Trump administration asks Supreme Court to strip legal protections from Venezuelan migrants

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an emergency order allowing it to strip legal protections from more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants.

Related Articles


Trump administration proposes selling nearly $6 billion in weapons to Israel


More than 400 arrests made in Chicago area operation so far, top immigration official says


Senate confirms Mike Waltz as Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations after months of delays


House approves resolution honoring Charlie Kirk, measure splits Democrats


US attorney whose office is investigating Letitia James is told he’s being removed, AP source says

The Justice Department asked the high court to put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that the administration wrongly ended Temporary Protected Status for the Venezuelans.

The federal appeals court in San Francisco refused to put on hold the ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen while the case continues.

In May, the Supreme Court reversed a preliminary order from Chen that affected another 350,000 Venezuelans whose protections expired in April. The high court provided no explanation at the time, which is common in emergency appeals.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued in the new court filing that the justices’ May order should also apply to the current case.

“This case is familiar to the court and involves the increasingly familiar and untenable phenomenon of lower courts disregarding this Court’s orders on the emergency docket,” Sauer wrote.

The result, he said, is that the “new order, just like the old one, halted the vacatur and termination of TPS affecting over 300,000 aliens based on meritless legal theories.”

President Donald Trump’s administration has moved aggressively to withdraw various protections that have allowed immigrants to remain in the country, including ending TPS for a total of 600,000 Venezuelans and 500,000 Haitians who were granted protection during Joe Biden’s presidency. TPS is granted in 18-month increments.

Congress created TPS in 1990 to prevent deportations to countries suffering from natural disasters, civil strife or other dangerous conditions. The designation can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary.

Chen found that the Department of Homeland Security acted “with unprecedented haste and in an unprecedented manner … for the preordained purpose of expediting termination of Venezuela’s TPS” status.

In denying the administration’s emergency appeal, Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote for a unanimous three-judge appellate panel that Chen determined that DHS made its “decisions first and searched for a valid basis for those decisions second.”

Nations ratify the world’s first treaty to protect international waters

posted in: All news | 0

By ANNIKA HAMMERSCHLAG, Associated Press

SEATTLE (AP) — The first treaty to protect marine diversity in international waters will come into force early next year after Morocco became the 60th nation to ratify the agreement Friday.

The high seas treaty is the first legal framework aimed at protecting marine biodiversity in international waters, those that lie beyond the jurisdiction of any single country. International waters account for nearly two-thirds of the ocean and nearly half of Earth’s surface and are vulnerable to threats including overfishing, climate change and deep-sea mining.

“The high seas are the world’s largest crime scene — they’re unmanaged, unenforced, and a regulatory legal structure is absolutely necessary,” said Johan Bergenas, senior vice president of oceans at the World Wildlife Fund.

Still, the pact’s strength is uncertain as some of the world’s biggest players — the U.S., China, Russia and Japan — have yet to ratify. The U.S. and China have signed, signaling intent to align with the treaty’s objectives without creating legal obligations, while Japan and Russia have been active in preparatory talks.

Ratification triggers a 120-day countdown for the treaty to take effect. But much more work remains to flesh out how it will be implemented, financed and enforced.

“You need bigger boats, more fuel, more training and a different regulatory system,” Bergenas said. “The treaty is foundational — now begins the hard work.”

Related Articles


Pakistan says its nuclear program can be made available to Saudi Arabia under defense pact


Efforts to punish Israel over Gaza grow in sports and cultural arenas


Estonia says 3 Russian fighter jets entered its airspace in ‘brazen’ incursion


US military strike off the coast of Venezuela disrupts life in impoverished fishing communities


EU chief urges bloc members to sanction Russia’s LNG exports

How it works

The high seas are home to an array of marine life and are crucial in regulating Earth’s climate — they absorb heat and carbon dioxide and generate half the oxygen we breathe. The treaty is also essential to achieving what’s known as the “30×30” target — an international pledge to protect 30% of the planet’s land and sea by 2030.

The treaty creates a legal process for countries to establish marine protected areas in those waters, including rules for potentially destructive activities like deep-sea mining and geoengineering schemes. It also establishes a framework for technology-sharing, funding mechanisms and scientific collaboration among countries.

Crucially, decisions under the treaty will be made multilaterally through what are known as conferences of parties, rather than by individual countries acting alone.

Within one year of the treaty taking effect, countries will meet to make decisions about implementation, financing and oversight, and only countries that ratify before then will have voting rights.

