National Guard troops to stay on Washington, DC, streets through 2026

posted in: All news | 0

By KONSTANTIN TOROPIN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — National Guard troops will be on the streets of Washington, D.C., until the end of the year, according to a memo reviewed by The Associated Press.

The memo, signed by Army Secretary Dan Driscoll and dated Wednesday, said “the conditions of the mission” warranted an extension past the end of next month to continue supporting President Donald Trump’s “ongoing efforts to restore law and order.”

Related Articles


FACT FOCUS: Former Proud Boys leader falsely identified as an ICE officer


Supreme Court will decide on use of warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users


Supreme Court will hear appeal by maker of popular Roundup weedkiller to block thousands of lawsuits


ChatGPT’s free ride is ending: Here’s what OpenAI plans for advertising on the chatbot


Ex-husband indicted by grand jury in slaying of couple found in their Ohio home

Meanwhile, Trump said this month that for now he was dropping his push to deploy National Guard troops in Chicago, Los Angeles and Portland, Oregon, which had provoked legal challenges. He also backed off a bit Friday from his threat a day earlier to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to quell protests in Minnesota.

In Washington, troops have been charged with patrolling the streets and picking up trash. Trump has asserted repeatedly that crime has vanished in the city.

Two National Guard troops from West Virginia that were part of the mission in D.C. were shot the day before Thanksgiving. Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, died from her injuries.

The National Guard has about 2,400 troops in Washington, with about 700 from D.C. and the rest from 11 states with Republican governors, including Indiana, South Carolina, Alabama and Oklahoma.

FACT FOCUS: Former Proud Boys leader falsely identified as an ICE officer

posted in: All news | 0

By MELISSA GOLDIN, Associated Press

As protests continue in Minneapolis after the fatal shooting of Renee Good by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, social media users are falsely claiming that Enrique Tarrio, a former Proud Boys leader, is working for the federal agency.

President Donald Trump pardoned Tarrio in a sweeping grant of clemency to all 1,500-plus people charged with crimes in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Tarrio was serving a 22-year prison sentence for orchestrating a failed plot to keep Trump in power after he lost the 2020 election. His was one of the most serious cases brought by the Justice Department and he received the longest sentence handed down for the attack.

Posts cited a list of leaked ICE agents as alleged evidence. However, both ICE and Tarrio say he does not work for the agency.

Here’s a closer look at the facts.

Related Articles


Supreme Court will decide on use of warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users


Supreme Court will hear appeal by maker of popular Roundup weedkiller to block thousands of lawsuits


ChatGPT’s free ride is ending: Here’s what OpenAI plans for advertising on the chatbot


Ex-husband indicted by grand jury in slaying of couple found in their Ohio home


Members of Zizians group attend hearing ahead of Maryland trespassing trial

CLAIM: Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio is now an ICE officer.

THE FACTS: This is false. Tarrio denied working for ICE on social media and the federal agency confirmed that he is not now, nor ever has been, employed there.

“This individual was never hired by ICE,” said Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE. “ICE only recruits patriotic professionals who respect our nation’s laws, care about their communities, and have the integrity and moral compass to perform such critical roles in keeping America safe.”

She called the claims about Tarrio “the types of smears that vilify our brave ICE law enforcement.”

In response to the claims spreading online, Tarrio wrote in a Tuesday X post: “A list I’m finally happy to be part of….” He clarified in a post on Wednesday that the claims are not true, but that he wishes he worked for ICE. Tarrio called his initial post “satire” in another post on Thursday.

Still, users on multiple social media platforms falsely identified Tarrio as an ICE officer.

“Proud Boy Leader / Convicted Felon Enrique Tarrio, Is one of Trump’s Nazi ICE agents. Imagine that,” reads one X post that had received nearly 74,000 likes and shares as of Friday.

A DHS whistleblower allegedly leaked details for about 4,500 ICE and Border Patrol employees to ICE List, an independent website that collects information related to federal immigration enforcement in the U.S., according to a Daily Beast report published on Tuesday.

Tarrio does have an entry on the website, but is not listed as being affiliated with any agency. His role is identified as “Propagandist; Agitator.”

Movie review: Later: ’28 Years Later: The Bone Temple’ a taut continuation of zombie world

posted in: All news | 0

Dr. Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) spends a lot of time alone. Coated in iodine to stave off the zombie virus that has laid waste to England for three decades, he sometimes dances alone in his ossuary — a bone temple — to the music of his youth, Duran Duran. He gazes at old photos listening to “Girls on Film,” the lyric, “and she wonders how she ever got here as she goes under again,” rattling around his shaved skull.

But Dr. Kelson won’t cry for yesterday, as he tries to survive this now ordinary world, isolated and primitive, where zombies roam the countryside, and pockets of human survivors quietly scavenge. Directed by Nia DaCosta, “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple,” starts right where 2025’s “28 Years Later,” directed by Danny Boyle, left off. Boyle and writer Alex Garland originated the franchise in 2002 with “28 Days Later,” kick-starting the 2000s zombie craze. Garland is penning the scripts for the “28 Years” sequels, a planned trilogy.

