Floating about 500 feet offshore of Illinois Beach State Park, Hillary Glandon tightened her scuba goggles, grabbed a small masonite plate from a nearby kayak and dove beneath the Lake Michigan surface.

The masonite plate, called a Hester-Dendy sampler, helps biologists like Glandon scrape algae off underwater rocks. Just a few feet below the surface, she reached a huge underwater ridge made of limestone and other rocks piled into 750-foot rows parallel to the coast.

On this dive in late June, a crew of four scuba divers ferried equipment back and forth between the kayaks and the underwater ridges, collecting sediment samples near the boulders and dropping off underwater cameras on the bottom of the lake. As the divers continued their work, a thick morning fog began to fade, giving way to clear blue waters. From the surface, schools of juvenile fish could be spotted drifting between patches of sunlight at the bottom of the ridges.

These structures, called “rubble ridges,” aren’t just typical rocky reefs found on the bottom of the Great Lakes — they’re entirely man-made.

“We just want to see, are these reefs impacting aquatic biodiversity as well as sediment retention?” Glandon said. “We’re trying to get the whole picture of the aquatic community, and in order to do that, we need to sample in a lot of different ways. It allows us to not only look at the sediment … but also the critters that are living in there.”

Man-made reefs have become a popular way to provide a habitat for fish in coastal communities. The rubble ridges, however, are also designed as a cost-effective tool to prevent erosion. Each ridge sits about 3 to 5 feet beneath the lake’s surface, which allows them to block some of the energy and sediments carried by waves during intense winter storms. When these waves reach the coast, they don’t hit the shoreline as hard, which slows the process of erosion. And the gaps between each ridge help to retain some sediment without fully stopping the natural flow of sand.

“The designers call it passive sand management, just to slow erosion down when it’s the worst,” said Steve Brown, the Illinois state geologist. “That was part of the idea — a lower-cost offshore breakwater system. And we’re trying to see, does it work like the designers thought it would work?”

Glandon and her team of biologists and geologists at the Lake Michigan Biological Station, a research station in Zion run by the University of Illinois, are studying the rubble ridges as part of a federally funded pilot project through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The initiative is a collaborative effort that provides funding to over a dozen federal agencies to protect the Great Lakes through infrastructure and lake monitoring projects.

Installed at Illinois Beach State Park in 2021 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the ridges are being monitored along with another artificial reef at Fort Sheridan in Highland Park, as well as two control sites, about 2 miles south of each respective reef.

In this part of Lake Michigan, just 3 miles south of the Illinois-Wisconsin state line, the lake bottom consists of a flat layer of sand, which doesn’t usually attract invertebrates and smaller fish.

But as Glandon descended onto the rocky ridge, she saw hundreds of fish, from species that tend to stay near the reef year-round like the round goby, to schools of younger migratory species like alewife that were using the ridge as a nursery habitat.

By analyzing both biodiversity and shoreline changes at the reef, researchers are hoping to see whether this new kind of infrastructure could be scaled up as a tool for cities across the Great Lakes.

“Lake Michigan is a very dynamic place. It is always changing, and it always wants to change, and it always will change,” said Philip Willink, a biologist with the Illinois Natural History Survey and an expert on natural reefs in Chicago. “People don’t like that change and are trying to hold the shoreline in stasis, when, in reality, nature wants to erode some shoreline … But how do we put that into city planning?”

Tracking shoreline changes

As Glandon and a crew of three other scuba divers and two kayakers ventured out to sample algae and sediments at the ridges, a few other researchers remained onshore to help handle equipment. It was the research team’s first dive of the year, and biologist Scot Peterson could already spot the traces of erosion from the winter’s storms.

Where a wooden boardwalk had once extended out over the beach, only a small chunk of wood remained, poking out from under a sand dune on a nearby roadbed. Strong waves had gradually weakened the structure over the past few years, and last year, the state park decided to remove it altogether.

“Every time I come back, it feels like something has changed,” Peterson said.

