Opinion: Preventing Youth Homelessness Before It Starts

posted in: All news | 0

“Through creative conversations, we’re able to work with youth to figure out solutions for their most immediate needs and help resolve their housing crisis as quickly as possible—so they never have to enter the homelessness system in the first place.”

Asia Smith, youth consultant with Point Source Youth. (James Matthew Daniel)

In 2022, I found myself where no parent wants to be—without a safe place to live with my two young children, an infant and a 3-year-old. Circumstances led me to the city’s entry point into the homelessness system, Prevention Assistance and Temporary Housing Office (PATH). From there, I was bounced around from person to person, having to repeat my situation again and again, all the while waiting until I was found eligible, or “homeless enough,” for housing support. After two and a half months, I was finally assigned a case manager.

I learned quickly that, when navigating the system, I had to be my own best advocate for me and my kids. Appointments with case managers were quick and to the point, without a lot of room for questions or compassion. There’s no breathing room when you are just there to check boxes. It was on me to figure out how to apply for SNAP and healthcare assistance. It was on me to determine how to get my 3-year-old into a preschool program. It was an overwhelming and lonely place to be. 

Eventually, my kids and I landed at Henry Street Settlement. And that’s where I learned about a program that could have helped me prevent my situation before it started. 

While meeting with Henry Street’s employment support team, I learned that Point Source Youth was looking to hire youth consultants to advise on a new homelessness prevention program. The position immediately appealed to me because the program seemed to ask the question, “How can we help those who are not seen?” I was hired and entered into a community where I felt like I fit in after feeling invisible, or just like a number, for so long. 

Point Source Youth worked with youth consultants like me to create a youth homelessness prevention program through lived experience. Along with about a half-dozen other youth consultants across the country, we were able to shape the program by what would have helped us the most when navigating the system. It felt important to me to give young people the opportunity to be heard, because I saw firsthand how a one-sized-fits-all approach leaves people behind or in limbo for far too long. 

When young people reach out for housing support, what if we instead asked them, “What do you feel like you need?” or “What will help you the most where you are, right now?” Beyond that, we want to look at solutions to help the young person not only resolve but sustain their housing situation, so they aren’t in the same crisis position month after month. 

Through a collaborative process, we built the Targeted Housing Assistance Program, an intervention that works with local service providers to deliver direct cash payments to young people experiencing a housing crisis while working with them on a customized housing plan and budget. 

Through creative conversations, we’re able to work with youth to figure out solutions for their most immediate needs and help resolve their housing crisis as quickly as possible—so they never have to enter the homelessness system in the first place. This program pilot launched in seven cities across the country and recently added an eighth program in Los Angeles. 

It’s shown promising results and proven life changing for many of the more than 300 youth it has served so far. The stories and solutions are as diverse as the people living them. One young person, who had just graduated college, used the cash to bridge the gap between no longer being on a housing scholarship to getting her first paycheck. Another was able to put the funds toward renovating his family’s basement after it flooded, allowing him to stay. 

Across the program, 90 percent of participants reported being stably housed at the 30-day mark. 

Finding community through Henry Street and Point Source Youth empowered me with the confidence I needed to move forward after experiencing homelessness and trauma. By working as a youth consultant, I learned how much I enjoy helping people. I’m now in school studying for my Registered Nursing license and have my own place with my two kids.

I want to bring empathy and compassion into my work in healthcare, because I know those things make the world a little brighter for those who need it. It’s been a long journey, and I’m proud to be in a position where I can not only advocate for myself, but for others, too. 

New York City estimated that approximately 146,000 students in the public school system—or one in eight kids—experienced homelessness during the 2023-24 school year. This number grows year after year. 

At times, I wonder what my life would look like if something like the Targeted Housing Assistance Program existed for me and my kids when we needed it the most. I’m sure it would have helped me get to a better place more quickly, and who knows what that would have meant for my kids. 

My wish is we continue to expand this program to support as many young people as possible, so they don’t have to go through the homelessness system at all. 

Asia Smith is a youth consultant with Point Source Youth, where she advised the organization and Henry Street Settlement in creation of the Targeted Housing Assistance Program, which helps young people navigating a housing crisis. 

The post Opinion: Preventing Youth Homelessness Before It Starts appeared first on City Limits.

PODCAST: ¿Cómo la visa para trabajadores agrícolas H-2A puede convertirse en una pesadilla para algunos?

posted in: All news | 0

Muchos trabajadores con visas H-2A cayeron en una trampa que, años después, se convertiría en parte de una de las operaciones de tráfico más grandes en el país.

Funcionarios durante una rueda de prensa celebrada el 22 de noviembre de 2021 para anunciar las acusaciones formales en la «Operación Blooming Onion». (U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia)

En 2018, cientos de trabajadores de México con visas de trabajo H-2A, que sirven para traer a trabajadores agrícolas a los campos de los Estados Unidos, subieron a autobuses con destino a las granjas de las zonas rurales de Georgia.

Muchos de estos trabajadores cayeron en una trampa que, años después, se convertiría en parte de una de las operaciones de tráfico laboral más grandes en el país.

