NEW YORK – One of the familiar “hockeyisms” that Don Lucia liked to use during his time as head coach of the Minnesota Gophers holds true even today.

“The first team to three is usually going to win,” he would say, stressing the importance of his teams putting three or more goals on the board.

The offensive challenges for the Minnesota Wild, as they push for the playoffs while still missing two of their more dynamic goal-scorers – Kirill Kaprizov and Joel Eriksson Ek – can be underscored with some simple math, showing how difficult it has been for the Wild to get to three goals on any given night.

Since resuming play after the 4 Nations break on Feb. 22 in Detroit with a 4-3 overtime win, the Wild have gone 8-9-2, and have scored 41 goals. That is an average of 2.1 goals per game. Take away the 11 power play goals scored by the Wild in that stretch, and they are averaging 1.5 even-strength goals per game.

Some nights that is enough, especially with the team generally playing stellar defense, buoyed by the return of Jonas Brodin, and getting solid goaltending from Filip Gustavsson.

Monday’s 3-2 shootout loss in New Jersey, even though it resulted in an important standings point, illustrated the offensive frustrations that have gripped the Wild of late. After the Devils scored a first period goal, the Wild needed to push and push and push to exhaustion to tie the game. The Devils took another lead, and Minnesota needed to take advantage of a defensive breakdown to get to overtime via Matt Boldy’s goal with 2:05 left in regulation.

Marcus Foligno, who set up the tying goal, joked that by this point in a season — with just seven games to go before the playoff field is set — the team is “pretty numb” to any potential offensive frustration after trailing 1-0 for much of the game in New Jersey.

“As long as we keep that a goal away, I think we’re fine. That’s the mentality we have. I mean, no one’s counting,” he said. “Really, it’s a lot of positivity. We think that if we can get one we can get another one after. This is how we have to play. We’ve gotta play stingy. We’ve gotta play smart and for most of the game … we had some really good, relentless pressure.”

On a team where injuries have been a non-stop part of the storyline, seemingly, since training camp, the healthy players are long past the point of worrying about who is not in the lineup or when they might return. And Boldy made it clear that nobody is looking for sympathy when pucks aren’t going in the net.

“I mean, what are you gonna do? Yeah, you’re down a goal, you’re not gonna sit there and pout, that’s the nature of life. Stuff goes wrong, you step up and you work harder, you put your head down and find ways to create a positive, score a goal, whatever it is,” said Boldy, whose 25th goal of the season — a pretty backhand move — tied the game late. “We’re not a group that pouts in here and that sits and gets all sad and stuff when things aren’t going our way. We put our heads down and go to work.”

And if that “head down, keep working” attitude gets them to three goals, most of the time the mission is accomplished.

April Fools from Da Beauty League

In 1993, Minnesota lost its NHL team to the Sunbelt, and needed to wait seven years to get a new franchise. For a time on Tuesday, it looked like the State of Hockey was losing an entire league to another warm-weather destination.

Da Beauty League, which has featured some of the best local NHL and college players scrimmaging a few nights a week in the summer has been a popular hockey fix for fans for the past decade or so, with games held at Braemar Arena in Edina. For hockey-starved fans in the off-season, the crowds are usually big, and it’s a place where autograph seekers can often get a hockey card or hat signed.

So there was naturally some shock and disappointment on Tuesday morning when the league’s official Instagram account included an announcement that Da Beauty League would be seeking to fill the void left in metro Phoenix when the NHL’s Coyotes moved to Utah, and that the league’s games would be played in Tempe, Arizona, next summer.

Alas, in the fourth paragraph of the solemn announcement, DBL officials confirmed that the relocation plans were just a harmless April Fool’s joke, and the 2025 edition of the league faces off on July 9 in Edina.

Related Articles

Matt Boldy’s late goal salvages a point for Wild in New Jersey

Newark is where it all began for Wild coach John Hynes

Progress, but still no set return date, for Wild’s Kaprizov and Eriksson Ek

Hischier’s hat trick too much for Wild to overcome

A double dip of Devils on the Wild schedule this week

“New York needs a comprehensive, modernized infrastructure to get food to hungry older adults and a system that goes beyond the outdated model of providing just one meal per day, five days a week.”

