Thune says a shutdown can still be avoided if Democrats ‘dial back’ their demands

posted in: All news | 0

By MARY CLARE JALONICK, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is rejecting Democratic demands on health care as unserious but says a government shutdown is still “avoidable” despite sharp divisions ahead of Wednesday’s funding deadline.

“I’m a big believer that there’s always a way out,” the South Dakota Republican said in an interview with The Associated Press on Thursday. “And I think there are off-ramps here, but I don’t think that the negotiating position, at least at the moment, that the Democrats are trying to exert here is going to get you there.”

Sen. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., speaks during a news conference after a policy luncheon at the Capitol, Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

Thune said Democrats are going to have to “dial back” their demands, which include immediately extending health insurance subsidies and reversing the health care policies in the massive tax bill that Republicans passed over the summer. Absent that, Thune said, “we’re probably plunging forward toward the shutdown.”

It’s just the latest standoff in Washington over government funding, stretching back through several administrations. President Donald Trump was the driving force behind the longest shutdown ever during his first term, as he sought money for a U.S.-Mexico border wall. This time it is Democrats who are making demands as they face intense pressure from their core supporters to stand up to the Republican president and his policies.

Democrats have shown little signs of relenting, just before spending runs out Wednesday. Their position remained the same even after the White House Office of Management and Budget on Wednesday released a memo that said agencies should consider a “reduction in force” for many federal programs if the government closes — meaning thousands of federal workers could be permanently laid off.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the OMB memo was simply an “attempt at intimidation” and predicted the “unnecessary firings will either be overturned in court or the administration will end up hiring the workers back.”

Thune stopped short of criticizing the White House threat of mass layoffs, saying the situation remains “a hypothetical.” Still, he said no one should be surprised by the memo as “everyone knows Russ Vought,” the head of the Office of Management and Budget, and his longtime advocacy for slashing government.

“But it’s all avoidable,” Thune said. “And so if they don’t want to go down that path, there’s a way to avoid going down that path.”

One way to avoid a shutdown, Thune said, would be for enough Democrats to vote with Republicans for a stripped-down “clean” bill to keep the government open for the next seven weeks while negotiations on spending continue. That’s how Republicans avoided a shutdown in March, when Schumer and several other Democrats decided at the last minute to vote with Republicans — to great political cost when Schumer’s party then revolted.

Related Articles


Trump holds talks with Pakistan’s prime minister in the latest sign of warming relations


Trump to put import taxes on pharmaceutical drugs, kitchen cabinets, furniture and heavy trucks


Ex-FBI Director James Comey indicted after Trump pushes for prosecution of longtime foe


Trump says he will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank


Trump signs executive order supporting proposed deal to put TikTok under US ownership

A seven-week funding bill has already passed the House.

“What would eight Democrats be willing to support?” Thune asked. “In terms of a path forward, or at least understanding what that path forward looks like.”

Republicans in the 100-member Senate need at least seven Democrats to vote with them to get the 60 votes necessary for a short-term funding package, and they may lose up to two of their own — Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul of Kentucky both opposed it in preliminary votes last week. A competing bill from Democrats also fell well short of 60 votes.

Thune suggested some individual bipartisan bills to fund parts of the government for the next year could be part of a compromise, “but that requires cooperation from both sides,” he said.

Democrats say they are frustrated that Thune hasn’t approached them to negotiate — and that Trump abruptly canceled a meeting with Schumer and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York that had been scheduled for this week. Trump wrote on social media, “I have decided that no meeting with their Congressional Leaders could possibly be productive.”

Thune said he “did have a conversation with the president” and offered his opinion on the meeting, which he declined to disclose. “But I think the president speaks for himself, and I think he came to the conclusion that that meeting would not be productive,” Thune said.

Still, he says he thinks Trump could be open to a negotiation on the expanded health care subsidies that expire at the end of the year if Democrats weren’t threatening a shutdown. Many people who receive the subsidies through the marketplaces set up by the Affordable Care Act are expected to see a sharp rise in premiums if Congress doesn’t extend them.

Some Republicans have agreed with Democrats that keeping the subsidies is necessary, but Thune says “reform is going to have to be a big part of it.” Democrats are likely to oppose such changes.

By Monday, when the Senate returns to session, lawmakers will have just over 24 hours to avoid federal closures.

Thune said he intends to bring up the bills that were rejected last week. “They’ll get multiple chances to vote,” he said, before a government shutdown begins at midnight Wednesday.

He said he hopes “cooler heads will prevail.”

