13 Aug 2025

Federal agents will be out 24/7 on patrol in Washington, the White House says

by | posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST and ASHRAF KHALIL

WASHINGTON (AP) — As a wary Washington waited, the White House promised a ramp-up of National Guard troops and federal officers on the streets of the nation’s capital around the clock starting Wednesday, days after President Donald Trump’s unprecedented announcement that his administration would take over the city’s police department for at least a month.

The city’s Democratic mayor and police chief framed the influx as a plus for public safety, though they said there are few hard measures for what a successful end to the operation might look like. The Republican president has said crime in the city was at emergency levels that only such federal intervention could fix even as District of Columbia leaders pointed to statistics showing violent crime at a 30-year low after a sharp rise two years ago.

For two days, small groups of federal officers have been visible in scattered areas of the city. That is about to change, the administration says.

A “significantly higher” presence of guard members was expected Wednesday night, and federal agents will be out 24/7 rather than largely at night, according to the White House. Hundreds of federal law enforcement and city police officers who patrolled the streets Tuesday night made 43 arrests, compared with about two dozen the night before.

In one neighborhood, officers from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the FBI could be seen along with the U.S. Park Police searching the car of a motorist parked just outside a legal parking area to eat takeout and drop off a friend. Two blocks away, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers gathered in a parking lot before driving off on patrol.

In other parts of the city, including those with popular nightlife hot spots, federal patrols were harder to find. At the National Mall, there was little law enforcement activity aside from Park Police cruisers pulling over a taxi driver near the Washington Monument.

Unlike in other U.S. states and cities, the law gives Trump the power to take over Washington’s police for up to 30 days. Extending his power over the city for longer would require approval from Congress, and that could be tough in the face of Democratic resistance.

Agents from various agencies including Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Park Police, and FBI, question a couple who had been parked in a car with Washington D.C. plates outside of a legal parking spot while eating McDonald’s takeout, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, in northwest Washington near Kennedy St. NW. The couple were released after a search of the car. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Agents with U.S. Customs and Border Protection as well as Metropolitan Police get into their vehicles to continue patrolling Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in northwest Washington on Kennedy St. NW. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Vehicles with law enforcement agents from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection as well as Metropolitan Police drive along Kennedy Street NW, in the early morning of Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Petworth neighborhood of Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Law enforcement agents with U.S. Customs and Border Protection as well as Metropolitan Police drive along Kennedy Street NW in a caravan, in the early morning of Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in the Petworth neighborhood of Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

1 of 4
Agents from various agencies including Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Park Police, and FBI, question a couple who had been parked in a car with Washington D.C. plates outside of a legal parking spot while eating McDonald’s takeout, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, in northwest Washington near Kennedy St. NW. The couple were released after a search of the car. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Expand

A variety of infractions are targeted

The arrests made by 1,450 federal and local officers across the city included those for suspicion of driving under the influence, unlawful entry, as well as a warrant for assault with a deadly weapon, according to the White House. Seven illegal firearms were seized.

Unlike in other U.S. states and cities, the law gives Trump the power to take over Washington’s police for up to a month. Extending Trump’s power over the city for longer would require approval from Congress, and that could be tough in the face of Democratic resistance.

The president has full command of the National Guard, but as of Tuesday evening, guard members had yet to be assigned a specific mission, according to an official who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. As many as 800 troops were expected to be mobilized in a support role to law enforcement, though exactly what form remains to be determined.

The push also includes clearing out encampments for people who are homeless, Trump has said. U.S. Park Police have removed dozens of tents since March, and plan to take out two more this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said. People are offered the chance to go to shelters and get addiction treatment, if needed, but those who refuse could be fined or jailed, she said.

City officials said they are making more shelter space available and increasing their outreach.

Related Articles


Trump pledged to move homeless people from Washington. What we know and don’t know about his plans


Judge skeptical of Trump administration’s suit against Maryland judges, will rule by Labor Day


Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine is latest chapter in Alaska’s long history — and tension — with Russia


South Korean president will meet Japanese leader ahead of summit with Trump


Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid

Violent crime has dropped in the district

The federal effort comes even after a drop in violent crime in the nation’s capital, a trend that experts have seen in cities across the U.S. since an increase during the coronavirus pandemic.

