Business People: Andrew Rosendorf to head Six Points Theater’s Wellsprings program

posted in: All news | 0

ENTERTAINMENT

Andrew Rosendorf

Six Points Theater, St. Paul, announced that playwright Andrew Rosendorf has been named director of Wellsprings and new play development. Rosendorf’s work has been produced or developed at numerous theaters nationwide. The theater’s Wellsprings program advances development of works with a Jewish perspective.

AGRICULTURE

The Minnesota State Cattlemen’s Association announced that Little Timber Farms in Blackduck, Minn., was recognized by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association as a regional winner of the 2024 Environmental Stewardship Award Program.

ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING

Minneapolis architectural firm Alliiance announced that Amanda Aspenson has joined the firm as a principal, senior project manager and co-leader of the firm’s higher education practice. Aspenson previously was with BWBR, where she was a leader on higher education projects.

FINANCIAL SERVICES

Northborne Partners, a Minneapolis-based investment bank, announced the appointment of Dan Davidson as managing director of its health care advisory practice. Davidson previously held leadership roles at Brentwood Capital Advisors.

HEALTH CARE

Fulcrum Health, a Plymouth-based health insurer focused on physical health provisions, announced that its ChiroCare network has been named a 2024 Human Experience Guardian of Excellence Award winner by Press Ganey, a health care market research organization. … R3 Continuum, a Bloomington-based workplace behavioral health care consultant for businesses, announced it has named Sergio Bonadona as vice president of leadership support services. … Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, an Eagan-based health insurer, announced the following changes and additions to its leadership team: Chris Fanning, promoted to chief growth officer; Carey Smith, promoted to chief technology and innovation officer and president of Xcelerate Health, a newly established business unit, and the hire of David Im as chief operating officer.

HONORS

The Economic Development Association of Minnesota announced the following Excellence in Economic Development Award winners: Economic Developer of the Year: Amanda Taylor, Greater MSP; Emerging Professional of the Year: Eric Van Oss, City of Rosemount; Innovation Award (greater Minnesota): goMARTI, (Twin Cities metro): The Heights Community Energy Collaborative Team; Project of the Year (greater Minnesota): Block 52 Redevelopment, Monticello, (Twin Cities Metro): Meta Tech Campus, Rosemount. …  MarketBeat.com, an online financial news outlet, named three Minnesota coffee shops to its list of the best coffee shops in the country for remote work: Wild Grind Coffee, Minneapolis, No. 66; Luminary Coffeehouse, St. Paul, No. 96, and Spyhouse Rochester, Rochester, No. 103.

LAW

Flaherty & Hood, St. Paul, announced the promotion of Nicholas Garcia Lisle (Nico) to senior attorney; Lisle joined the firm in January 2022. … Nationwide employment law firm Jackson Lewis announced that Jennifer A. Nodes has rejoined its Minneapolis office as a principal. Nodes’ litigation practice includes the defense of employers in single and multi-plaintiff actions in state and federal court.

OPENINGS

Five Iron Golf, a national chain offering indoor golf and other recreation activities, announced the opening of its first Minnesota location at 729 N. Washington Ave. Suite D, North Loop, Minneapolis.

REAL ESTATE

Edina Realty, Edina, announced the promotion of Jim Young to president of Edina Realty Title, succeeding Brad Fisher, who is retiring. Young first joined Edina Realty’s Maplewood office in 1996.

RETAIL

Simon, a real estate investment trust focused on shopping malls, announced the following new retailers to its Southdale Center in Edina: Aritzia, Mango, Athleta, JD Sports (apparel); Pandora (jewelry), and CAMP (family recreation).

TECHNOLOGY

AVI Systems, an Eden Prairie-based provider of audio-visual systems for business, announced the following promotions: John Bagnell to executive vice president; Shannon O’Reilly and Roland Schlegel, senior vice presidents; Michael Safranski, senior vice president of operations, and Keith Yandell, senior vice president of innovation. … Calabrio, a Minneapolis-based provider of human resources software and services, announced the appointment of Carl Gillert as chief financial officer. Before joining Calabrio, Gillert served as CFO of Litera.

Related Articles

Business |


New nonprofit and its leader provide a strategy for downtown St. Paul’s revival

Business |


Business People: 3M CEO Bill Brown named chairman, amid other board moves

Business |


Business People: Joy King named CEO of Animal Humane Society

Business |


Business People: Chris Bent to lead Midwest autism services provider

Business |


Minnesota business owners in limbo: If enacted, Canadian tariffs could wreak havoc

EMAIL ITEMS to businessnews@pioneerpress.com.

