Healthy babies born in Britain after scientists used DNA from three people to avoid genetic disease

posted in: All news | 0

By MARIA CHENG and LAURA UNGAR

LONDON (AP) — Eight healthy babies were born in Britain with the help of an experimental technique that uses DNA from three people to help mothers avoid passing devastating rare diseases to their children, researchers reported Wednesday.

Related Articles


Congress targeted Planned Parenthood for defunding, but also caught a Maine health care provider


Stillwater: Silver Sobriety marks 10 years with new location, new executive director


RFK Jr. and other Trump officials embrace psychedelics after FDA setback


Insurers fight state laws restricting surprise ambulance bills


Children’s Minnesota names Dr. Emily Chapman new president and CEO

Most DNA is found in the nucleus of our cells, and it’s that genetic material — some inherited from mom, some from dad — that makes us who we are. But there’s also some DNA outside of the cell’s nucleus, in structures called mitochondria. Dangerous mutations there can cause a range of diseases in children that can lead to muscle weakness, seizures, developmental delays, major organ failure and death.

Testing during the in vitro fertilization process can usually identify whether these mutations are present. But in rare cases, it’s not clear.

Researchers have been developing a technique that tries to avoid the problem by using the healthy mitochondria from a donor egg. They reported in 2023 that the first babies had been born using this method, where scientists take genetic material from the mother’s egg or embryo, which is then transferred into a donor egg or embryo that has healthy mitochondria but the rest of its key DNA removed.

The latest research “marks an important milestone,” said Dr. Zev Williams, who directs the Columbia University Fertility Center and was not involved in the work. “Expanding the range of reproductive options … will empower more couples to pursue safe and healthy pregnancies.”

Using this method means the embryo has DNA from three people — from the mother’s egg, the father’s sperm and the donor’s mitochondria — and it required a 2016 U.K. law change to approve it. It is also allowed in Australia but not in many other countries, including the U.S.

Experts at Britain’s Newcastle University and Monash University in Australia reported in the New England Journal of Medicine Wednesday that they performed the new technique in fertilized embryos from 22 patients, which resulted in eight babies that appear to be free of mitochondrial diseases. One woman is still pregnant.

One of the eight babies born had slightly higher than expected levels of abnormal mitochondria, said Robin Lovell-Badge, a stem cell and developmental genetics scientist at the Francis Crick Institute who was not involved in the research. He said it was still not considered a high enough level to cause disease, but should be monitored as the baby develops.

Dr. Andy Greenfield, a reproductive health expert at the University of Oxford, called the work “a triumph of scientific innovation,” and said the method of exchanging mitochondria would only be used for a small number of women for whom other ways of avoiding passing on genetic diseases, like testing embryos at an early stage, was not effective.

Lovell-Badge said the amount of DNA from the donor is insignificant, noting that any resulting child would have no traits from the woman who donated the healthy mitochondria. The genetic material from the donated egg makes up less than 1% of the baby born after this technique.

“If you had a bone marrow transplant from a donor … you will have much more DNA from another person,” he said.

In the U.K., every couple seeking a baby born through donated mitochondria must be approved by the country’s fertility regulator. As of this month, 35 patients have been authorized to undergo the technique.

Critics have previously raised concerns, warning that it’s impossible to know the impact these sorts of novel techniques might have on future generations.

“Currently, pronuclear transfer is not permitted for clinical use in the U.S., largely due to regulatory restrictions on techniques that result in heritable changes to the embryo,” Williams, of Columbia, said in an email. ”Whether that will change remains uncertain and will depend on evolving scientific, ethical, and policy discussions.”

For about a decade, Congress has included provisions in annual funding bills banning the Food and Drug Administration from accepting applications for clinical research involving techniques, “in which a human embryo is intentionally created or modified to include a heritable genetic modification.”

But in countries where the technique is allowed, advocates say it could provide a promising alternative for some families.

Liz Curtis, whose daughter Lily died of a mitochondrial disease in 2006, now works with other families affected by them. She said it was devastating to be told there was no treatment for her eight-month-old baby and that death was inevitable.

She said the diagnosis “turned our world upside down, and yet nobody could tell us very much about it, what it was or how it was going to affect Lily.” Curtis later founded the Lily Foundation in her daughter’s name to raise awareness and support research into the disease, including the latest work done at Newcastle University.

“It’s super exciting for families that don’t have much hope in their lives,” Curtis said.

Ungar reported from Erie, Pennsylvania.

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

5 ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ changes to marketplace insurance

posted in: All news | 0

President Donald Trump signed his “big, beautiful bill” into law on July 4, making changes to health insurance coverage for millions of Americans.

Related Articles


Wall Street hangs near its record as PepsiCo and United Airlines offset drops for health care stocks


Fewer Americans file for jobless benefits last week as layoffs remain at historically healthy levels


Retail sales up a surprising 0.6% in June after a May pullback by consumers


Republican senators caution Trump against firing Fed chair Jerome Powell


The online gunseller with Donald Trump Jr. on its board makes its market debut. Shares plunge

If you have a marketplace health insurance plan, sometimes also known as Obamacare or Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans, your premiums might go up, and you might need to do more work to stay eligible.