Sights like these are common across the Great Lakes, and Lake Michigan in particular can be especially “unpredictable,” said Liz Spitzer, a coastal geologist with the Illinois State Geological Survey. The lake’s levels tend to fluctuate from low to high in 10- to 30-year cycles, with levels usually reaching their annual peak during the summer.

However, climate change is speeding up these fluctuations, experts say. In January 2013, Lake Michigan was at a record low. Just 3 ½ years later, the lake had risen 4 feet and by July 2020, it nearly broke the record high. Lake levels have always fluctuated, but that has been over a period of decades. Now these shifts are happening within a few years. That variability is attributed to multiple factors, but increased precipitation from climate change is the driving force.

Today, lake levels are hovering at about 579 feet, close to the lake’s average.

At Illinois Beach State Park, these fluctuations have taken a toll, causing extreme erosion along the coastline. Kellogg Creek, located just south of the rubble ridges, has flooded several times over the past few years, damaging one of the buildings that researchers at the Lake Michigan Biological Station used to store samples. The lake bed at the northern part of the beach has eroded away, leaving grass roots exposed as windswept dunes pile up behind the shore.

In response, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources approved a massive breakwater installation project in 2019 for the state park. The state spent $73 million to install 22 breakwaters along a 2.2-mile stretch of the state park’s shoreline, making it the largest capital project in IDNR history.

According to a 2023 release about the breakwaters, the state intended the structures to “guide and direct the movement of the sand instead of simply trying to prevent its movement.” The breakwaters, made of stone, are angled slightly to the northwest to block storms that typically come from that direction. IDNR officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The breakwaters, along with 430,000 cubic feet of sand that was added to bolster the beach, have helped rehabilitate the beach since construction finished in August 2024. The first chain of breakwaters ends just a few hundred feet north of the rubble ridges.

With extreme erosion and other construction projects unfolding at the state park, Glandon said her team has had to deal with several “confounding factors” at this reef site.

“The rubble was actually supposed to be built a little bit north of where it currently is, and that’s because the large breakwater project was in the process of being designed when the rubble was being implemented,” Glandon said. “They moved (the rubble) further south to accommodate those breakwaters.”

The monitoring project at Illinois Beach State Park began in 2021 and is set to wrap up next year. The other artificial reef site at Fort Sheridan has been monitored since 2023 under a different project funded by the Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant. Researchers are comparing the results between the two sites, hoping to explain how reef systems function along different types of shorelines. The shoreline at Fort Sheridan consists mostly of rocky bluffs, and the lake bottom in that area is dotted with small boulders.

Each spring, geologists have used drones to map the elevation of the bottom of the lake, allowing them to compare any changes in the lake’s topography that happened during the winter storm season and see if the reefs are helping retain sediment.

According to the research team’s preliminary results, the Fort Sheridan reef has successfully helped to build up some sand. At Illinois Beach State Park, though, erosion has overall increased. Most of this erosion occurred between 2022 and 2024, with very little change happening at the site during the 2025 winter season.

“The sediment dynamics, that part of it is going to be very hard to make any conclusions without a huge asterisk, since they built these big breakwaters,” Glandon said. “But what we’re hoping to do is kind of zoom out with the geology story, and tell it from the perspective of before they built these big breakwaters and after. We’re just trying to be nimble with the way we’re sampling.”

Starved of sand

Illinois Beach State Park, which boasts the state’s longest continuous stretch of natural shoreline, is somewhat of an anomaly. The park takes up 6.5 of Illinois’ 63 miles of coastline along Lake Michigan, and the majority of this coastline consists of man-made structures, such as breakwaters or seawalls.

This infrastructure is meant to help protect the urban coastline from eroding. However, it’s not how the shoreline naturally functions, according to Spitzer.

“Along this stretch of the coast, the dominant current is generally coming from the north, going southward,” she said. “Over the past couple thousand years, with the direction of the dominant current, we’ve been seeing the sand moving southward over time. And then human activity adds an extra layer of complexity to that, because that compartmentalizes where the sand can go.”

