Opinion: It’s Time for NYC to Appoint a Heat Czar

posted in: All news | 0

“Heat is an infrastructure problem, an economic problem, a policy problem, a community problem, and a health problem. It requires a coordinated approach on all these fronts.”

An open fire hydrant in Brooklyn during a heat wave. (Photo by Jeanmarie Evelly)

New York summers are hot. On average, the city annually weathers 17 days with temperatures above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. But climate change is heating our planet at an alarming rate, making our city’s heat waves hotter, longer, and more frequent.

The New York City Panel on Climate Change projects that in the next 25 years we are likely to experience, on average, between 38 and 62 days above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2080, in the worst-case scenario, we could see as many as 108.

The city’s built environment magnifies hot weather. This phenomenon, known as the urban heat island effect, increases urban temperatures from 3 degrees Fahrenheit up to 20 degrees Fahrenheit higher than suburban and rural settings. The effect is particularly pronounced in densely built areas with limited green space and high concentrations of heat-absorbing surfaces. 

But heat exposure is unequal and highly inequitable. According to the city’s Heat Vulnerability Index, low-income communities of color bear disproportionate heat burdens in neighborhoods undermined by historical disinvestment and environmental injustice. 

Summer heat is a threat to public health: heat is the leading cause of climate- and weather-related death nationwide. Unlike natural disasters such as floods, heat hazards are invisible, making extreme heat an often underestimated “silent killer.” Around 580 New Yorkers die each summer due to heat-related causes, with Black New Yorkers twice as likely to succumb to heat mortality than white residents. 

Heat requires short-term emergency measures to protect residents during heat waves (heat response), and long-term strategies to cool a city (heat mitigation and prevention). In 2021 Miami-Dade County, Florida, officials appointed the world’s first chief heat officer (CHO) and Phoenix, Arizona, opened an office of Heat Response and Mitigation. That same year, officials in Athens, Greece, appointed the first CHO in Europe. Since then, the United Nations and half a dozen cities worldwide have followed suit. It is time for New York City to do the same.

In 2017 the Mayor’s Office of Climate and Environmental Justice (MOCEJ) published the Cool Neighborhoods NYC plan, a coordinating vision for citywide heat response. The plan deserves a “heat czar.” The plan’s mandate encompasses multi-agency programs with several critical responsibilities: coordinating heat mitigation across city agencies, ensuring equitable resource distribution, and integrating heat response into broader climate strategy.

But this plan is not the extent of the city’s heat responses. Our research shows that, in city government, there are currently over 30 specific heat-related programs in 10 departments and agencies under four deputy mayors. This work and the Cool Neighborhoods NYC plan are important, and deserve the greater coordination, dedicated focus, and advocacy of a CHO. It has been eight years since Cool Neighborhoods NYC debuted. It is time to update and turbocharge Cool Neighborhood NYC with a CHO who can align efforts across government, communities, and the private sector. 

A CHO would advise and advocate, maintaining focus on the issues of heat and heat resilience. With regulatory and budgetary power, a CHO could accelerate and expand the impact of existing programs. A CHO could coordinate across the city’s full network of existing plans to reduce silos, clarify responsibilities, prevent cross-purpose policies, and streamline financing. A CHO should further advocate for new urban heat mitigation through nature and design, not fossil fuels that add to the climate crisis. A CHO should also advocate for preserving urban spaces for communities; we all need to be able to bear the heat outside.

While NYC recently appointed its first Chief Climate Officer, Rohit T. Aggarwala, his Department of Environment Protection (DEP) is pursuing stormwater and coastal resilience as priorities. According to Aggarwala, “heat and hurricanes” keep him “up at night,” but the DEP has yet to appoint a deputy commissioner dedicated to heat. The City Council also recently failed to pass a bill to codify and improve New York’s cooling center program. Summer is here, and New Yorkers deserve a CHO.

Heat is an infrastructure problem, an economic problem, a policy problem, a community problem, and a health problem. It requires a coordinated approach on all these fronts. Extreme heat will increasingly impact public health but also energy and water use, urban vegetation, transportation, economic productivity, tourism, and workplace safety standards.

New York already has plans and programs in place. The city also has good data and spatial resolution on heat distribution and risk. But without clear management, without sustained advocacy, and without dedicated outreach—in other words, without a CHO—we risk failing to meet the size and scale of the challenge of hotter summers. 

Dr. Kara Murphy Schlichting is an associate professor of history at Queens College and the Graduate Center, CUNY, and a co-investigator of the Wellcome Discovery Award project Melting Metropolis: Everyday Histories of Heat and Health in London, New York, and Paris since 1945. Selassie Mawuko is a 2025 Queens College CUNY graduate and former Melting Metropolis research intern.