Here are a few key changes to marketplace health insurance in the new law — plus one thing that went unaddressed — and what to do about them.

» MORE: What the ‘big, beautiful bill’ means for your finances

1. Premiums might get much pricier

How it works now: Premium tax credits help taxpayers afford marketplace health insurance premiums. Since 2021, “enhanced” premium tax credits have been larger and available to more people.

In states using HealthCare.gov, enhanced tax credits made subsidized premiums about $624 less expensive per year in 2024. That’s according to estimates by KFF, a health policy nonprofit.

Enhanced subsidies are set to expire after 2025. Smaller tax credits — and therefore more expensive premiums — go back into effect starting in 2026.

What’s changing: The new law was an opportunity for Congress to extend the enhanced subsidies. It did not.

If the enhanced subsidies expire, marketplace health insurance members at all income levels will pay more. Net premiums would rise by 25% to 100%, depending on income, according to estimates by the Commonwealth Fund, a health care policy think tank.

Expiring subsidies would lead to 4.2 million more people without health insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

What to do about it: It’s still possible for Congress to extend the enhanced subsidies before they expire. You can contact your members of Congress about potential changes.

If subsidies expire, you might need to budget for higher premiums. You could also consider other ways to get health insurance if marketplace plans are no longer affordable.

2. You’ll need to re-enroll for subsidies every year

How it works now: Currently, people with marketplace health insurance are automatically re-enrolled for the next year. You can also stay eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions. Eligibility is automatically checked using your original application information and updated tax data.

Nearly 11 million people were automatically re-enrolled in health insurance marketplace plans for 2025, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. That’s about 44% of total members.

What’s changing: Under the new law, your eligibility for premium tax credits and/or cost-sharing reductions doesn’t carry over from year to year.

To keep those subsidies, you’ll need to re-verify your eligibility. Otherwise, your premiums and/or out-of-pocket costs will go up — potentially by hundreds of dollars per month.

Changes go into effect starting in tax year 2028.

What to do about it: Take action each year during open enrollment, even if you want to keep the same plan. To keep your subsidies, be ready to provide information about:

Household income.
Family size.
Address.
Immigration status.
Other health coverage you have or are eligible for.

3. Enrollment will be more restricted for people with low income

How it works now: If your income is at or below 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL), you have a year-round special enrollment period. That means you can sign up for marketplace health insurance any time without waiting for open enrollment. You can also qualify for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.

What’s changing: Under the new law, if you apply during this income-based special enrollment period, you can’t qualify for premium tax credits or cost-sharing reductions. (Other types of special enrollment periods are unchanged.)

The change takes effect starting in the 2026 plan year.

What to do about it: If possible, plan to apply for coverage during open enrollment. Open enrollment in most states runs from Nov. 1 to Jan. 15. (Some state marketplaces use different dates.)

If you enroll under a different kind of special enrollment period, you could get subsidies. For example, you might qualify if you’ve lost other health coverage, moved, gotten married or divorced, or had a baby.

4. Some immigrants will lose premium tax credits

How it works now: Lawfully present immigrants can get marketplace health insurance plans. They can also qualify for subsidies.

What’s changing: Under the new law, only certain categories of immigrants qualify for marketplace coverage and subsidies:

Lawful permanent residents (green card holders).
Certain Cuban and Haitian immigrants.
Immigrants covered by a Compact of Free Association.

Others no longer qualify, even if lawfully present. Examples could include refugees, asylees and people with temporary protected status. Changes take effect starting in tax year 2027.

What to do about it: Check whether your immigration status makes you eligible for coverage and subsidies. If not, you might need to find another source of insurance.

5. Advance premium tax credits will be riskier

How it works now: Advance premium tax credits pay for some or all of your health insurance premiums. Credit amounts are based on your estimated annual income.

It’s possible for your actual income to end up higher than the estimate. If that happens, you qualify for smaller tax credits and have to pay the IRS back for the difference.

You might not have to repay the full amount. There are caps based on income. For example, an individual with income below 200% of the FPL would repay no more than $375 for 2024, according to the IRS.

What’s changing: Under the new law, there’s no cap on premium tax credit repayments. People with low or no income will have to repay the full difference in amounts starting in tax year 2026.

What to do about it: Provide the best information you can on your application about your expected income. The more accurate your estimated income, the less you might have to repay.

You can choose not to take the premium tax credit in advance. Instead, you can get the credit when you file taxes. In that case, you’d avoid the possibility of needing to repay it later. But paying full, unsubsidized premiums each month could be very expensive.

“You should be aware that the IRS routinely works with taxpayers who owe amounts they cannot afford to pay,” according to the IRS website. Consider contacting the IRS to make a payment arrangement.

Alex Rosenberg writes for NerdWallet. Email: arosenberg@nerdwallet.com.

