Charges: MN man emailed threats of retaliation for the killing of Charlie Kirk

posted in: All news | 0

Charges say a 64-year-old Mora, Minn., man became angry with banter between two members of a Beatles cover band during a concert at a White Bear Lake church and then sent off emails threatening to kill two church music directors in retaliation for Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

John Allan Sandeen Jr. (Courtesy of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office)

John Allan Sandeen Jr. was arrested Wednesday and charged in Ramsey and Hennepin counties on Friday with several felony counts for allegedly sending threatening emails over several days to the music director at White Bear Lake Methodist Church and one to a member of the cover band who is also the music director at a church in Maple Grove.

Sandeen had an initial hearing Friday on the Ramsey County charges and remained jailed on $100,000 bail. His attorney declined to comment on the allegations.

According to the charges, the music director at White Bear Lake Methodist Church reported to police Monday that Sandeen sent him a series of threatening emails, the first on Sept. 12.

He said he’s known Sandeen for decades — that he once taught him — and that they’ve remained in contact through phone and email the past 15 years.

Sandeen attended a Sept. 7 concert at the church by the Beatles Ensemble, which played songs by the Beatles, John Lennon and Paul McCartney, the music director told police. He said he spoke to Sandeen at the concert and that he seemed like “his usual self,” the charges say.

At some point during the concert, two band members engaged in “stage banter” between songs:

“When ‘The Fool on the Hill’ was released, we all thought the song was a reference to President Nixon, but it turns out to have been a reference to the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, whom the Beatles had met in 1967,” one said.

The other replied, “Interesting. I did not know that. But also, President Nixon was working with the FBI in an attempt to have John Lennon deported.”

“I’m sure glad they don’t do that anymore,” the first band member said.

The other then said, “Let’s hear it for ICE!”

The complaint said Sandeen “apparently took offense to the stage banter believing musicians should just shut up and play.”

‘Your people killed my friend’

Sandeen sent an email to the White Bear Lake church music director, writing that “music speaks volumes. We don’t need (the band member’s) opinions. Yah he is going to be with Charlie Kirk.”

He also wrote: “Charlie Kirk was a friend of mine” and told him to “let all your liberal leftie friends know” that he is “(expletive) very (expletive) angry. … (The band member) better have (expletive) eyeballs on his back.”

Sandeen emailed the band member the same day and referenced his comment about ICE, saying, “you think that ICE is evil. I think that you and your cohorts have killed my friend Charlie. … It’s fair game to let the hunted know that they are hunted. You are now advised.”

Other emails Sandeen sent that same day and the next — 16 writings in all — included threats that the music director “better (expletive) hide” and that he was going to “break your (expletive) fingers,” and also do physical harm to the band member, according to the complaint.

Sandeen further mentioned the Sept. 10 killing of Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative activist that federal prosecutors allege was intentionally targeted by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson at Utah State University.

“Your people killed my friend in front of his wife and children,” Sandeen allegedly wrote to the music director, adding that he was “going to cut your (expletive) throat.”

The director told police the emails made him fearful for himself and his church members, and that he did not respond to them.

Police learned that Sandeen was in a hangar at Rush City Regional Airport. He was pulled over and arrested after leaving the airport.

Officers executed a search warrant on Sandeen’s pickup truck and hangar. They recovered a box of shotgun shells and a plastic bag of ammunition from the hangar.

Related Articles


Mahtomedia football game canceled Friday night due to nearby law enforcement activity


Boys brought replica guns to St. Paul school, police say


DNA testing underway on remains believed to be Travis Decker, wanted in killings of his girls


Liquid larceny: Used cooking oil thefts bubbling up in the Twin Cities


Second defendant gets 12½-year sentence for role in fatal shooting of South St. Paul father during marijuana robbery

In an interview with investigators, Sandeen initially said he didn’t know anything about threatening emails. He then told them he was probably drunk and said some “crazy (expletive),” the complaint continued.

