns on the armoire’s top shelf and that they were not secured or locked up, according to Guthmann’s ruling. He admitted catching the children playing with his guns in the past. He said the guns are usually loaded, but that he takes out the bullets when the kids come over.

Upon his return from the store, police were on site and someone said that a child had been shot on the third floor. He immediately concluded the shooting was in his apartment because they mentioned the third floor and he had children in his apartment.

He kept them in the same place

Lloyd is not eligible to possess firearms because he has a conviction for third-degree drug sale, stemming from a 2010 case, which state law defines as a crime of violence.

Guthmann pointed out that Lloyd admitted keeping the two firearms in his apartment, explaining that he did so for his protection. He admitted putting them in the location where they were found by the children and he admitted keeping them loaded.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Former Eagan pastor found guilty of criminal sexual conduct with parishioner

Crime & Public Safety |


Minnesota court upholds sexual abuse conviction after support dog was present during girl’s testimony

Crime & Public Safety |


Man sentenced in 2019 ‘cold-blooded revenge’ murder outside St. Paul bar

Crime & Public Safety |


Do this right now if your Social Security number was snared by hackers

Crime & Public Safety |


Trump repeats false claims over 2020 election loss, deflects responsibility for Jan. 6

Guthmann concluded that Lloyd’s statement to police, the police investigation and the girl’s testimony “conclusively establish that (Lloyd) failed to use reasonable care” in the storage of his loaded guns.

“The Smith & Wesson and Hellcat were undisputedly loaded firearms,” the judge wrote. “He kept leaving them in the same place knowing that his under-18 children and his under-18 nieces and nephews were accessing and playing with the guns. Thus, (Lloyd) knew or reasonably should have known that children would access the guns.”

St. Paul police presented an investigation involving the girl to the county attorney’s office for review. Because of her age, the county attorney’s office said Thursday they couldn’t release information about whether she is charged.

Generally, information about juveniles is public if they are 16 and older and charged with a felony, or if they are younger and certified to stand trial as an adult.

Amazon boosts pay for subcontracted delivery drivers amid union pressure

posted in: News | 0

By HALELUYA HADERO

Amazon is giving another pay boost to its subcontracted delivery drivers in the U.S. amid growing union pressure.

Drivers who work with Amazon’s Delivery Service Partners, or DSPs, will earn an average of nearly $22 per hour, a 7% bump from the previous average of $20.50, the company said Thursday.

The increase in wages is part of a new $2.1 billion investment the Seattle-based online retailer is making in the delivery program. Amazon doesn’t directly employ drivers but relies on thousands of third-party businesses that deliver millions of customer packages every day.

The company also gave a pay bump to U.S. drivers last year. Last week, it also said it would increase wages for front-line workers in the United Kingdom by 9.8% or more.

Amazon said the DSP program has created 390,000 driving jobs since 2018 and its total investments of $12 billion since then will help with safety programs and provide incentives for participating businesses.

U.S. labor regulators are putting more scrutiny on Amazon’s business model, which has put a layer of separation between the company and the workers who drive its ubiquitous gray-blue vans.

The Teamsters and other labor groups have argued that Amazon exercises great control over the subcontracted workforce, including by determining their routes, setting delivery targets and monitoring their performances. They say the company should be classified as a joint employer under the eyes of the law, which Amazon has resisted.

However, labor regulators are increasingly siding against the company.

Last week, a National Labor Relations Board prosecutor in Atlanta determined Amazon should be held jointly liable for allegedly making threats and other unlawful statements to DSP drivers seeking to unionize in the city. Meanwhile, NLRB prosecutors in Los Angeles determined last month that Amazon was a joint employer of subcontracted drivers who delivered packages for the company in California.

If a settlement is not reached in those cases, the agency could choose to bring a complaint against Amazon, which would be litigated within the NLRB’s administrative law system. Amazon has the option to appeal a judge’s order to the agency’s board and eventually, to a federal court.

Donald Trump says no to second debate with Kamala Harris

posted in: Politics | 0

Former President Trump said Thursday that he won’t do a second debate with Vice President Kamala Harris.

After his rocky performance in Tuesday’s debate, Trump posted on his social media site that he wouldn’t agree any further clashes.

“There will be no (additional) debate!” Trump wrote.

There was no immediate response from the Harris campaign, which challenged Trump to a second debate immediately after the first one on Tuesday night.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Most Americans don’t trust AI-powered election information: survey

National Politics |


Q&A: How to talk about politics with people who don’t agree with you

National Politics |


Young women are more liberal than they’ve been in decades, a Gallup analysis finds

National Politics |


2 Black women could make Senate history on Election Day

National Politics |


Maligning a culture via its foods is a longtime American habit. Trump did it Tuesday

The Democratic candidate said she wants to debate again during her rally in North Carolina Thursday afternoon.

“I believe we owe it to the voters to have another debate because this election and what is at stake could not be more important,” Harris told thousands of supporters at a rally in Charlotte.

Trump claimed that he won the first debate, a claim that is undercut by polls that said viewers considered Harris the winner by wide margins.

He compared Harris to a boxer who asks for a rematch after losing a bout.

“When a prizefighter loses a fight, the first words out of his mouth are, ‘I want a rematch,’” Trump wrote.

Trump advisers and Republican leaders were split over whether Trump should accept another debate after what they acknowledged was a shaky showing in the first clash.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Most Americans don’t trust AI-powered election information: survey

National Politics |


Q&A: How to talk about politics with people who don’t agree with you

National Politics |


Young women are more liberal than they’ve been in decades, a Gallup analysis finds

National Politics |


2 Black women could make Senate history on Election Day

National Politics |


Maligning a culture via its foods is a longtime American habit. Trump did it Tuesday