The near-bare refrigerator of a senior enrolled in the city’s home-delivered meals program last summer. Photo by Adi Talwar for City Limits.

Every New Yorker has a stake in how our city cares for its oldest residents—whether they’re our parents, grandparents, neighbors, or ourselves in the years to come. This reality takes on new urgency as our city is now home to a record 1.8 million older adults—more than the number of school-age children. A recent report found that the number of older adults living in poverty in New York City rose over 33 percent in the past 10 years, revealing a crisis throughout the five boroughs.

These striking numbers should concern all of us. Research by Citymeals and the CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute found that 60 percent of older New Yorkers relying on home-delivered meal programs experienced food insecurity in the past year, with 65 percent living on less than $15,000 annually in one of America’s most expensive cities.

Even more troubling, the study found that 50 percent of those surveyed had never received any pension or retirement income, and 32 percent had never received Social Security benefits. As food, housing, and medical costs surge alongside our growing elderly population, we need to reimagine our approach to ending elder hunger.

The path forward is clear: city leaders must significantly increase funding for older adult nutrition programs. New York needs a comprehensive, modernized infrastructure to get food to hungry older adults and a system that goes beyond the outdated model of providing just one meal per day, five days a week.

Meal delivery programs are lifelines for New Yorkers like Jewel, a 78-year-old Bronx resident and former pediatric nurse’s assistant. Since suffering a stroke in 2001 that left her with severe vertigo, she rarely leaves her apartment. After overcoming tremendous personal challenges and serving others for decades, she now struggles with the basic necessity of feeding herself.

“I can prepare simple meals,” she says, “anything that’s easy, so I don’t have to stand up.” But even with her cane, Jewel can’t be on her feet for long. She relies on home-delivered meals for her most consistent support—one meal a day for the past eight years. But as essential as that support is, it doesn’t go far enough to provide food security.

The 1965 Older Americans Act established a federal program requiring only one meal a day, five days a week for older Americans in need. Sixty years later, this is drastically insufficient. Over 50 percent of meal recipients say they need two or more meals daily, with many describing the current service as “appreciated, but just not enough.” People cannot age safely in place while hungry and at risk of malnutrition.

This is not just a moral imperative but a fiscally responsible investment. A full year of home-delivered meals costs the equivalent of just one month in a nursing facility or one week in a hospital. Adequate nutrition helps older adults like Jewel remain home, avoiding costly hospitalizations and institutional care that burden our healthcare system and city budget.

RELATED READING: For Many Older New Yorkers, Home-Delivered Meals Offer More Than Food

The evidence is compelling: 87 percent of meal recipients report that these services help them remain in their own homes, 85 percent say the meals help them eat more healthily, and 81 percent say that meals help them manage health conditions. These outcomes save money across multiple city agencies by reducing emergency healthcare needs. 

Citymeals has launched several innovative pilot programs in response to this data, including delivering breakfast boxes that provide a second daily meal for the most food insecure recipients and an expanded mobile grocery program. But these efforts alone cannot meet the escalating need.

During this budget cycle, New York City must significantly increase funding for expanded nutrition programs that go beyond the outdated one-meal-a-day model. Recently introduced legislation by Councilmember Linda Lee would require that home-delivered meals be delivered each day of the calendar year—one solution that’s part of a broader campaign to increase vital funding for aging services in New York City and statewide.

More than half of Citymeals recipients are over 80 years old, nearly 20 percent are over 90, and almost 400 have lived at least a century. These vulnerable New Yorkers deserve a comprehensive, modernized approach that recognizes food as a human right and as essential preventive medicine, not a supplement. By investing proactively in food security for older adults, we make a sound fiscal decision that also aligns with our values as New Yorkers. 

We cannot allow New Yorkers who built this city to spend their final years hungry and alone. Our elected officials must commit to the funding that matches the scale of this challenge, ensuring older New Yorkers can age in place with dignity.

 Beth Shapiro is the CEO of Citymeals on Wheels.

The post Opinion: Older New Yorkers Built This City—Now They’re Going Hungry appeared first on City Limits.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld a state agency’s decision to deny an iron ore mine and processing plant’s request to allow a downstream lake to have sulfate pollution nearly eight times higher than the standard for wild rice waters.

