Trump administration sues New York City over ‘sanctuary city’ policies

posted in: All news | 0

NEW YORK (AP) — The Trump administration on Thursday sued New York City over its “sanctuary city” policies, arguing they are obstructing the government from enforcing immigration law and contributed to the recent shooting of an off-duty U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer.

The federal lawsuit is the latest in a series of suits brought by the Justice Department targeting state or city policies seen as interfering with immigration enforcement.

“New York City has released thousands of criminals on the streets to commit violent crimes against law-abiding citizens due to sanctuary city policies,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a news release. “If New York City won’t stand up for the safety of its citizens, we will.”

Related Articles


Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million research-funding cuts


Trump’s AI plan calls for massive data centers. Here’s how it may affect energy in the US


How Trump could use a building renovation to oust Fed Chair Powell


Migrant sent to El Salvador prison by the Trump administration says he was beaten by guards


Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes’ employment status

The lawsuit — which also names Mayor Eric Adams, Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch and numerous other city officials and departments — targets policies that include barring city law enforcement from honoring civil immigration detainers by holding people in custody past their release date.

Kayla Mamelak Altus, a spokesperson for Adams, said the mayor “supports the essence” of the city’s policies but has urged the City Council “to reexamine them to ensure we can effectively work with the federal government to make our city safer” when it comes to dealing with “violent criminals.” She added: “So far, the Council has refused.”

A representative for the City Council did not immediately return a request for comment.

The suit comes after Trump officials on Monday blamed the city’s sanctuary policies for the shooting of a Customs and Border Protection officer in a Manhattan park over the weekend. The officer was off duty and not in uniform at the time.

Authorities have said the two men apprehended in connection with Saturday’s robbery-gone-wrong have been arrested a number of times since they entered the country illegally from the Dominican Republic in recent years. One of the men had been released following a 2024 arrest despite an active detainer, according to the lawsuit.

Police say the 42-year-old officer had been sitting with a woman in a park beneath the George Washington Bridge when two men approached on a moped. The officer, who has not been named, drew his service weapon and exchanged gunfire with one of the men. The officer was shot in the face and arm while the suspect was hit in the groin and leg.

Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million research-funding cuts

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

The Justice Department argued a federal judge in Massachusetts was wrong to block the National Institutes of Health from making $783 million worth of cuts to align with President Donald Trump’s priorities.

Related Articles


Trump’s AI plan calls for massive data centers. Here’s how it may affect energy in the US


How Trump could use a building renovation to oust Fed Chair Powell


Migrant sent to El Salvador prison by the Trump administration says he was beaten by guards


Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes’ employment status


Trump signs bill to cancel $9 billion in foreign aid, public broadcasting funding

U.S. District Judge William Young found that the abrupt cancellations ignored long-held government rules and standards.

Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, also said the cuts amounted to “racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community.”

The ruling came in lawsuits filed by 16 attorneys general, public-health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. His decision addressed only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects that have been cut.

The Trump administration’s appeal also takes aim at nearly two dozen cases over funding.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a 5-4 decision on the Supreme Court’s emergency docket from April that allowed cuts to teacher training programs to go forward. That decisions shows that district judges shouldn’t be hearing those cases at all, but rather sending them to federal claims court, he argued.

Trump’s AI plan calls for massive data centers. Here’s how it may affect energy in the US

posted in: All news | 0

By ALEXA ST. JOHN, Associated Press

President Donald Trump’s plan to boost artificial intelligence and build data centers across the U.S. could speed up a building boom that was already expected to strain the nation’s ability to power it.

The White House released the “AI Action Plan” Wednesday, vowing to expedite permitting for construction of energy-intensive data centers as it looks to make the country a leader in a business that tech companies and others are pouring billions of dollars into.

The plan says to combat “radical climate dogma,” a number of restrictions — including clean air and water laws — could be lifted, aligning with Trump’s “American energy dominance” agenda and his efforts to undercut clean energy.

Here’s what you need to know.

What AI means for the environment

Massive amounts of electricity are needed to support the complex servers, equipment and more for AI. Electricity demand from data centers worldwide is set to more than double by 2030, to slightly more than the entire electricity consumption of Japan today, the International Energy Agency said earlier this year.

In many cases, that electricity may come from burning coal or natural gas. These fossil fuels emit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide and methane. This in turn is tied to extreme weather events that are becoming more severe, frequent and costly.

The data centers used to fuel AI also need a tremendous amount of water to keep cool. That means they can strain water sources in areas that may have little to spare.

What Big Tech is saying and doing about finding all that power

Typically, tech giants, up-and-comers and other developers try to keep an existing power plant online to meet demand, experts say, and most existing power plants in the U.S. are still producing electricity using fossil fuels — most often natural gas.

In certain areas of the U.S., a combination of renewables and energy storage in the form of batteries are coming online.

But tapping into nuclear power is especially of interest as a way to reduce data center-induced emissions while still meeting demand and staying competitive.

