Movie Review: A suburban comedy of errors unspools in the darkly excellent ‘Adulthood’

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK KENNEDY, AP Entertainment Writer

Early on in “Adulthood,” siblings Meg and Noah Robles suddenly — and unhappily — learn why they never got to have a dog growing up.

Related Articles


Robert Redford, Oscar-winning director, actor and indie patriarch, dies at 89


Emmy Awards highlights: Tramell Tillman, Colbert wins and a teen who stepped out of his comfort zone


‘The Pitt’ wins drama Emmy Award as the ‘The Studio’ breaks Emmys comedy record


Fall films 2025: Here are 44 reasons to get excited


Polly Holliday, theater star famous as the tart waitress Flo on sitcom ‘Alice,’ dies at 88

It’s not because their parents didn’t think they could handle the responsibility or because dogs can be messy. It’s because there was a body walled up in the basement.

“How could our parents act like nothing ever happened?” Noah Robles asks. “That’s worse than the killing. It’s not, but still. They called it the ‘playroom.’”

That 30-year-old corpse will soon unleash a suburban comedy of errors as the bungling brother and sister — raised on TV police procedurals — try to find a way out of this mess without losing their freedom or precarious lifestyles.

“I wrote for two seasons on ‘Blue Bloods.’ I know how cops think,” says Noah Robles, a wonderfully childlike loser played by Josh Gad. His man-boy is a failed screenwriter in an Alamo Drafthouse T-shirt with maxed out credit cards.

Director Alex Winter and screenwriter Michael M.B. Galvin combine for a pitch-perfect black comedy that has a nifty satirical edge, inverting the movie convention of discovering that the kids are monsters.

Meg — played with lovely comic timing by a languid Kaya Scodelario — brings her young children to a dangerous payoff meet because she couldn’t get child care and loses her cool when she’s mocked for missing a yoga class. “Have a good day. Make good choices,” she tells her kids even as she clearly doesn’t.

Not long after the body in the basement is found, more bodies start piling up, as does the extortion, sword play, swirling detectives and so-called heavies who look the part even if they’re really lambs. If you liked “Fargo,” “Adulthood” is for you. It’s all about the noose slowly tightening.

“Once we do this, there’s no going back, Meg. Even years from now you’ll think about it when you’re trying to get to sleep,” the brother tells his sister as they decide what to do about the body. “It’ll pop in your head at random times.”

Winter keeps the tension tight but nicely steps off the gas for some neat touches — like a conversation between the siblings about moving on that’s set against a child’s flag-football game — while both Gad and Scodelario take turns being the strong one.

He offers advice about not leaving evidence while moving a dead body — “You should put some towels down” — and she juggles mundane tasks like Zoom meetings and checking her son’s glucose levels with slamming a hammer into someone’s skull, like just another task for stressed-out parents these days.

Fitting for a movie with an actual skeleton in a closet, “Adulthood” is about legacy and how we become our parents. It’s also about recognizing that our parents are human and complicated.

Very rarely do such movies end well. They peter out or ramp up the violence to absurd and pointless levels. “Adulthood” finds the sweet spot and lands the thing perfectly. If you think Meg and Noah are monsters, what would you do in a similar situation? There are probably monsters like that everywhere. They even might be in the foldable chair next to you at the flag football game.

“Adulthood,” a Republic Pictures release that opens in select theaters on Friday and streams on Sept. 23, is rated R for “violence, language throughout, drug use and brief sexual material.” Running time: 97 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Judge blocks Trump administration from immediately deporting Guatemalan migrant children

posted in: All news | 0

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from immediately deporting Guatemalan migrant children who came to the U.S. alone back to their home country, the latest step in a court struggle over one of the most sensitive issues in Trump’s hard-line immigration agenda.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly comes after the Republican administration’s Labor Day weekend attempt to remove Guatemalan migrant children who were living in government shelters and foster care.

There was already a temporary order in place preventing the removal of Guatemalan children. But that was set to expire Tuesday. Kelly, who was appointed by Trump, granted a preliminary injunction extends that temporary protection indefinitely, although the government can appeal.

There are also temporary restraining orders in separate cases in Arizona and Illinois, but those cases are much more narrow in the scope of children they cover.