Concerns over enforcement

Some experts warn the treaty’s impact could be blunted if the most powerful players on the high seas remain outside it.

“If major fishing nations like China, Russia and Japan don’t join, they could undermine the protected areas,” said Guillermo Crespo, a high seas expert with the International Union for Conservation of Nature commission. “It will be interesting to see how the implementation of the treaty will work without those who have historically made the most use of high seas resources.”

The treaty does not create a punitive enforcement body of its own. Instead, it largely relies on individual countries to regulate their own ships and companies. If a ship flying a German flag violates the rules, for example, it’s Germany’s responsibility to act, said Torsten Thiele, founder of the Global Ocean Trust and an adviser on ocean governance and blue finance. That makes universal ratification essential, he said: “If somebody hasn’t signed up, they’ll argue they’re not bound.”

Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project, warned that some nations may now point to the treaty as a reason to delay or avoid conservation efforts within their own waters.

“There are countries that are using the process to justify inaction at home,” he said.

Without proper protections, marine ecosystems risk irreversible harm

Lisa Speer, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s international oceans program, said failing to protect the high seas could mean damage for any individual nation’s waters.

“Marine life doesn’t respect political boundaries. So fish migrate across the ocean,” Speer said. “Same with turtles, with seabirds, and a whole host of other marine life. And so what happens in the high sea can really affect the health and resilience of the ocean within national jurisdiction, within our coastal waters.”

Ocean exploration pioneer Sylvia Earle welcomed the ratification, but urged leaders not to see it as a finish line.

“This is a way station — not the end point,” she said. “If we continue to take from the ocean at the scale we presently are, and use the ocean as a dump site as we presently are, yes we’re putting the fish and the whales and the krill in Antarctica and the high seas at risk, but mostly, we are putting ourselves at risk.”

For small island nations like Vanuatu, the treaty marks a major step toward inclusion in decisions that have long been beyond their reach.

“Everything that affects the ocean affects us,” said Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu’s minister for climate change.

Follow Annika Hammerschlag on Instagram @ahammergram

The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment

Preteen boys brought BB guns to St. Paul school, police say

posted in: All news | 0

After a St. Paul school received a tip that students may have brought BB guns to school Friday, two were found during a search.

“No one was injured, and no threats were made,” Creative Arts Secondary School Principal Kristen Lynch wrote in a letter to parents. “… BB guns are not toys, and students who bring them to school face serious consequences.”

Officers responded about 8:40 a.m. to the public school on Kellogg Boulevard in downtown, which is for sixth- to 12-graders.

Police determined the 11- and 13-year-old boys each brought a BB gun to school to show friends, said Sgt. Toy Vixayvong, a St. Paul police spokesman. They did not arrest the boys and the school “will be handling the incident with the students and their parents,” he said.

Lynch asked parents to make sure any weapons at home are safely stored and not accessible to children.

“This also serves as a good reminder to check your child’s backpack daily to ensure that dangerous and non-educational items are left at home,” she wrote.

There were two previous instances of guns discovered at St. Paul Public Schools this school year.

On the first day of school this month, a 14-year-old was found with a handgun at Johnson Senior High School on Arcade Street and arrested. It was unloaded when police recovered it.

Last week, a report of a gun at Como Park Senior High led police to arrest a 16-year-old student off school grounds. The student ran from the Rose Avenue school and police said they found him about a mile away, and recovered a handgun and loaded magazine from a yard where the suspect had been seen.

Related Articles


Officials find remains they believe are Travis Decker, wanted in killings of his 3 young daughters


Liquid larceny: Used cooking oil thefts bubbling up in the Twin Cities


Second defendant gets 12½-year sentence for role in fatal shooting of South St. Paul father during marijuana robbery


Feds charge 8 in ‘massive’ housing stabilization fraud scheme involving $10M


DC leaders defend crime fighting efforts to Congress as federal law enforcement surge continues

David M. Drucker: Trump is not as unpopular as his opponents think

posted in: All news | 0

President Donald Trump is not as popular as he claims. But neither is he as unpopular as his opponents might like to think.

That’s the simple explanation. Dig under the hood, however, and things get complicated.

I’m constantly asked to assess Trump’s political standing; it’s among the more consistent questions posed to professional political analysts. And — in case you hadn’t noticed — there is a ton of polling out there. But these surveys, many of them credible and worth considering, often spit out different data, allowing interested readers to draw different, sometimes contradictory, conclusions.

