With Primary Field Still in Flux, James Talarico Pitches His Big Tent Revival

posted in: All news | 0

Democrats haven’t won a U.S. Senate race in Texas for more than 35 years. In 2018, Beto O’Rourke came the closest when he lost to Ted Cruz by only 2.6 percentage points. In 2024, Cruz, boosted by Donald Trump’s performance in the state, beat then-Congressman Colin Allred by 8.5 percentage points. But, as many Texans fail to see the Republican promises of economic prosperity materialize, Democratic candidate James Talarico is running on the slogan to “start flipping tables” of Texas politics’ status quo. 

A former San Antonio public school teacher and current Presbyterian seminarian, the 36-year-old Talarico first won a seat in the Texas House back in 2018. Since then, he’s gained a reputation as an effective advocate for public schools and an unyielding opponent of school vouchers and right-wing zealotry who’s effectively built and wielded a massive social media following. 

Since launching his campaign in September, Talarico has raised a boatload of cash and garnered a Beto-esque number of fawning national headlines. The question is centered around whether this young man of faith has what it takes to not just flip the political tables, as his campaign slogan portends, but to flip the state of Texas. Talarico already has endorsements from more than a hundred state and local officials, as well as kudos from former president Barack Obama for his leadership in Texas’ redistricting battle. But first he’ll have to win a contested primary against repeat-runner Allred and, possibly, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett.

The Texas Observer spoke with Talarico in late November about the policies he believes can unite working people, his faith, and why he thinks he can beat John Cornyn or Ken Paxton. 

TO: You’ve been able to engage Texans from different sides of the political spectrum around the fight for public education and against school vouchers. How does that shape how you approach this campaign?

I think the biggest divide in our politics is not left versus right, but top versus bottom. And I think that voucher fight was a prime example. It was two billionaires from West Texas who were trying to close our public schools all over the state, and we were able to build a coalition of Democrats, independents, and Republicans, rural, urban, suburban, Black, white, brown—a coalition to take on those two billionaires and and protect and strengthen public education. I remember I was walking around the halls of the Capitol during the session with those self-described MAGA moms, and we were knocking on the doors of legislators, trying to get as many votes as we could to kill the voucher bill. And we were successful time and time again until they were finally able to push it through at the end of this last session with some pretty dirty tactics. 

How does the working-class politics you describe translate to policies you would prioritize in the Senate?

I’ve served for eight years in the trenches of the Texas Legislature, and even as a Democrat, I’ve been able to pass pretty major legislation to help working people in our state: the first ever cap on insulin copays in Texas history; a bill to import cheaper prescription drugs from Canada into Texas; the first early childhood bill in recent memory that’s going to bring down the cost of childcare for working parents; and, most recently, a major housing bill that’s going to hopefully make housing cheaper for folks in Texas. I think there’s so much that I could do at the federal level to continue that work. The cost of childcare, the cost of housing, the cost of healthcare—those are, I think, three of the biggest pain points that Texans feel every day. If we’re going to make progress on all those issues, I would like to see the U.S. Senate prioritize comprehensive political reform: Ban super PACs and billionaire secret donations, ban lawmakers from insider trading—from turning around and becoming lobbyists right after they finish their public service. And finally, once and for all, ban gerrymandering in every state in the union. 

What is your position on healthcare reform?

I am very interested in fighting for a public option, so that every single Texan, every single American, would have the ability to join Medicare and would have that option of affordable, quality coverage. I think there is public support and bipartisan interest in that kind of policy. 

Immigration will once again be a hot-button issue. Many Democrats have recently moved to the right on the issue; what position are you taking on immigration that can possibly unify working people on the left and right?

I really do think that most Texans and most Americans are in the same place on this issue. Our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front and a lock on the door. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. Most people, including me, are pro-immigrants. We know that folks who are coming here to contribute to our economy, to live their version of the American dream, those immigrants make us stronger and richer. I think most Americans are also pro-security. We have a right to know who’s coming into our country, just like you have the right to know who’s coming into your house. So if I’m elected, I would hope to be one of the senators crafting comprehensive immigration reform that protects public safety and also creates an orderly, speedy process for immigrants who want to come and make us stronger. 