The post Opinion: It’s Time for NYC to Appoint a Heat Czar appeared first on City Limits.

Trump comes to Bondi’s defense amid uproar from his base over Jeffrey Epstein files flop

posted in: All news | 0

By ERIC TUCKER, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump leapt to the defense of Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday in the face of mounting criticism from far-right influencers and conservative internet personalities over the Justice Department’s abrupt refusal to release additional documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation.

When a reporter attempted to ask Bondi about Epstein at a White House Cabinet meeting, Trump headed off the questions and scolded the journalist: “Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy’s been talked about for years.”

“At a time like this,” he added, “where we’re having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas, it just seems like a desecration.”

The comments appeared to signal continued job security for Bondi and amounted to a striking rebuke of members of Trump’s base who have called for her resignation and mocked her for what they believe to be her failed commitment to release incriminating files from the Epstein investigation. A supposed Epstein “client list” that Bondi once intimated was sitting on her desk for review does not exist, the Justice Department acknowledged in a two-page memo Monday that further riled conservative critics who’d been hoping for proof of a government cover-up.

Related Articles


Trump says he’s ‘not happy’ with Putin and blames him for ‘killing a lot of people’ in Ukraine


Supreme Court clears the way for Trump’s plans to downsize the federal workforce


Trump caught off guard by Pentagon’s abrupt move to pause Ukraine weapons deliveries, AP sources say


Trump administration pulls back on plans to rewrite Biden-era asbestos ban


Noem says first responders in Texas ‘still looking for a lot of little girls’ missing after flood

The pressure is on Bondi

Bondi has faced pressure after a first document dump she hyped failed to deliver revelations. Far-right influencers were invited to the White House in February and provided with binders marked “The Epstein Files: Phase 1” and “Declassified” that contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain.

After the first release fell flat, Bondi said officials were poring over a “truckload” of previously withheld evidence she said had been handed over by the FBI and raised expectations of forthcoming releases.

But after a months-long review of evidence in the government’s possession, the Justice Department said in Monday’s memo that no “further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.” The department noted that much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and “only a fraction” of it “would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial.”

The only evidence disclosed as part of the memo was a video meant to definitively prove that the wealthy financier had taken his own life in jail in 2019, but even that disclosure did little to quiet conspiracy theorists who believe he was killed.

It’s not a happy development for online detectives

The department’s client list revelation was especially dismaying for conservative influencers and online sleuths given that Bondi in a Fox News interview in February had intimated that such a document was “sitting on my desk” for review. Bondi insisted Tuesday that she had been referring to the Epstein case file as being on her desk, as opposed to a specific client list.

“That’s what I meant by that,” she said.

She also defended her earlier public statements suggesting that the FBI was reviewing “tens of thousands” of videos of Epstein with “children or child porn.” The Associated Press published a story last week about the unanswered questions surrounding those videos and the Justice Department’s refusal to provide clarity.

The memo Monday did not suggest that the videos in the government’s possession depicted Epstein with children, instead referring to images of Epstein as well as more than 10,000 “downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography.”

“They turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein,” she said.

But she did not explain why the department could not release other files from the “truckload” of evidence she said was delivered to the agency months ago.

Trump says he’s ‘not happy’ with Putin and blames him for ‘killing a lot of people’ in Ukraine

posted in: All news | 0

By WILL WEISSERT, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he’s “not happy” with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, saying Moscow’s ongoing war in Ukraine is “killing a lot of people” on both sides.

“I’m not happy with him, I can tell you that much right now. This is killing a lot of people,” Trump said of Putin during a meeting with his Cabinet.

The president also acknowledged that his previous suggestions that he might be able to cajole Russia’s president into bringing the fighting to a close and quickly ending the war in Ukraine has “turned out to be tougher.”

It was notable for a president who has all but aligned himself with Putin at moments in the past and has praised the Russian leader effusively at times — though less so in recent months.

Related Articles


Trump comes to Bondi’s defense amid uproar from his base over Jeffrey Epstein files flop


Supreme Court clears the way for Trump’s plans to downsize the federal workforce


Trump caught off guard by Pentagon’s abrupt move to pause Ukraine weapons deliveries, AP sources say


Trump administration pulls back on plans to rewrite Biden-era asbestos ban


Noem says first responders in Texas ‘still looking for a lot of little girls’ missing after flood

The Cabinet meeting comments came a day after Trump said the United States will now send more weapons to Ukraine — dramatically reversing a previous announcement of a pause in critical, previously approved firepower deliveries to Kyiv in the midst of concerns that America’s own military stockpiles have declined too much.