The goal of most coastal protection structures, like seawalls, is to retain sand that’s flowing through the lake. This helps build up extra sand along lakefront beaches and harbors, and lessens the impacts of erosion. Sand was already a scarce resource in southern Lake Michigan before humans began to build coastal infrastructure, according to a 2020 study conducted by Brown and other geological survey researchers, making sand retention in the area particularly vital.

But man-made structures, which often run perpendicular to the shore, can also block the natural southward flow of sand. So while seawalls can build up sand in one location, a beach directly downstream of that seawall might face worse erosion as a result.

“Every time we create a structure, it stops the sand movement, and you get erosion downstream,” said Brown. “And so the real question is that we haven’t sorted out how to live along the lake.”

The rubble ridges were designed to be an “actively moving system,” Glandon said — as waves crash against the ridges over several years, researchers expect that some of the boulders will tumble to the bottom, flattening out over time.

Since reef structures like the rubble ridges run parallel to the coast, they serve as somewhat of a middle ground — they retain some sand near the coastline but still allow most of it to pass through. So as the sand moves downstream, it leaves more for lakefront properties to the south to use as they build up their own shorelines, helping distribute sediments more evenly across the lake.

That’s part of the reasoning behind government investments in this project, Glandon said. Currently, most municipalities along the North Shore run their own coastal management programs and tend to build shoreline infrastructure like seawalls without consulting their neighbors. When one town builds a seawall, it creates a so-called domino effect — that can starve neighbors of sand directly to the south, and usually the only solution is to build their own seawalls.

“When we have private land ownership, it can be tricky to manage sediment movement that occurs outside of those human-created bounds,” Glandon said.

Using infrastructure like artificial reefs, or other more natural designs, could help alleviate the need to build seawall after seawall. It also presents a relatively low-cost option — installing the rubble ridges cost just over $1.4 million.

“One of the hopes of our program is to try to provide this quantitative data on the effects of these structures … to give towns and local managers options for ways that they could potentially retain some sand in their areas without impacting their neighbors as much,” Glandon said.

Building biodiversity

From the shores of Fort Sheridan and Illinois Beach State Park, the artificial reefs are invisible, hovering just beneath the surface. For aquatic creatures, though, these rocky reefs are a landmark, rising distinctly above the lake bottom.

“Most of the bottom of Lake Michigan is pretty flat. It’s either sand or mud, with no real features,” Willink said. “But every once in a while, there are natural reefs out there, and these can be in shallow water, in deeper water, they can be from a variety of sources as well.”

Willink, the biologist who now works with the Illinois Natural History Survey at the University of Illinois, worked for many years at Chicago’s Field Museum and Shedd Aquarium. There, he studied one of Chicago’s most iconic underwater landmarks.

Morgan Shoal, located just off the coast of Promontory Point by 53rd Street, is one of a handful of naturally occurring rocky reefs in Lake Michigan. This reef is actually a remnant of Chicago’s ancient past, Willink said — about 425 million years ago, the modern-day Great Lakes region was located south of the equator, submerged in a tropical sea that was home to several coral reefs.

Though the region’s latitude has shifted, traces like the rocky reefs remain on the bottom of the lake, providing an ideal habitat for fish. Morgan Shoal features a wide variety of “nooks and crannies,” Willink said, which provide habitats for a range of animals from large migratory fish to small invertebrates and worms.

“In the smaller spaces, that’s where we found a lot of the aquatic insects and worms — things which may not sound super exciting, but that is the bottom of the food chain,” Willink said. “This is the key, to have a variety of different habitats. When you do that, you create more of a larger variety of living spaces for a larger variety of species. And then ultimately, you end up with a higher biodiversity on the site.”

While natural reefs often provide more appealing habitats for fish, artificial reefs are also widely used for the same purpose, and have been shown to boost biodiversity.

This has been shown at the rubble ridges, too. Both the Illinois Beach State Park and Fort Sheridan reefs showed a significant increase in fish populations and biodiversity when compared against the control site for each reef, according to preliminary data from the Lake Michigan Biological Station research team.

The team tracks fish diversity with a number of different measures. During the June dive at Illinois Beach State Park, kayakers carried large aluminum frames, each with an underwater camera mounted in the middle, out to the reefs. Scuba divers carried these frames down to the reefs, where they’ll remain for the rest of the summer season.

