One thing has been consistently excellent for Minnesota through the first two games of its round series with the Lakers – the defensive end.

The Timberwolves are surrendering just 94.5 points per game. Defense is the primary reason Minnesota won Game 1 and was the sole reason the Wolves had a prayer at the end of Game 2.

Driving the bus on the defensive success? Rudy Gobert.

That should seem obvious on its surface. Gobert is a four-time Defensive Player of the Year. He led the Wolves in defensive rating yet again this season, with Minnesota allowing just 107.6 points per 100 possessions with the center on the floor.

And yet the center keeps being framed as a liability in certain matchups in this series. Luka Doncic hit a ridiculously tough baseline jumper over Gobert in an isolation situation in the second quarter Tuesday in Los Angeles.

After the shot tickled the twine, Doncic turned to the Wolves’ bench and signaled for Minnesota to sub out the center.

That’s not likely to happen. Because while “SportsCenter” seemingly aired that Doncic play on a loop, and while the Lakers’ home crowd came alive whenever Los Angeles got Gobert switched onto a perimeter player in isolation during the first two games of the series, the numbers suggest Gobert continues to hold his own.

The NBA’s matchup data shows Lakers players are 8 for 29 from the field (28%) against Gobert thus far this series. Minnesota is giving up just 99 points per 100 possessions with Gobert on the floor, the team’s best defensive rating through two games.

“So his impact on the floor remains pretty strong,” Wolves coach Chris Finch said.

“He’s doing a great job of just working and trying to force guys into tough reads, tough shots,” Wolves guard Mike Conley said. “Yeah, they’re going to score every now and then. But he’s done a really good job with just being active and trying to know everybody’s tendencies when he is out there guarding those guys.

“We want to use him out there. For the most part, we’re going to continue to try to game plan around it. And if he gets up in iso, we trust him and anybody else that’s out there.”

Gobert noted before the series started that he will get beat at times in isolation, and those plays will be clipped and widely shared on social media. But, over a large sample size, he believes he’ll win out.

And while Gobert noted a few things he’d like to do better against Doncic, specifically, even the Slovenian star is just 1 for 8 when shooting against Gobert.

“I think some of the times they score, some of the times I do a pretty good job,” Gobert said. “There’s always things that I’ve got to do better, we’ve got to do better. But overall, as a defender, that’s what I enjoy. I enjoy guarding the best players in the world and I always embrace that challenge.”

Related Articles

The Lakers bamboozled Anthony Edwards and Minnesota again. What’s the solution for Game 3?

Timberwolves can’t match Lakers’ physicality in Game 2 defeat

Anthony Edwards fined again by NBA, running season total to $370k

Wolves watched as Lakers got stagnant watching Doncic. They knew feeling.

Timberwolves no longer underdogs against Lakers. Is that cause for concern?

All things considered, Minnesota delivered one of its best offensive showings of the season in Game 1 on Saturday in Los Angeles.

And followed it up with one of its worst on Tuesday in Game 2.

The Timberwolves shot 38% from the floor and 20% from beyond the arc while scoring a season-low 85 points in defeat.

Their 14 assists marked a new season low.

After seemingly deciphering Los Angeles’ defensive scheme in Game 1 – when he tallied nine assists to just one turnover – Anthony Edwards didn’t record a single assist Tuesday. It’s the first time the all-star guard has been shut out of that column since the 2021-22 campaign. He did have nine potential assists, per tracking data. But none of those bore fruit.

And while the Lakers’ roster has turned over throughout the season, one thing that hasn’t changed is Los Angeles’ approach to guarding the Timberwolves’ best player. The Lakers consistently switch pick and rolls to take away Edwards’ space on the perimeter and commit heavy gap help to show him a crowd whenever he steps inside the arc.

It’s been largely effective throughout the year. Edwards’ offensive rating during the regular season versus the Lakers was an abysmal 104 points per 100 possessions. He’s now had three assists or fewer in four of his six matchups with Los Angeles.

In those six meetings, Edwards is shooting 40% from the field and 33% from beyond the arc while averaging 3.3 free throws per game. Minnesota has recorded 18 assists or fewer just seven times this season. Three of those occasions came against the Lakers.

Edwards felt as though the Lakers threw something different at him Tuesday.