“We wanted (to) put defensive weapons (in). Putin is not, he’s not treating human beings right,” Trump said during the Cabinet meeting, explaining the pause’s reversal. “It’s killing too many people. So we’re sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine and I’ve approved that.”

Trump’s decision to remove the pause follows his privately having expressed frustration with Pentagon officials for announcing a halt in some deliveries last week — an action he felt wasn’t properly coordinated with the White House, according to three people familiar with the matter.

But the president refused to provide more details on that matter Tuesday.

“I don’t know,” he said sarcastically to a reporter who pressed him on the weapons pause’s original approval. “Why don’t you tell me?”

Still, his expressing open displeasure with Putin — especially after approving a resumption of U.S. weapons to Ukraine — underscores how much Trump’s thinking on Russia and Ukraine policy has shifted since he returned to the White House in January. It also lays bare how tricky navigating the ongoing conflict has proved to be.

Trump suggested during last year’s campaign that he could quickly end the Russia-Ukraine war. But by April, he was using his Truth Social account to exhort Putin to end military strikes on the Ukrainian capital.

“Vladimir, STOP!” he wrote. But large-scale Russian attacks on Ukraine have continued since then and Trump’s public pronouncements on Putin have continued to sour.

Trump said after a call last week with Putin that he was unhappy with Russia’s president and “I don’t think he’s looking to stop” the war. Then, speaking at the start of a dinner he hosted for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Monday night, Trump said, “I’m not happy with President Putin at all.”

Asked during Tuesday’s Cabinet meeting what his growing displeasure with Putin might mean for U.S. foreign policy, Trump declined to discuss specifics.

“I will say, the Ukrainians were brave. But we gave them the best equipment ever made,” Trump said. He also said that without U.S. weapons and military support, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 might have otherwise sparked what “probably would have been a very quick war.”

“It would have been a war that lasted three or four days,” he said, “but they had the benefit of unbelievable equipment.”

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ sentencing set for Oct. 3 after split verdict in federal sex crimes case

posted in: All news | 0

By MICHAEL R. SISAK and LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — Sean “Diddy” Combs will be sentenced in his federal criminal case on Oct. 3, a judge said Tuesday after probation officials rejected the defense and prosecution’s plan to move the date up by about two weeks.

Combs, who remains jailed after a split verdict last week, spoke briefly to his lawyer Marc Agnifilo during a virtual hearing on the scheduling issue that lasted all of two minutes. At one point he asked the lawyer to turn on his camera so they could see each other’s faces.

The hip-hop mogul’s lawyers had been urging Judge Arun Subramanian to sentence him as soon as possible after jurors acquitted him last week on racketeering and sex trafficking but convicted him on two prostitution-related charges.

Related Articles


Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman, shot 9 times by a man posing as an officer, leaves the hospital


Noem says first responders in Texas ‘still looking for a lot of little girls’ missing after flood


Bird flu emergency response ends in US as infections decline


After Texas floods that killed campers, here’s what to consider when sending your kids to camp


10 held in Texas immigration detention center shooting that was ‘planned ambush,’ US attorney says

Combs, 55, faces up to a decade in prison for each of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for flying people around the country, including his girlfriends and male sex workers, for sexual encounters. A conviction on racketeering conspiracy or sex trafficking could have put him in prison for life.

Prior to Tuesday’s hearing, Combs’ lawyers and prosecutors filed a joint letter proposing a Sept. 22 sentencing date, subject to the consent of the U.S. Probation Office. A short time later, they filed a second letter stating that all parties — including the probation office — were on board with the Oct. 3 date Subramanian originally proposed.

Combs got a standing ovation from fellow inmates when he returned to jail after the verdict last week, Agnifilo said. The Bad Boy Records founder will remain at the federal lockup in Brooklyn where he’s been held since his arrest last September after Subramanian last week rejected his request for bail.

The judge, citing a now-infamous video of Combs beating a former girlfriend and photographs showing injuries to another ex-girlfriend, made clear that he plans to hold Combs accountable for the years of violence and bullying behavior that were exposed at his eight-week trial.

Combs’ lawyers want less than the 21 to 27 months in prison that they believe the sentencing guidelines recommend. Prosecutors contend that the guidelines, when properly calculated to include Combs’ crimes and violent history, call for at least four to five years in prison.

Combs’ punishment is Subramanian’s decision alone, and the judge will have wide latitude in determining a sentence. While judges often adhere to the federal judiciary’s formulaic guidelines meant to prevent disparity in sentences for the same crimes, they are not mandatory.

As part of the sentencing process, Combs must give an interview to probation officers for a pre-sentence investigation report that will aid the judge in determining the proper punishment.