Homophobic chant at San Diego FC’s inaugural home match condemned by coach, sporting director

posted in: All news | 0

SAN DIEGO — San Diego FC coach Mikey Varas and sporting director Tyler Heaps expressed disappointment and anger after their club’s inaugural home match was marred in the second half by three occurrences of the homophobic chant frequently heard at the Mexican national team’s soccer matches.

The club uniformly decried the notorious one-word Spanish chant both during and after San Diego finished a scoreless draw with St. Louis City on Saturday night at Snapdragon Stadium, which was packed with 34,506 fans celebrating the arrival of Major League Soccer’s 30th team.

Varas opened his postmatch news conference by condemning the fans who made the chant despite repeated warnings against it on the scoreboard and over the public address system. Varas delivered his statement in both Spanish and English.

“The chant that was heard tonight is unacceptable,” Varas said. “It’s outside of our value system. It doesn’t represent the players, myself or the club, and it certainly doesn’t represent San Diego or Baja California. It’s not a reflection of who we are. We’re a community full of love, of support, and we believe in the power of diversity.”

Varas emphasized that the chant wasn’t made by San Diego FC’s main supporter section, the group known as La Frontera.

“This came from more the general population in the seats, and it wasn’t everybody,” Varas said. “I understand that, but it was enough people, and I just want to make very clear that it has no place here. If they’re going to continue to come to the game and make that chant, it’s better that they don’t come here.”

The one-word slur is typically made by fans while an opposing goalkeeper takes a goal kick, and it regularly occurs in both club soccer and national team soccer in Mexico. It’s also become a regrettable staple in the Mexican national team’s matches in the U.S.

The Mexican national team has been fined repeatedly by FIFA for its fans’ behavior regarding the chant, which has forced both stoppages in play and the shortening of a match between El Tri and the U.S. national team in recent years. The chant nevertheless persists, and it seems likely to be an issue at North America’s 2026 World Cup, which will feature 13 matches in Mexico.

“It’s totally against our values as a club, but also who we are as people,” Heaps said. “One of our core values is to be a good person, and I think that’s what we’ll continue to stand behind. It’s totally unacceptable, and obviously us as a club, we’ll make sure it does not continue into the future.”

Real World Economics: Playing chicken with egg prices

posted in: All news | 0

Edward Lotterman

God may be “the Great Unknowable,” but eggs at $7.49 a dozen at our local supermarket in Roseville certainly shows that God has a wicked sense of humor and irony.

A year ago, high egg prices were the poster child of public dissatisfaction with President Joe Biden. Then-candidate Donald Trump excoriated his opponent for having caused the highest inflation in nearly 40 years. He also made sweeping promises to lower prices generally “starting on day 1.”

But in January, the month Trump was inaugurated, egg prices averaged $4.25 a dozen, nearing their 2022 high point of Biden’s term. Adjusted for inflation, we were at the historic high of the 1984 bird flu epidemic.

Then things rapidly got worse.

In its weekly “Egg Markets Overview” for Feb. 21, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service listed prices near double January’s average:

• “Nationally, “White Large shell eggs increased $0.33 to $8.07 per dozen.”

• “The wholesale price on the New York market for Large cartoned shell eggs delivered to retailers rose $0.24 to $8.47 per dozen”.

• “In the major Midwest production region, wholesale prices for Large, white, shell eggs delivered to warehouses increased $0.28 to $8.09 per dozen, while prices paid to producers for large cartoned shell eggs increased $0.28 to $7.92 per dozen.

• “The California benchmark for Large shell eggs rose $0.05 to $9.22 per dozen.”

• “Delivered prices on the California-compliant wholesale loose egg market increased $0.99 to $9.68 per dozen.”

How do we unpack all that? What are the prospects for the weeks and months going forward? And what will USDA’s newly announced $1 billion program to curb the spread of the avian flu virus and lower egg prices do for consumers?

Start with the program announced by Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins.

It is heavily weighted toward traditional poultry disease control measures USDA has used for decades. Half goes for “biosecurity.” This largely means stopping contact between laying flocks and the wild birds that serve as a vector for the virus. It includes ending any possible transmission by humans, feed trucks and egg pick-up trucks that have been on farmsteads with infected flocks.

Nearly as much, $400 million, will go to pay producers for the value of birds killed to limit the spread of the disease. Without this compensation, there is an incentive for farmers who suspect they have sick birds to continue to produce and sell eggs rather than inform health officials promptly. So a control program based on killing infected birds needs this compensation.