“Every time I caught the ball, (Los Angeles) kind of went like in a zone, in a sense,” Edwards said. “So it’s kind of confusing at times.”

The guard said it was the first time he’s seen such a look this season. When he caught the ball on the top of the floor, he felt as though Lakers defenders would hold their positions, even as Edwards’ teammates cut across the floor.

To the contrary, Lakers star Luka Doncic said Los Angeles followed the “same gameplan” in general as it did in Game 1. That’s true in terms of the principles of the approach. But the Lakers seemed to pay more attention to perimeter shooters than they did in Game 1, and did somewhat decrease their interior presence.

That freed up Edwards, Julius Randle and others to get inside and attempt a number of contested shots around the bucket.

It also left Rudy Gobert more available on the rolls and in the dunker spot, though Minnesota rarely tapped into that option after Gobert failed to capitalize on a couple of first-quarter opportunities.

“They were in the gaps a lot. And when they’re in the gaps, I think we’ve got to be timely with our passes. I think we were just a beat off every now and then on those plays,” Wolves guard Mike Conley said. “When guys are open, we’ve got to hit them right when they’re open. Not a half second, two seconds later when guys (are) closing out to him, which is a different shot for people. First game, we were getting wide-open looks. We were getting rhythm shots. That’s what we want to try to accomplish.”

The hesitance Tuesday to do seemingly everything caused Minnesota’s offense to stagnate. And when neither the ball nor the bodies are moving, the Wolves are infinitely easier to guard.

“I mean it’s kind of hard (with) the way that they’re guarding us because … when I catch the ball, they kind of go zone,” Edwards said. “So it’s hard to see. And then once I try to attack a gap, it’s like three people (there). And then I jump and make a pass. That takes time off the clock, they get back into their rotation. So I just got to make my decisions a little quicker like coach said, and then we’ll be all right.”

Because, frankly, Wolves coach Chris Finch felt simple plays were there to be made even in Game 2. He labeled Minnesota’s execution as “not good.” The coach noted the Lakers didn’t make many tactical adjustments. Finch said Los Angeles’ increased ball pressure caused Minnesota to go sideways with the dribble rather than getting downhill and punching gaps as often as it should have.

As a result, the ball got sticky.

There was a possession in the second quarter in which Edwards was essentially doubled on the catch, leaving Terrence Shannon Jr. wide open, one pass away in the corner. Rather than immediately making the pass, Edwards collected himself and drove to the bucket.

He scored, but that wasn’t necessarily the “right play” in that situation. And making the “right play” is what generated Minnesota’s offensive explosion in Game 1.

“We won Game 1 with the right ball movement, the right mindset, and making the easy easy and right reads,” Conley said. “So we just have to do it again. Do it again, again and again and not get tired of doing a consistent thing.”

Edwards said film study should reveal answers ahead of Game 3 on Saturday. To this point in the season, the Lakers’ defense has proved to be a difficult equation for the Wolves to solve.

“The way it felt (Tuesday) is they were really physical, and we were a little more reluctant to make that extra pass a little bit sometimes, and sometimes to just take the shot,” Gobert said. “It’s hard to judge from just not watching the tape, so I think we’ll have those answers.”

Related Articles

Anthony Edwards fined again by NBA, running season total to $370k

Wolves watched as Lakers got stagnant watching Doncic. They knew feeling.

The Timberwolves had one of best shooting performances of the season Saturday. How will the Lakers react in Game 2?

Pack of rabid Timberwolves harass Lakers en route to Game 1 rout

Timberwolves playoffs: From contracts to reputation, what’s at stake

By YURI KAGEYAMA and MATT OTT, Associated Press Business Writers

U.S. markets are poised to open with big gains, a clear sign of relief after President Donald Trump said he would not attempt to fire the head of the Federal Reserve.

Futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped 1.9% before the bell Wednesday, while S&P 500 futures rose 2.6%. Nasdaq futures climbed a full 3%.

Trump, upset that the Federal Reserve was not cutting interest rates immediately, said that he could fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell. But Trump told reporters Tuesday, “I have no intention of firing him.”

Trump wants Powell and the Fed to resume cutting its benchmark borrowing rate to help boost the economy. Powell and other Fed official have said they plan to remain cautious with interest rates amid the economic uncertainty caused by Trump’s tariffs and inflation that remains above the Fed’s 2% target.