Veteran polling analyst Nate Silver, writing Sunday with colleague Eli McKown-Dawson in his newsletter, Silver Bulletin, explained: “Inevitably, there’s a lot of disagreement from survey to survey, not just because of statistical variation but because pollsters have long had trouble pegging down Trump’s popularity — and often underestimated it.”

Even respected polling averages — which you should absolutely heed more than individual polls — aren’t saying quite the same thing. The Silver Bulletin’s most recent average clocks the president’s job approval rating at 44.2%; the RealClearPolitics average is 45.9% and the Cook Political Report’s average is 42.9%. Yes, the numbers are similar. But mentally, 46% and 43% can feel much different — after all, elections have been decided by slimmer margins.

Either way, Trump’s “topline” job approval rating — the overall share of voters who approve of how he’s doing — is short of 50%, a vital sign that suggests poor political health for the president personally. And yet, to extend the analogy further, Trump is not flat-lining. This November’s key off-year contests and the 2026 midterm elections may not go well for the Republican Party; historically, the president’s party loses ground in both. But it’s not necessarily a shellacking, or a thumping, in the making.

“I’d keep my eye on the toplines, which are bad enough that they might well cost the GOP the House, but not (yet) nuclear,” RealClearPolitics senior elections analyst Sean Trende told me via email.

To wit, Democratic candidates are favored in this fall’s gubernatorial campaigns in New Jersey and Virginia. And with Republicans defending a threadbare majority in the House of Representatives, Trump’s numbers don’t have to drop too far under 50% for Democrats to recapture the speaker’s gavel in 2026. (GOP mid-decade redistricting efforts underway in various red states could change that equation.) Total collapse is probably what would have to happen for Democrats to win control of the U.S. Senate, where Republicans aim to grow their three-seat advantage.

But as I wrote at the outset: Assessing Trump’s political standing via these polls is complicated.

Although the president’s topline numbers remain relatively stable, crucial independent voters seem to be abandoning the president, with a YouGov poll for The Economist showing the president’s approval among them at a miserable 33%. On the other hand, a Fox News poll showed Trump with a decent 48% rating among Hispanic voters and a positive 55% approval among men ages 45 and younger. On the other other hand, the president is underwater on his handling of the economy.

“His base is solid as a rock,” CNN polling expert Harry Enten told me. Among Republicans, Trump’s ratings are sky high, in the high 80s to low 90s. That support is helping to keep Trump’s overall numbers afloat. In fact, he’s more popular — or perhaps we should say “less unpopular” — than he was in his first term.

“There is zero doubt that Trump is in a better position now than he was at this point in his first presidency,” Enten said. That might have something to do with Trump’s second term unfolding more like a first term. But when Trump’s second “first term” is compared to his predecessors in their actual first terms, Enten finds, “Compared to every other elected presidency, he is in worse shape now than those other presidents were.”

However, Enten went on to explain that ultimately, it’s most accurate to compare Trump’s political standing so far in his second presidency to how his predecessors were performing in the polls at the same point in their second term. On that front, Trump is in better shape than those who came immediately before him. “Maybe the right baseline is comparing him to other second-term presidents,” he said. “In that way, he’s in a better position than George W. Bush and, arguably, Barack Obama.”

And if there’s any real improvement in Trump’s topline numbers, Enten said, he’d put his party in a decent position for the midterms.

Such an outcome might seem improbable, given historical trends and the political headwinds buffeting the White House. But it was no less improbable in 2022, when Democrats managed to increase their Senate majority and come close to hanging onto the House amid President Joe Biden’s lousy 40% job approval rating and voters’ dissatisfaction with skyrocketing inflation, rising crime and the disastrous pullout of United States military forces from Afghanistan.

It’s why what I fear most in politics is certainty.

David M. Drucker is columnist covering politics and policy. He is also a senior writer for The Dispatch and the author of “In Trump’s Shadow: The Battle for 2024 and the Future of the GOP.”

Related Articles


Lynn Schmidt: Presidential incapacity and the limits of the 25th Amendment


Bret Stephens: Our vanishing culture of argument


Stephen L. Carter: Presidents can’t sue their way out of criticism


Mary Ellen Klas: Don’t let a generation lose faith in free speech


Pegah Banihashemi: Three years after ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ protests, Iran remains in a deadlock