Related Articles


Federal Reserve shows unexpected unity, independence as it weathers Trump’s attacks


Trump and Starmer sign a tech deal before holding private talks on tariffs and war


Kennedy’s advisory panel is expected to vote on hepatitis B and MMRV vaccines


Federal judge orders Alabama’s largest county to redraw racially gerrymandered districts


Brothers testify about box left with them by man accused of trying to assassinate Trump

Should physicians have to see children whose parents oppose vaccinations?

posted in: All news | 0

As Florida seeks to end vaccine mandates, a behind-the-scenes debate in the medical community has been thrust into the public spotlight: Should doctors see young patients whose parents do not want them to get shots?

The decision has long rested with physicians, who say they weigh the needs of children who have no control over their families’ health care choices against their responsibility to protect their most vulnerable patients — including newborns — from potential exposure to highly contagious, preventable diseases. Many pediatricians opt to require vaccines, even posting such policies on their practice’s websites.

But doctors no longer will make the call if Florida leaders have their way. Gov. Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo said on Sept. 3 they want to end vaccine requirements in public and private spaces, including doctors’ offices.

That announcement alarmed some Central Florida pediatricians, who view requiring vaccines for diseases such as measles, polio and whooping cough as critical public health measures even as the COVID-19 pandemic made parents increasingly distrustful of vaccines and government mandates.

Dr. Pamela Trout said she asks parents who refuse to vaccinate their children to look elsewhere for their health care because she feels she needs to protect children who are too young to get the shots or can’t get them for medical reasons. That means keeping unvaccinated kids out of her waiting room.

“It’s not fair to my other patients,” said the Winter Park doctor.

But DeSantis has decried this stance as a form of “discrimination” he wants to stop.

“That is limiting people’s freedom to do what they think is right for their kids by having these restrictions,” DeSantis said during a press conference last week.

Not all vaccines required by the state may make sense, DeSantis added, citing Hepatitis B, which is often transmitted through activities like sex and needle-sharing, as an infection he did not think young children would be likely to contract.

Under current state law, doctors can turn away patients who refuse vaccines, but legislators could change that, said Lars Noah, a law professor at the University of Florida whose areas of focus include public health.

And they may have ethical reasons for doing so, he said. “To say, ‘you do it my way or I’m not going to see you anymore,’ is fairly coercive,” Noah said. “Some of these patients may not have a whole lot of choices.”

Posts from parents searching for pediatricians who take a flexible stance on vaccines are common on local social media pages.

“I have multiple children but my youngest isn’t vaccinated yet and I’m not sure when or if I want to but I don’t want to constantly be pushed every time I take my baby to the doctor,” one mother wrote on Facebook recently.

Ladapo said last week the Florida Department of Health will end state rules that mandate certain vaccines first and then work with DeSantis and the Legislature to eliminate the rest of the required shots. It’s unclear whether lawmakers would support such a change or pass a new law requiring doctors to treat unvaccinated patients.

Earlier this year, legislators failed to pass a law that would have prohibited healthcare providers and facilities from declining to treat patients based solely on vaccination status. Some lawmakers worried that the provision exposed physicians to medical malpractice lawsuits. 

During the pandemic, Florida forbade businesses from asking for proof of COVID-19 vaccination from their customers and employers from requiring their workers to get the shots. That prohibition was narrowly focused on the COVID-19 vaccines, but Noah said it shows lawmakers can stomp out vaccine mandates and could extend such a ban to health care settings.

“Doctors are subject to all kinds of intrusive state mandates these days,” Noah said. “This one strikes me as one of the least controversial that you could pick.”

But local pediatricians say lawmakers need to consider that some patients can’t get the shots for medical reasons and depend on the immunity of others to protect them.

Pediatrician Dr. Jaime Candelori at her Maitland office, on Monday, Sept. 8, 2025. (Ricardo Ramirez Buxeda/Orlando Sentinel)

“The most vulnerable kids, the ones who can’t be vaccinated, are the ones at highest risk,” said Dr. Jaime Candelori, who is based in Maitland. “As a pediatrician, as a parent, I would not send them to a school knowing not all the kids are vaccinated.”

Candelori said she works with parents who are hesitant about shots but willing to discuss the benefits, but suggests that families who are adamantly opposed to vaccines pick a different doctor.

“If parents don’t trust you to say vaccines are safe, and they’re the best method we have in preventing serious illness in kids, how can you have a relationship?” Candelori said.

Pediatrician Dr. Jaime Candelori at her Maitland office, on Monday, Sept. 8, 2025. (Ricardo Ramirez Buxeda/Orlando Sentinel)

Jessica Tillmann, a Seminole County mother of four, believes parents have the “fundamental right” to decide whether their children receive shots. Tillmann said she decided not to vaccinate her two youngest children after her second oldest had an adverse reaction after receiving a shot.