Most legal scholars agree that Trump can’t fire Powell from the Fed’s board of governors, and there is no legal precedent for doing so. However, there is less agreement over whether a president can remove him as chair.

Markets are also reacting to comments Tuesday from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He said the ongoing tariffs showdown with China is unsustainable and he expects a “de-escalation” in the trade war.

“Of course, markets will continue to listen out for the latest White House rhetoric on tariffs and any hints of upcoming trade deals. As such, market direction will more likely than not continue to be dictated by Trump’s latest whims regarding tariffs and trade,” said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.

The only prediction many Wall Street strategists are willing to make is that financial markets will likely continue to gyrate along with hopes that Trump may negotiate deals with other countries to lower his tariffs. If no such deals come quickly enough, many investors expect the economy to fall into a recession.

Among stocks seeing a big rebound is Tesla, after Elon Musk that he will spend less time in Washington and more time running his electric vehicle company. The promise follows the company’s quarterly financial report late Tuesday and a massive tail off in profit. Tesla has been racked by vandalism of its cars on the street, it’s dealerships, widespread protests and calls for a consumer boycott, all a backlash to Musk’s oversight of cost-cutting efforts for the U.S. government.

Musk’s promise to distance himself from the Trump administration overshadowed fading profits at Tesla, which tumbled from $1.39 billion to $409 million in the first quarter.

Tesla shares rose 7% before the opening bell Wednesday.

Big technology stocks also gained early Wednesday, with Nvidia leading the way. The chipmaker’s shares have swung wildly with the recent market undulations and were up 5.5% before the bell.

Apple rose 3% and Meta gained 4.5%, after the European Union fined the companies 500 million euros and 200 million euros, respectively, for breaching its digital competition rules.

In Europe at midday, France’s CAC 40 jumped 2.4%, while Germany’s DAX rose 2.6%. Britain’s FTSE 100 gained 1.4%.

In Asia, Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 gained 1.9% to finish at 34,868.63. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 surged 1.3% to 7,920.50. South Korea’s Kospi gained 1.6% to 2,525.56. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng added 2.4% to 222,072.62, while the Shanghai Composite edged down 0.1% to 3,296.36.

In energy trading, benchmark U.S. crude added 55 cents to $64.22 a barrel, but is still on track for its worst month since October 2023. That’s been good for consumers, with the average price for a gallon of gas in the U.S. Wednesday coming in at $3.17, nearly 14% lower than last year at this point.

Brent crude, the international standard added 54 cents to $67.98 a barrel.

The U.S. dollar declined to 141.99 Japanese yen from 142.37 yen. The euro cost $1.1392, up from $1.1379. ___

The 6-second soundless video of an April 2024 incident at Beaumont United High School starts with Ja’Liyah Celestine, a 17-year-old Black student, kneeling in the middle of a hallway, covering her eyes. 

Celestine later told the Texas Observer that, before this, Linda Holland, a white Beaumont ISD police officer waited “a long time” before breaking up a fight between her and another student, who Celestine said had instigated the fight. Celestine said that after the fight had already ended, Holland pepper-sprayed Celestine’s face, bringing her to her knees. The video, recorded by a teacher and obtained and reviewed by the Observer, shows students and teachers still circled around Celestine a few feet away, watching. Holland grabs Celestine by the hair, knees her in the face, and knocks the 4’11”, 100-pound girl on her back. Celestine’s friend attempts to pull her to her feet, while Holland shakes her head and walks away. 

“It was so much going on, and all I remember is my eyes started burning. And then after that, I remember the cop kicking me in my face. She had me by my hair. She kneed me,” Celestine told the Observer. “I was really confused. … I didn’t know that I was getting pepper-sprayed, and I was scared.” 

Six months later, in late October, Texas Appleseed, an education and juvenile justice advocacy organization, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) on behalf of Celestine and other Black students in the district, alleging that Beaumont ISD “violated Title IV and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against them and disproportionately subjecting them to law enforcement referrals.” The main school district in the eponymous city of 115,000, located between Houston and the Louisiana line, Beaumont ISD is a majority-Black district in a racially diverse town. 

Beaumont (Shutterstock)

The Texas Appleseed complaint also states the district violated a state law by allowing a police officer, rather than other school staff, to engage in “routine student discipline” for minor infractions of campus or district policy. 