On Monday, a three-judge panel unanimously said the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency was right in February 2024 to deny U.S. Steel’s request for a site-specific standard allowing Hay Lake to have sulfate levels of 79 parts per million or 79 milligrams per liter. The state standard for wild rice waters is 10 ppm of sulfate.

U.S. Steel, which owns the Keetac mine and pellet plant, had appealed the decision, arguing the MPCA’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence and based on an error of law.

He cited a Minnesota statute that allows the MPCA to determine if a modified standard is warranted.

“The MPCA’s analysis in this regard was based on its expertise, to which we defer. … Therefore, U.S. Steel did not demonstrate that the MPCA’s decision was based on an error of law,” Harris wrote.

Paula Maccabee, executive director and counsel for environmental group WaterLegacy, celebrated the court’s decision.

“It’s just a very simple opinion, it’s really easy to understand, and basically, it’s telling the MPCA, ‘You did the right thing to regulate, and you’re not stuck with that equation that was thrown out by the administrative law judge,’” Maccabee said, referring to the MPCA’s previous attempt at replacing the 10 ppm sulfate limit with a formula that would have included the water’s organic carbon and iron content. The agency withdrew its rule change proposal in 2018 after an administrative law judge said it was “unconstitutionally void for vagueness.”

In Monday’s opinion, Harris quoted the MPCA’s statement that “recent concerns have emerged that suggest the degree of protection against sulfide that is afforded by iron may not be as great as originally conceived.”

“Overall,” Harris wrote, “the record does not support U.S. Steel’s argument that MPCA used its will and not its judgment when determining that the sediment-based equation was not scientifically defensible, especially when used to grant an SSS (site-specific standard), instead of a statewide sulfate standard. Even if research related to the sediment-based equation continues to develop, potentially leading to conflicting scientific opinions, evolving research does not make the MPCA’s decision arbitrary and capricious.”

U.S. Steel can still petition the Minnesota Supreme Court to review the case, though it has not said whether it would.

“We are disappointed with the court’s finding and are reviewing the decision to determine next steps,” U.S. Steel spokesperson Andrew Fulton said in a statement Monday.

The MPCA did not immediately respond to the Duluth News Tribune’s request for comment.

Sulfate released into water from industrial processes such as mining and wastewater treatment can harm rice at elevated levels as it converts into hydrogen sulfide within the sediment, but

Federal permits covering water released from Keetac’s tailings basin, where a slurry of water and fine pieces of crushed waste rock sit behind earthen dams, and its open-pit mine, limit the monthly average sulfate in wastewater releases to 14 ppm and monthly maximum sulfate levels in wastewater releases to 24 ppm. Those figures are designed to keep downstream wild rice waters under 10 ppm of sulfate.

But under the Biden administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in May sent a notice of violation to U.S. Steel’s Keetac iron ore mine and pellet plant, alleging that it released wastewater with sulfate levels higher than the permitted amount 299 times into nearby waters between September 2019 and September 2022.

Related Articles

Sheriff: Parents won’t be charged after son, 3, fatally shot himself in December

Skier, 21, killed in weekend accident at Giants Ridge in Biwabik

Richard Carlbom will lead Minnesota DFL, succeeding Ken Martin

On Minnesota’s Iron Range, Trump’s tariffs could be boom or bust

High school hockey coach, Lakeville officer returns home 2 months after injury

Homage would be the kinder term, but no matter how you slice it, the Hulu sitcom “Mid-Century Modern” is a “Golden Girls” ripoff. Three gay best friends sans significant others — played by Nathan Lane, Matthew Bomer and Nathan Lee Graham — decide to become roommates and share a spacious home together. Instead of Miami, the setting is Palm Springs, which is a distinction without a difference when it comes to a vaguely gestured-at backdrop of palm trees and retirees.

I actually don’t mind the recycled template. In an era defined by old intellectual property reanimated into its latest zombie form, it was inevitable someone would reimagine this ’80s TV stalwart, which still holds up (boy, does it hold up). Technically, “Mid-Century Modern” is an original show, not a reboot. But in spirit? Rebootapalooza. Even the general layout of the set is reminiscent of the “Golden Girls” house. If only the similarities extended to the show’s quality overall.

