Trump says he’s in ‘no rush’ to end tariffs as he holds talks with Italy’s Meloni

posted in: All news | 0

By COLLEEN BARRY and JOSH BOAK

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Thursday that he is in “no rush” to reach any trade deals because of the revenues his tariffs are generating, but suggested while meeting with Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni that it would be easy to find an agreement with the European Union and others.

His administration has indicated that offers are coming from other countries and it is possible to do 90 deals during the 90-day tariff pause, but the president played down the likelihood of an accelerated timeline, saying any agreements would come “at a certain point.”

“We’re in no rush,” said Trump, hinting that he has leverage because other countries want access to U.S. consumers.

Meloni’s meeting with Trump will test her mettle as a bridge between the EU and the United States. She is the first European leader to have face-to-face talks with him since he announced and then partially suspended 20% tariffs on European exports.

Meloni secured the meeting as Italy’s leader, but she also has, in a sense, been “knighted” to represent the EU at a critical juncture in the fast-evolving trade war that has stoked recession fears. She was in close contact with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen before the trip, and “the outreach is … closely coordinated,” a commission spokeswoman said.

“We know we are in a difficult moment,” Meloni said this week in Rome. “Most certainly, I am well aware of what I represent, and what I am defending.”

The EU is defending what it calls “the most important commercial relationship in the world,’’ with annual trade with the U.S. totaling 1.6 trillion euros ($1.8 trillion). The Trump administration has said its tariffs would enable trade negotiations that would box out China, the world’s dominant manufacturer. But Trump maintains that rivals and allies alike have taken advantage of the U.S. on trade.

Trade negotiations fall under the authority of the EU Commission, which is pushing for a zero-for-zero tariff deal with Washington. Trump administration officials, in talks with the EU, have yet to publicly show signs of relenting on the president’s insistence that a baseline 10% tariff be charged on all foreign imports. Trump paused for 90 days his initial 20% tax on EU products so that negotiations could occur.

The EU has already engaged with Trump administration officials in Washington. Maroš Šefčovič, the European Commissioner for trade and economic security, said he met on Monday with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Šefčovič said afterward on X that it would “require a significant joint effort on both sides” to get to zero tariffs and work on non-tariff trade barriers.

Meloni’s margins for progress are more in gaining clarity on the Republican president’s goals rather than outright concessions, experts say.

“It is a very delicate mission,” said Fabian Zuleeg, chief economist at the European Policy Center think tank in Brussels. “There is the whole trade agenda, and while she’s not officially negotiating, we know that Trump likes to have this kind of informal exchange, which in a sense is a negotiation. So it’s a lot on her plate.”

As the leader of a far-right party, Meloni is ideologically aligned with Trump on issues including curbing migration, promoting traditional values and skepticism toward multilateral institutions. But stark differences have emerged in Meloni’s unwavering support for Ukraine after Russia’s invasion in February 2022.

Related Articles


How war, money and the quest for discovery entwined the US government and universities


Draft budget plan proposes deep cuts across federal health programs


Why Elon Musk installed his top lieutenants at a federal agency you probably haven’t heard of


Trump administration takes aim at Harvard’s international students and tax-exempt status


Judge says labor unions’ lawsuit over DOGE access to Labor Department systems can move forward

The two leaders are expected to discuss the war and Italy’s role in an eventual postwar reconstruction of Ukraine. Trump is expected to press Meloni to increase Italy’s defense spending, which last year fell well below the 2% of gross domestic product target for countries in the NATO military alliance. Italy’s spending, at 1.49% of GDP, is among the lowest in Europe.

Despite the differences on Ukraine and defense spending, Meloni is seen by some in the U.S. administration as a vital bridge to Europe at a difficult moment for trans-Atlantic relations.

Trump is looking not only to discuss with Meloni how “Italy’s marketplace can be opened up, but also how they can help us with the rest of Europe,” according to a senior administration official who briefed reporters before the visit. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the White House.

After being the only European leader to attend Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration, Meloni has responded with studied restraint as abrupt shifts in U.S. policy under Trump have frayed the U.S.-European alliance. She has denounced the tariffs as “wrong” and warned that “dividing the West would be disastrous for everyone,” after Trump’s heated White House exchange with Ukraine’s president.

“She has been very cautious,’’ said Wolfango Piccoli, an analyst at the London-based Teneo consultancy. “It is what we need when we have a counterpart that is changing every day.’’