Judge OKs release plan for woman who stabbed a classmate to please Slender Man

posted in: All news | 0

By TODD RICHMOND and CHRISTINE FERNANDO, Associated Press

A Wisconsin woman will be released from a mental hospital more than a decade after she nearly stabbed a classmate to death to please the horror character Slender Man, a judge decided Thursday.

Waukesha County Circuit Judge Scott Wagner signed off on the conditional plan to release Morgan Geyser, now 22, from the Winnebago Mental Health Institute, a psychiatric hospital where she has spent the last seven years. Another judge had ruled in January she could be released after three experts testified she has made progress battling mental illness.

In April, prosecutors objected to Geyser’s original conditional release plan after the mother of the victim, Payton Leutner, expressed concern that Geyser’s group home was located eight miles away from Leutner. The judge then ordered the Department of Health Services to draft a new plan, which was approved Thursday.

Related Articles


Puerto Rico bans hormone therapy and gender surgery for transgender youth


Wall Street hangs near its record as PepsiCo and United Airlines offset drops for health care stocks


1.4M of the nation’s poorest renters risk losing their homes with Trump’s proposed HUD time limit


Fewer Americans file for jobless benefits last week as layoffs remain at historically healthy levels


Retail sales up a surprising 0.6% in June after a May pullback by consumers

Details of the plan and the timing of her release were not shared in court, and Geyser’s attorney did not immediately respond to phone messages seeking comment.

Geyser and her friend, Anissa Weier, lured Leutner to a Waukesha park after a sleepover in 2014. Geyser stabbed Leutner 19 times while Weier egged her on. All three girls were 12 years old at the time.

Geyser and Weier fled after the attack but were arrested as they were walking on Interstate 94. They told investigators they attacked Leutner to earn the right to be Slender Man’s servants and feared he would hurt their families if they didn’t follow through. They had planned to walk to Slender Man’s mansion in northern Wisconsin after the attack, they said.

Leutner barely survived. Geyser ultimately pleaded guilty to being a party to attempted first-degree intentional homicide in 2017 but claimed she wasn’t responsible because she was mentally ill. The following year, Waukesha County Circuit Judge Michael Bohren had committed her to a psychiatric hospital for 40 years.

State health officials argued in March that Geyser couldn’t be trusted after learning that she hadn’t told her therapists that she had read a novel about murder and black market organ sales. They also alleged she had been communicating with a man who collects murder memorabilia and sent him her own sketch of a decapitated body and a postcard saying she wants to be intimate with him.

Cotton countered that Geyser only read what the facility allowed, and staff knew she had been communicating with the collector. He added that she stopped talking to the man in 2024 after she discovered he was selling things she sent him. Bohren concluded that Geyser wasn’t trying to hide anything and ordered state health officials to continue developing a release plan.

Wagner took over Geyser’s release request after Bohren retired this past April.

Weier pleaded guilty to being a party to attempted second-degree intentional homicide with a dangerous weapon in 2017, but like Geyser claimed she was mentally ill and not responsible for her actions. She was committed to 25 years in a mental hospital but was granted release in 2021 after agreeing to live with her father and to wear a GPS monitor.

The case has drawn widespread attention in part because of the girls’ fascination with the Slender Man character. Slender Man was created online by Eric Knudson in 2009 as a mysterious specter photo-edited into everyday images of children at play. He’s typically depicted as a slim, spidery figure in a black suit with a featureless white face. He has grown into a popular boogeyman and has appeared in video games, online stories and a 2018 movie.

Puerto Rico bans hormone therapy and gender surgery for transgender youth

posted in: All news | 0

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — Puerto Rico’s governor has signed a bill that prohibits hormone therapy or gender-affirming surgeries for transgender youth, a move that has drawn sharp criticism from activists in the largely conservative U.S. territory.

The law approved late Wednesday applies to those younger than 21 and calls for 15 years in prison for any violators, as well as a $50,000 penalty and the revocation of all licenses and permits of medical staff.

Related Articles


1.4M of the nation’s poorest renters risk losing their homes with Trump’s proposed HUD time limit


Fewer Americans file for jobless benefits last week as layoffs remain at historically healthy levels


Retail sales up a surprising 0.6% in June after a May pullback by consumers


Army veteran and US citizen arrested in California immigration raid warns it could happen to anyone


Today in History: July 17, Disneyland’s opening day

“Minors, having not yet reached the necessary emotional, cognitive, and physical maturity, are particularly vulnerable to making decisions that can have irreversible consequences,” the law reads. “Therefore, it is the State’s duty to ensure their comprehensive well-being.”

It also states that public funds cannot be used for such purposes.

Puerto Rico’s LGBTQ+ Federation criticized the law in a statement Thursday.

“Let there be no doubt: We will go to court to challenge the constitutionality of the governor’s cruel and inhumane signing of a law that criminalizes health professionals for caring for trans minors,” said Justin Jesús Santiago, the federation’s director.

Puerto Rico associations that represent physicians, surgeons, psychologists, social workers, lawyers and other professionals had urged the governor to veto the bill.

Roughly two dozen U.S. states have similar laws.