St. Paul City Council calls for investigation of officers’ use of force during ICE operation

posted in: All news | 0

The St. Paul City Council on Wednesday called for the city’s Police Civilian Internal Affairs Review Commission to conduct a “thorough investigation” of St. Paul officers’ use-of-force during Tuesday’s federal immigration enforcement operation in St. Paul.

All seven city council members, Mayor Melvin Carter and Mayor-elect Kaohly Her, and community members have raised concerns about St. Paul officers deploying chemical irritants and projectiles, along with questions about the presence of the city’s officers when ICE agents were in the Payne-Phalen neighborhood Tuesday.

The city council will also be asking the PCIARC to examine the police department’s adherence to the city’s separation ordinance and seeking an audit of the public cost incurred. A resolution is planned for next Wednesday’s council meeting.

St. Paul’s separation ordinance says city employees are not authorized to enforce federal immigration policies, and Police Chief Axel Henry said Tuesday the city’s officers had not violated it. He said officers were not doing immigration enforcement, “but we do have a responsibility to make sure that laws aren’t broken in our city.”

Federal authorities arrested two

Federal authorities arrested two men on Tuesday. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said one was previously removed from the U.S. and illegally re-entered. Another man is charged with assaulting a federal officer during Tuesday’s operation, accused of striking an ICE officer’s vehicle with his own vehicle.

The Department of Homeland Security said a large number of people, who a spokesperson referred to as “rioters,” arrived and they called in back-up “to help secure the scene.”

DHS said in its statement that people on the scene “continued to ignore law enforcement commands and aggressively advanced on law enforcement. ICE used their training and deployed crowd control measures for the safety of the public and law enforcement.”

But on Wednesday, City Council Member Cheniqua Johnson said “no matter the explanations offered or the intentions behind yesterday’s events, the impact remains the same: trust between our community, our St. Paul Police Department, and the city has been broken.”

“I support the residents’ demands and the council in getting the answers we need to make sure yesterday never happens again on the East Side or in the city of St. Paul,” she said in a statement.

At least 3 journalists injured

Also on Wednesday, the Minnesota Society of Professional Journalists said at least three local photojournalists were injured by less-lethal munitions deployed by St. Paul police officers while covering the story.

“The three journalists hit by munitions shared with MNSPJ that they believe they were targeted by law enforcement for doing their jobs,” the society said in a statement. “Photojournalists are on the frontlines of documenting history and it is imperative that they are kept safe and their First Amendment rights are protected.”

Mayor Carter said the injuries to journalists are troubling.

“The conduct we saw yesterday was jarring,” he said in a statement. “I have directed a thorough review of all St. Paul police body-worn camera footage be done in a timely manner to understand exactly what happened and ensure full transparency and accountability.”

Police union: Officers were assaulted

Henry said Wednesday that a “full review of the department’s response to the incident on Nov. 25, 2025, is under review. This includes our response to resistance and aggression (RRA) and other related policies or practices.”

The review includes viewing hundreds of hours of body camera footage and footage shared by community members.

“We are also actively seeking to arrange meetings with local law enforcement leaders and federal law enforcement to create sustainable prevention strategies for our city and the rest of the state,” Henry said in a statement.

The St. Paul Police Federation said officers were responding to federal agents’ call for help.

“We responded only to protect lives and restore order — nothing more,” said a Wednesday statement from the police union. “We do not do immigration enforcement. Never have, never will.”

The federation said there was a “core of professional agitators” who “refused every order, attacked officers with frozen bottles and rocks, damaged patrol cars, and shouted, ‘Don’t let them leave.’

“Our officers, while being assaulted, used the absolute minimum force necessary to end the threat and get everyone home safe,” the statement continued. “Not one rioter was seriously injured. Several officers were struck by projectiles, yet every one of them showed extraordinary discipline and courage.”

PCIARC chairperson: Officers were safe in vehicles

Sarah Florman, Police Civilian Internal Affairs Review Commission chairperson, wrote to Chief Henry Tuesday that she was at the scene during the aftermath of the ICE action when St. Paul officers remained in unmarked vehicles.

“They were engaging the protesters and I personally witnessed both pepper balls and two types of aerosol gas … deployed on peaceful protesters,” she wrote. “While a few protesters were blocking vehicles, many … were standing on sidewalks.”

Florman wrote that she saw objects thrown at police vehicles as they were being driven away, but didn’t see anyone throwing items at officers “or anyone impeding their departure.”

“Instead of driving away from the crowd, one car of SPPD officers stopped and opened the doors of their vehicles to deploy so much gas it created a white-out,” she wrote. “The officers were leaving the scene and stopped to deploy these agents even though they were safe inside their vehicles.”

During this time, Kerem Yücel of Minnesota Public Radio News was hit by a less-lethal munition in the shoulder. The senior visual journalist was taken to the hospital by an ambulance and has since been released.