You’ve expressed that it is your faith and not partisanship that grounds your politics. Has that drawn more independents and conservatives to your campaign?

My politics grows out of my faith. I was taught when I was little, by my granddad, who was a Baptist preacher in South Texas, that we Christians are supposed to follow Jesus’s two commandments: to love God and to love neighbor. And you know that commandment to love our neighbors is inherently a public thing. Politics is just another way that we figure out how we treat our neighbors and how we treat each other. So that’s what led me into public service—first as a public school teacher and now as a public official. It allows me to connect with voters who maybe aren’t in my party or who don’t share all of my beliefs. We’re able to connect on that deeper ground. I’ve seen so many people come into our events, and met so many people who don’t consider themselves Democrats, who consider themselves Independents or Republicans or former Republicans, and many of those conversations begin with our shared faith.

Why would you be a better general election candidate than Colin Allred or Jasmine Crockett, if she runs? 

I’m not interested in tearing down my fellow Democrats, because we are all on the same team, the same team that’s trying to change the politics of this country. But, I think that I’ve got a compelling case to make. I first got elected to the Texas Legislature by flipping a Trump district, winning in a district that hadn’t voted for a Democrat in 30 years. And I did that by running an aggressive, authentic, unorthodox campaign that brought people together. On election night, we flipped that district with 51 percent of the vote. And so I want to take those skills, both electoral and legislative, and win this nomination and win the Senate seat, not just for Democrats, but for all Texans. 

On the Republican side, which candidate would you have an easier time beating, John Cornyn or Ken Paxton? 

Both of them are far more interested in serving their billionaire megadonors than serving the people of Texas, and both of them have sold us out time and time again. Obviously, Ken Paxton’s crimes are well known. I was part of the bipartisan majority in the Texas House that impeached our corrupt attorney general. But in some ways, I think John Cornyn is even more corrupt than Ken Paxton because he was the deciding vote on that Big Ugly Bill that’s going to kick Texans off their health care, take food out of the mouths of hungry Texas kids, all just to give another tax break to his donors. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The post With Primary Field Still in Flux, James Talarico Pitches His Big Tent Revival appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Tennessee voters make final call in House special election testing Trump’s power

posted in: All news | 0

By JONATHAN MATTISE, Associated Press

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — President Donald Trump and Republicans will try to bounce back from recent losses around the country when Tennessee voters choose the next representative for the reliably conservative 7th U.S. House Congressional District on Tuesday.

The special election, which was organized after Republican Rep. Mark Green resigned this summer, saw an unexpected surge of spending in recent weeks, flooding the airwaves and filling residents’ mailboxes with campaign flyers.

Matt Van Epps, the Republican candidate, has been backed by more than $1 million from MAGA Inc. It’s the first time the Trump-supporting super PAC has spent money on a campaign since last year’s presidential race, a reflection of this contest’s outsize importance. House Speaker Mike Johnson and GOP chair Joe Gruters rallied supporters in Tennessee on Monday. Trump addressed the crowd by phone and later held a tele-rally for Van Epps, his second of the general election.

Democrats recently won by wide margins in New Jersey, Virginia and elsewhere, and a strong showing in Tennessee could further embolden the party ahead of midterm elections next November.

The House Majority PAC has put $1 million behind state Rep. Aftyn Behn, the Democratic candidate. National party chair Ken Martin visited to campaign for Behn. Former Vice President Kamala Harris participated in a canvassing kickoff while in Nashville on a book tour. And former Vice President Al Gore, a Tennessee native, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez headlined a virtual rally on the election’s eve.