But, now that President Donald Trump is back in the White House and has ordered that the Education Department be gutted, Celestine may not see any relief from the feds, leaving her and other students potentially subject to discrimination looking for other recourse. In January, Trump ordered OCR attorneys to cease all investigations initiated under prior administrations. On March 11, the department cut half its total staff. Seven of 12 regional OCR offices have already been shut down, including the Dallas office, which handled complaints based in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. 

Sheria Smith, an OCR attorney, had been working out of the Dallas office for nine years before she and her coworkers were terminated, shut out of what Smith said was OCR’s busiest office. Smith, who is also president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252, a union representing 2,800 Department of Education employees, told the Observer that, even in the roughly two months before the firings, OCR attorneys had “been hamstrung” in efforts to enforce civil rights laws: “We were prohibited from doing any work on any cases, moving it forward, setting up interviews with stakeholders.”

OCR is “often the last line of defense,” Smith said at an American Federation of Teachers town hall meeting. “When families come to us, they have already tried to work things out with their school district. They tried to work things out with their state.”

Even as Trump carries out plans to dismantle the Education Department, he has shifted OCR’s priorities by using the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a basis to remove gender-neutral bathrooms, ban transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports, investigate complaints of anti-semitism and discrimination against white students, and “end DEI” in schools. Smith described the anti-DEI effort as “witch-hunting school districts and schools that might be providing services that benefited Black and brown or students of color.” 

Beth Echols, the OCR attorney assigned to Celestine’s case, last spoke to Celestine, her mom Angela Mack, and Texas Appleseed attorney Andrew Hairston around Thanksgiving, Hairston told the Observer. At the time, the agency was looking for information about racial disparities in arrest and law enforcement referrals at Beaumont ISD. Hairston received another email from Echols in mid-December, then “We’ve heard nothing in the new year,” he said. 

On March 3, a Department of Education spokesperson responded to an Observer email inquiring about the status of Celestine’s complaint: “The Office for Civil Rights does not confirm complaints.”

Since 1980, the department’s civil rights office has enforced the nation’s anti-discrimination laws in schools, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the landmark law that dismantled legal segregation, and later the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The OCR specifically enforces Title II of the civil rights law, which ensures everyone has access to “places of public accommodations”; Title VI, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, or religion by entities that receive federal funding; and Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination. The OCR also mandates school districts send civil rights-related and other data so the agency can develop research and regulations guiding school districts. 

Organizations including Texas Appleseed have also pushed state lawmakers to enact legislation reining in excessive policing, as recent laws expanded police presence in schools. In 2019, Texas passed a law barring districts from assigning “routine student discipline” to police officers or having police officers engage in “contact with students unrelated to the law enforcement duties.” Instead, bill author and former Democratic state Senator Eddie Lucio Jr. told the Observer, campus rule infractions should be “taken care of by their teachers and administration or in-house without using security officers” and “the school board [should] take quick action” to see it enforced. 

Celestine’s complaint also asserts Holland failed to comply with the Beaumont ISD Police Department’s own policy manual and Beaumont ISD’s Student Code of Conduct, which describes district disciplinary procedures for student misconduct. The police department manual requires officers “use only an amount [of force] that ‘reasonably appears necessary’ under the totality of circumstances,”  but the complaint states: “No circumstances exist to justify this excessive use of force and deprivation of Ja’Liyah’s rights.” The code of conduct lists both permissible and impermissible disciplinary techniques. “Of those techniques that are prohibited are ‘directed use of […] unpleasant spray’ near a student’s face,” states the complaint. 

Beaumont ISD spokesperson Jackie Simien provided the Observer an emailed statement saying: “BISD is aware of the allegations and disputes the characterization of the events. … The District can confirm BISD staff responded appropriately to safeguard the safe operation of the campus in compliance with policy and law.” Simien did not provide answers to other Observer questions.

Relying on local law enforcement and school districts to enforce federal, state, or local policies without oversight is challenging, Hairston said. “Generally, districts don’t have much, in my experience, willingness to stand up against the culture of school policing and the abuse that so many Black and brown children face at the hands of school police officers,” he told the Observer.