The cameras are programmed to take a picture every five minutes, which helps scientists track the density and mass of the fish living on the reef.

“We see at the control sites, biomass is high, but abundance is low, versus at the reef sites, we have much smaller fish,” Glandon said. “We think it’s because this is showing that the reefs are nursery habitats for these fish.”

They also take samples of algae living on the underwater boulders that make up the reef, and collect sediments to see what types of invertebrates are living at the site. These invertebrates are the core of the food chain, attracting smaller fish in search of food sources.

While fish and invertebrates do sometimes seek shelter around man-made breakwaters, Willink said they’re most attracted to natural structures that don’t totally stop the flow of sand.

“Part of the key is that it isn’t a dam to the sand, it doesn’t hold the sand there,” Willink said. “If there’s too much sediment, that would smother all these small places.”

As the reef monitoring project continues, so does the constant movement of sand. Despite humans’ best efforts to counter this, the currents of the lake are ever-changing and ever-powerful, scientists say. As lakefront communities have built containment structures along their waterfronts, this trend has remained the same — even at established places like Illinois Beach State Park, waves surge above boardwalks, benches sink beneath sand, roadways are left to crumble in the face of encroaching shorelines.

“A lot of what we’re facing right now in the 21st century is, how do we deal with nature in urban areas? How do we live with nature next to us and allow nature to do its thing, and yet still maintain the infrastructure of a city?” Willink said. “And I think that’s sort of an emerging field, trying to figure out how to deal with this sort of struggle between the two. It’s not just restricted to Lake Michigan — it’s everywhere.”

Lily Carey is a freelancer.

Head Start supports school readiness for children from birth to age 5, including free childcare, nutrition assistance, health screenings, and resources for pregnant women. It’s serving 42,997 people across New York State this year, including thousands of homeless families.

(Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office)

On July 10, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a policy change to the federal Head Start program that would exclude undocumented immigrant children from enrollment. 

The proposal would rescind a 1998 Clinton-era interpretation of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). It allowed certain children without legal immigration status to access services that were not considered “federal public benefits,” but rather part of the government’s school readiness education program.

The rules are expected to take effect after publication in the Federal Register on Aug. 13, following a 30-day public comment period.

They’re part of a set of changes by President Donald Trump to make it harder for immigrants to access government services, and comes as his administration adds stricter requirements for public assistance. 

HHS also listed other federally funded programs that would now be considered “public benefits” to exclude immigrants without legal status, which HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said had previously “diverted hardworking Americans’ tax dollars to incentivize illegal immigration.” 

Soon after the announcement, the American Civil Liberties Union sued the administration, while advocates condemned the plan.

Should the new rule take effect, it would require verification of a child’s citizenship or immigration status before they could be enrolled in a Head Start program, excluding undocumented children nationwide. 

Head Start offers a variety of services to support school readiness for children from birth to age 5, including free childcare, nutrition assistance, health screenings, and resources for pregnant women. 

It primarily serves children from low-income families, but also children who don’t have a home, are in foster care, or receiving public assistance. In the past, the program was also available to legal permanent residents, children who’ve been granted asylum, humanitarian parole or refugee status. 

According to HHS’s final regulatory impact analysis, Congress provided $12.27 billion for the Head Start Preschool and Early Head Start programs in fiscal year 2024, to serve 718,947 children and pregnant women throughout the country.

While HHS oversees the program, it’s mostly run by local municipalities. New York City Public Schools (NYCPS, formerly known as the Department of Education) runs Head Start programs in the city, as well as a network of providers that receive funding directly from the federal government. City Limits reached out to providers receiving federal funds, but they declined to speak publicly about the matter, worried it would jeopardize their funding.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced the policy change on July 10. (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian)

The National Head Start Association (NHSA), a nonprofit that represents Head Start staff and families, says Head Start funded 42,997 program seats in New York State in fiscal year 2024. The program served 3,807 local homeless families, but neither officials nor advocates know how many might be excluded from the program if undocumented children are made ineligible. 