Democratic congressional candidate State Rep. Aftyn Behn, D-Nashville, attends a campaign event during the special election for the seventh district, Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025, Nashville, Tenn. (AP Photo/George Walker IV)

The 7th District is one of three seats redrawn in 2022 to erode the influence of Nashville, the state’s largest city and a Democratic stronghold. Only about 1 in 5 of its registered voters are in Nashville, and last year it went to Green by 21 percentage points and to Trump by a similar margin.

Democrats say closing the gap would signal that their party has momentum going into next year. Republicans remain confident that they can defend the seat, and they hope to dismiss Democratic claims that even red districts are now in play as Trump struggles with low approval ratings and persistent economic dissatisfaction.

Related Articles


US envoy Witkoff will meet Putin in Moscow while Zelenskyy tours Europe as peace efforts press ahead


Shooting of National Guard members prompts flurry of US immigration restrictions


GOP-led states settle lawsuit against federal government over checking citizenship status of voters


White House says admiral ordered follow-on strike on alleged drug boat, insists attack was lawful


Former Trump lawyer Alina Habba is disqualified as top New Jersey prosecutor, US appeals court rules

However there are concerns about turnout due to the timing, as early voting went into Thanksgiving week with Election Day the following Tuesday.

Trump held a virtual rally in November with Van Epps, a former state general services commissioner from Nashville who previously served as an Army helicopter pilot, to boost his candidacy.

Republicans have tried to turn Behn’s own words against her in television advertising, such as when she described herself as a “radical” or claimed to be “bullying” immigration agents and state police officers. A frequent target are comments Behn made about Nashville years ago, when she said “I hate this city” and complained about bachelorette parties.

For the most part, Behn has answered questions about those remarks by redirecting to cost of living issues. But she has responded specifically about Nashville, saying she wants it “to be a place where working people can thrive” even if she gets annoyed at some tourist draws.

Behn, a self-proclaimed “pissed-off social worker,” has condemned Trump’s tariffs and tax cut legislation, both of which Van Epps supports. She also has criticized Republicans’ reluctance to release files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Van Epps originally opposed a House vote to force the Justice Department to disclose more Epstein documents but changed his stance to mirror Trump after the president backed the measure.

Democratic allies sought to eat away at Van Epps’ base by urging conservatives to back independent candidate Jon Thorp instead. That messaging came in mailers from Your Community PAC, which has spent more than $16 million supporting Democratic candidates across the country since last year.

Northeast prepares for first major snowstorm of season

posted in: All news | 0

By PATRICK WHITTLE, Associated Press

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — The Northeast was getting ready Tuesday for its first major snowstorm of the season, just as the Midwest began to escape snow and ice that snarled travel after the Thanksgiving holiday.

Some parts of northern New England were expecting up to 10 inches of snow. A windy, potentially icy storm was headed to the region and could soak some parts of the area’s six states while piling snow in others, forecasters said.

The National Weather Service issued winter storm warnings and winter weather advisories in states including Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Connecticut and New York ahead of the snow’s arrival.

The winter blast is set to arrive days after more than 8 inches of snow fell at Chicago O’Hare International Airport over the weekend, setting a record for the highest single calendar day snowfall in November at the airport, according to the weather service. The previous record was set in 1951.

A man fills up a vehicle’s gas tank at a gas station in Buffalo Grove, Ill., Monday, Dec. 1, 2025. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

Snow in the Great Lakes region was tapering off, but the new storm was heading to the mid-Atlantic and Northeast, with up to a foot (30 centimeters) of snow by Tuesday, said National Weather Service meteorologist Andrew Orrison.

“It’s going to be the first snowfall of the season for many of these areas, and it’s going to be rather significant,” Orrison said.

Winter weather on tap in Northeast next

The National Weather Service issued a warning for coastal Maine from Tuesday morning until Wednesday morning, stating that residents “should delay all travel if possible” due to snow. The state is one of many that is in for its first wallop of snow of December, forecasters said.