Amazon said last month it would spend $20 billion on data center sites in Pennsylvania, including one alongside a nuclear power plant. The investment allows Amazon to plug right into the plant, a scrutinized but faster approach for the company’s development timeline.

Meta recently signed a deal to secure nuclear power to meet its computing needs. Microsoft plans to buy energy from the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, and Google previously signed a contract to purchase it from multiple small modular reactors in the works.

Related Articles


Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million research-funding cuts


How Trump could use a building renovation to oust Fed Chair Powell


Migrant sent to El Salvador prison by the Trump administration says he was beaten by guards


Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes’ employment status


Trump signs bill to cancel $9 billion in foreign aid, public broadcasting funding

What’s at stake in the kind of energy that powers data centers

Data centers are often built where electricity is cheapest, and often, that’s not from renewables. And sometimes data centers are cited as a reason to extend the lives of traditional, fossil-fuel-burning power plants.

But just this week, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called on the world’s largest tech players to fuel their data center needs entirely with renewables by 2030. It’s necessary to use fewer fossil fuels, he said.

Experts say it’s possible for developers, investors and the tech industry to decarbonize.

However, though industry can do a lot with clean energy, the emerging demands are so big that it can’t be clean energy alone, said University of Pennsylvania engineering professor Benjamin Lee.

More generative AI, ChatGPT and massive data centers means “relying on wind and solar alone with batteries becomes really, really expensive,” Lee added, hence the attention on natural gas, but also nuclear.

What does AI growth mean for my electricity bills?

Regardless of what powers AI, the simple law of supply and demand makes it all but certain that costs for consumers will rise.

New data center projects might require both new energy generation and existing generation. Developers might also invest in batteries or other infrastructure like transmission lines.

All of this costs money, and it needs to be paid for from somewhere.

“In a lot of places in the U.S., they are seeing that rates are going up because utilities are making these moves to try to plan,” said Amanda Smith, a senior scientist at research organization Project Drawdown.

“They’re planning transmission infrastructure, new power plants for the growth and the load that’s projected, which is what we want them to do,” she added. “But we as ratepayers will wind up seeing rates go up to cover that.”

Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

‘Solutions are Hyper-Local’: Brooklyn Climate Organizer On Facing the Next Big Storm As Feds Pull Support

posted in: All news | 0

On the heels of torrential flooding, City Limits caught up with Sunset Park community leader, Elizabeth Yeampierre, to talk about federal cuts to natural disaster protections and how communities can come together to survive extreme weather.

BROOKLYN, N.Y. — Elizabeth Yeampierre, executive director of UPROSE, a grassroots organization promoting climate justice in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, Wednesday, July 23, 2025.

As New York City grapples with extreme weather like last week’s torrential rains, which halted traffic and flooded the subway system, a Trump administration decision from earlier this spring to cut federal funding for natural disaster protection hits hard.

But Elizabeth Yeampierre, executive director of the grassroots environmental organization UPROSE, says the way forward is to create a neighborhood plan to face severe weather events that grow stronger as climate change worsens

“People are starting to realize that the solutions are hyper-local and that their relationships with each other are going to be central to us being able to survive the next big storm,” Yeampierre said.

In Brooklyn’s Sunset Park, her organization has been training people to take on green jobs, hosting workshops on how to prune trees and build community gardens that collect stormwater before it floods the streets. 

And they host community-led conversations on how neighborhoods can respond to severe weather. That could include building an inventory of residents that have emergency preparedness skills, from nurses who could care for the injured to leaders who could act as first responders or construction workers who could help rebuild.

This approach, Yeampierre says, protects communities at a time when they can’t count on the federal government to protect them from flash floods and storms.

In April the Trump administration decided to shut down a program run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that supports  critical infrastructure across the country, protecting communities from disasters before they happen.

New York’s Attorney General joined a coalition of 19 states last week in suing the Trump administration for shutting down the program.

Known as the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, the initiative gave nearly 2,000 projects $4.5 billion over the past four years to safeguard cities from climate catastrophes, according to the New York Attorney General.

Given that coastal communities face the biggest threats from flooding, New York is among the states that received the most money from the program, totalling over $380 million for 38 BRIC projects.

That included, for instance, a $50 million grant for the Central Harlem Cloudburst Flood Mitigation Project, which paid for flood prevention measures to protect over 45,000 city residents from flash flooding of the Harlem River.

But the Trump administration questions the importance of the initiative.

“The BRIC program was yet another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program,” FEMA reportedly said in a news release at the time, which has since been taken down from the agency’s website.

FEMA “should be terminated” as the agency “has been slow and totally ineffective,” President Donald Trump said on Truth Social.

Among the defunded BRIC projects was a $50 million grant for flood protections along the Harlem River. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

“Individual states should handle storms etc as they come. Big savings, far more efficient,” he added on the social media platform.

But Yeampierre says FEMA provides food, health care, and shelter when disaster strikes, and that undermining it will hurt communities across the city. 