Both NYCPS  and the Office of Children and Family Services for New York State (OCFS) don’t know exactly how many children may lose coverage, the agencies told City Limits.

“New York City Public Schools does not track or ask for our students’ immigration status or country of origin,” a City Hall spokesperson said. “We are reviewing this change and will continue to monitor the situation.”

An OCFS spokesperson said via email that the agency is “currently assessing the impact of the guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).” 

HSS’s final regulatory impact analysis acknowledges that estimating the share of beneficiaries it would exclude “is inherently uncertain since this demographic information is not currently collected under the 1998 Notice.”

According to their estimates, however, “approximately 115,000 Head Start children and families could be impacted, or about 16 percent” of Head Start enrollees nationwide during the last fiscal year. 

NHSA Deputy Director Tommy Sheridan raised concerns about the policy’s potential to create barriers for children and families, especially those experiencing homelessness. “Producing documentation is a challenge, and we need to be mindful of that as we’re thinking about the verification of this,” he said. 

“We’re also really worry that requiring Head Start programs to verify [immigration] status changes both the relationship that we have with families as well as with the community, and is something that will pull us away from our primary job, which is to ensure that children are prepared for school and that families are ready to succeed in life as well,” he added.

Nora Moran, the director of policy & advocacy at United Neighborhood Houses, which provides Head Start services, said that the program’s providers and city administrators have never had to ask children or their families about their immigration status as a condition for enrollment.

“We know that there are families with varying immigration statuses who enroll their children in Head Start programs, but we cannot offer a precise number,” Moran said.

She said the announcement has confused community-based organizations that run Head Start programs. Previously, providers said their main responsibility was to identify people in the city who met the program’s income, housing, and other eligibility criteria, adding that the U.S. government had for decades viewed Head Start as an early education program, rather than a public benefit that would exclude noncitizens.

“United Neighborhood Houses condemns the federal administration’s latest attempt to undermine our communities,” said the organization’s Executive Director Susan Stamler. “To be clear: throwing immigrant children out of Head Start programs or adults out of education and training programs is as senseless as it is cruel.”

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Daniel@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post NYC Head Start Providers Assessing Impact of Plan to Exclude Undocumented Children appeared first on City Limits.

By KEVIN FREKING and MARY CLARE JALONICK

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House is expected late Thursday to approve President Donald Trump’s request to claw back about $9 billion for public broadcasting and foreign aid as Republicans target institutions and programs they view as bloated or out of step with their agenda.

Related Articles

State Department layoffs affect key Trump priorities like intelligence, energy and China

Consultant, claiming White House backing, called Colorado clerks to gain access to voting machines

Trump administration hands over Medicaid recipients’ personal data, including addresses, to ICE

Border Patrol hiring spree offers lessons as another immigration agency embarks on massive growth

Urban League declares a ‘state of emergency’ for civil rights in the US in response to Trump

The White House had described the package as a test case and said that if Congress went along, more would come. The House’s approval would mark the first time in decades that a president has successfully submitted such a rescissions request to Congress, and even then the results were more mixed. Unlike other presidents, Trump is getting nearly all the cuts he requested.

Opponents voiced concerns not only about the programs targeted, but about Congress ceding its spending powers to the executive branch as investments approved on a bipartisan basis are being subsequently canceled on party-line votes. No Democrats supported the measure when it passed the Senate, 51-48, in the early morning hours Thursday. Two Republicans also voted no.

“We need to get back to fiscal sanity and this is an important step,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters.

The package cancels about $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and nearly $8 billion for a variety of foreign aid programs, many designed to help countries where drought, disease and political unrest endure.

The effort to claw back a sliver of federal spending comes just weeks after Republicans also muscled through Trump’s tax and spending cut bill without any Democratic support. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that measure will increase the U.S. debt by about $3.3 trillion over the coming decade.

A heavy blow to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

The cancellation of $1.1 billion for the CPR represents the full amount it is due to receive during the next two budget years.

The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense.

The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national programming.

Democrats were unsuccessful in restoring in the Senate.