She obtained a religious exemption for her unvaccinated children, who attend a private school. Her family has been “kicked out” of several doctors’ practices because of her stance on vaccines, she said.

“I think it’s almost disturbing a pediatrician would kick out a parent for asking questions about an invasive procedure,” said Tillmann, the chair of Seminole’s Moms for Liberty chapter, a conservative parents group that formed during the pandemic. “If that is their true concern, then I would suggest that they make time in their schedule to see those patients when they know they won’t be around other patients.”

Many parents, like Tillmann, are already declining the shots. Florida, which offers parents easy-to-get religious exemptions from its current vaccine rules, saw a 20-year low in the kindergarten vaccination rate during the 2024-25 school year.

Last school year, less than 89% of Florida kindergarteners were fully immunized. That rate is well below the 95% level, sometimes referred to as herd immunity, which makes it unlikely that a single infection will spark a disease cluster or outbreak.

The lower vaccination rate alarms experts, who note there was a measles outbreak at a Broward County elementary school last year, where 33 students lacked at least one required shot, and that two unvaccinated Texas school-age children died from measles a few months later.

If the mandates go away entirely, even fewer parents will vaccinate their kids, said Dr. David Carr, a pediatrician whose practice is just south of downtown Orlando.

Carr said he sees children whose parents refuse vaccines because many of his patients are covered by Medicaid insurance plans and the rules of that program generally forbid doctors from withholding care based on their vaccination status.

But as a physician for nearly four decades, Carr described vaccines as “one of the biggest medical marvels of modern history.”

Today’s parents haven’t seen most of the diseases that shots are intended to prevent and many don’t realize how seriously ill their children could become if they’re not protected, he said.

Carr said he fears diseases like diphtheria, a respiratory infection that’s particularly dangerous for young children and older adults, could make a comeback if vaccination rates dip too low. Because Central Florida draws tourists from around the world, this area is particularly vulnerable to an outbreak, he said.

“I think the vaccine program in the United States has been so successful it’s become a victim of its own success,” he said.

The American Medical Association said last week it “strongly opposes” Florida’s plan to end all vaccine mandates. “This unprecedented rollback would undermine decades of public health progress,” it said in a statement, and put children at risk of serious illness.

However, the organization previously has urged doctors not to turn away patients who decline shots. During the pandemic, it acknowledged that many doctors were frustrated with patients who forwent the COVID-19 vaccines but said they should see them anyway.

Dr. Pam Trout at her pediatrics practice near AdventHealth Winter Park hospital, Monday, Sept. 8, 2025. Like many pediatricians, Trout has concerns about state plans to remove school vaccine mandates. (Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel)

But Trout doesn’t budge on shots. She said she knows many of her peers will make exceptions, adding she’s “one of the stricter pediatricians in town.”

“I require all vaccines on schedule and if they choose not to, I just tell them, ‘It’s been great treating you and I would love to continue, but this is my policy and I would just ask you to find a practice that’s comfortable with kids that aren’t fully vaccinated being in their office,” she said.

If Florida laws change, Trout said, her office policies “will be what is best for my patients.”

She added she thinks some parents resist vaccines because of notions about personal freedom or feelings that they should only look out for their own families.

“I don’t even think people are willing to consider the community or the greater good,” Trout said.

anmartin@orlandosentinel.com

Insurance company repeatedly denied her medical claim, then AI delivered victory

posted in: All news | 0

A correction to an earlier version of this article has been appended to the end of the article.

Health insurance giant Anthem wanted $1,800 from Lauren Gonzalves for hospital nursery services after the birth of her son. But it had been two years since the Concord mother gave birth, she had already paid her out-of-pocket maximum and she believed her policy covered the care for which Anthem repeatedly sought payment.

The situation may be unsurprising for many of those with health insurance. Health care consultancy Premier pegged the national medical claims denial rate at 15% in 2023, while independent research group KFF found insurers that sell policies under the Affordable Care Act denied one in five claims that year.

Gonzalves, however, had an advantage over many policyholders: She has a doctorate in a medical field and has worked for large health care companies for years as a clinician and scientist.

Still, she spent almost two years working to get the bill canceled, and in the end, only found rescue in an AI bot.

