Recipe: Herbed Green Rice is a flavorful sidekick for your next barbecue

posted in: All news | 0

With Memorial Day just around the corner, my culinary thoughts turn to grilling season. Informal gatherings with the main course fired up on the barbecue are a source of spring-to-summer fun.

As a side dish, flavorful rice is often my choice. It can be prepared in advance and transferred to a microwave-safe dish. If prepared more than 1 hour in advance, cover and refrigerate after cooling. Then just before serving, microwave it to heat it up. Done.

Herbed Green Rice

Yield: 6 to 8 servings

INGREDIENTS

2 teaspoons fennel seeds

1 cup chicken broth plus 1 1/4 cups water

1/2 cup packed Italian parsley

1/4 cup packed mint leaves

2 tablespoons minced chives

1/4 cup packed cilantro leaves

1 teaspoon hot sauce, see cook’s notes

1/4 cup plus 1 tablespoon extra-virgin olive oil

3/4 cup finely diced fresh fennel bulb

3/4 cup finely diced red onion

1/2 teaspoon salt

1 1/2 cups raw white basmati rice

1 tablespoon butter

Kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper

Cook’s notes: The original recipe called for adding 1 crumbled chili arbol when sautéing the vegetables. I prefer to use one teaspoon of Frank’s RedHot sauce to the cooking liquid in Step 2. I like it because it adds a spark of acidity and (for me) has just-right spicy heat. If you use Sriracha “rooster sauce” use 1/2 teaspoon.

Related Articles


Dining Diary: Three established patios and one fabulous newbie


Give salt-and-pepper pork chops a crunchy coating without the deep frying


5 weeknight dishes: Turkey meatballs so tender you can cut them with a fork


St. Anthony Park cafe Hey Bear to shutter abruptly over rent dispute with landlord


Burnsville Cub to celebrate revamped grocery store with fanfare

DIRECTIONS

1. Toast fennel seeds in a small pan over medium heat for 2 to 3 minutes, until they release their aroma and turn light golden brown. Cool. Grind in mortar and pestle, or place in small zipper-style plastic bag and pound with mallet or bottom of a pot until ground.

2. Bring chicken broth and water to a boil in medium-large saucepan. Turn off heat.

3. Place parsley, mint, chives and cilantro in blender. Add 1 cup of hot liquid and puree herbs at medium speed (cautiously hold down lid of blender with potholder). Add remaining liquid and puree at high speed for about 2 minutes, stopping to wipe down sides and lid as needed. You should have a smooth, very green broth.

4. Rinse out pot and heat it over high heat. Add oil, fennel, onion, toasted ground fennel seeds and 1/2 teaspoon salt; cook over medium-high heat for about 5 minutes, stirring often, until onion and fennel are translucent. Add rice, 1 teaspoon salt and pinch of pepper; toss to coat and cook just until rice starts to turn a very light brown. Add herb broth and bring to boil. Reduce heat to simmer. Add butter. Cover and simmer for 15 to 20 minutes, or until tender and liquid is absorbed. Turn off heat and leave rice covered for 5 minutes. Fluff rice with fork. Taste and adjust seasoning if needed.

Source: Adapted from Chef Suzanne Goin and “The A.O.C. Cookbook” (Alfred A. Knopf, $35)

Award-winning food writer Cathy Thomas has written three cookbooks, including “50 Best Plants on the Planet.” Follow her at CathyThomasCooks.com.

A Thirsty Tesla Refinery Could Exacerbate Corpus Christi’s Water Crisis

posted in: All news | 0

Corpus Christi is a town built around water. But while the Gulf of Mexico has made the region what it is today, seawater can’t save Corpus from a rapidly growing water crisis.

As the Gulf shines on the horizon, water for the town’s residents is nowhere to be found. Wilting plants, timed showers, and unwashed cars have become a staple as drought restrictions continue. Industries, on the other hand, face no limits on water use, and a resource-intensive expansion of new projects in the region, including Tesla’s new lithium refinery, is expected to add much more demand for an already strained supply. 

A Texas city the size of Corpus Christi, with a population of about 315,000, generally uses around 38 percent of its water supply for industrial, commercial or institutional use, according to the Texas Water Development Board. In Corpus, a coastal hub for heavy industry, that rate is at least 58 percent, according to Corpus Christi Water, the city’s municipal water utility. 