The remaining $100 million will go to research into vaccines, encouragement of egg imports and research. It also threatens to dismantle state programs, such as that instituted in California by a statewide ballot initiative, that require producers to keep laying hens in more spacious conditions than the cages used elsewhere. Producers have accepted the new standards and have spent tens of millions of dollars on compliant facilities, ones that are being studied by producers elsewhere. Their state producers’ association has taken a position against federal overrule of this ongoing effort.

Now consider the Feb. 21 market news:

There are regional variations. Prices are higher in the Northeast than in the Midwest. But the 38-cent differential is larger than the long term average. In a tumultuous situation with poor information, markets become less efficient.

Also note the Midwest’s narrow 17-cent margin between the wholesale price of eggs and that paid to producers. What we are seeing now is not a case of processors using a health scare to pad margins. In fact it is the opposite.

As with milk, California is in many ways its own market. Its animal-rights rules do keep prices above national averages. But it is a premium that many are happy to pay and that substantial numbers of people in other states would support. As in Europe, after initial opposition lasting years, producers have found they can live with the new standards and are investing accordingly.

It is noteworthy that, despite Trump administration rhetoric about overhauling government procedures at all levels, the measures announced this week are long-standing practice. That is understandable because we have had several bird flu epidemics in the last 50 years that raised egg prices. In all cases, measures directed by USDA’s animal health specialists brought the epidemics to an end in a matter of months. Prices rapidly returned to usual levels.

One in 1984 was particularly severe. In February of that year, prices were 50% higher than six months earlier. But by July, prices were below the starting point. Adjusted for inflation, that February 1984 high of $4.12 would not be reached again until December of 2022 through February 2023.

In December 2003, prices were 50% higher than in September 2002. But eight months later, they were back to the previous low. Similarly, in August 2015, the price of $2.97 a dozen was 50% higher than $1.95 10 months earlier. Yet in another 10 months, prices had collapsed by half to $1.49.

Thus the historic pattern of high egg prices is that they correct themselves in rather predictable periods if sanitary measures are effective.

What else can be extrapolated about this from this week’s news?

Many people don’t really realize the scale of our country or the necessary size of programs to address problems. To many, $1 billion sounds like a lot of money. But Americans collectively buy $180 billion in eggs yearly. And on a per-capita basis covering over 338 million of us, $1 billion in added USDA outlays is $2.96 per person, about the same as four and a half eggs.

Similarly, the announced increase in annual imports from Turkey from 70 million to 420 million eggs amounts to an added 1.04 eggs per person. In 2023, we produced 109.5 billion eggs, so the increment in imports from that largest foreign supplier is about a third of 1% of our usual output. It will be useful, but not to a degree that will really show up in prices.

And why the huge spike from a measured $4.95 average per dozen for the month of January to spot prices $4 per dozen higher just three weeks later? Future researchers may tease this out with sophisticated modeling, but one factor has to be the unprecedented amount of policy uncertainty engendered by the new administration’s slash and burn approach to Cabinet agencies. Perhaps there is waste in our human- and animal-health agencies, and perhaps this waste is detrimental to consumers, but firings of personnel have not been targeted nor explained in any way. The population, including MAGA voters, have been taken by shock. One could expect that individual and collective actions taken both by producers and consumers to protect themselves might collectively push up prices.

Moreover, the toboggan has just been pushed away from the top of the hill. The moguls still lie ahead. History of the last 50 years tell us that egg price spikes are self-correcting, but all the rules of the game now are in flux.

And how does this all affect Minnesota farmers? Our state is 10th overall in total value of poultry production, but this is driven by our leadership in turkeys for meat. For eggs, we are 14th. The 2.4 billion eggs we produced in 2023 put us just over 2% of the national total. Our broiler production is tiny, about two-thirds of 1% of the U.S. total. So for producers, the avian flu is relatively less important here than in many other states.

There were no reported cases from June through November 2024, but then nine in November and December and four more so far in 2025. Five were not in poultry at all and nine in turkeys being raised for meat. None have been in chickens.

And how will this spike in egg costs affect general inflation? Less than most people might think. In December 2024, all food made up 13.6% of the total household spending. Food eaten at home is 8.04% and eggs only 0.172%. So even a month-to-month doubling in egg prices does not move the overall needle much even if it causes shock and anger for consumers.