Related Articles


ICE identifies Honduran immigrant arrested in St. Paul; another man charged with assault on officer


Woodbury cop and son survive DUI crash, urge holiday partiers to find another way home


Shoreview bus driver awarded for rescue of 4-year-old in Lake Owasso


Washington County emergency alert system is victim of cyberattack


Protesters gather as federal agents take man into custody at St. Paul home

Colorado doesn’t plan to transfer imprisoned former county clerk to federal custody

posted in: All news | 0

By COLLEEN SLEVIN

DENVER (AP) — Colorado doesn’t plan to transfer from state prison to federal custody a former county clerk who has become a hero to election conspiracy theorists following a request from the Trump administration, state officials said Wednesday.

Related Articles


Higher fees for foreigners visiting US national parks stokes tourism concerns


Court transcripts show Border Patrol official Greg Bovino dodging questions about use of force


Judges allow North Carolina to use a map drawn in bid to give Republicans another US House seat


FACT FOCUS: It is not illegal for voters to show ID in New York and California


Trump administration’s effort to end 1960s school desegregation cases faces a hurdle

The Colorado Department of Corrections said it is not seeking a transfer of Tina Peters, who was convicted last year of orchestrating a scheme in Mesa County to breach voting machine data driven by false claims of fraud in the 2020 election.

“Transferring an individual is an action initiated by the Colorado Department of Corrections, not an outside entity,” department spokesperson Alondra Gonzalez-Garcia said in an email.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons declined to comment.

Peters, 70, is serving a nine-year sentence at a state prison in Pueblo.

The Bureau of Prisons requested on Nov. 12 that the state corrections department transfer her to federal custody to serve her sentence. The reason isn’t known.

A copy of the request released by the state corrections department was heavily redacted. The department said releasing that information was “contrary to the public interest.”

Peters’ release has become a cause celebre in the election conspiracy movement. On Sunday, President Donald Trump renewed his call for her to be set free. One of Peters’ lawyers, Peter Ticktin, suggested on Trump ally Steve Bannon’s podcast this week that the military be used to free Peters from prison.

County clerks in Colorado of various political affiliations blame Peters for making their jobs more dangerous by fueling distrust in the voting system. They have been urging Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat, to definitively reject the federal transfer request.

In a statement Tuesday, a Polis spokesperson praised the integrity of the state’s election system and said the governor welcomes a chance to meet with the clerks about the federal transfer request but did not directly address it.

“Governor Polis takes his responsibilities seriously and has been clear that he will take threats from the federal government head-on – especially when they undermine our democracy – which is why we have vigorously defended Colorado’s values during this turbulent time,” Polis spokesperson Shelby Wieman said.

Matt Crane, executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association, said the state corrections department is ultimately under Polis’ control and will do what he directs it to.

“The open-ended statement from the Department of Corrections does not alleviate our concerns,” he said.

Loons veteran Hassani Dotson officially on way out

posted in: All news | 0

Veteran Minnesota United midfielder Hassani Dotson will leave the club this offseason.

The Loons’ end-of-season roster decisions Wednesday shared how Dotson and his 2019 MLS draft peer Dayne St. Clair are officially out of contract with the club after the 1-0 loss to San Diego in the Western Conference semifinal on Monday. MNUFC added it was entering contract negotiations with St. Clair but not Dotson.

“It’s been a pleasure,” Dotson wrote on Instagram.

Dotson played in 149 regular-season games, behind only Michael Boxall and Robin Lod in club history. Dotson, who earned $682,500 in 2025, demanded a trade in preseason, but MNUFC retained him and offered him a new deal, but his side declined.

United said it was turning down contract options for Lod, Loic Mesanvi, Sam Shashoua and Kipp Keller. MNUFC also shared it wants to negotiate deals new contracts with Lod and Mesanvi.

MNUFC exercised contract options for 2026 with five players: defenders Morris Duggan, Devin Padelford and D.J. Taylor, as well as goalkeepers Alec Smir and Wessel Speel.

The following players have guaranteed contracts for next season:

— Defenders: Michael Boxall, Anthony Markanich, Nicolás Romero, Carlos Harvey, Joseph Rosales, Jefferson Diaz, Julian Gressel, Kieran Chandler.

— Midfielders: Joaquín Pereyra, Nectarios Triantis, Wil Trapp, Dominik Fitz, Owen Gene, Hoyeon Jung, Mattus Kmet, Kenyel Michel and Alexis Fariña.

— Forwards: Kelvin Yeboah, Mamadou Dieng, Darius Randell and Jordan Adebayo-Smith.