Related Articles


Russia and the US threatened to resume nuclear testing after several decades. Here is why it matters


Today in History: December 2, Terror attack on San Bernardino holiday party kills 14


USA Gymnastics and Olympic sports watchdog failed to stop coach’s sexual abuse, lawsuits alleges


Shooting of National Guard members prompts flurry of US immigration restrictions


US air travelers without REAL IDs will be charged a $45 fee

In New Hampshire, the Department of Transportation on Sunday invited residents to submit names for its second annual name-a-plow competition.

“Welcome to The Department of the Seven Snowplows, our winter twist on a classic tale. Hawthorne had gables. We have orange snowplows just waiting for the perfect name,” the department said on social media.

Last winner’s top name was Ctrl-Salt-Delete. This season’s winners will be announced in January.

Pennsylvania prepares for snow

With plowable snow expected to coat large parts of Pennsylvania, crews began to treat lanes along the 565-mile (909-kilometer) Pennsylvania Turnpike system on Monday, said the agency’s press secretary, Marissa Orbanek. Vehicle restrictions on many interstates in the eastern half of Pennsylvania, including on the turnpike system’s Northeast Extension, from the Lehigh Valley to Clarks Summit, will be imposed at 5 a.m. Tuesday.

More than 600 equipment operators and safety workers are available to help clear the turnpike’s 2,900 miles (4,667 kilometers) of lanes, Orbanek said. The turnpike’s winter staffing schedule began in mid-November, and 23 maintenance sheds are staffed around the clock.

“We really prepare for snow all year long,” Orbanek said.

Travelers recovering in Midwest

In Chicago, Don Herrian was among the crowds of travelers at O’Hare on Sunday, hoping to make it back home after Thanksgiving as hundreds of flights were delayed and canceled following a winter storm in the Great Lakes region.

An American airplane arrives at the O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, Sunday, Nov. 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

The 76-year-old retiree from Ardmore, Oklahoma, had visited his daughter and her family in Indianapolis. He said his first flight was three hours late, and his connecting flight to Oklahoma City from Chicago was already running another two hours behind.

“It is what it is,” Herrian said. “It’s congested, but that’s expected due to the snow, the delays and the holidays.”

Roads leading to O’Hare were packed Sunday with slow-moving vehicles, even after the roads had been cleared of snow. Planes were being de-iced at several airports across the country on Sunday, including at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.

Associated Press reporters Adam Schreck in Chicago, Jamie Stengle in Dallas and Mark Scolforo in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and photojournalist Nam Y. Huh in Chicago contributed to this report.

Russia and the US threatened to resume nuclear testing after several decades. Here is why it matters

posted in: All news | 0

By STEPHANIE LIECHTENSTEIN, Associated Press

VIENNA (AP) — The United States and Russia have both recently threatened to resume nuclear testing, alarming the international community and jeopardizing a global norm against such tests.

Experts say these threats from the world’s two largest nuclear powers put pressure on nonproliferation efforts and endanger global peace and security.

FILE – A mushroom cloud rises from a test blast at the Nevada Test Site on June 24, 1957. (U.S. Energy Department via AP, File)

“Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis,” U.S. President Donald Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site at the end of October. “That process will begin immediately.”

Moscow quickly responded.

Russian President Vladimir Putin told his Security Council that should the U.S. or any signatory to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty conduct nuclear weapons tests, “Russia would be under obligation to take reciprocal measures.”

Here’s is a look at what a resumption of nuclear testing could mean.

The treaty established a norm against nuclear testing

Concerns about the negative effects of nuclear weapon tests grew in the 1950s when the U.S. and the Soviet Union carried out multiple powerful atomic tests in the atmosphere. As a result, a limited nuclear test ban treaty was negotiated that prohibited such tests but underground tests were still permitted.

Related Articles


Today in History: December 2, Terror attack on San Bernardino holiday party kills 14


USA Gymnastics and Olympic sports watchdog failed to stop coach’s sexual abuse, lawsuits alleges


Shooting of National Guard members prompts flurry of US immigration restrictions


US air travelers without REAL IDs will be charged a $45 fee


Here’s why everyone’s talking about a ‘K-shaped’ economy

Renewed international efforts to ban all nuclear tests resulted in the start of negotiations for a comprehensive treaty in 1994, culminating in its adoption by the U.N. General Assembly in 1996.