He said musicians are supposed to play music and not give political opinions, then complained that had he known the concert was going to be a political rally he would not have attended.

Hennepin County prosecutors charged Sandeen with four counts of threats of violence.

In Ramsey County, he faces one count each of stalking and threats of violence.

Trump administration moves to revoke permit for Massachusetts offshore wind project

posted in: All news | 0

By JENNIFER McDERMOTT and MATTHEW DALY, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration has moved to block a Massachusetts offshore wind farm, its latest effort to hobble an industry and technology that President Donald Trump has attacked as “ugly” and unreliable compared to fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, or BOEM, filed a motion in federal court Thursday seeking to take back its approval of the SouthCoast Wind project’s “construction and operations plan.” The plan is the last major federal permit the project needs before it can start putting turbines in the water.

SouthCoast Wind, to be built in federal waters about 23 miles south of Nantucket, is expected to construct as many as 141 turbines to power about 840,000 homes in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

The Interior Department action is the latest by the Trump administration in what critics call an “all-out assault” on the wind energy industry.

Trump’s administration has stopped construction on major offshore wind farms, revoked wind energy permits and paused permitting, canceled plans to use large areas of federal waters for new offshore wind development and stopped $679 million in federal funding for a dozen offshore wind projects.

The moves are a complete reversal from the Biden administration, which approved construction of 11 large offshore wind projects to generate enough clean energy to power more than 6 million homes. The projects now face uncertain futures under Trump.

Last week, the Interior Department asked a federal judge in Baltimore to cancel a previous approval by BOEM to build an offshore wind project in Maryland. The ocean agency has concluded that its prior weighing of the project’s impacts was “deficient” and intends to reconsider that analysis to make a new decision, the department said.

Developer U.S. Wind has not yet begun construction, but plans for the Maryland Offshore Wind Project call for up to 114 turbines to power more than 718,000 homes.

BOEM had approved SouthCoast’s operations plan on Jan. 17, 2025, three days before Trump’s second term began.

“Based on its review to date, BOEM has determined that the COP approval may not have fully complied with the law” and “may have failed to account for all the impacts that the SouthCoast Wind Project may cause,” Interior said in its legal filing. The agency asked a federal judge to allow reconsideration of the project.

Related Articles


Trump says US has carried out another fatal strike targeting alleged drug-smuggling boat


Man accused of trying to kill Trump says prosecutors haven’t proven assassination attempt


Missouri judge strikes down ballot summary for anti-abortion measure backed by Republican lawmakers


Trump DOJ argues Michigan effort to shut down underwater pipeline interferes with US foreign policy


Judge blocks USDA from collecting data about SNAP applicants in 21 states

In a statement, developer Ocean Winds said the company “intends to vigorously defend our permits in federal court.”

“Stable permitting for American infrastructure projects should be of top concern for anyone who wants to see continued investment in the United States,” the statement said.

Jason Walsh, executive director of the BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition of labor unions and environmental groups, said Trump “is threatening good jobs while he pursues his senseless vendetta against offshore wind.”

Pulling energy project permits and canceling lease sales isn’t new. Biden revoked the permit to build the long-disputed Keystone XL oil pipeline on his first day in office, halting construction. He canceled scheduled oil and gas lease sales.

But Trump’s efforts to dismantle the offshore wind industry are much more extensive than the way Biden targeted fossil fuels, said Kristoffer Svendsen, assistant dean for energy law at the George Washington University Law School. He thinks offshore wind developers will now see the U.S. as too risky.

“They have plenty of options. They can invest in Europe and Asia. There are good markets to invest in offshore wind. It’s just the U.S. is not a good market to invest in,” he said.

The Trump administration has stopped construction on two major offshore wind farms, so far. One of them, the Empire Wind project for New York, was allowed to resume construction. The Revolution Wind project for Rhode Island and Connecticut is paused, and both the developer and the two states sued in federal courts.

The Danish energy company Orsted is building Revolution Wind. The Danish government owns a majority stake in the company.