An activist and co-chair of the Climate Justice Alliance—a national non-profit that also suffered federal funding cuts—Yeampierre spoke with City Limits about the slashes to FEMA and how a neighborhood approach to the climate crisis could save lives.

This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Tell us about the work that you do and why it’s important to your community?

UPROSE was founded in 1966, it’s the oldest Latino community based organization in Brooklyn. Next year it turns 60. And next year I will have been here 30 years, so I’ve seen a lot.

Basically our organization listens to the community and follows the community’s charge. So when it comes to climate we are doing environmental justice work because that’s what the community said was important.

It did take a while to get the community involved because not everyone saw how climate change was affecting them back in the early 2000s. 

But then there was a tornado that hit this part of Brooklyn [in 2007] and after that people started showing up. We started having sinkholes in Sunset Park and then Superstorm Sandy happened. 

Sandy became sort of like the marker, where all of a sudden the base of people interested in environmental issues in Sunset Park started growing. Old oak trees were uprooted and fell all over the place. Being in the park was dangerous because anything could fall and kill you.

But Sunset Park was not impacted the way that Red Hook was, which is our sister community, we found them under seven feet of water. So people here set themselves up to help Red Hook, to help the Rockaways, so it kind of became this place where people were dispatched to go to different places to help them.

What was that community effort like?

[Right after Sandy happened] we called for a meeting and it was packed. Everybody came, and I remember because it was a storefront that we had before we moved into our current office, and there were just so many people. And all we did was ask: what do you want us to do, what should it look like, and what are your ideas? 

And the ideas were mind-blowing. 

One was a block-to-block organizing effort where we could identify one person per block who could act as a first responder. In everybody’s block there is always a lady at her window, who knows which of her neighbors is on dialysis, who knows everybody’s business, who is hooking up with who. And that’s your first responder, that’s your organizer. And so we started organizing block by block and identifying projects that they would want to do together on each block to prevent flooding in the future. 

We identified places where people could grow gardens behind their houses to soak up the water when it rained and then share food. We did workshops on how to build a stormwater barrel and what it cost and where they could get the supplies, and our young people made a video about that.

So we started identifying interventions that were accessible and affordable to people. Because the other thing that we heard from the community is that addressing climate change was expensive, and only the gentrifiers could afford these things and that they couldn’t. And so little by little, we basically started educating the community about all the different kinds of things that they could do together. 

How does losing FEMA funding impact the community in times of crisis?

First let me begin by saying that I don’t want to romanticize FEMA. It needs to be reformed because it doesn’t serve our communities in the best way. The resources have been allocated in a discriminatory way. We have seen climate disasters where communities of color died in the thousands, but white communities got so much more money [from FEMA] even though they lost fewer lives. 

Flood damage in Woodside, Queens, following Hurricane Ida in 2021. (Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office)

But FEMA funds do make it possible for people to get up from under the rubble, gather their lives and recover from serious life-threaning events. When you think about the need for FEMA, think about tornadoes. Think of a Category 5 hurricane, think of an event that is massive in size and leaves places looking like a war zone, right? 

So FEMA is supposed to make it possible for people to get health care and a place to live. 

And so basically, what the federal administration is saying by defending that it should be terminated is that at the hardest moment in a family’s life, in a person’s life, when they need the federal government to show up the most so that they can survive, that they are not going to be there for them. That’s what they’re telling them, and that’s not an exaggeration. 

They’re basically telling them that you’re on your own. 

So I think that message to our communities has to come through: we are on our own. And what do we do when the government fails us, when it’s not available? What do we do for each other? We build community.

We work to complement each other and work in a way that is deeply collaborative and complementary.

What are some examples of what can be done?

We’ve been meeting with churches and people from our own base and teachers that are really pretty freaking badass and we are forming a collective of people from the neighborhood to build our own sustainable community. Saturday we had a workshop that was packed with everybody who came to learn to get their certificate on tree pruning, because that’s a green job. 

During the winter we have these learning circles in the basement of a local church where we talked about what do you do if there’s an extreme weather event, what can we do on the block? The questions were really open to get the neighborhood and the people to really think critically about what they could do.

One woman said, well we can find out who in our building knows how to do first aid and who is a nurse? Who knows how to do construction and who knows how to fix things, who knows how to grow things? And then somebody can check in on the elders, and we can find out what medication they take? What do they need? We can make a list. We can create a list in our building and then on our block. We can create an inventory. 

And they went on and on. Once they were asked, they were already thinking about how we take care of each other. So that is the conversation that’s been happening in a real granular way. 

People are starting to realize that the solutions are hyper local and that their relationships with each other are going to be central to us being able to survive the next big storm. 

You have to invest in communities. Communities have the solutions. They have the answers and you have to trust that they know how to do it. 

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Mariana@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post ‘Solutions are Hyper-Local’: Brooklyn Climate Organizer On Facing the Next Big Storm As Feds Pull Support appeared first on City Limits.