“The City of Corpus Christi keeps telling us that we need to save water, but they don’t do anything to implement that on the industries,” said Myra Alaniz, a member of the environmental justice group Chispa Texas and resident of Robstown, just outside of Corpus. “We’re having to take the burden of the drought while industries, who make profit from it, go on their merry way.”

Drought restrictions have been in place since the summer of 2022 and have only grown more strict. Now, Corpus Christi Water, the city’s water agency, is preparing to implement brand-new Stage 4 drought restrictions, which would make it mandatory to comply with the currently voluntary recommendations to limit car washing and lawn watering.

“It’s called Stage 4, but the future recommendation from my office will be to call it an emergency,” Esteban Ramos, water resource manager at Corpus Christi Water (CCW), told the Texas Observer in March. “We’re at the end of the rope, and there isn’t rainfall on the horizon. … Calling it an emergency prepares our community and communities around us” for the next steps that could be coming.

Yet, while residents are pushed to cut back on use, large industrial facilities in the vicinity of the Nueces Bay are still using the majority of the water under CCW’s jurisdiction—without restrictions—such as the energy company Avina’s new high-tech plant to process ammonia and hydrogen into alternative fuels and export it abroad. Last April, Avina purchased rights to 5.5 million gallons of water per day for the next 25 years—the last remaining supply from the Nueces River.

It’s not just Corpus Christi. Fifteen minutes west, near Robstown, Texas-based electric car manufacturer Tesla’s new lithium refinery has also drawn concerns about the local water supply.

Under the direction of Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO, Texas transplant and key ally to President Donald Trump, Tesla announced its plans to build the $1-billion, 1,200-acre facility—a key part of its domestic manufacturing supply chain—back in 2023 and began production in December 2024.  

Tesla estimated that the plant would use around 1 million gallons of water per day by October of this year but could eventually use as much as 8 million gallons per day, according to February 2024 meeting minutes from the South Texas Water Authority, which purchases its water from Corpus Christi. If you filled plastic water bottles with those 8 million gallons every day and lined them up end-to-end, you could circle the equator nearly nine times in a month.

It’s not yet clear how Tesla will source its water supply for the refinery, and both the company and local officials have provided few details. Tesla did not respond to the Observer’s requests for comment about its water supply plans. Tesla reportedly began refinery operations without an official water contract, according to a recent report by KRIS 6 News. 

The prospect of Tesla becoming yet another thirsty industrial water consumer has locals worried about the future. 

“It’s always on the back of our mind that we have to conserve [water], so we try to wash dishes quickly or take a bath quickly, but then in the back of our minds we’re also thinking, why are we doing this?” said Alaniz, the Robstown resident and activist, who’s been closely tracking local water supply and regulation issues ever since Avina announced plans for its facility. “What we conserve is literally a drop in the bucket to what needs to be done, which industry is not contributing to.”

Environmental advocates are alarmed, but not surprised, that big industries are able to pursue their seemingly unquenchable thirst for water in Texas without resistance. “I’d like to be surprised these days that they’d be proposing facilities that could take that much water from us,” said Jake Hernandez, a lead organizer in the Corpus office of the Texas Campaign for the Environment, a nonprofit focused on industrial pollution. “The sad truth is, it’s a pattern … so it doesn’t surprise me that much. The simple fact of the matter is, we don’t have that.”

Nueces County Water Control and Improvement District #3, which controls Robstown’s water distribution, did not respond to requests for comment. The South Texas Water Authority, which oversees a number of water suppliers in the region, also didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Some attempts are being made to get additional water supply for the region, such as the expansion of the Mary Rhodes Pipeline, which supplies the Corpus Christi and Robstown areas with water from Lake Texarkana and the Colorado River. However, many residents fear it’s not enough, and they may well be right. 

If the pipeline were to operate at maximum capacity once the expansion is completed as expected later this month, Lake Corpus Christi would run out of water for municipal use by June 2026, according to estimates obtained through a public information request. Water levels in the lake are currently at one of the lowest since the reservoir was created in 1958 and are on track to reach their lowest ever in the coming months, according to the estimates and data from the Texas Water Development Board.