“I don’t think shutdowns benefit anybody, least of all the American people,” Thune said.

The Loop NFL Picks: Week 4

posted in: All news | 0

Vikings vs. Steelers (+1½)
The NFL North co-leaders begin their two-week European adventure in Dublin against Aaron Rodgers and the Steelers. Irish football fans are very similar to their American counterparts in that they share a common nausea when the Pittsburgh quarterback opens his mouth.
Pick: Vikings by 3

Aaron Rodgers #8 of the Pittsburgh Steelers is sacked by Milton Williams #97 of the New England Patriots during the first half at Gillette Stadium on Sept. 21, 2025 in Foxborough, Massachusetts. (Photo by Jaiden Tripi/Getty Images)

Bengals at Broncos (-7½)
The Bengals suffered their worst loss ever last Sunday, falling by 38 points to the Vikings. Sports historians believe the debacle may have been the most disgraceful thing ever endured by Cincinnati fans that didn’t involve Pete Rose.
Pick: Broncos by 3

Ivan Pace Jr. #0 of the Minnesota Vikings tackles Jake Browning #6 of the Cincinnati Bengals during the first half at U.S. Bank Stadium on Sept. 21, 2025 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Photo by Adam Bettcher/Getty Images)

Packers at Cowboys (+6½)
It will be Micah Parsons Day in JerryWorld as the all-pro edge rusher returns just weeks after Jerry Jones traded him for scraps. Green Bay mavens are so excited that they immediately forgot all about last Sunday’s abomination in Cleveland.
Pick: Packers by 11

Micah Parsons #1 of the Green Bay Packers in action against the Washington Commanders at Lambeau Field on Sept. 11, 2025 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)

Eagles at Buccaneers (+3½)
Tampa Bay improved to 3-0 last Sunday wearing its 50th anniversary throwbacks with the creamsicle-faced Buccaneer on their helmet. The logo is quite dated, as it was used in those days where having an orange face was not necessarily a sign of low IQ.
Pick: Buccaneers by 3

Mike Evans #13 and Baker Mayfield #6 of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers celebrate after a touchdown during the second quarter against the New York Jets at Raymond James Stadium on Sept. 21, 2025 in Tampa, Florida. (Photo by Julio Aguilar/Getty Images)

Ravens at Chiefs (+2½)
Baltimore’s Derrick Henry threw a helmet-slamming fit after another key fumble of his that led to another Ravens loss. Normally, if you want to see grown adults throwing tantrums like toddlers, you’d have to watch the House of Representatives on C-SPAN.
Pick: Ravens by 3

Baltimore’s Derrick Henry shows a high level of disenchantment on the sidelines after his critical fumble Monday night against Detroit. (Screen grab from YouTube)

Chargers at Giants (+5½)
New York lost to Kansas City on Monday night, dropping the Giants’ record to 2-20 in evening games over the past six seasons. So they’re switching to rookie Jaxson Dart at quarterback this week, because Russell Wilson now sucks both day and night.
Pick: Chargers by 11

Russell Wilson #3 of the New York Giants sacked by Chris Jones #95 of the Kansas City Chiefs during the third quarter at MetLife Stadium on Sept. 21, 2025 in East Rutherford, New Jersey. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Commanders at Falcons (+2½)
Atlanta reportedly is still asking for an exorbitant price to trade former Vikings QB Kirk Cousins. But so far the best offer they’ve gotten, from an unnamed team, is an exchange of the veteran quarterback for a 1974 Chevy Vega.
Pick: Commanders by 3

Kirk Cousins #18 of the Atlanta Falcons participates in warmups prior to the NFL Preseason 2025 game against the Dallas Cowboys at AT&T Stadium on Aug. 22, 2025 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Stacy Revere/Getty Images)

Jets at Dolphins (-2½)
Two winless teams battling to avoid the AFC East basement are slated to stink up ESPN’s premium Monday night time slot. This game is such a dog that Disney is considering taking the game broadcast off the air and replacing it with Jimmy Kimmel re-runs.
Pick: Dolphins by 3

Miami Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa, right, sits on the bench during the second half of an NFL football game against the Buffalo Bills in Orchard Park, N.Y., Thursday, Sept. 18, 2025. (AP Photo/Adrian Kraus)

Colts at Rams (-3½)
The Rams, and many bettors, lost big time when their try for a game-winning field goal turned into a pointspread-flipping, blocked-kick touchdown by the Eagles. That result will mean more cash for seedy gambling sites to spend on tedious Kevin Hart-LeBron James commercials.
Pick: Rams by 7

