Lower rates proposed for toll lanes on Beltway, I-270 in Maryland

posted in: All news, News | 0

Drivers who use toll lanes on portions of the Beltway and Interstate 270 in Maryland would pay a minimum of 17 cents per mile under a new proposal by the state’s tolling authority.

With express lanes still in the early planning stages, the Maryland Transportation Authority’s suggestion is 3 cents per mile less than in its initial 20-cent proposal, and identical to the per-mile rate on the nearby Intercounty Connector, or ICC.

In a news release, the MDTA said the lowered prices were a result of comments received during the first public comment period, which included in-person and online hearings.


  • More Maryland News
  • More Local News
  • Transportation News

The new minimum rates would also be lower for trucks, ranging from 26 cents for smaller commercial vehicles to $1.02 for tractor-trailers.

If built, two toll lanes in each direction would run from on the Beltway in Maryland from the American Legion Bridge to Old Georgetown Road, and on I-270 up to I-370.

The toll lanes would be Maryland’s first to use “dynamic pricing,” with rates changing based upon real-time traffic, with the goal of maintaining speeds of at least 45 miles-per-hour.

In the new proposal, the maximum per mile rate for passenger vehicles would be $3.76 per mile, and $22.58 for tractor trailers. The maximum rates are consistent with the original proposal.

Click to enlarge. A full list of the proposed toll rates, depending on vehicle size and distance traveled. (Courtesy Maryland Transportation Authority)

The toll lanes would be designed by Australian toll road operator Transurban, which operates toll lanes in Northern Virginia. A public-private consortium would build and finance the lanes, and get most of the revenue.

Some vehicles would be able to drive in the toll lanes for free: Vehicles carrying three or more people, buses, and motorcycles.

Regular lanes on the Beltway and I-270 would remain free. Critics say the toll lanes are unfair for low-income drivers, and argue space used for toll lanes could be used for more free lanes.

The transportation authority’s board is scheduled to vote on the proposal on Nov. 18. If construction is ultimately approved, the lanes would likely open five years later.

‘It’s not a success’: Dems head home after infrastructure stalemate

posted in: All news, Politics | 0

President Joe Biden deflated the air of urgency around a bipartisan infrastructure vote and tamped down liberal dreams of a $3.5 trillion spending bill in a speech before House Democrats Friday. Hours later, Democratic leaders conceded defeat — at least for now.

After weeks of trying and failing to find a legislative solution both the progressive and centrist wings of the caucus could support, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her team passed a bill temporarily funding expiring transportation programs and sent frustrated members home until they can find a solution.

“It’s not a success,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said in a brief interview Friday night. “We need to pass both these bills, that’s going to be our objective.”

In a letter late Friday, Pelosi said “more time is needed” to reach an agreement on a legislative framework for Democrats’ social spending plan before the House will be able to vote on the Senate-passed infrastructure bill, delaying a vote on the bipartisan measure for a third time and infuriating moderates.

The anticlimactic end to a week of high stakes negotiations left moderates furious, blaming their fellow Democrats for derailing what they saw as a simple — and critical — party win.

And while centrists were raging, it was a tactical win for Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who went toe-to-toe with leaders of her own party and solidified liberals’ muscle in the caucus — defying the expectations of some in their own party.

“People just had tremendous buy-in to the strategy, to the content, and were down to fight for everybody and leave nobody behind,” Jayapal said leaving the Capitol Friday night.

But beneath the normal narrative of intraparty feuding, Democrats worried whether the week’s failure to deliver either a deal on their social spending bill or an infrastructure vote would have lasting consequences. Some left the Capitol after a frenzied day of meetings — including 40 minutes with Biden himself — wondering whether their party was on track to achieve neither of his major domestic priorities.

Biden’s visit to the Capitol caps a dizzying three months in which Pelosi cut seemingly competing deals with the two disparate factions of her caucus amid escalating threats. Those promises collided this week, with little certainty of whether Biden, Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer can regain enough momentum to achieve either plank of the president’s domestic agenda.