Se llamó “Operation Blooming Onion” (Operación Cebolla Floreciente) y en septiembre de 2021, el fiscal federal del distrito sur de Georgia presentó los resultados del caso, tildándola de “esclavitud moderna”.

Entre las personas que vinieron, estaba la joven Sofi, de 24 años, madre soltera, con experiencia trabajando en el campo, y quien creía que venía a recolectar arándanos en la zona rural de Georgia, que para esa época dependía más de los trabajadores H-2A que cualquier otro estado.

Pero el hombre que le ayudó a tramitar el visado, Javier Sánchez Mendoza Jr., tenía otros planes. 

A ella no se le asignó trabajo en el campo. En cambio tendría que recibir transferencias bancarias de México en su nombre y hacer los cheques a los trabajadores, aunque no se le pagaría nada.

Durante el año siguiente, la retuvieron contra su voluntad. Ella no tenía su pasaporte consigo. No conocía a nadie a quien pudiera acudir. No hablaba inglés. Y estaba asustada.

Según los investigadores federales, Sánchez Mendoza cobraba miles de dólares a algunos solicitantes y ganaba más de $25.000 dólares al mes. 

Más detalles en nuestra conversación a continuación.

Si usted o alguien que conoce es víctima de la trata de seres humanos, llame al teléfono de atención a la trata 1-888-373-7888. Todos los informes son confidenciales y hay intérpretes disponibles. Aquí encontrará una guía para que los trabajadores con visa H-2A conozcan sus derechos.

Ciudad Sin Límites, el proyecto en español de City Limits, y El Diario de Nueva York se han unido para crear el pódcast “El Diario Sin Límites” para hablar sobre latinos y política. Para no perderse ningún episodio de nuestro pódcast “El Diario Sin Límites” síguenos en Spotify, Soundcloud, Apple Pódcast y Stitcher. Todos los episodios están allí. ¡Suscríbete!

The post PODCAST: ¿Cómo la visa para trabajadores agrícolas H-2A puede convertirse en una pesadilla para algunos? appeared first on City Limits.

FACT FOCUS: Alleged FBI documents do not prove federal agents incited Jan. 6 Capitol attack

posted in: All news | 0

By MELISSA GOLDIN

President Donald Trump bolstered a years-old conspiracy theory over the weekend, claiming that 50 pages of alleged FBI documents recently made public prove that 274 FBI agents at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were there to incite the attack.

Related Articles


Expectations low amid high tensions as shutdown deadline nears


Trump administration opens more land for coal mining, offers $625M to boost coal-fired power plants


Trump takes his tariff war to the movies announcing 100% levies on foreign-made films


Dar Global to launch a $1 billion project in Saudi Arabia in a deal with Trump Organization


What we know about Trump’s peace proposal for Gaza

The documents first appeared in an article published Thursday by the conservative site Just The News, which did not blame the Jan. 6 insurrection on federal agents as Trump did. It focused instead on complaints made in an “after-action report” by FBI personnel, who were critical about the bureau’s response that day.

The information — which The Associated Press was not able to verify as authentic — does not support Trump’s claim. It says that FBI agents responded to the U.S. Capitol attack, not that those agents had any role in making it happen.

Here’s a closer look at the facts.

TRUMP: “As it now turns out, FBI Agents were at, and in, the January 6th Protest, probably acting as Agitators and Insurrectionists, but certainly not as ‘Law Enforcement Officials.’”

THE FACTS: This is false. The alleged FBI documents to which Trump is referring state on page 46 that 274 agents from the FBI’s Washington Field Office “responded to” to the U.S. Capitol and other nearby locations on Jan. 6. They do not contain any credible evidence to suggest that federal agents were acting as agitators or insurrectionists.

“This number includes agents that responded to the Capitol grounds as well as inside the Capitol, the pipe bombs, and the red truck that was believed to contain explosive devices as well as CDC/ADCs,” the documents read.

The mention of “pipe bombs” refers to the devices planted outside offices of the Democratic and Republican national committees in Washington on the eve of the attack, while “the red truck” refers to a pickup truck filled with weapons and Molotov cocktail components that was parked near the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

In addition to information about the agents and other FBI staff who were deployed in response to the Jan. 6 attack, the documents include extensive feedback from alleged bureau personnel about how the FBI responded to the day’s events. There are also suggestions from different operational divisions for future best practices, as well as notes on what went well.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Trump’s allegation. The FBI declined to comment.

Rioters determined to overturn Trump’s 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, in a violent clash with police. Unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that federal agents played a role in instigating the attack became popular soon after and were advanced even by some Republicans in Congress. Many iterations have since been debunked.

A watchdog report published in December 2024 by the Justice Department inspector general’s office found that no undercover FBI employees were at the riot on Jan. 6 and that none of the bureau’s informants were authorized to participate. Informants, also known as confidential human sources, work with the FBI to provide information, but are not on the bureau’s payroll. Undercover agents are employed by the FBI.