Lawmakers with large rural constituencies have voiced particular concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., said Tuesday that the stations are “not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert.”

Less than a day later, as the Senate debated the bill, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck off the remote Alaska Peninsula, triggering tsunami warnings on local public broadcasting stations that advised people to get to higher ground.

Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House that some money administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in about a dozen states.

But Kate Riley, president and CEO of America’s Public Television Stations, a network of locally owned and operated stations, said that deal was “at best a short-term, half-measure that will still result in cuts and reduced service at the stations it purports to save.”

Inside the cuts to foreign aid

Among the foreign aid cuts are $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and family reunification for refugees and $496 million to provide food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. There also is a $4.15 billion cut for programs that aim to boost economies and democratic institutions in developing nations.

Democrats argued that the Republican administration’s animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America’s standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill.

Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said the amount it takes to save a starving child or prevent the transmission of disease is minuscule, even as the investments secure cooperation with the U.S. on other issues. The cuts made to foreign aid programs through Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency were having life-and-death consequences around the world, he said.

“People are dying right now, not in spite of us but because of us,” Schatz said. “We are causing death.”

After objections from several Republicans, GOP leaders took out a $400 million cut to PEPFAR, a politically popular program to combat HIV/AIDS that is credited with saving millions of lives since its creation under Republican President George W. Bush.

Looking ahead to future spending fights

Democrats say the bill upends a legislative process that typically requires lawmakers from both parties to work together to fund the nation’s priorities.

Triggered by the official rescissions request from the White House, the legislation only needs a simple majority vote to advance instead of the 60 votes usually required to break a filibuster. That meant Republicans could use their 53-47 majority to pass it along party lines.

In the end, two Republican senators, Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, joined with Democrats in voting against the bill, though a few other Republicans also raised concerns about the process.

“Let’s not make a habit of this,” said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who voted for the bill but said he was wary that the White House wasn’t providing enough information on what exactly will be cut.

Russ Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, said the imminent successful passage of the rescissions shows “enthusiasm” for getting the nation’s fiscal situation under control.

“We’re happy to go to great lengths to get this thing done,” he said during a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

In response to questions about the relatively small size of the cuts — $9 billion — Vought said that was because “I knew it would be hard” to pass in Congress.

Vought said another rescissions package is ’likely to come soon.”

“But we’re not there yet,” he said.

Associated Press writers Becky Bohrer in Juneau, Alaska, and Seung Min Kim contributed to this report.

By REBECCA BOONE, Associated Press

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — An Idaho judge lifted a sweeping gag order Thursday in Bryan Kohberger’s quadruple murder case.

Related Articles

Trump administration hands over nation’s Medicaid enrollee data, including addresses, to ICE

Juul can continue selling its tobacco and menthol e-cigarettes, FDA says

Urban League declares a ‘state of emergency’ for civil rights in the US in response to Trump

Nationwide protests planned against Trump’s immigration crackdown and health care cuts

Connie Francis, whose hit songs included ‘Who’s Sorry Now?’ and ‘Pretty Little Baby,’ dies at 87

Bryan Kohberger avoided a potential death sentence by pleading guilty earlier this month to the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students at a rental home near campus in 2022.

A coalition of news organizations including The Associated Press had asked the court to lift the gag order since a trial is no longer planned. They renewed their request after Kohberger pleaded guilty.

During a hearing Thursday morning, 4th District Judge Steven Hippler agreed that lifting the gag order would protect the First Amendment rights of the public and press.

“The primary purpose of the non-dissemination order, which is to ensure that we can seat an impartial jury, is no longer at play,” Hippler said. He said he couldn’t not justify continuing the gag order because the public has the right to receive information about the case, and those rights are “paramount.”

A different judge in Moscow, Idaho, originally issued the gag order early in the case, saying additional publicity could harm Kohberger’s right to a fair trial.

Kohberger admitted to breaking into the rental home through a sliding door and killing the four friends, who had no connection with him.

Prosecutors said he spent months carefully planning the attack, and that his studies as a criminal justice graduate student at Washington State University helped him take steps to cover up his tracks.