Besides SouthCoast, the Trump administration has said it is reconsidering approvals for another wind farm off the Massachusetts coast, New England Wind. It previously revoked a permit for the Atlantic Shores project in New Jersey.

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at ap.org.

J.J. McCarthy out of walking boot; Vikings won’t place him on IR

posted in: All news | 0

After suffering a high ankle sprain last weekend in a 22-6 loss to the Atlanta Falcons, young quarterback J.J. McCarthy has progressed enough that he was able to return to the practice field for the Vikings.

Kind of.

Though he wasn’t able to actually participate with his teammates on Friday afternoon at TCO Performance Center, McCarthy stood alongside head coach Kevin O’Connell on the sideline, listening while he delivered the play call to veteran quarterback Carson Wentz in the huddle.

That’s as much as McCarthy will be able to be a part of in the short term.

“He’s handling his responsibilities from a rehab standpoint,” O’Connell said. “We’re kind of through the initial wave of that, as far as getting the swelling down and all those things.”

That’s a step in the right direction for McCarthy after suffering the injury while while being dragged down from behind by linebacker Kaden Elliss on a scramble near the sideline. He finished the game without issue before being diagnosed with a high ankle sprain in the aftermath.

Asked if McCarthy was still wearing a walking boot, O’Connell replied, “I know he was in it on the practice field as a precaution.” In that same breath, O’Connell seemed to indicate that McCarthy had graduated beyond that step when he’s simply walking around the locker room.

When will McCarthy return to the field? That remains to be seen.

Though the Vikings still haven’t provided a timeline for McCarthy’s recovery process, it wouldn’t be surprising if he’s on the shelf for the next month.

After the Vikings host the Cincinnati Bengals this weekend, they will travel to Dublin to play the Pittsburgh Steelers, then to London to play the Cleveland Browns. The bye week will come immediately following the international trip across the pond, then Vikings host the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles.

The good news for the Vikings is that McCarthy won’t land on injured reserve in the meantime.

“I do feel good about where he’s at in the early stages,” O’Connell said. “I can say I feel pretty strongly as of right now that we’re on the daily kind of work to get healthy and get him back to 100% as soon as we can.”

It remains to be seen if McCarthy will be back under center for the Vikings when they play the Eagles on Oct. 19 at U.S. Bank Stadium.

Briefly

In addition to McCarthy ruled out for the game against the Bengals, the Vikings have also ruled out center Ryan Kelly (concussion) and left tackle Justin Skule (concussion). Meanwhile, left tackle Christian Darrisaw (knee), safety Harrison Smith (illness), edge rusher Andrew Van Ginkel (concussion), and linebacker Austin Keys (groin) are being listed as questionable.

Related Articles


Vikings vs. Bengals: What to know ahead of Week 3 matchup


The growth spurt that turned Carson Wentz into an NFL prospect


Vikings vs. Bengals picks: Carson Wentz or Jake Browning?


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 3


Max Brosmer is suddenly the backup for the Vikings. How is he staying ready?

Trump says US has carried out another fatal strike targeting alleged drug-smuggling boat

posted in: All news | 0

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Friday the U.S. military has carried out its third fatal strike against an alleged drug smuggling vessel this month.

Related Articles


Man accused of trying to kill Trump says prosecutors haven’t proven assassination attempt


Missouri judge strikes down ballot summary for anti-abortion measure backed by Republican lawmakers


Trump DOJ argues Michigan effort to shut down underwater pipeline interferes with US foreign policy


Judge blocks USDA from collecting data about SNAP applicants in 21 states


Trump signs proclamation imposing $100K annual fee for H-1B visa applications

Trump in a social media posting said the strike killed three and was carried out against a vessel “affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization conducting narcotrafficking in the USSOUTHCOM area of responsibility.” He did not provide more precise details about the location of the strike.

The U.S. twice this month carried out strikes against alleged drug-smuggling vessels that had originated from Venezuela.