With 187 states having signed the treaty and 178 having ratified it, most experts believe the treaty has established a norm against atomic testing — even without formally entering into force.

For the treaty to officially take effect, 44 specific states — listed in an annex to the treaty — must ratify it. Nine of them have not yet done so.

China, Egypt, Iran, Israel and the U.S. signed but didn’t ratify it. India, North Korea and Pakistan neither signed nor ratified the treaty. Russia signed and ratified the treaty but revoked its ratification in 2023, saying the imbalance between its ratification and U.S. failure to do so was “unacceptable in the current international situation.”

Alongside the treaty, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization was established in Vienna. It runs a global monitoring network to detect nuclear tests worldwide, operating 307 monitoring stations, using seismic, hydroacoustic, infrasound and radionuclide technologies.

The organization is financed mainly through assessed contributions by its member states. Its budget for 2025 is more than $139 million.

China and India would profit from resuming tests

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association in Washington, said that a resumption of U.S. atomic tests would “open the door for states with less nuclear testing experience to conduct full-scale tests that could help them perfect smaller, lighter warhead designs.”

This would “decrease U.S. and international security,” he said.

Joseph Rodgers, fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that states such as China or India stand to profit from a resumption of nuclear tests.

“It makes more sense for them to test” than it does for the U.S. or Russia, the two states who have conducted most atomic tests to date, Rodgers said.

The U.S. conducted its last nuclear test in 1992. Since 1996, only 10 nuclear tests have been conducted by three countries: India, Pakistan and North Korea. None of them have signed or ratified the treaty

The vast majority of nuclear tests — approximately 2,000 — occurred before 1996, mostly by the U.S. and Soviet Union.

The organization creates ‘confidence’

Given the uncertainty around Trump’s announcement and the potential for escalation of tensions around the issue, the test ban treaty organization could play a role in resolving the situation.

Rodgers said that the treaty organization is primarily a scientific one and should focus on providing scientific data to the international community.

But Kimball disagrees, suggesting the organization’s Executive Secretary Robert Floyd could “take the initiative and bring together” officials from the U.S. and other countries to help resolve some uncertainties, such as what type of nuclear tests the U.S. president was referring to in his statement.

Floyd told The Associated Press that in the current situation, he believes his organization’s main role is providing “confidence to states” that they would know if a nuclear weapon explosion occurred “anywhere, anytime.”

The organization’s monitoring network successfully detected all six atomic tests conducted by North Korea between 2006 and 2017, he said.

Not all atomic tests create explosions

The White House has so far not clarified what kind of tests Trump meant and what other countries he was referring to in his statement. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said the new tests would not include nuclear explosions.

Nuclear test explosions banned under the treaty are so-called supercritical tests, where fissile material is compressed to start a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction that creates an explosion.

These tests produce a nuclear yield — the amount of energy released, which defines a weapon’s destructive power. The treaty bans any nuclear explosion with a yield, following a zero yield standard.

In contrast, subcritical nuclear experiments, the ones Wright was referring to, produce no self-sustaining chain reaction and no explosion. Nuclear weapon states, including the U.S., conduct these experiments routinely without violating the treaty.

Some tests may remain undetected

Kimball says hydronuclear tests with extremely small yields conducted underground in metal chambers are “undetectable” by the organization’s monitoring system.

“So that creates what I would say is a verification gap regarding this particular type of extremely low yield explosion,” he said.

When the organization’s monitoring system was established in the 1990s, it was designed to detect nuclear explosions of 1 kiloton (1,000 tons of TNT). Floyd said the system actually performs better, detecting explosions below 1 kiloton, at 500 tons of TNT.

The nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima by the U.S. was approximately 15 kilotons.

The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.