Jordan Davis #90 of the Philadelphia Eagles returns a blocked field goal for a touchdown against the Los Angeles Rams during the fourth quarter at Lincoln Financial Field on Sept. 21, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images)

Saints at Bills (-15½)
Winless New Orleans broke out its alternate white helmets in Week 3 for its loss in Seattle. The blank shade matches perfectly the white flags the Saints waved when crafting their 2025 roster.
Pick: Bills by 21

Tyler Shough #6 of the New Orleans Saints in action against the Seattle Seahawks at Lumen Field on Sept. 21, 2025 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)

Jaguars at 49ers (-3½)
San Francisco’s Nick Bosa suffered a season-ending knee injury, a severe blow to the 49ers’ defense. He received many online condolences, including one from President Trump, urging Bosa to avoid taking Tylenol and “tough it out.”
Pick: 49ers by 7

San Francisco 49ers defensive end Nick Bosa (97) lies down on the sideline during an NFL football game against the Arizona Cardinals, Sunday, Sept. 21, 2025, in Santa Clara, Calif. (AP Photo/Scot Tucker)

Other games

Browns at Lions (-8½)
Pick: Lions by 7

Titans at Texans (-6½)
Pick: Texans by 3

Panthers at Patriots (-4½)
Pick: Panthers by 3

Bears at Raiders (-1½)
Pick: Raiders by 7

Record

Andre Szmyt #25 of the Cleveland Browns celebrates with teammates after kicking the game winning field goal against the Green Bay Packers during the fourth quarter at Huntington Bank Field on Sept. 21, 2025 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)

Last week
11-5 straight up
11-5 vs. spread

Season
34-14 straight up (.708)
30-18 vs. spread (.625)

All-time (2003-25)
3853-2115 straight up (.646)
2940-2897-145 vs spread (.504)

You can hear Kevin Cusick on Thursdays on Bob Sansevere’s “BS Show” podcast on iTunes. You can follow Kevin on X — @theloopnow. He can be reached at kcusick@pioneerpress.com.

Related Articles


The Loop Fantasy Football Report Week 4: Time to panic over struggling standouts?


The Loop Fantasy Football Update Week 3: Last-minute moves


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 3


The Loop Fantasy Football Update Week 2: Last-minute moves


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 2

Carson Wentz or J.J. McCarthy? Vikings will soon have a decision to make

posted in: All news | 0

There was a quiet confidence about veteran quarterback Carson Wentz at TCO Performance Center as he stood at the podium reserved for the man starting under center.

He acknowledged that he left some meat on the bone last weekend in Minnesota’s 48-10 victory over the Cincinnati Bengals. He vowed to be better this weekend against the Pittsburgh Steelers in Dublin, Ireland.

“There are definitely some things to clean up,” Wentz said. “It was far from perfect.”

Wentz was wasn’t spectacular in the blowout win, but he didn’t need to be.

All the Vikings needed Wentz to do while filling in for injured quarterback J.J. McCarthy was keep the train on the tracks, and that’s exactly what he did. He completed 14 of 20 pass attempts for 173 yards and a pair of touchdowns while looking the part of somebody who has started nearly 100 games in the NFL.

The poise that Wentz displayed was enough to ask whether the Vikings are still fully committed to McCarthy as their starter when he recovers from his high ankle sprain.

That head coach Kevin O’Connell was noncommittal in his answer to that question kept the door open for a potential quarterback controversy down the road.

As for his evaluation of Wentz, in particular, O’Connell was effusive in his praise, highlighting some of the fundamentals, like his capacity to go through his progression in the pocket and ability to throw with anticipation when attacking the intermediate part of the field.

“He was very sharp,” O’Connell said. “I just thought he did a really nice job of playing point guard.”

The way that Wentz played the position looked much different than how McCarthy played the position in the Vikings’ first two games.

The most glaring difference was decisiveness. Wentz’s average time from snap to throw was 2.43 seconds, according to Next Gen Stats, while McCarthy’s average time from snap to throw was 3.15 seconds.

That’s a lifetime in the NFL when pass rushers are trying to get home.

“He was getting the ball out of his hands,” offensive coordinator Wes Phillips said when asked about Wentz. “I think the more he plays, the more comfortable he’ll be.”

Some of the comfort Wentz had when dropping back to pass can be chalked up to the return of star left tackle Christian Darrisaw. To make it all about that, however, wouldn’t be giving Wentz enough credit for how he was consistently able to play in rhythm.

“That can be an incredible weapon for a quarterback,” O’Connell said. “I think there’s value in J.J. seeing that.”