On average, the level of violence Washington remains mostly higher than averages in three dozen cities analyzed by the nonprofit Council on Criminal Justice, said the group’s president and CEO, Adam Gelb.

Police Chief Pamela Smith said during an interview with the local Fox affiliate that the city’s Metro Police Department has been down nearly 800 officers. She said the increased number of federal agents on the streets would help fill that gap, at least for now.

Mayor Muriel Bowser said city officials did not get any specific goals for the surge during a meeting with Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, and other top federal law enforcement officials Tuesday. But, she said, “I think they regard it as a success to have more presence and take more guns off the street, and we do too.”

She had previously called Trump’s moves “unsettling and unprecedented” while pointing out he was within a president’s legal rights regarding the district, which is the seat of American government but is not a state.

For some residents, the increased presence of law enforcement and National Guard troops is nerve-wracking.

“I’ve seen them right here at the subway … they had my street where I live at blocked off yesterday, actually,” Washington native Sheina Taylor said. “It’s more fearful now because even though you’re a law-abiding citizen, here in D.C., you don’t know, especially because I’m African American.”

Associated Press writers Konstantin Toropin and Will Weissert, photographer Jacquelyn Martin and video journalist River Zhang contributed to this report.

13 Aug 2025

Texas Lawmakers Push ‘Massive Secrecy Grab’ to Shield Police Files

by | posted in: All news | 0

In 1998, the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) began requiring officers to fill out reports any time they had to use force, a big step toward tracking when and why police resorted to strong-arming residents of the state’s then-third largest city. Members of the public, including reporters, could already access incident reports and offense reports—which had been public by law for decades—but these new documents could offer a more detailed look into how officers were reacting to tense situations. 

That same year, a young San Antonio Express-News reporter named John Tedesco asked to see the use of force reports, but the department declined. SAPD had tucked these particular reports away in confidential files, separate from officers’ main personnel files, shielding them from the prying eyes of the public. 

This secret file, commonly referred to as the “G-file” because of the subsection of the Texas Local Government Code that created it, was meant to be a repository for what lawmakers considered to be the most sensitive law enforcement and fire department personnel records, including those related to unsubstantiated misconduct complaints. Under Texas open records law on the books since 1973, Police officers’ general personnel files are public, but the G-file has served as a carve-out since the late ’80s. 

In 1999, the Texas Attorney General’s Office sided with the Express-News, but the San Antonio police still refused to release the documents until an appeals court finally ruled that the department had no reason to put the records in a confidential file. “San Antonio spent thousands of taxpayer dollars on legal fees to withhold information from the public—and kept losing at every turn,” Tedesco told the Texas Observer in early August. He said the records allowed him to look at trends in use-of-force data, resulting in stories about problematic officers and units, as well as analyses of racial disparities.

This legal fight exemplified what’s proven true in the ensuing decades: Allowing police departments the discretion to silo off certain parts of police personnel records is a recipe for abuse. The headlines over the San Antonio legal fight may have run alongside coverage of the coming Y2K disaster, but the issue is no thing of the past. 

In his agenda for the current special legislative session, Governor Greg Abbott called for “legislation that protects law enforcement officers from public disclosure of unsubstantiated complaints in personnel files.” Lawmakers in both chambers swiftly filed bills to meet the governor’s demand, SB 14 and HB 14—repeats of measures that failed to pass in the earlier regular session. The proposed legislation would shield large swaths of records about officers—including complaints of misconduct that didn’t result in discipline—from public view. This would allow hundreds of departments that would have previously disclosed these records to keep them secret. 

The state Senate passed SB 14 on Tuesday, but the House remains at a standstill as Democrats maintain a quorum break in protest of proposed congressional redistricting, setting up a likely additional special session (and possibly even more).

The bills, which are being presented as a way to standardize personnel records in departments across the state, are based on a model created by the regulatory agency the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE). Critics say the measure could have devastating consequences for police transparency.

“This is the most massive secrecy grab in Texas since the adoption of the Public Information Act,” Kathy Mitchell, senior advisor with the criminal justice policy nonprofit Equity Action, told the Observer. 