If the pipeline were to fail for any reason, the lake would run out by October—just over half a year from now, according to the water level forecast. Meanwhile, industrial water use is classified as essential, which means plants and refineries are largely exempt from local water conservation mandates.

While the City of Corpus Christi doesn’t sell water to Tesla, Ramos, the Corpus Christi water manger, acknowledged that the impacts of industrial water use nearby can harm others in the area. Still, he said that Corpus Christi Water is being intentional with its decision-making and denied claims that the entity has overcommitted its water supply.

“We have not over-allocated [or] oversold our water,” Ramos said. “We look at everybody that’s coming in, and we evaluate our supply and whether or not to get into any additional contracts.”

The Corpus Christi area isn’t alone in its water problems. Water crises are plaguing regions all across Texas and have become a growing political concern. In his State of the State address in February, Governor Greg Abbott declared water policy an emergency item this legislative session, calling for what he said will be the largest one-time water investment in the state’s history. 

Senator Charles Perry, a Republican from Lubbock, has taken the lead on the issue with a package of water legislation, including the centerpiece Senate Bill 7. That bill would establish protocols for the Texas Water Fund to finance infrastructure development like pipelines or reservoirs and expand the power of the Texas Water Development Board, the state’s leading water agency. The Texas Water Fund was approved by voters in 2023 to fund the investments proposed under SB 7. 

“Every day, there’s a news story of some community development stopped or not able to go forward because their water supply system doesn’t support the current growth,” Perry said when presenting SB 7 to the Senate on April 2. “The one thing that is lacking to get the [Texas Water Plan] to where it needs to be today is funding.”

The roughly $1 billion-a-year bill passed unanimously in the Senate and is awaiting a vote in the House. 

But organizers around Corpus say the bill isn’t addressing the right problems—and instead will invest large sums of money into purported solutions like industrial desalination plants, which convert saltwater into freshwater, in places like Corpus Christi, where such projects are already in the works. While it will take years to build those desalination plants, local authorities are already taking water “reservations” from industrial operators in the area. 

Chispa Texas program director Elida Castillo worries that SB 7 focuses on funding investments in desalination and other harmful water sourcing methods instead of prioritizing the conservation of pre-existing water sources.

“[The Legislature is] going to be spending billions of dollars for new water supplies, and they’re not doing anything to protect our existing water supplies,” said Castillo, who is also a city council member in the small town of Taft near Corpus. “[SB 7] is only going to lead to funding for desalination, which impacts communities like mine. … If you look at who’s supporting this proposition, it’s the oil and gas industry and the desalination associations.”

Castillo also said that the contracts between water suppliers and industrial customers like Avina benefit those big companies far more than the average residential user, with companies sometimes paying just over half what residents pay per gallon because of the industries’ bulk purchases. When CCW took steps to bridge the cost gap last year, industrial customers filed a complaint with the Texas Public Utility Commission, sparking a legal battle that was settled privately, according to Commission filings

Castillo said that proposed water contracts from the desalination plant include a small surcharge companies have agreed to pay in an attempt to offset the cost imposed on residents for the plant’s operation but that it won’t be enough to mitigate the cost from overselling.

“Just in the Corpus area, you have Robstown Water District Number Three, South Texas Water Authority, the Nueces River Authority, the City of Corpus Christi, and they’re all drawing water from the same sources, but they’re all signing their own contracts for water with these different industries,” Castillo said. 

She warns that water policies that focus on supplying the expansion of new industrial development without any type of conservation regulations will devastate the Corpus bay’s ecosystem and leave ordinary residents facing the brunt of the impacts. 

“We have to accept that Texas’ economic prosperity comes at an expense, and that price tag is way too high,” Castillo said. “Every part of the state has some sort of issue with either no water or excessive pollution, things of that nature. [We have to] look at the situation and take those measures to mitigate the risks and harms to our community and accept that the Texas miracle isn’t a real thing [for everyone].”

While Tesla has yet not disclosed a contract for its refinery water supply, those in the Corpus area are worried it’s only a matter of time. Residents and activists feel like a lack of water hasn’t stopped local or state leaders before, and they worry it may not now.

“This is continuing this culture of sacrificing communities to expand the economy,” Hernandez said. “We cannot allow any more of our communities to become sacrifice zones for people who do not live here.”