Italy maintains a 40 billion euro ($45 billion) trade surplus with the U.S., its largest with any country, fueled by Americans’ appetite for Italian sparkling wine, foodstuffs like Parmigiano Reggiano hard cheese and Parma ham, and Italian luxury fashion. These are all sectors critical to the Italian economy, and mostly supported by small- and medium-sized producers who are core center-right voters.

“All in all, I think she will focus on the very strong economic and trade relations that Italy has with the United States, not just in terms of exports, but also services and energy,” said Antonio Villafranca, vice president of the ISPI think tank in Milan. “For example, Italy could even consider importing more gas from the U.S.”

The meeting comes against the backdrop of growing concerns over global uncertainty generated by the escalating tariff wars. Italy’s growth forecast for this year has already been slashed from 1% to 0.5% as a result.

The Trump administration has imposed tariffs on much of the world, arguing that other countries have taken advantage of the U.S., as evidenced by its trade deficits. But with the 90-day pause, the White House has increased Trump’s tariffs on China to 145% while keep separate tariffs of as much as 25% on Canada, Mexico, autos, steel and aluminum.

On Wednesday, Trump met with Japan’s chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa. Trump, on social media, summarized the meeting s achieving “Big progress!” but he did not offer any specifics. China is simultaneously seeking to strike deals that could possibly undercut claims made by Trump that his tariffs will ultimately lead to more domestic factory jobs and stronger growth.

Experts cautioned against raising expectations over any concrete progress between the U.S. and EU.

“The best strategy has been to be very circumspect: Get there, get the meeting, get the photo opportunity,” Piccoli said. “If she is able to come back, and give a sense of how Washington wants to frame future relations on trade, defense and Ukraine policy, that would be a huge win.”

Barry reported from Milan. Associated Press writers Lorne Cook in Brussels and Aamer Madhani contributed to this report.

Medical device company to close Maple Grove facility, cut 101 jobs

posted in: All news | 0

Come July, more than 100 workers in Maple Grove are expected to be laid off.

Teleflex, a Pennsylvania-based medical device provider, is closing all operations at its Maple Grove facility and expects to lay off 101 employees July 1, according to a notice filed last week with the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.

The Maple Grove site, located at 6464 Sycamore Ct. N., was used to create diagnostic and interventional catheters. Laboratory and manufacturing operations are expected to cease by June 30 and a complete closure of the building is expected by March 2026.

A spokesperson for Teleflex did not immediately respond to a Pioneer Press request for comment.

The impacted employees are not part of a union and no bumping rights exist, according to the notice.

Earlier this year, Teleflex announced it would split into two public entities. The new entity, NewCo, will consist of its urology, acute care and OEM businesses while the other, RemainCo, houses hospital-focused vascular access, interventional and surgical businesses, MedTechDive reported.

The same day the split was announced, Teleflex also announced its roughly $790 million acquisition of “all of the vascular intervention business” of medical technology and device company Biotronik, according to a news release from Teleflex.

Related Articles


UnitedHealth cuts 2025 forecast after dealing with first-quarter care use spike


Trump gripes about interest rates, says Fed Chair Powell’s ‘termination cannot come fast enough’


US jobless benefit claims fall last week as labor market remains strong despite recession fears


UnitedHealth’s worst drop in decades weighs on US indexes even as most stocks tick higher


Athena Bitcoin asks Stillwater to repeal cryptocurrency ATM ban

Google’s digital ad network declared an illegal monopoly, joining its search engine in penalty box

posted in: All news | 0

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Technology Writer

Google has been branded an abusive monopolist by a federal judge for the second time in less than a year, this time for illegally exploiting some of its online marketing technology to boost the profits fueling an internet empire currently worth $1.8 trillion.

Related Articles


UnitedHealth cuts 2025 forecast after dealing with first-quarter care use spike


Trump gripes about interest rates, says Fed Chair Powell’s ‘termination cannot come fast enough’


US jobless benefit claims fall last week as labor market remains strong despite recession fears


UnitedHealth’s worst drop in decades weighs on US indexes even as most stocks tick higher


Athena Bitcoin asks Stillwater to repeal cryptocurrency ATM ban

The ruling issued Thursday by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia comes on the heels of a separate decision in August that concluded Google’s namesake search engine has been illegally leveraging its dominance to stifle competition and innovation.

After the U.S. Justice Department targeted Google’s ubiquitous search engine during President Donald Trump’s first administration, the same agency went after the company’s lucrative digital advertising network in 2023 during President Joe Biden’s ensuing administration in an attempt to undercut the power that Google has amassed since its inception in a Silicon Valley garage in 1998.