Transparency advocates like Mitchell point out that many Texas police departments currently operate without a G-file—and without the sky falling. Only municipalities whose voters have adopted the state’s civil service law for police and firefighters actually have the secret police files, and most of these votes occurred around the middle of the 20th century, prior to 1989 when the G-file was added to that statute. Seventy-eight Texas municipalities fall into this civil service category, including most major cities: Houston, San Antonio, and Austin—but not Dallas, where the public has access to unsubstantiated misconduct complaints.

Meanwhile, statewide groups that support the reduction in police transparency—including TCOLE and the state’s largest police union the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)—point to this very variance across cities as the reason for the current legislation. In August, SB 14 was heard before the Senate State Affairs Committee. “The legislative intent behind these model policies was to establish a standardization of the way we do things in law enforcement in certain areas where we lack standardization,” said Jennifer Szimansky, deputy executive director of CLEAT.

Throughout the hearing, lawmakers and bill proponents repeatedly stated that the measure would only protect officers’ sensitive personal information and regularize practices across the state. Prominent representatives from Dallas, the largest Texas city that doesn’t maintain a G-file, showed up to testify on the bill. Lieutenant Jonathan Blanchard with the Dallas Police Department spoke in favor, on behalf of the department, emphasizing the need to keep things like sick days and vacation time confidential. 

But the wording of the proposed legislation has raised alarms for advocates, who say it would not only spread the existing G-file system to more cities but would essentially super-size the secret file: creating a catch-all “department file” to ferret away even more information about police misconduct. The bill states the file would contain documents including “any letter, memorandum, or document relating to the license holder not included in a personnel file.”

Other opponents worried the bill would make it more difficult for citizens to successfully level complaints and that it didn’t account for all the agencies and people who should legally have access to the information, including independent oversight boards and the Legislature itself. 

“SB 14 should be named the ‘Protect Bad Cops and Let the People Eat Cake Act,’” said CJ Grisham, a retired federal agent, right-wing activist, and civil rights attorney.

The details of the legislation may still change, but underlying any minor modifications is a fundamental debate about whether unsubstantiated complaints should see the light of day. Proponents say unconfirmed complaints can show patterns of behavior on the part of an officer and the department. According to the National Police Accountability Project, most civilian complaints are deemed unsubstantiated, regardless of whether the officer violated policy. The executive director of that project, Lauren Bonds, said access only to complaints that resulted in discipline provides “a very, very small snapshot of the types of problems that people might be having.” 

Similar concerns hold for records related to county jailers. “‘Unsubstantiated’ doesn’t mean ‘false,’” said Krishnaveni Gundu, executive director of the Texas Jail Project. “‘Unsubstantiated’ could also mean ‘did not get a thorough investigation,’ or maybe ‘it wasn’t investigated at all.’”

Michael Bullock, president of the Austin Police Association, testified at the hearing that the capital city should serve as a cautionary tale about the need for legislation shielding unsubstantiated complaints. 

In 2023, local voters passed the Austin Police Oversight Act, which effectively opened up the previously confidential G-file. After about a year of pushback from the department and the police union—and following a judge’s order that the records must be released—city officials agreed to open up the G-file. This promise was written into a 5-year contract between the city and the police union, which was signed in 2024 after protracted negotiations. In his testimony, Bullock said that Austin officers “are being tried in a court of public opinion before they ever have a chance to get a fair trial” and urged state lawmakers to overrule the transparency outlined in his own union contract.

As originally filed, SB 14 contained a carve-out that specifically grandfathered in existing union contract provisions about disclosure of police files. That language was removed in committee, but the bill still allows disclosure “as required by law.” In a floor exchange that Austin state Senator Sarah Eckhardt had entered into the written record, bill author Phil King stated the new language was still meant to protect union contract provisions—including those agreed to going forward.

The post Texas Lawmakers Push ‘Massive Secrecy Grab’ to Shield Police Files appeared first on The Texas Observer.

13 Aug 2025

Floodwaters from glacier near Alaska’s capital city break record levels and prompt evacuations

by | posted in: All news | 0

By CEDAR ATTANASIO, Associated Press

Record floodwaters released by the nearby Mendenhall Glacier crested Wednesday in a river that flows through Alaska’s capital city with no immediate reports of major damage, though officials warned that high water would remain for several hours.