It does state that “after the Capitol had been breached on Jan. 6 by the rioters, and in response to a request from the USCP, the FBI deployed several hundred Special Agents and employees to the U.S. Capitol and the surrounding area.” USCP refers to the U.S. Capitol Police.

According to the report, 26 informants were in Washington on Jan. 6 in connection with the day’s events. Of the total 26 informants, four entered the Capitol during the riot and an additional 13 entered a restricted area around the Capitol. But none were authorized to do so by the FBI, nor were they given permission to break other laws or encourage others to do the same. The remaining nine informants did not engage in any illegal activities.

It wasn’t clear prior to the report’s release how many FBI informants were in the crowd that day. Former FBI Director Christopher Wray, who resigned in January at the end of the Biden administration, refused to say during a congressional hearing in 2023 how many of the people who entered the Capitol and surrounding area on Jan. 6 were either FBI employees or people with whom the FBI had made contact. But Wray said the “notion that somehow the violence at the Capitol on January 6 was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and agents is ludicrous.”

Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

Louisiana issues a warrant to arrest California doctor accused of mailing abortion pills

posted in: All news | 0

By SARA CLINE and GEOFF MULVIHILL

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Louisiana is pursuing a criminal case against another out-of-state doctor accused of mailing abortion pills to a patient in the state, court documents filed this month revealed.

Related Articles


Expectations low amid high tensions as shutdown deadline nears


Trump administration opens more land for coal mining, offers $625M to boost coal-fired power plants


Trump takes his tariff war to the movies announcing 100% levies on foreign-made films


Dar Global to launch a $1 billion project in Saudi Arabia in a deal with Trump Organization


What we know about Trump’s peace proposal for Gaza

A warrant for the arrest of a California doctor is a rare charge of violating one of the state abortion bans that has taken effect since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 and allowed enforcement.

It represents an additional front in a growing legal battle between liberal and conservative states over prescribing abortion medications via telehealth and mailing them to patients.

Pills are the most common way abortions are accessed in the U.S., and are a major reason that, despite the bans, abortion numbers rose last year, according to a report.

A Louisiana woman says she was forced to take abortion drugs

Louisiana said in a court case filed Sept. 19 that it had issued a warrant for a California-based doctor who it says provided pills to a Louisiana woman in 2023.

Both the woman, Rosalie Markezich, and the state attorney’s general, are seeking to be part of a lawsuit that seeks to order drug regulators to bar telehealth prescriptions to mifepristone, one of the two drugs usually used in combination for medication abortions.

In court filings, Markezich says her boyfriend at the time used her email address to order drugs from Dr. Remy Coeytaux, a California physician, and sent her $150, which she forwarded to Coeytaux. She said she had no other contact with the doctor.

She said she did not want to take the pills but felt forced to and said in the filing that “the trauma of my chemical abortion still haunts me” and that it would not have happened if telehealth prescriptions to the drug were off limits.

The accusation builds on a position taken by anti-abortion groups: That allowing abortion pills to be prescribed by phone or video call and filled by mail opens the door to women being coerced to take them.

“Rosalie is bravely representing many woman who are victimized by the illegal, immoral, and unethical conduct of these drug dealers,” Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said in a statement.

The doctor also faces a lawsuit in Texas

Murrill’s office did not immediately answer questions about what charges Coeytaux faces, or when the warrant was issued. But under the state’s ban on abortions at all stages of pregnancy, physicians convicted of providing abortion face up to 15 years in prison and $200,000 in fines.

Coeytaux is also the target of a lawsuit filed in July in federal court by a Texas man who says the doctor illegally provided his girlfriend with abortion pills.

Coeytaux did not immediately respond to emails or a phone message.

The combination of a Louisiana criminal case and a Texas civil case over abortion pills is also playing out surrounding a New York doctor, Margaret Carpenter. New York authorities are refusing to extradite Dr. Carpenter to Louisiana or to enforce for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton the $100,000 civil judgment against her.

In the Louisiana case, officials said a pregnant minor’s mother requested the abortion medication online and directed her daughter to take them. The mother was arrested, pleaded not guilty and was released on bond.

New York officials cite a law there that seeks to protect medical providers who prescribe abortion medications to patients in states with abortion bans — or where such prescriptions by telehealth violate the law.

New York and California are among the eight states that have shield laws with such provisions, according to a tally by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights.

The legal and political fight over abortion pills is expanding

The legal filings that revealed the Louisiana charge against Coeytaux are part of an effort for Louisiana, along with Florida and Texas, to join a lawsuit filed last year by the Republican attorneys general for Idaho, Kansas and Missouri to roll back federal approvals for mifepristone.

This year, both Louisiana and Texas have adopted laws to target out-of-state providers of abortion pills.

The Louisiana law lets patients who receive abortions sue providers and others. The Texas law goes further and allows anyone to sue those who prescribe such pills in the state.

Both Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary have said they are conducting a full review of mifepristone’s safety and effectiveness.

Medication abortion has been available in the U.S. since 2000, when the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of mifepristone.

Mulvihill reported from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.