According to Texas Education Agency spokesperson Jake Kobersky, the agency does not investigate complaints of racial discrimination that might violate the Civil Rights Act, adding that “Such complaints are referred to the USDOE Office of Civil Rights.” 

Hairston told the Observer that when school districts and the state fail to protect students against discrimination in schools, typically the mere act of filing a complaint with the feds can put pressure on school districts to change practices. Without federal oversight, as the OCR is being dismantled, Hairston said school police “are going to be so emboldened.” 

Two years ago, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Education Department released a report finding that racial discrimination against Black and Latino students in school discipline persisted in public schools nationwide. The agencies issued a joint letter calling on school districts to reform their practices to comply with Title VI. “Discrimination in student discipline forecloses opportunities for students, pushing them out of the classroom and diverting them from a path to success in school and beyond,” the letter stated. The report has now been removed from the Department of Education’s website. 

When Trump took office, OCR was investigating 12,000 complaints: 6,000 related to discrimination against students with disabilities; 1,000 related to sex discrimination; and 3,200 related to racial discrimination, ProPublica reported. OCR records show there are still 952 Texas-based cases left pending: 527 related to students with disabilities; 162 related to sex discrimination; and 258 related to racial discrimination. Eight of these civil rights complaints are from Beaumont ISD. 

In Beaumont ISD, law enforcement referrals disproportionately affect Black students. OCR data for the 2021-22 school year shows Black students comprised 75 percent of students arrested by school law enforcement, even though they made up 60 percent of the student population that year. TEA records show Black students made up 60 percent of the district’s student population in the 2023-24 school year, but they accounted for 85 percent of students who received out-of-school suspensions and were moved from schools into the disciplinary alternative education program (DAEP), where students receive online education under surveillance and which criminal justice advocates refer to as a step in the school-to-prison pipeline. 

Statewide, Black students made up less than 13 percent of all students enrolled in public schools in 2023-24. But TEA data for that year reveals that Black students accounted for 31 percent of students who received out-of-school suspensions and 22 percent of students sent to DAEP. 

On the same day of the Beaumont incident, Holland called Celestine’s mom, Angela Mack, to apologize, Mack said. “I thought that was very strange for an officer to reach out and apologize to me, and that was before I knew that incident between her and my daughter had happened,” Mack told the Observer. 

But Mack said Holland did not mention that she pepper-sprayed Celestine’s face, grabbed her by her hair, and kneed her. Nor did Beaumont United High School administrators inform Mack about what happened during the incident. Instead, Celestine’s friend had called Mack, and later, she saw the video. “You hear about things like this on TV all the time, and you never expect it to happen to somebody so close, let alone your child,” she said. Holland deferred to district administrators when the Observer asked her for comment on the incident.

The school suspended Celestine and required her to perform 30 hours of community service and spend 60 days in the district’s DAEP before she could return to Beaumont United. The district later reduced the time in DAEP to 30 days.

Celestine said she felt helpless. “I was sad about it, especially because of the altercation with a white police officer,” Celestine said. “And then, adding on, going to Pathways [DAEP], knowing that all this wasn’t my fault, all that happened to me, that made me even sadder.”  

Mack said she eventually met with Principal Wiley Johnson and Assistant Principal Dalana Bennett a week after the incident. “Nobody told me anything. They just thought I was an angry mom because my daughter got in a fight and I didn’t want her to go to DAEP,” Mack said. “Up until this very moment … nobody from both the Beaumont Independent School District or Beaumont United has mentioned [the police actions] to me.” 

In DAEP, Celestine said instructors demanded her to write a letter to the Beaumont United principal, apologizing for her actions. 

At the start of this school year, Celestine returned to Beaumont United and has been volunteering for a community mentoring program, holding down a job as an HEB customer service rep, and looking forward to graduation. She told the Observer she still hasn’t completely recovered from the incident, but she’s determined to keep fighting so people know that what happened to her “can happen and that it should not happen.” Hairston said that Celestine, Mack, and attorneys at Texas Appleseed are planning to file a civil suit in state court seeking a declaratory judgment that the Beaumont ISD police department violated the law by allowing a police officer to engage in routine discipline. 

“Something needs to be done to show that this won’t be tolerated,” Mack said.  

The post A White School Officer Pepper-Sprayed and Kneed a Black Beaumont Student, Complaint Says. Will Feds Act? appeared first on The Texas Observer.