Juneau officials reported water pooling on a handful of streets, and some seeped under newly erected barriers designed to protect riverfront homes. Some residents in the flood zone heeded warnings and evacuated after water started escaping the glacier’s ice dam on Tuesday.

The Mendenhall Glacier is about 12 miles from Juneau, home to 30,000 people, and is a popular tourist attraction due to its proximity to Alaska’s capital city and easy access on walking trails. Homes on the city’s outskirts are within miles of Mendenhall Lake, which sits below the glacier, and many front the Mendenhall River, into which the glacial outburst is flowing.

The river hit major flood stage Wednesday morning, peaking around 8 a.m. and surpassing a flood level of 16 feet (5 meters), according to preliminary measurements, breaking a record set last year.

The map above locates Mendenhall Glacier, which has begun releasing floodwater toward Juneau, Alaska, where some areas have been urged to evacuate. (AP Digital Embed)

Basin flooding is a yearly worry

Flooding from the basin has become an annual concern since 2011, and in recent years has swept away houses and swamped hundreds of homes. Government agencies installed temporary barriers this year in hopes of protecting several hundred homes in the inundation area from widespread damage.

The flooding happens because a smaller glacier near Mendenhall Glacier retreated — a casualty of the warming climate — and left a basin that fills with rainwater and snowmelt each spring and summer. When the water creates enough pressure, it forces its way under or around the ice dam created by the Mendenhall Glacier, enters Mendenhall Lake and eventually flows down the Mendenhall River, as it did Tuesday.

Before the basin began overtopping, the water level was rising rapidly — as much as 4 feet per day during especially sunny or rainy days, according to the National Weather Service.

The city saw successive years of record flooding in 2023 and 2024 — with the river last August cresting at 15.99 feet, about 1 foot over the prior record set a year earlier — and flooding extending farther into the Mendenhall Valley. This year’s flooding had been predicted to crest at between 16.3 and 16.8 feet.

Last year, nearly 300 residences were damaged.

A large outburst can release some 15 billion gallons of water, according to the University of Alaska Southeast and Alaska Climate Adaptation Science Center. That’s the equivalent of nearly 23,000 Olympic-size swimming pools. During last year’s flood, the flow rate in the rushing Mendenhall River was about half that of Niagara Falls, the researchers say.

FILE – A canoe, bottom right, glides on Mendenhall Lake, in front of the Mendenhall Glacier, on Sunday, May 18, 2025, in Juneau, Alaska. (AP Photo/Becky Bohrer, File)
The Mendenhall Glacier is visible in the distance from a residential area, Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025, in Juneau, Alaska. (Marc Lester/Anchorage Daily News via AP)
HESCO flood barriers, to protect property against glacial outburst flooding, separate a residential area from the Mendenhall River, Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025., in Juneau, Alaska. (Marc Lester/Anchorage Daily News via AP)

1 of 3
FILE – A canoe, bottom right, glides on Mendenhall Lake, in front of the Mendenhall Glacier, on Sunday, May 18, 2025, in Juneau, Alaska. (AP Photo/Becky Bohrer, File)

Expand

A temporary levee is installed

City officials responded to concerns from property owners this year by working with state, federal and tribal entities to install a temporary levee along roughly 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) of riverbank in an attempt to guard against widespread flooding. The 10,000 “Hesco” barriers are essentially giant sandbags intended to protect more than 460 properties completely during an 18-foot flood event, said emergency manager Ryan O’Shaughnessy.

Related Articles


Trump pledged to move homeless people from Washington. What we know and don’t know about his plans


Don’t scan QR codes on unsolicited packages delivered to your house, FBI warns


Wall Street drifts around its records following a worldwide rally


Amazon expands its perishable delivery service, putting pressure on traditional grocers


‘Alligator Alcatraz’ migrant jail could halt construction over environmental concerns

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is at the start of what’s expected to be a yearslong process of studying conditions in the region and examining options for a more permanent solution, such as a levee. The timeline has angered some residents, who say it’s unreasonable.

Outburst floods are expected to continue as long as the Mendenhall Glacier acts as an ice dam to seal off the basin, which could span another 25 to 60 years, according to the university and science center researchers.