While several Democrats hoped Biden’s rare appearance Friday — his first in-person huddle with House Democrats as president — would rally support for the $550 billion infrastructure bill, he actually did the opposite.

The infrastructure bill “ain’t going to happen until we reach an agreement on the next piece of legislation,” Biden declared in the private caucus meeting.

The announcement stunned Democrats, from moderates who have been promised a vote on the infrastructure bill from the leadership for weeks, to rank-and-file members who just wanted to know the next steps.

“I thought the president might have asked for support. But. he called for unity and said, let’s work through this together,” said Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.).

“It was a shocking failure to meet the moment,” added one Democratic moderate, who emerged disappointed that Biden hadn’t delivered a call to action for the caucus.

Some Democrats argued that Biden had made progress toward unifying the party behind his social safety net bill that would reform policies on child care, health care and climate change by significantly lowering expectations for what was initially going to cost as much as $3.5 trillion.

Biden sought to lower those expectations in the meeting Friday, where he discussed a price tag for the legislation between $1.9 trillion and $2.3 trillion, implying that it could win the backing from Senate moderates. Progressives, who had previously balked at the idea of a lower price tag, rallied around it afterward.

But several centrist Democrats worried that Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) — who along with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) is key to any deal on the social spending plan — would pull out of the talks after the House once again punted on the infrastructure bill. Moderate Democrats also worried that the setback would cost them the votes of a dozen or so House Republicans who planned to back the Senate infrastructure bill.

Liberals, meanwhile, were invigorated.

“I feel great,” said Rep. Chuy García (D-Ill.), one of dozens of progressives who had threatened he wouldn’t back the president’s infrastructure bill without promises on the broader spending plan.

“I feel like we have an affirmation about the direction we’re moving in,” added Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas.).

What’s unclear now is what happens next. Pelosi has vowed to continue working with Schumer and the White House to strike a deal with Manchin and Sinema.

Democratic leaders are hoping to get the two powerful Senate centrists to agree to a spending bill target around $2.1 trillion as well as consensus on major policy issues including child care and paid family leave, health care and climate change.

While those negotiations continue, the House could be out for up to two weeks until lawmakers need to return to vote on a deal or address the debt ceiling and keep the government from defaulting, whatever comes first.

Pelosi and her leadership team did discuss another procedural vote on the president’s infrastructure and spending packages — a wonky procedural tactic to formally link the bills and show forward momentum on the bill. But moderates shot down the idea, and leadership dropped it by dinnertime Friday.

Instead, Democrats passed a 30-day patch for a highways funding program and sent their lawmakers home.

“Everybody’s hung up on, it has to be this date or that date, this hour or that hour. What we want is to pass two bills. ” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.).

“They’re listening to the progressives, also understanding that we have other wings in our party too. We have to listen to everybody and that’s what’s happening right now.”

Nelson shines as ‘Old Henry’ revives the classic Western

posted in: All news, Society | 0

“OLD HENRY”

Not rated. On VOD.

Grade: A-

Who doesn’t like a good old fashioned Western every now and then? “Old Henry,” a fine, boiled down, Sam Peckinpah-evoking example of the genre, even dares to rewrite the history books about an iconic outlaw.

When the action begins, we meet Henry McCarty (Tim Blake Nelson, also an executive producer), who is not particularly old. He’s digging rocks out of a trench on his farm in the Oklahoma territory in 1906. Henry’s adolescent son Wyatt (Gavin Lewis, “Little Fires Everywhere”) longs rather monotonously to leave the farm and see the world and get away from his overprotective widower father. Wyatt has never even fired a gun, which seems unlikely given the frontier setting and that his hulking Uncle Al (Trace Adkins) is an avid hunter. These men are in dire need of some women folk to keep them in line. The film begins with the sounds of insects and birds, and we know we are in a primal world of men, mud, chickens, horses and pigs that will eat anything.