Although antitrust regulators prevailed both times, the battle is likely to continue for several more years as Google tries to overturn the two monopoly decisions in appeals while forging ahead in the new and highly lucrative technological frontier of artificial intelligence.

The next step in the latest case is a penalty phase that will likely begin late this year or early next year. The same so-called “remedy” hearings in the search monopoly case are scheduled to begin Monday in Washington D.C., where Justice Department lawyers will try to convince U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta to impose a sweeping punishment that includes a proposed requirement for Google to sell its Chrome web browser.

Opinion: Permanent Supportive Housing Is Key to Solving Homelessness

posted in: All news | 0

Mayor Adams has committed to providing temporary housing to New Yorkers with severe mental illness, but the city needs more supportive SROs to prevent a worsening homelessness crisis.

A supportive SRO on W. 22nd Street run by St. Francis Friends of the Poor (Jeremy Amar)

Homelessness among mentally ill New Yorkers is dire and growing, and the city continues to overlook the organizations capable of addressing it. Despite continued efforts, the number of unhoused individuals keeps rising, shelters are over capacity, and more people than ever are living on the streets. So, what can we do? 

In January, Mayor Adams made a $650 million investment to provide temporary housing to patients with severe mental illness. The investment includes the addition of hundreds of shelter beds and funding for a new NYC Health + Hospitals Bridge to Home program. This program provides rooms, meals, recreation, therapy and other support to mentally ill New Yorkers for a period of six to 12 months. Then, unhoused residents will be transitioned into permanent supportive housing. However, there is no mention of investment into such permanent supportive housing, particularly the kind designed to serve those living with serious mental illness. 

As of July 2024, more than 132,000 people were sleeping in NYC’s shelters, not counting the thousands forced to live in public spaces. Mental health disorders are up to four times more common among the homeless, causing those with serious mental illness to cycle between shelters, jails and hospitals due to a lack of stable housing.  

The city’s failure to provide the right housing options has created a ripple effect. Emergency rooms are overcrowded with psychiatric cases, law enforcement is stretched thin responding to mental health crises, and social services are overwhelmed. Without real solutions, chronic homelessness will continue to rise, and more people will lose their lives to preventable tragedies.

A key step in addressing this crisis is restoring support and funding for single-room occupancy (SRO) housing and easing the creation of permanent supportive housing for unhoused people living with serious mental illness. 

For years, SROs served as an essential form of housing for low-income individuals, including those with serious mental illness. These units — small private rooms with shared common spaces — were an affordable way to offer safe, affordable housing to those in need. But decades ago, zoning changes and urban renewal policies led to their systematic removal, worsening today’s crisis while gutting the city’s affordable housing stock. 

Unlike traditional apartments, supportive SROs provide the simplicity that many individuals with serious mental illness need to maintain stability and focus on recovery. Supportive housing offers on-site services like psychiatric care, medication management and case management — services that are essential for keeping residents housed long-term. SROs are a cost-effective, scalable model that could provide immediate relief for those who desperately need a stable place to live.

However, past concerns about isolating people with mental illness have led to policies that discourage 100 percent supportive housing in favor of mixed-population models. Under current requirements, developments must follow a 60/40 model, where 60 percent of units are reserved for people with special needs, such as those with serious mental illness, while 40 percent are allocated to affordable housing. While this approach works for some, it is not suitable for all. Many people with serious mental illness do best in environments surrounded by peers with access to supportive services tailored to their needs.

The worsening homeless crisis — especially among those with serious mental illness — requires urgent, focused solutions. First, the city must remove outdated zoning barriers and support the return of SROs to make it feasible to build deeply affordable housing again. Second, we must expand 100 percent permanent supportive housing that offers on-site services, structure and community — allowing people with serious mental illness to live and recover together. Without this investment, even well-intentioned efforts in shelters and temporary housing will fall short.

New York City cannot afford to delay. By prioritizing SROs and the creation of more permanent supportive housing as a specialized solution for people living with serious mental illness, the city can address homelessness in a meaningful way. Housing is not just a policy issue — it is a matter of life and death. It is time to act.

Christina Byrne is executive director, and Linda Flores is development and communications manager of St. Francis Friends of the Poor.

The post Opinion: Permanent Supportive Housing Is Key to Solving Homelessness appeared first on City Limits.