The series comes from “Will & Grace” creators Max Mutchnick and David Kohan, who understand the mechanics and rhythms of a sitcom. The cast, however, does not (with one exception), which is perhaps why it feels like everyone is playing to the back row. It’s so bad in the pilot that I’m curious if people will stick around and keep watching. I hope so, because the show improves. Not enough. But it’s better than the first episode suggests.

The owner of the house is Bunny (Lane), a mostly retired founder of a Victoria’s Secret-esque company. His snazzy, opinionated mother also lives with him, and zingers aplenty from this one. She’s played by Linda Lavin, the only sitcom veteran in the main cast and who instinctually knows what’s required here. She’s brilliant. The newcomers to their abode are Jerry, a hunky Mormon flight attendant (Bomer), and Arthur, a haughty fashion doyen recently fired from Vogue (Graham). As longtime friends, this setup is just what they need at this point in their lives, with everyone feeling somewhat adrift.

All good, in terms of the general framework. I’m dying — dying — for a traditional-style sitcom, laughtrack and all, that really works. The great James Burrows directs, and his legacy includes everything from “Cheers” to “Friends.” What could go wrong?

Quite a bit, actually. The show keeps getting in its own way, mostly because the characters lack distinct personalities. Bunny is … a lot? Arthur is … a lot too, but with a supercilious edge? Jerry is … blissfully dim? (He’s the obvious “Golden Girls” corollary, playing a version of Rose). These barebones traits don’t help you peg who they are in this little world. What do they want, as individuals? What is their comedic function within the show? None of this has been worked out. The creators go heavy on ribald, sometimes overworked, banter — “You don’t look sad, you just look like a reluctant bottom” — which in general can be fun (though in lighter doses than we get here), but only if it feels specific to each character, not just a dirty line anyone in the scene would rattle off.

That’s where “The Golden Girls” could have been instructive, because the punchlines on that show are tailored to each person’s nature and temperament and outlook on life. If “Mid-Century Modern” had a clearer idea of who its central characters were (aside from Lavin, who is perfect), the sweaty need to sell, sell, sell every joke probably wouldn’t weigh on everyone so heavily. When Bunny becomes flustered in front of an attractive man, the double entendre tumbles out of his mouth as he likens the hot guy’s storytelling skills to a one-man stage show: “People would definitely come, I’d come every night!” But Lane’s delivery doesn’t finesse the line so you laugh despite yourself; the delivery feels focused on ensuring audiences get it. Yes, we get it. Stop pushing so hard. Lane is a wonderfully versatile actor, it’s troubling to see him working to overcompensate for such an amorphously written role.

They all get COVID in one episode and are stuck at home trying to amuse themselves, and I at least appreciate that a TV show — any TV show — is acknowledging that COVID is still an ongoing reality. Another storyline sees the men taking a trip to Fire Island to recapture their youth, which doesn’t go as planned, and it’s one of the season’s strongest episodes. Pamela Adlon shows up occasionally as Bunny’s younger sister and she brings a much needed piquant energy to the proceedings. Bomer is good when Jerry the ding-dong must navigate a moment of real sentiment or complication; the juxtaposition is effective.

But overall the show is missing the kind of scenes that allow the core ensemble to sit around the kitchen table and share absurd stories with one another about their lives.

Lavin died in December at 87, before filming on the season finished. “I’m thrilled you’re gonna move in here,” she says to her son’s friends, “it’s gonna be so good for Bunny to not be alone when I’m gone, which won’t be for a long while!” She yells that last part for emphasis. It’s a line that leaves a lump in your throat.

Her death is incorporated into the final two episodes, leaving the show with an unfillable hole. The finale suggests that if the show is renewed, the creators might simply add yet another gay guy to the mix. But that doesn’t change up the energy the way Lavin’s character did. Her glamorous and slightly tacky presence served to pour cold water on whatever emotional spiral the men were in the midst of, and that was a source of real comedy. If there’s a Season 2, here’s hoping the show can conceive of the right kind of person — and the right kind of actor — who can recreate that energy.

“Mid-Century Modern” — 2.5 stars (out of 4)

Where to watch: Hulu

Nina Metz is a Tribune critic.