The post A Thirsty Tesla Refinery Could Exacerbate Corpus Christi’s Water Crisis appeared first on The Texas Observer.

What to know about the Supreme Court arguments in the birthright citizenship case

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is hearing arguments Thursday in its first case stemming from the blitz of actions that have marked the start of President Donald Trump’s second term.

Before the court are the Trump administration’s emergency appeals of lower court orders putting nationwide holds on the Republican president’s push to deny citizenship to children born to people who are in the United States illegally.

Birthright citizenship is among several issues, many related to immigration, that the administration has asked the court to address on an emergency basis, after lower courts acted to slow the president’s agenda.

The justices are also considering the administration’s pleas to end humanitarian parole for more than 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela and to strip other temporary legal protections from another 350,000 Venezuelans. The administration remains locked in legal battles over its efforts to swiftly deport people accused of being gang members to a prison in El Salvador under an 18th century wartime law called the Alien Enemies Act.

In Thursday’s arguments, the justices will be weighing whether judges have the authority to issue what are called nationwide, or universal, injunctions. The Trump administration, like the Biden administration before it, has complained that judges are overreaching by issuing orders that apply to everyone instead of just the parties before the court.

Yet in discussing the limits of a judge’s power, the court almost certainly will have to take up the change to citizenship that Trump wants to make, which would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years.

What is birthright citizenship?

The first sentence of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The Citizenship Clause, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, was included to ensure that formerly enslaved people would be citizens. It effectively overturned the notorious Dred Scott decision, in which the Supreme Court held that Black people, no matter their status, were not citizens.

Since at least 1898 and the Supreme Court case of Wong Kim Ark, the provision has been widely interpreted to make citizens of everyone born on U.S. soil except for the children of diplomats, who have allegiance to another government; enemies present in the U.S. during hostile occupation; and, until a federal law changed things in 1924, sovereign Native American tribes.

Trump signed the birthright citizenship executive order on the first day of his second term

Trump’s executive order would deny citizenship to children if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. Those categories include people who are in the country illegally or temporarily because, the administration contends, they are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.

Almost immediately, states, immigrants and rights groups sued to block the executive order, accusing the Republican administration of trying to unsettle the understanding of birthright citizenship. Every court to consider the issue has sided with the challengers.

The court will not be making a final ruling on birthright citizenship

The administration is asking for the court orders to be reined in, not overturned entirely, and spends little time defending the executive order. The Justice Department argues that there has been an “explosion” in the number of nationwide injunctions issued since Trump retook the White House. The far-reaching court orders violate the law as well as long-standing views on a judge’s authority, Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote on behalf of the administration.

Related Articles


Trump downplays Putin’s decision to skip Istanbul peace talks with Zelenskyy


South African leader and Trump will meet next week after US took in white South Africans as refugees


Other voices: A global drug supply chain is actually a good thing


Mihir Sharma: How the US gave India and Pakistan an excuse to stand down


Prosecutor in Trump classified files case takes 5th Amendment in private interview with Congress

Courts typically deal only with the parties before them. Even class actions reach only the people who are part of a class certified by a judge, though those can affect millions of people, Sauer wrote.

Nationwide injunctions, by contrast, have no limits and can even include parties who oppose what the court orders are designed to protect, he wrote. As an example, Sauer pointed to Republican-led states that favor the administration’s position but are subject to the nationwide injunctions.

But the justices may well ask about Trump’s executive order and perhaps even tip their hand.

Lawyers for the states and immigrants argue that this is an odd issue for the court to use to limit judges’ authority because courts have uniformly found that Trump’s order likely violates the Constitution. Limiting the number of people who are protected by the rulings would create a confusing patchwork of rules in which new restrictions on citizenship could temporarily take effect in 27 states. That means a child born in a state that is challenging Trump’s order would be a citizen, but a child born at the same time elsewhere would not, the lawyers said.

Arguments over emergency appeals are rare

The Supreme Court almost always takes up the underlying substance of a dispute, not an emergency appeal of court orders issued early in a legal case.

The main argument against the court deciding too much on the emergency, or shadow, docket is that the justices are intervening too early in the process, sometimes before lower courts have had much to say or the legal arguments are fully developed.

Last year, the justices heard arguments in emergency appeals, then blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s air pollution-fighting “good neighbor” plan, which aimed to restrict smokestack emissions from power plants and other industrial sources that burden downwind areas with smog-causing pollution.