Associated Press writer Becky Bohrer in Juneau contributed to this report.

13 Aug 2025

Trump pledged to move homeless people from Washington. What we know and don’t know about his plans

by | posted in: All news | 0

By MEG KINNARD, Associated Press

President Donald Trump says homeless people in the nation’s capital will be moved far from the city as part of his federal takeover of policing in the District of Columbia and crackdown on crime.

With his exact plans unclear, there is concern among advocates and others who say there are better ways to address the issue of homelessness than clearing encampments, as the Republican administration has pledged to do.

Washington’s status as a congressionally established federal district gives Trump the opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime.

Here’s a look at what we know and what questions remain about how Trump’s actions will affect the city’s homeless population:

How many homeless people are in Washington?

It is difficult to obtain accurate counts of homeless populations.

On one day at the end of each January, municipal agencies across the United States perform what is called a “point-in-time” count aimed at capturing the total number of people in emergency shelters, transitional housing or without any housing.

The 2025 count in the district put the total at 5,138 adults and children, a 9% decrease compared with the year before, according to Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser.

Where will the city’s homeless people be taken?

It’s not entirely clear.

Trump wrote on his social media site before Monday’s news conference announcing the takeover that “The homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital.”

Asked during a media briefing at the White House on Tuesday where homeless people would be relocated, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said local police and federal agencies would “enforce the laws that are already on the books,” which, she said, “have been completely ignored.”

Citing a city regulation that she said gives local police “the authority to take action when it comes to homeless encampments,” Leavitt said homeless people “will be given the option to leave their encampment, to be taken to a homeless shelter, to be offered addiction or mental health services.” Those who refuse “will be susceptible to fines or to jail time.”

In the past five months, the U.S. Park Police has removed 70 homeless encampments, giving the people living in them the same options, she said. As of Tuesday, Leavitt said only two homeless encampments remained in district parks maintained by the National Park Service and would be removed this week.

Caroline McIntyre, left, who is homeless, carries her belongings past the Kennedy Center, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in northwest Washington, as President Donald Trump makes an appearance there. She says her tent and belongings were taken from her last month in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

What are city officials doing for the homeless?

District officials said Tuesday they were making additional shelter space available after Trump said federal agents would remove homeless people in the city.

Kevin Donahue, the city administrator, said outreach workers were visiting homeless encampments and that the city has a building available that could house as many as 200 people, if needed.

Donahue made the comments during a conversation with community advocates and Bowser. The conversation was broadcast on X.

He said the outreach would continue through the week with a “greater level of urgency.”

Bowser said that when Trump sees homeless encampments in the city it “triggers something in him that has him believing our very beautiful city is dirty, which it is not.”

What are Washington residents saying?

Washington residents emphasized reductions in crime in recent years and concerns over the removal of homeless encampments in interviews Tuesday criticizing the federal takeover of the city’s police department.

Jeraod Tyre, who has lived in the city for 15 years, said “crime has been slowing down lately” and argued that federal troops would only escalate tensions because they do not have “relationships with the people in the community” like local police do.

Sheiena Taylor, 36, said she is more fearful as a result of the presence of federal forces in the city where she was born and raised.

Taylor said she has seen federal officers around her home and on the subway and worries about their targeting of young people and people experiencing homelessness.

“Being homeless isn’t a crime,” she said, emphasizing the need for solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime rather than policing.

What do we still not know?

It’s not exactly clear what agents specifically will be tasked with moving homeless people to areas outside the city.

Related Articles


South Korean president will meet Japanese leader ahead of summit with Trump


Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid


Leaving a top Trump administration post? The president may have an ambassadorship for you


FEMA abruptly disbands youth advisory council, but students say their climate advocacy won’t stop


Trump names Strait, Stallone and Kiss for Kennedy Center Honors and says he’ll host the awards show

There also hasn’t been detailed information about how the people will be housed or provided for in new locations.

Some advocates have raised constitutional questions about the legality of forcibly removing homeless people from the city.

Associated Press writers River Zhang, Christine Fernando, Mike Balsamo and Darlene Superville contributed to this report.

Kinnard can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP