Amid halt in federal food aid, Gov. Tim Walz announces $4 million to Minnesota food shelves

posted in: All news | 0

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz announced $4 million in state aid for food shelves at The Open Door in Eagan on Monday, Oct. 27, just hours after the USDA said SNAP funding has “run dry” from the shutdown.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz discusses the state’s ability to backfill SNAP funding losses during the federal government shutdown on Monday, Oct. 27, 2025, at The Open Door in Eagan. (Mary Murphy / Forum News Service)

Walz said the $4 million boost from the state will not be enough to make up for the loss of federal SNAP funding.

“I want to be very clear: It will not make up and backfill everything that is going to drop off starting on Saturday (Nov. 1). We do not have that capacity,” he said. “We put out about $74 million a month in SNAP benefits, just so you know the scope and the scale of this. Those are Minnesota tax dollars that went to the federal government.”

In a press conference at the beginning of the shutdown, Minnesota Management and Budget Director Ahna Minge warned in early October that the state’s current available SNAP funding would run out by November. The shutdown, which has stretched 27 days as of Monday, is the second-longest in U.S. history.

The additional state funding also comes as Minnesota’s food shelves are seeing record visits, with 9 million in 2024 alone — a number that tops the early pandemic years. Walz said 440,000 Minnesotans are on SNAP benefits, 38% of them children and 18% seniors.

Jason Viana, Open Door executive director, said that before the shutdown began Oct. 1, the pantry was already helping about 30% more people than last year.

Jason Viana, director of The Open Door in Eagan, talks about the increasing need for food shelves and food pantries amid the federal government shutdown on Monday, Oct. 27, 2025. (Mary Murphy / Forum News Service)

“This shutdown and reducing benefits that are available to our clients are absolutely a step back that are going to be felt in households across the state of Minnesota. I will tell you that in our footprint, we have heard increased concern, anxiety from our families, and we are seeing more families than we’ve seen since 2020,” he said.

Tikki Brown, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Children, Youth and Families, said Monday the state tapped into existing funds from the Family First Prevention Services Act and emergency Department of Human Services funds to come up with the $4 million.

Brown said the money will be distributed to The Food Group, which will be tasked with distributing the funds throughout Minnesota’s roughly 300 food shelves, with the aim of prioritizing SNAP recipients.

Walz said most of the state’s money is not fungible and has already been appropriated for other reasons. He said he probably wouldn’t want to tap into the state’s rainy day fund — which has roughly $3 billion in untouched funds — and added that the Legislature would need to be called back to appropriate that money.

Brown said she received word from the USDA that any state funding disbursed to make up for SNAP funding losses would not be reimbursed.

“It’s Day 27. Doesn’t appear like there’s really any sense of urgency out of the folks in D.C.,” Walz said. “As this continues to go on, it will become much more of a crisis. And it may not feel like a crisis for some folks … but it will eventually all start to come home.”

Will you lose food benefits in November? Please contact reporter Molly Guthrey at mguthrey@pioneerpress.com to be interviewed for a story.

Related Articles


Lakeville center opts out of same-day driver’s license pilot program


Minnesota Dream Hunt offers ‘heartwarming’ experiences


Letters: Without a push from home, more money might not help schools


Letters: A papal exhibit? What about the sisters?


Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe wins federal relief for June storm cleanup

 

Anthony Edwards has hamstring strain, to be re-evaluated in a week

posted in: All news | 0

Anthony Edwards has been one of the most durable superstars in the NBA since entering the league in 2020. So you’ll have to excuse teammate Naz Reid for assuming the guard would be ready to go for Monday’s game against Denver after Edwards left the first quarter of Sunday’s home opener against Indiana.

But the All-NBA guard is indeed mortal, and Minnesota will have to play without its lead man for an extended period of time.

Minnesota announced Monday an MRI scan revealed a right hamstring strain, adding the guard will be re-evaluated in a week. A one-week absence would result in three to four missed games.

ESPN reported earlier in the day that Edwards is set to miss two weeks with the injury.

That’s an absence that would cause him to miss the next eight games. The Wolves play Monday, Nov. 10 in Utah, the end of the two-week period, then have three days off before a Nov. 14 home bout with Sacramento.

That return date would give Edwards more than two and a half weeks to recover.

If it’s a Grade 1 strain, that would be a conservative amount of time to heal and give him the best chance to potentially resolve the issue for the final 65-plus games of the season.

Minnesota will have to at least tread water without its best player. You don’t want to give up much ground at any point in the season in the hyper-competitive Western Conference.

But past history suggests the Wolves aren’t doomed by any stretch. Heading into this season, Edwards had missed 19 career games. The Timberwolves are 12-7 in those contests.

The reality is most teams play without top guys for extended periods for various portions of every season. Minnesota has been fortunate enough to avoid such a fate for this long.

King Charles III dedicates Britain’s first national memorial to LGBTQ+ troops

posted in: All news | 0

By JILL LAWLESS, Associated Press

LONDON (AP) — King Charles III on Monday dedicated Britain’s first national memorial to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops, 25 years after the U.K. ended a ban on homosexuality in the armed forces.

The king, who is the ceremonial head of the armed forces, laid flowers at the monument in the National Memorial Arboretum in central England at a service attended by scores of serving troops and veterans. The sculpture takes the form of a crumpled bronze letter bearing words from personnel who were affected by the ban.

Between 1967 and 2000, soldiers, sailors and air force personnel who were — or were thought to be — gay or transgender were labeled unfit to serve and dismissed or discharged from the forces. Some were stripped of medals or lost their pension rights, and many struggled with the stigma for decades.

The government lifted the ban after a 1999 ruling from the European Court of Human Rights.

In 2023 then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak formally apologized for what he called “an appalling failure of the British state.” A compensation program was established, with veterans who were dismissed from the military because of their sexual orientation or gender identity receiving up to 70,000 pounds ($93,000) each.

LGBTQ+ military charity Fighting with Pride said the new monument represents a “powerful step forward in recognizing and honoring the service and sacrifices” of the gay and transgender troops.

Claire Ashton, who was forced to leave the Royal Artillery in 1972, when she was 21, said it was “a moment I never believed would happen, a moment full of meaning and, finally, of pride.”

“I’m in my 70s now and have forever lived with the psychological scars of being kicked out – ‘medically discharged,’ as it was labeled on my records,” she said. “It means so much to be with others who’ve been through similar nightmares to me and, like me, are making peace with the past.”

Brig. Clare Phillips told the ceremony that as “a gay woman who has served in the British Army for 30 years … my career has taken me from a life of secrecy, fear and darkness to a career of pride, openness and joy.

“For the serving community, today’s unveiling of this incredible memorial is about remembering that we stand on the shoulders of giants – those people who fought discrimination and persecution so we can now serve openly and proudly,” she said.

The event followed an appearance by the king at Lichfield Cathedral, where he was heckled about Prince Andrew’s friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

A heckler asked the king how long he had known about Andrew and Epstein, and if he asked police to cover up for his brother.

The king did not answer and the man was shouted down and pulled out of sight. Some in the crowd then chanted “God Save the King.”

Andrew recently agreed to stop using titles including Duke of York, but Buckingham Palace and the British government have been under pressure to formally strip him of his princely title and royal mansion after new revelations about his relationship with Epstein.

What to know about uncontacted Indigenous peoples and efforts to protect them

posted in: All news | 0

By STEVEN GRATTAN, Associated Press

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — From the depths of Brazil’s Amazon to Indonesia’s rainforests, some of the world’s most isolated peoples are being squeezed by roads, miners and drug traffickers — a crisis unfolding far from public view or effective state protection.

A new report by Survival International, a London-based Indigenous rights organization, attempts one of the broadest tallies yet, identifying at least 196 uncontacted Indigenous groups in 10 countries, primarily in the South American nations sharing the Amazon rainforest. Released Sunday, the report estimates that nearly 65% face threats from logging, about 40% from mining and around 20% from agribusiness.

“These are what I would call silent genocides — there are no TV crews, no journalists. But they are happening, and they’re happening now,” said Fiona Watson, Survival’s research and advocacy director, who has worked on Indigenous rights for more than three decades.

The issue often receives little priority from governments, which critics say see uncontacted peoples as politically marginal because they don’t vote and their territories are often coveted for logging, mining and oil extraction. Public debate is also shaped by stereotypes — some romanticize them as “lost tribes,” while others view them as barriers to development.

Survival’s research concludes that half of these groups “could be wiped out within 10 years if governments and companies do not act.”

Herlin Odicio is interviewed after the launch of Survival International’s major new report on the world’s uncontacted Indigenous peoples, in London, Monday, Oct. 27, 2025. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Who the uncontacted peoples are

Uncontacted peoples are not “lost tribes” frozen in time, Watson said. They are contemporary societies that deliberately avoid outsiders after generations of violence, slavery and disease.

“They don’t need anything from us,” Watson said. “They’re happy in the forest. They have incredible knowledge and they help keep these very valuable forests standing — essential to all humanity in the fight against climate change.”

Survival’s research shows that more than 95% of the world’s uncontacted peoples live in the Amazon, with smaller populations in South and Southeast Asia and the Pacific. These communities live by hunting, fishing and small-scale cultivation, maintaining languages and traditions that predate modern nation-states.

Why contact can be deadly

Groups living in voluntary isolation have “minimal to no contact with those outside of their own group,” said Dr. Subhra Bhattacharjee, director general of the Forest Stewardship Council and an Indigenous rights expert based in Bonn, Germany. “A simple cold that you and I recover from in a week … they could die of that cold.”

Beyond disease, contact can destroy livelihoods and belief systems. International law requires free, prior and informed consent — known as FPIC — before any activity on Indigenous lands.

“But when you have groups living in voluntary isolation, who you cannot get close to without risking their lives, you cannot get FPIC,” Bhattacharjee said. “No FPIC means no consent.”

Her organization follows a strict policy: “No contact, no-go zones,” she said, arguing that if consent cannot be obtained safely, contact should not occur at all.

The Associated Press reported last year on loggers killed by bow and arrow after entering Mashco Piro territory in Peru’s Amazon, with Indigenous leaders warning that such clashes are inevitable when frontier zones go unpoliced.

Maipatxi Apurina, left, and Herlin Odicio, right, take a photograph at the launch of Survival International’s major new report on the world’s uncontacted Indigenous peoples, in London, Monday, Oct. 27, 2025. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

How the threats have evolved

Watson, who has worked across the Amazon for 35 years, said early threats stemmed from colonization and state-backed infrastructure. During Brazil’s military dictatorship between 1964 and 1985, highways were bulldozed through the rainforest “without due regard” for the people living there.

“The roads acted as a magnet for settlers,” she said, describing how loggers and cattle ranchers followed, bringing gunmen and disease that wiped out entire communities.

A railway line now planned in Brazil could potentially affect three uncontacted peoples, she said, but the rise of organized crime poses an even greater risk.

Across Peru, Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador, drug traffickers and illegal gold miners have moved deep into Indigenous territories. “Any chance encounter runs the risk of transmitting the flu, which can easily wipe out an uncontacted people within a year of contact,” she said. “And bows and arrows are no match for guns.”

Evangelical missionary incursions have also caused outbreaks. Watson recalled how, under former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, an evangelical pastor was placed in charge of the government’s unit for uncontacted peoples and gained access to their coordinates. “Their mission was to force contact — to ‘save souls,’” she said. “That is incredibly dangerous.”

Ways to protect uncontacted peoples

Protecting uncontacted peoples, experts say, will require both stronger laws and a shift in how the world views them — not as relics of the past, but as citizens of the planet whose survival affects everyone’s future.

Advocates have several recommendations.

First, governments must formally recognize and enforce Indigenous territories, making them off-limits to extractive industries.

Mapping is crucial, Bhattacharjee said, because identifying the approximate territories of uncontacted peoples allows governments to protect those areas from loggers or miners. But, she added, it must be done with extreme caution and from a distance to avoid contact that could endanger the groups’ health or autonomy.

Related Articles


Hurricane Melissa’s wind speeds doubled in less than a day


Blood tests show highest levels of forever chemicals in those living near New Mexico plume


In a California farming region, researchers are mapping rural heat to protect farmworkers


Lacking community resilience centers, Houston neighbors opt for solar-powered ‘hub homes’


‘Chemtrail’ theories warn of health dangers from contrails. The idea takes wing at Kennedy’s HHS

Second, corporations and consumers must help stop the flow of money driving destruction. Survival’s report calls for companies to trace their supply chains to ensure that commodities such as gold, timber and soy are not sourced from Indigenous lands.

“Public opinion and pressure are essential,” Watson said. “It’s largely through citizens and the media that so much has already been achieved to recognize uncontacted peoples and their rights.”

Finally, advocates say the world must recognize why their protection matters. Beyond human rights, these communities play an outsized role in stabilizing the global climate.

“With the world under pressure from climate change, we will sink or swim together,” Bhattacharjee said.

Governments’ uneven response

International treaties such as the International Labor Organization’s Convention 169 and the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples affirm the right to self-determination and to remain uncontacted if they choose. But enforcement varies widely.

In Peru, Congress recently rejected a proposal to create the Yavari-Mirim Indigenous Reserve, a move Indigenous federations said leaves isolated groups exposed to loggers and traffickers.

In Brazil, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has sought to rebuild protections weakened under Bolsonaro, boosting budgets and patrols.

And in Ecuador, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled this year that the government failed to protect the Tagaeri and Taromenane peoples who live in voluntary isolation in Yasuni National Park.

Watson warned that political forces tied to agribusiness and evangelical blocs are now working to roll back earlier gains.

“Achievements of the last 20 or 30 years are in danger of being dismantled,” she said.

What the new report calls for

Survival International’s report urges a global no-contact policy: legal recognition of uncontacted territories, suspension of mining, oil and agribusiness projects in or near those lands and prosecution of crimes against Indigenous groups.

Watson said logging remains the biggest single threat, but mining is close behind. She pointed to the uncontacted Hongana Manyawa on Indonesia’s Halmahera Island, where nickel for electric-vehicle batteries is being mined.

“People think electric cars are a green alternative,” she said, “but mining companies are operating on the land of uncontacted peoples and posing enormous threats.”

In South America, illegal gold miners in the Yanomami territory of Brazil and Venezuela continue to use mercury to extract gold — contamination that has poisoned rivers and fish.

“The impact is devastating — socially and physically,” Watson said.

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.