It also hurts the profit margins for restaurants specializing in breakfast, especially ones with “egg” in their names, and may turn off bargain consumers. But if you’re already willing to pay the relatively higher prices for someone to cook your eggs, bring them to the table, pour your coffee and do the dishes, versus doing it all at home, the higher prices for the experience probably shouldn’t phase you.

Related Articles

Business |


Real World Economics: Shaky politics make for a shaky economy

Business |


Real World Economics: Contemplating the interconnectivity of things and ideas

Business |


Real World Economics: The Fed cannot save our wayward economy

Business |


Real World Economics: Understanding inflation will lead to trust in economic policies

Business |


Real World Economics: Steelmaking faces clash of new tech, obsolete values

St. Paul economist and writer Edward Lotterman can be reached at stpaul@edlotterman.com.

Lewis M. Rambo: A personal reflection on the dismantling of DEI initiatives

posted in: All news | 0

As an 87-year-old person of color who has witnessed the long arc of America’s struggle with racial equality, I find myself compelled to respond to Matt K. Lewis’s recent commentary praising Donald Trump’s elimination of DEI programs (“Trump is right to end federal diversity programs,” Feb. 9). From the very beginning, I’ve observed with growing concern how the acronym “DEI” has often functioned more like “DIE” for meaningful progress in racial equity.

Lewis’s analysis, while failing to fully acknowledge the pervasive inequality in the daily lives of non-white Americans, fundamentally misses the deeper implications of this policy shift.

To understand why, we need only look at our history. In the past, the entertainment industry offered a stark illustration of systemic exclusion — films were overwhelmingly white, with people of color relegated to servant roles or completely absent even from crowd scenes. The recent trend toward more representative casting isn’t about entertainment value — it’s about accurately reflecting our country’s increasingly diverse composition and taking advantage of the best and most talented actors.

Trump’s executive order has provided organizations with what many businesses are viewing as an excuse to dismantle their investments in their diversity initiatives. Programs that were prominently featured in corporate messaging only weeks ago have vanished with stunning speed, revealing perhaps their half-hearted sponsorship … all along.

The three pillars of DEI deserve individual examination:

Diversity represents an immutable demographic reality. America is becoming increasingly multiracial, and organizations will eventually have no choice but to embrace this reality if they wish to remain viable. The pressing question now is how companies will navigate talent acquisition if an appreciation of the differences in the make-up of our population is ignored.

Equity presents a more complex challenge, as its measurement inherently involves subjective judgments. Consider the revealing example from Bloomberg BusinessWeek about auto insurance rates being heavily influenced by credit scores — a practice that disproportionately, and negatively, impacts communities of color and the economically disadvantaged, while not correlating with a driver’s safe driving experience. This single example illuminates how inequality permeates every aspect of American life impacting equal treatment, in ways that are obvious and subtle, intentional and unintentional. While the complete eradication of inequity may be unrealistic, meaningful remediation must be at least an aspirational goal.

Inclusion presents a fascinating paradox. While the absence of inclusion for people of color, women, and the economically disadvantaged remains painfully evident, true inclusion could potentially dilute the distinct cultural characteristics that have enriched our communities and our nation. Consider the historical significance of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) such as Morehouse, Spelman, Hampton and 96 others. These institutions have provided crucial, safe spaces for cultural preservation and academic excellence. “Perfect inclusion” would likely diminish the unique role these institutions have played, and continue to play, in nurturing Black excellence and leadership. Their doors have always been open to all – students, faculty, staff, and administrators — despite being founded in response to the almost total exclusion of Black students at what are now referenced as “predominantly white institutions.”

Having crossed the threshold of 80 years, I find myself increasingly unwilling to accept comfortable rationalizations or remain silent in the face of misinformation. My years have granted me both perspective and the freedom to question more vigorously, push harder against accepted narratives, and challenge the complacency that too often surrounds discussions of racial progress.

The dismantling of DEI initiatives cannot be met with misguided approbation or resigned acceptance or the fatalistic shrug of “it is what it is.” The stakes are too high, and the potential for backsliding too real. We must remain vigilant in monitoring the consequences of these kinds of policy changes while continuing to advocate for meaningful progress toward a truly equitable, inclusive society.

The path forward requires neither blind acceptance nor despair, but rather clear-eyed assessment and sustained commitment to addressing the underlying inequities that make DEI initiatives necessary in the first place.

Lewis M. Rambo, Ph.D., lives in St. Paul and is an executive coach and organizational psychologist who consults with corporations, nonprofits and universities.