Thomas Friedman: An epidemic of moral cowardice

posted in: All news | 0

I write today about an epidemic. It’s not biological. It’s an epidemic of cowardly, immoral and unprincipled decisions by leaders across the political spectrum. Our last biological epidemic — COVID-19 — was a tiny invisible pathogen that made us physically sick. This epidemic of moral cowardice is right in everybody’s face and it’s eating away at the civic bonds that hold societies together.

Three examples preoccupy me personally: The Republican Party today has a neo-Nazi problem that it refuses to confront. The progressive left today has a pro-Hamas problem that it refuses to confront. And the Jewish people and Israel have a radical Jewish settler problem that they refuse to confront.

While this may seem an odd grouping, its elements have more in common than you might think. The neo-Nazis in the Republican camp want a white Christian America from sea to shining sea — empty of as much diversity as possible. The radical settlers in the West Bank want a Jewish state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea — empty of as many Palestinian Arabs as possible. And Hamas jihadis also want an Islamic state in Palestine from the same river to the same sea — empty of as many Israeli Jews as possible.

What else they have in common

Those three examples have other things in common. One is they just don’t care anymore about hiding their excesses or their agendas. It’s all out there online or on YouTube. They are not embarrassed.

Another is how much they feed off one another — how each uses the worst behavior of the others as both justification and fuel for their own twisted views. Republican neo-Nazis exploit global condemnation of the Israeli settlers’ violent behavior in the West Bank — on top of Israel’s excesses in the Gaza Strip — as license to now openly flaunt their antisemitism.

Jewish supremacist settlers, and those in the Israeli government who support them, use Hamas’ savagery as a moral permission slip for their own lawless marauding against Palestinians in the West Bank. Lately, the Israeli right has begun a vociferous campaign to prevent the prosecution of Israeli prison guards caught on camera abusing a Palestinian prisoner.

Hamas, meanwhile, has cited what it claimed were Israeli efforts to take over Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem — Islam’s third holiest site — as well as the abuse of Palestinians in Israeli jails and violence by the Israeli army and settlers against Palestinians in the West Bank, as part of its justification for its mass murder of Israeli Jews on Oct. 7.

But what really makes me sick is the third thing they have in common — how much their behavior is now excused or normalized by adjacent members of their own political communities.

The uprooting of ‘mangroves’

Put them all together and it becomes obvious that we are watching a broad breakdown in the liberal, humanistic order that dominated Western democracies after World War II. It’s the wholesale uprooting of what I call our societal “mangroves” — the unwritten norms that are necessary to restrain, filter and buffer aberrant behaviors and hatemongering, even when technically legal.

Anti-Nazi Lutheran pastor and theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was hanged by Hitler’s henchmen shortly before his concentration camp was liberated by the Americans, is often said to have described the moral implications of this kind of behavior: “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”

But that is precisely what is going on today. Just look around — and listen to the silence.

I totally respect those on the left, right or center who have protested Israel’s killing of thousands of Palestinian civilians as collateral — and sometimes seemingly deliberate — damage in Israel’s retaliation/revenge campaign against Hamas. Such protests are a sign of moral health.

But I am still shocked by the declaration signed by more than 30 Harvard University “Palestine Solidarity Groups” late on Oct. 7 two years ago. It stated: “We, the undersigned student organizations, hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence.” That was only hours after Hamas’ indiscriminate killing of some 1,200 men, women, children, soldiers and elderly people in Israel — including more than 360 people at a music festival, and the kidnapping of some 250 more. That Harvard declaration was issued well before Israel invaded Gaza in retaliation.

When pro-Hamas protesters blame everything on Israel and give Hamas a free pass for its murder, sexual abuse and kidnapping; when they ignore everything else that Hamas stands for — its anti-LGBTQ+, antidemocratic, antisemitic, women-subjugating Islamist ideology that should be anathema to everyone; and when they ignore past and current attempts by moderate, non-Hamas Palestinians to forge a two-state solution with the Jewish state, as an alternative to armed struggle — in my view they are essentially telling the world: It’s not Israel’s actions that motivate us, it is Israel’s existence. Therefore, the project of eliminating Israel must come before any critique of Hamas.

That is warped — and don’t kid yourself, it’s a view not confined to only a very few on the far left.

The pillars of Israeli security

Unfortunately, too many Israelis and diaspora Jews have put on similar blinders. A day does not go by without a report like this recent one from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz:

“The attacks of October 7 and Israel’s subsequent devastation of Gaza also ignited a lethal conflagration of settler violence in the occupied West Bank. Over the same two-year period that Israeli forces killed more than 68,000 Palestinians in Gaza, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank. New settler outposts have been constructed with rapid speed, displacing entire Palestinian communities — a process often facilitated by Israel’s army. … In the face of this reality, there appears to be a concerted campaign on the part of the pro-Israel right to deny it.”