In a statement, Anthem said it could not comment on Gonzalves’ billing for privacy reasons.

The free conversational bot Gonzalves, 39, used for help in defending the insurance coverage for her son’s care in the hospital nursery identified a federal law and other information that supported her claim. It’s one of two primary offerings from Counterforce Health, a North Carolina-based company running an AI-based platform for challenging health-coverage denials.

Counterforce Health’s flagship product, also free, produces AI-generated letters of appeal, to be sent to insurance companies by patients fighting denials.

The platform was co-founded by Neal Shah after insurance companies denied everything from an oncologist-prescribed MRI to a life-saving drug for his 34-year-old wife as she fought cancer, he said.

“It’s absurd how many people are fighting insurance denials,” Shah said.

It appears that it’s getting worse. In a survey of 200 executives and managers at health care providers — which are reimbursed by insurers for authorized patient care claims — consumer-credit and data company Experian found that in 2024, more than three-quarters said denials were rising. Fewer than half gave that response in 2022.

Insurance companies increase profits by refusing to pay initial claims, under a “Let’s deny, and see what you do” approach, Shah said.

In California, health plans approve the vast majority of the hundreds of millions of claims received every year, according to the California Association of Health Plans, which represents insurers,

“In fact, over 85 percent of medical services and 75 percent of pharmacy services are approved immediately,” the group said this week. “When a claim is denied, it’s most often due to incomplete information that needs clarification. Most denied claims are quickly resolved.”

Shah, who works as a principal investigator at the Johns Hopkins Artificial Intelligence Collaboratory for Aging Research in Baltimore, pointed to research from KFF showing that very few people appeal denied claims, but when they do, they often succeed.

Gonzalves gave birth to her son Grant in October 2021 at a local hospital. On the payment side, all went well, until more than two years later in December 2023, when she received a hospital bill of about $9,000, with her share at $1,800.

Anthem said she had failed to appeal within 180 days of receiving the medical care, although no bill had arrived during that time, she said. Further appeals went nowhere.

“It makes you want to pull your hair out,” Gonzalves said. “It’s so frustrating. It was so stressful.”

Meanwhile, she’d had twins, Fiona and Lucas, now 2.

Lauren Gonzalves, a cancer care social worker, is seen at her home in Concord, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025. Gonzalves uses the Counterforce website, which works with AI to help individuals dispute medical bills. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)

“We had three under three and I’m literally having to fight this claim while I’m on maternity leave with my twins,” said Gonzalves, a medical social worker at Sutter Solano Cancer Care Center in Vallejo.

Then, earlier this year, a nurse friend who was doing consulting work for Counterforce Health suggested the app, and Gonzalves tried out its AI assistant, Maxwell.

The bot identified issues related to timing of billings and denials, and highlighted a federal statute concerning newborns’ coverage under mothers’ policies, essentially telling her, “These are all the reasons you should keep fighting this,” Gonzalves said.

Gonzalves also used ChatGPT, asking the chatbot how to escalate a grievance with Anthem, and receiving email addresses for people at a company handling complaints for the insurer. Within days, she was connected to an analyst — who easily found the claim Anthem had told her was inaccessibly archived — and a week later, last month, her $1,800 bill was dismissed, she said.

Insurance company denials, Shah said, should be taken as the starting point of a negotiation.

“The vast majority of the time the person is thinking, ‘I don’t have options now,’” Shah said. “Most people view it as a finality.”

Patients using the Counterforce Health appeal-letter generator upload the denial letter from their insurer, their policy documents, and any other relevant materials. The app’s AI — trained on thousands of successful appeal letters, plus insurance billing codes, and information from peer-reviewed medical journals, clinical guidelines, and state and federal regulations — scans relevant medical literature, insurance policy language, and appeal regulations, then produces an appeal letter the patient can send to the insurer, Shah said.

Because Counterforce Health doesn’t solicit results from users, Shah said he doesn’t know its success rate. But a rheumatology clinic that uses the app dozens of times a week reported success nearly three-quarters of the time, he said.

Stanford University health policy professor Maria Polyakova noted that insurance isn’t the only area with complicated, paperwork-based appeals — think the IRS or property taxes. But often, she said, “it’s just a really bad mismatch of getting into a bureaucratic nightmare in the middle of having a sickness.”

It remains to be seen whether Counterforce Health could boost the number of successful appeals, but such technology could help patients understand insurance processes that are, Polyakova said, “not particularly user friendly, in fact maybe the opposite.”