Related Articles


What’s next for Minnesota United? Diving into key points for 2026 season


One shining moment darkens Loons season in 1-0 playoff loss to San Diego


Loons at San Diego: Keys to the match, storylines and prediction


St. Paul’s Tony Sanneh to be inducted into National Soccer Hall of Fame


MLS votes to align schedule with international leagues

Higher fees for foreigners visiting US national parks stokes tourism concerns

posted in: All news | 0

By MATTHEW BROWN and MATTHEW DALY

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — A $100-per-person charge for foreigners entering Yellowstone, Grand Canyon and other popular national parks is stoking apprehension among some tourist-oriented businesses that it could discourage travelers, but supporters say the change will generate money for cash-strapped parks.

Related Articles


Court transcripts show Border Patrol official Greg Bovino dodging questions about use of force


Judges allow North Carolina to use a map drawn in bid to give Republicans another US House seat


FACT FOCUS: It is not illegal for voters to show ID in New York and California


Trump administration’s effort to end 1960s school desegregation cases faces a hurdle


Russia’s frozen assets at center of negotiations over Ukraine peace deal

The new fee was announced Tuesday by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and takes effects Jan. 1. Foreign tourists also will see a sharp price increase for an annual parks pass, to $250 per vehicle. U.S. residents will continue to be charged $80 for an annual pass.

The change in policy puts the U.S. in line with other countries that charge foreigners more to see popular attractions.

At the Whistling Swan Motel just outside Glacier National Park in northwestern Montana, owner Mark Howser estimates that about 15% of his customers are foreigners. They come from Canada, China, India, Spain, France, Germany and elsewhere, said Howser, who also runs a bakery and general store.

Those visitors already pay up to $35 per vehicle to enter the park. Adding the $100-per-person charge for foreigners, Howser said, “is a sure-fire way of discouraging people from visiting Glacier.”

File – People hike at Glacier National Park in Montana. (AP Photo/Beth J. Harpaz, File)

“It’s going to hurt local businesses that cater to foreign travelers, like myself,” he said. “You’re discouraging them from seeing something in the country by attaching a fee to that experience.”

A Yellowstone tour operator, Bryan Batchelder with Let’s Go Adventure Tours and Transportation, said the charge represents “a pretty big hike” for the roughly 30% of his clientele that are foreigners. That percentage has been going up in recent years after Batchelder switched to a new booking service.

Next summer, he said, will reveal how the new charge plays out among foreign visitors. “They’ll probably still come to the country, but will they visit national parks?” Batchelder asked.

The charge also will apply at Acadia, Bryce Canyon, Everglades, Grand Teton, Rocky Mountain, Sequoia & Kings Canyon, Yosemite and Zion national parks.

Interior officials described the new fee structure as “America-first pricing” that will ensure international visitors contribute to maintaining parks.

FILE – Tourists flock to Mather Point at Grand Canyon National Park, Oct. 1, 2025, in Grand Canyon, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

For Yellowstone park alone, the $100 charge could generate $55 million annually to help fix deteriorating trails and aging bridges, said Brian Yablonski with the Property and Environment Research Center, a free market research group based in Bozeman, Montana. A recent analysis by the group said visitor numbers would drop only about 1% in response to the higher price.

If the charges for foreigners were extended to park sites nationwide, Yablonski said it could generate more than $1 billion from an estimated 14 million international visitors annually.

“Americans are already paying more than international visitors because they are paying taxes,” Yablonski said. “For international visitors, this is kind of a no-brainer, common sense approach.”

Many other countries charge international visitors an extra fee to visit public sites, said Melissa Weddell, director of the University of Montana’s Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research. Foreign visitors to Ecuador’s Galapagos Islands, for example, pay $200 per adult, while Ecuadorian nationals pay only $30, according to tourist websites for the islands.

FILE – Visitors watch a sunset on rock ledge near Taft Point in Yosemite National Park, Calif., Oct. 30, 2025. (Stephen Lam/San Francisco Chronicle via AP, File)

A coalition of current and former employees park service denounced the new charge.

“In a year where national park staff have already been cut by nearly 25%, we worry this will be yet another burden for already overworked employees,″ said Emily Thompson, executive director of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks.

“National parks should be available and accessible to all, or America’s best idea will become America’s greatest shakedown,″ she said.

Gerry Seavo James, deputy campaign director for Sierra Club’s Outdoors for All campaign, said Trump and his administration have worked for nearly a year to undermine the park service, slashing its budget and firing thousands of staff.

“Gouging foreign tourists at the entrance gate won’t provide the financial support these crown jewels of our public lands need,” he said. “Without that support, we run the risk of our true common grounds becoming nothing more than playgrounds for the super-rich.”

Interior Department spokesperson Elizabeth Peace said the agency previously did not collect data on international visitors but will start doing so in January.

Republican lawmakers in July introduced a bill in Congress that would codify the surcharge for foreign visitors to national parks. It’s sponsored by West Virginia Rep. Riley Moore and Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke, who served as interior secretary during Trump’s firs term.

“President Trump and Secretary Burgum are putting Americans first by asking foreign visitors to pay their fair share while holding entrance fees steady for the American people,” Zinke and Moore said in a statement Wednesday.

Daly reported from Washington, D.C.