In “The Bone Temple,” it’s not the zombies one has to worry about — it’s the Jimmies. Our young hero Spike (Alfie Williams), having abandoned the secluded safety of his island home in the wake of his mother’s death, finds himself at the mercy of this merry band of bloodthirsty pranksters, shepherded by a sadistic Manson-esque leader, Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell).

Clad in ratty platinum blond wigs and colorful tracksuits, the cult apes the look of the late English television personality and notorious sexual predator Jimmy Savile. Sir Jimmy is obsessed with the television of his childhood, before his reality was ripped limb from limb. Raised in chaos and bloodshed, receiving directives from a satanic voice in his head dubbed “Old Nick,” Sir Jimmy and his bewildered teenage followers, the Fingers, leave a bloody path in their wake, handing out “charity,” as they call it, randomly torturing the few humans who are unlucky enough to encounter their swaggering and silly nihilism.

Spike is a quivering young boy, but he’s good with a blade and has strong survival instincts. Joining the Fingers is his way of continuing to survive for one more day. Roaming the same patch of northern England, they’re on a collision course with Dr. Kelson, who spends his days hanging out with a heavily drugged alpha zombie, Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry, who delivers a beautifully unexpected performance), hoping to find a way to bring him back to life.

In this second installment, DaCosta has the challenging task of continuing a story with established characters, and then leaving us with new ones, and more story to be told. What’s remarkable is her ability to keep the thread of tension pulled taut, even as we jump between characters and locations, and as she offsets savagery and noise with stillness and quiet. The film is shockingly violent and bloody, but there are also profoundly poetic moments and images that pop up like wildflowers in a field.

She does have some dazzling material to work with — the strange beauty of the bone temple, where the strikingly orange Kelson tends to the doped up Samson, and the distinctive style of the Jimmies, with their “Children of the Corn” hair, gold chains, tiaras and fairy wings. Cinematographer Sean Bobbitt brings his own visual language to the film too. While Boyle’s iPhone camera rigs zipped and zoomed around the landscape with an almost game-like mobility, Bobbitt’s camera shakes with zombie rage and then stills, lulling us in and out of violence and peace.

In “The Bone Temple,” Garland juxtaposes faith and reason and how they oppose one another in a world where the foundations and “order” have been torn asunder. Believing in something bigger than ourselves can feel comforting even if it’s false, because humans contain all the beauty, grace and violence that can be imagined. Religion is mere theater — or at least a really great rock show.

“The Bone Temple” is a deeply wistful film, imbued with nostalgia and highly specific British cultural memory: Teletubbies, Duran Duran, Iron Maiden, Radiohead, Jimmy Savile, Winston Churchill. There’s a sweetness to the comfort of childhood touchstones and shared history in a world gone psychotic with death and destruction. These small reminders of our humanity are adjacent to Kelson’s practice of honoring the dead as a way to honor life.

Despite longing for the past, Garland knows we cannot go back to the way things were. All we can do is remember — or “never forget,” as some have famously said. Reality is bleak, shredded by violence and disinformation, but Garland does allow for a glimmer of hope. If zombie-ism is mass psychosis, an infectious disease passed from person to person, maybe there’s a way to treat it, a way to wake up from the fog. It’s a nice idea, especially in this profoundly un-ordinary world.

’28 Years Later: The Bone Temple’

3.5 stars (out of 4)

MPA rating: R (for strong bloody violence, gore, graphic nudity, language throughout, and brief drug use)

Running time: 1:49

How to watch: In theaters on Friday, Jan. 16

Related Articles


‘Disneyland Handcrafted’ changes everything you think you know about Disneyland


11 must-watch music documentaries coming to theaters and streaming in 2026


Complete list of 2026 Golden Globe Award winners


Nikki Glaser takes swings at CBS and Leo, goes gentle on Julia in Golden Globes monologue


Photos: 2026 Golden Globes red carpet standout fashion moments

Supreme Court will decide on use of warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide the constitutionality of broad search warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users to find people near crime scenes.

The case involves what is a known as a “geofence warrant” that was served on Google in a police hunt for a bank robber in suburban Richmond, Virginia. Geofence warrants, an increasingly popular investigative tool, seek location data on every person within a specific location over a certain period of time.

Related Articles


Trump says he wants to keep Hassett in White House, clouding Fed chair selection


Judge allows a third offshore wind project to resume construction as the industry challenges Trump


In their words: Greenlanders talk about Trump’s desire to own their Arctic island


Trump thanks Iran for not following through on executions of political prisoners


How the Trump administration erased centuries of Justice Department experience

Police used the information to arrest Okello Chatrie in the 2019 robbery of the Call Federal Credit Union in Midlothian. Chatrie eventually pleaded guilty and was sentenced to nearly 12 years in prison.

Chatrie’s lawyers challenged the warrant as a violation of his privacy because it allowed authorities to gather the location history of people near the bank without having any evidence they had anything to do with the robbery. Prosecutors argued that Chatrie had no expectation of privacy because he voluntarily opted into Google’s Location History.

A federal judge agreed that the search violated Chatrie’s rights, but still allowed the evidence to be used because the officer who applied for the warrant reasonably believed he was acting properly.

The federal appeals court in Richmond upheld the conviction in a fractured ruling. In a separate case, the federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment’s ban on unreasonable searches.

The case is expected to be argued later this year, either in the spring or in October, at the start of the court’s next term.