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his fellow travelers — and here I include the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, which has flown air cover for Netanyahu in Washington, D.C., for his 18 years in office — have done more to undermine the long-term security of Israel and the Jewish people than any Hamas fighters.

Why do I say that? Because they have presided over and abetted the shattering of the three most important pillars of Israeli security. I speak of Israel’s national unity — Bibi has deliberately tried to govern by division not addition — as well as Israel’s long-standing commitment to democratic values and judicial independence and its commitment to fighting its wars, albeit inconsistently applied over the years, with a humanitarian ethos.

All three are being shredded by Netanyahu and his allies in pursuit of the insane obsession with annexing the West Bank. Israel is now in grave danger — and all those threats are from within.

Nothing to see here?

And then there’s us. Politico recently broke the story about what was being said in a Telegram group chat involving leaders of Young Republican groups in four states: “They referred to Black people as monkeys and ‘the watermelon people’ and mused about putting their political opponents in gas chambers. They talked about raping their enemies and driving them to suicide and lauded Republicans who they believed support slavery.” Plenty of antisemitism was stirred in as well.

Ho-hum, said Vice President JD Vance, nothing to see here: “The reality is that kids do stupid things, especially young boys,” Vance said. “They tell edgy, offensive jokes.”

Yes, teenagers will be teenagers, except that Mother Jones discovered that eight of the 11 Republican operatives who took part in the offensive chat appear to range in age from 24 to 35.

Of course, President Donald Trump also didn’t even whisper a hint of condemnation. Just as he had no problem with the recent lovefest/interview between Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, promoting Fuentes’ white nationalist neo-Nazi sympathies.

Not surprisingly, Trump’s defense of Carlson centered mainly on his own ego. He’s “said good things about me over the years,” the president said of Carlson. So nothing else should matter?

Trump could have said that Carlson has a right to interview anyone he wants, something that should never be suppressed, but that he was very troubled by the open contempt being directed by Fuentes at Jewish Americans. But neither Trump nor Vance said that — because they undoubtedly know that a not insignificant minority of their voters hold these racist, antisemitic views and they don’t want to alienate them before the midterms, which are expected to be very close.

Dishonor will remain

How far we have fallen. We’ve had political movements in the past use antisemitism to try to get to the White House — for example, those who wanted well-known antisemite Charles Lindbergh to run for president in 1940 — but until Vance and Trump we have not seen it being normalized to try to stay in power. We have seen Jewish supremacists, like Rabbi Meir Kahane, get elected to the Israeli Knesset, but we have never seen them setting Israeli defense policy, until Bibi gave them the keys. We have seen pro-Palestinian demonstrations aplenty over the years, but never ones, as far as I recall, that gave such a complete pass to Hamas after its mass murder of Israeli civilians.

This is how norms collapse — and take their societies down with them.

So, to Trump, Vance, Netanyahu and the pro-Hamas protesters, I have one message. It’s the one offered by Liz Cheney to her fellow GOP House members who turned a blind eye to Trump’s stoking of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol: “I say this to my Republican colleagues who are defending the indefensible: There will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain.”

Thomas Friedman writes a column for the New York Times.

 

Twin Cities ICE employee charged in child sex sting, Bloomington police say

posted in: All news | 0

The Bloomington Police Department is reporting that a federal immigration agency employee based in the Twin Cities was among 16 men arrested in a child sex trafficking sting operation.

Alexander Steven Back, 41, of Robbinsdale, was arrested Nov. 13 when he allegedly attempted to meet up with who he thought was a 17-year-old girl, but was actually undercover law enforcement, according to a criminal complaint. Back is a non-sworn U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement employee and one of four charged in the operation, according to Bloomington police.

According to the complaint, officers posing as a minor in a text message exchange said, “I am 17 and one guy got hella mad at me,” to which Back said, “I’m not going to be mad at you.”

In a second instance, officers said “Kk and u ain’t gonna flip ur s**t that I’m 17 right? One dude yelled so loud I thought the neighbors would call the cops.”

Back responded, “Are you with the cops?” Officers said, “Lol definitely not R U?” and Back said, “No definitely not. Ok send address, im chill,” according to the complaint.

In a post-Miranda statement, Back said he doesn’t know why he didn’t “bail” after “Bella” told him she was 17 and said, “I don’t really know if there is anything to say. It’s all there in the texts,” the complaint said.