Stephen Dorff in ‘Old Henry.’ (Photo courtesy Shout! Factory)

Meanwhile, three armed thugs on horseback track a man. The apparent leader of the armed men, the long-winded Ketchum (Stephen Dorff), tortures and hangs their captive. The three then set off after a second man. Henry finds this man, whose name is Curry (Scott Haze), wounded, near death and with a satchel of cash, after the man’s horse wanders to the farm. Henry takes the wounded man in to try to save his life. When the others arrive claiming to be lawmen, Henry is skeptical.

A fight will have to ensue if Henry does not let the strangers take the wounded man. The truth is Henry does not know who the good or bad guys are. Even Curry, who claims to be the real lawman, might be a killer. Henry has only his wits, which are a lot sharper than others suspect, and his fighting skills, which are also more potent than anyone knew. In fact, Henry may have a secret about his true identity.

Written and directed by Potsy Ponciroli (TV’s “Still the King”), “Old Henry” has limited settings and a small, all-male cast. But it makes the most of all of them.

Forty or 50 years ago, “Old Henry” might have been a Clint Eastwood film. Instead, it’s a Clint Eastwood film starring Nelson, a highly skilled character actor, who handles himself and his guns convincingly and has what it takes to play a lead role, especially in a genre film such as this. The film’s shootouts are very realistically staged and shot. Fighters spend as much time reloading as firing for a change.

Dorff is as impressive as Nelson as the sadistic and occasionally poetic Ketchum, a dangerous adversary with a keen eye. But it is Henry who is most fun to watch as he transforms from a Scripture-quoting Oklahoma farmer to a quick-drawing, hard-punching, dead-eyed gunfighter, a kind of Jason Bourne of the late-era Wild West. Western scholars might be disturbed by the liberties taken by “Old Henry.” But I had a blast.

Violent ‘Venom’ sequel – let there be more of the same

posted in: All news, News | 0

“VENOM: LET THERE BE CARNAGE”

Rated PG-13. At AMC Boston Common and South Bay, Landmark Kendall Square, Regal Fenway and suburban theaters.

Grade: C

Like its predecessor, the “Venom” sequel “Let There Be Carnage” is virtually a smug non-stop cavalcade of violence. With a PG-13 rating.

Don’t worry — there’s no blood from the mass mortality. No sex either, just a schoolboy-style crush on a pretty woman. The film’s target teen audience never has to worry about being embarrassed by the mushy stuff.

Once again, the comedy of having an alien symbiote living in your body and dictating what you do is the focus.

Tom Hardy’s determined reporter Eddie Brock gets an insider’s story by helping condemned murderer Cletus Kasady (Woody Harrelson). This enrages Stephen Graham’s Detective Mulligan.

  • Venom in Columbia Pictures’ VENOM: LET THERE BE CARNAGE. (Courtesy Sony Pictures publicity)

Brock has what might have been called a monkey on his back with Venom, the alien symbote, constantly popping up, having violent fits (“Don’t throw my $2,000 TV out the window!” Brock pleads.) and continually dictating what Brock should be doing.

This relationship between two misfits constitutes the series’ running gag.

Cletus is in love with the imprisoned Frances Barrison (Naomie Harris, a long, long way from her job with MI6 as Ms. Moneypenny in the Bond series). She’s got an awfully loud scream that would do Edvard Munch proud and needs to be kept in a soundproof Plexiglas box. I believe her nickname is Shriek, which she does a lot.

The state has revived the death penalty just to be able to kill Cletus but through some twisty plotting, Cletus now has an alien symbiote occupying his body that is conveniently and accurately named Carnage.

That means many, many die as Cletus skips out of prison to reunite with Shriek, and Carnage and Venom have a battle that rivals the tediousness of Batman versus Superman years ago.

It all ends up in a church, the better to have clanging church bells — a nod to “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” perhaps?

Hardy, one of our best actors, gives Brock a dim sweetness that makes co-starring with a special effect work well.

Harrelson at 60 is made up to resemble a a 60-year-old who resembles a scary-looking 6-year-old. It’s the funniest aspect of his performance.

Michelle Williams, here with a doctor boyfriend (Reid Scott), has virtually nothing to do except let us know she has Brock’s — and Venom’s — number.

Andy Serkis, so splendid as a motion capture star, directed. The story is credited to Hardy.