Two years earlier, the court delivered a split decision that allowed rules requiring COVID-19 vaccines for health care workers but not for employees of large companies.

Wall Street, global markets mostly lower and oil prices drop $2 on hopes for a US-Iran nuclear deal

posted in: All news | 0

By ELAINE KURTENBACH and MATT OTT, Associated Press Business Writers

Wall Street veered lower before the opening bell Thursday and oil prices fell more than $2 a barrel as optimism over a possible U.S.-Iran nuclear deal rose.

Futures for the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average each fell 0.4%. Nasdaq futures dipped 0.6%.

President Donald Trump, visiting Qatar as part of a three-country Middle East tour, has urged the nation to use its influence with Iran to persuade its leadership to dial back its rapidly advancing nuclear program. A deal would help pave the way to ease sanctions against Tehran.

U.S. benchmark crude oil lost $2.37 to $60.78 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, gave up $2.32 to $63.70 per barrel.

Oil prices surged early this week after China and the U.S. announced an agreement to scale back painfully high tariffs each has imposed on the other for 90 days. But they’ve since retreated after the U.S. Energy Administration reported relatively high crude oil stockpiles that could lead to an oversupply.

In equities markets, Walmart shares rose 2.2% after it reported strong sales but a decline in first quarter profit, and said it has to raise prices due to higher costs from tariffs.

Like many other U.S. companies, Walmart did not issue a profit outlook for the quarter because of the chaotic environment around rapidly changing U.S. trade policy. The company maintained its full-year guidance issued in February.

Foot Locker shares nearly doubled after Dick’s Sporting Goods said it was buying the struggling footwear chain for about $2.4 billion. It’s the second buyout of a major footwear company in as many weeks as business leaders struggle with uncertainty over how Trump’s tariffs will impact companies that make many of their products overseas.

Last week Skechers announced that it was being taken private by 3G Capital for $9 billion.

Dick’s said Thursday that it expects to run Foot Locker as a standalone unit and keep the Foot Locker brands, which include Kids Foot Locker, Champs Sports, WSS and the Japanese sneaker brand atmos.

Foot Locker shares soared more than 80% to $23.57 before the bell. Dick’s fell 8.5%.

Elsewhere, China moved to reverse some of its “non-tariff” measures against the U.S. as agreed with Washington in their temporary trade war cease-fire, while demanding that the U.S. side “immediately correct its wrong practices.”

A Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson accused the Trump administration of violating world trade rules by announcing that use of Ascend computer chips made by China’s Huawei Technologies violates U.S. export controls.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 index dropped 1% to 37,775.51. Computer chip-related stocks were among the biggest decliners, with Disco Corp. falling 3.2% and Advantest down 1.1%.

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng dropped 0.8% to 23,453.16, while the Shanghai Composite index lost 0.7% to 3,380.82. Taiwan’s Taiex fell 0.2%, while India’s Sensex rebounded to gain 1.6%.

In Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 edged 0.2% higher to 8,297.50. South Korea’s Kospi gave up 0.7% to 2,621.36.

European markets are mixed at midday with Germany’s DAX shedding 0.1%, while the CAC 40 in Paris fell 0.2%. Britain’s FTSE 100 was up 0.3%.

On Thursday, the government will release its April report for inflation at the wholesale level, as well as for retail sales and weekly jobless claims.

The latest retail data is expected to reflect a meager 0.2% sales increase in April, down significantly from a 1.4% gain the previous month.

The stock market has been relatively steady since surging Monday after the U.S. and China announced a 90-day pause in their trade war. The market gained more ground on Tuesday after the government reported that inflation unexpectedly cooled across the country in April.

Trump has delayed a large swath of his most severe tariffs against America’s trading partners, but some import taxes remain in place. Uncertainty over the path ahead continues to hang over businesses and consumers. The on-again-off-again nature of Trump’s trade policy has left companies reluctant to make plans about investment and hiring and consumers nervous about spending.

Businesses continue to trim or withdraw their financial forecasts as they face unpredictable trade policy and cautious consumers.

More than 90% of companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings for their latest quarter and most reported better-than-expected earnings. But they have cut or scrapped forecasts for the current quarter and even the full year.