The operation, dubbed “Operation Creep,” is similar to one Bloomington police conducted in March when former state Sen. Justin Eichorn, R-Grand Rapids, was arrested for allegedly attempting to solicit a minor for prostitution. He pleaded not guilty to federal charges in April, and his lawyer is arguing that he’s being unfairly prosecuted because of his status as a former state senator.

Related Articles


Authorities say man, 75, was killed by Clearwater County deputy after firing flare gun


Woodbury man gets 30 years in federal prison for extorting minors after coercing sexually explicit videos


Two arrested after glue found in locks at St. Anthony Starbucks


ICE crackdown heightens barriers for immigrant domestic violence victims


New hurdle in Comey case as Trump’s Justice Department faces questions about the grand jury process

Women’s basketball: Gophers lose at Kansas

posted in: All news | 0

After recovering from a slow start, the Minnesota women’s basketball team couldn’t close late in a 63-57 loss at Kansas on Wednesday night.

Tori McKinney led the Gophers in scoring with 14 points. Mara Braun had 13 points and Grace Grocholski added 12. It was Minnesota’s (4-1) first loss of the season in its first road game of the season.

The Gophers shot just 3 of 17 (17.6%) from the field in the first quarter as the Jayhawks built a 10-point advantage. Minnesota recovered and actually led, 25-23, in the second while outscoring Kansas 19-11 in the quarter.

The Jayhawks led throughout much of the second half, but Minnesota tied the game 49-all, and then closed to 59-57 with 36 seconds remaining. But Kansas closed out the game from the free-throw line.

The Gophers shot 34.4% from the field and were 5 of 23 (21.7%) from 3-point territory.

Minnesota next participates in the Baha Mar Hoops Pink Flamingo Championship tournament in the Bahamas in Nassau, Bahamas. The Gophers face South Florida at 3 p.m. on Monday, and either Harvard or Alabama on Wednesday.

Related Articles


UMD’s Bill Watson puts 1985 Hobey Baker Award up for auction


Gophers avoid scary upset in 66-54 win over Chicago State


Gophers running back Tre Berry has left the team


How Gophers are adjusting their quarterback recruiting


Gophers looking forward to playing at Wrigley Field

Trump signs bill to release Jeffrey Epstein case files after fighting it for months

posted in: All news | 0

By SEUNG MIN KIM, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump signed legislation Wednesday that compels his administration to release files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, bowing to political pressure from his own party after initially resisting those efforts.

Trump could have chosen to release many of the files on his own months ago.

“Democrats have used the ‘Epstein’ issue, which affects them far more than the Republican Party, in order to try and distract from our AMAZING Victories,” Trump said in a social media post as he announced he had signed the bill.

Now, the bill requires the Justice Department to release all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in a federal prison in 2019, within 30 days. It allows for redactions about Epstein’s victims for ongoing federal investigations, but DOJ cannot withhold information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.”

It was a remarkable turn of events for what was once a farfetched effort to force the disclosure of case files from an odd congressional coalition of Democrats, one GOP antagonist of the president, and a handful of erstwhile Trump loyalists. As recently as last week, the Trump administration even summoned one Republican proponent of releasing the files, Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, to the Situation Room to discuss the matter, although she did not change her mind.

But over the weekend, Trump did a sharp U-turn on the files once it became clear that congressional action was inevitable. He insisted the Epstein matter had become a distraction to the GOP agenda and indicated he wanted to move on.

“I just don’t want Republicans to take their eyes off all of the Victories that we’ve had,” Trump said in a social media post Tuesday afternoon, explaining the rationale for his abrupt about-face.

Related Articles


US Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick of Florida indicted on charges of stealing $5M in disaster funds


Democratic senator accuses Trump of playing politics with aviation safety during shutdown


5 accused of supporting antifa plead guilty to terrorism-related offense after Texas shooting


Trump says allowing skilled immigrants to train US workers ‘is MAGA’


Joe Biden to attend Dick Cheney’s funeral, as Donald Trump continues to remain silent on his death

The House passed the legislation on a 427-1 vote, with Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., being the sole dissenter. He argued that the bill’s language could lead to the release of information on innocent people mentioned in the federal investigation. The Senate later approved it unanimously, skipping a formal vote.

It’s long been established that Trump had been friends with Epstein, the disgraced financier who was close to the world’s elite. But the president has consistently said he did not know of Epstein’s crimes and had cut ties with him long ago.

Before Trump returned to the White House for a second term, some of his closest political allies helped fuel conspiracy theories about the government’s handling of the Epstein case, asserting a cover-up of potentially incriminating information in those files.