The willingness that McCarthy has shown to continue to learn despite his high ankle sprain is a good sign.

“That’s the something we love about him,” O’Connell said. “He’s going to find positives even in a situation where he can’t be on the field. ”

Though it’s still unclear how much longer Wentz will be the starter, he’s doing everything in his power to learn the ins and outs of the offense. Playing for his sixth team in six years, he has leaned heavily on O’Connell, Phillips and quarterbacks coach Josh McCown, among others, while also relying on some of his past experiences to give him an edge.

“There’s still a lot of carry over in this system to other teams I’ve been on,” said Wentz, the second overall draft pick in 2016. “Even if it might be called something different, and there might be little nuances and intricacies … throwing into a zone versus Cover 3 is still the same window.”

The opportunity in front of him isn’t lost on Wentz, who has earned the reputation of a journeyman, having played for the Philadelphia Eagles, Indianapolis Colts, Washington Commanders, Los Angeles Rams, and Kansas City Chiefs in his career.

As he prepared to start for the Vikings last week, Wentz noted it had been a few years since he had played in a game of consequence. What’s it been like for him this week preparing for another game of consequence?

“Fun,” Wentz said with a smile. “I did this for quite a long time leading up until the little hiatus.”

There’s a chance he’ll get to continue doing it for the Vikings moving forward.

Related Articles


Jordan Addison returns from suspension ready to produce for the Vikings


Isaiah Rodgers named NFC Defensive Player of the Week


The Loop Fantasy Football Report Week 4: Time to panic over struggling standouts?


Mizutani: Jordan Mason can lead the Vikings, no matter who’s quarterback


Vikings rookie Donovan Jackson will miss time after having wrist surgery

Elizabeth Shackelford: Commentary: Why we need dissent

posted in: All news | 0

Last week, I began teaching a new undergraduate course on “Dissent and Democracy in the World.” I started developing the course over a year ago, convinced that the subject is not only essential to well-functioning communities, but also not well understood or appreciated in American society today.

When the class began, our country looked different than it did when I started down this path.

During my lifetime, I’ve taken for granted that I could speak out freely in this country. I could share views that did not align with my employer’s position or the prevailing view in my community. I could openly object to the positions of the church my family attended. I could publish my opinions in a newspaper or on social media. I might lose friends or ostracize family. I might not be invited back to someone’s house. I might not get hired for a dream job or could even lose a job or a promotion.

But never before had I been afraid that speaking my opinion or voicing my moral objections to the actions of other groups, individuals or my government would risk my government coming after my job, my finances or my freedom.

What we heard from officials of the Donald Trump administration recently were direct threats against free speech and, specifically, dissent. Vice President JD Vance told members of the public to watch their fellow citizens and report their unpalatable opinions to their employer. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, without evidence, called left-wing political organizations terrorist groups and vowed to use law enforcement to go after them “to take away your money, take away your power, and if you’ve broken the law, take away your freedom.”

Our legal system has painstakingly determined the narrow range of speech that is not legally protected, such as speech that is intended to — and in fact does — incite imminent lawless action. But the clear subtext here is that you do not have to break the law to come under attack from this government.

The threats are so vague, and government power so extensive, that this will undoubtedly drive widespread self-censorship and suppress free expression across many communities out of fear. One need not eradicate all dissent to be effective. Punishing a few will quiet many.

Fear is already having this impact, as corporations preempt government suppression by doing so on their own. Canceling comedians the president has lambasted is only a start.

We can no longer take our freedom of speech for granted under these circumstances. That will not only cost us our personal freedom, but it will cost society too.

Dissent is nothing more than the expression of an opinion that varies from the prevailing or traditional view or the position held by those in power. That expression can come in a variety of ways, such as speaking up in a group, filing an official complaint, writing or publishing those views, or demonstrating and rallying to draw attention to them. Most dissent is conducted to push back on the status quo or widely accepted beliefs in an effort to bring about change.

Our First Amendment exists explicitly to protect the expression of dissenting opinions. Our Founding Fathers did not put it there to protect our right to agree with our government.

But dissent is hard under the best of circumstances, even when it doesn’t risk the government’s ire. Social pressure and human nature are natural obstacles to expressing dissent in our everyday lives. Groups prefer and reward consensus. Authorities prefer and reward compliance. Speaking out to express different views is always uncomfortable, even within a democracy that protects free speech fervently. But we lose a lot when people do not dissent. Groupthink, affirmation bias and collective blind spots have led to all manners of disasters in the past.

The corporate culture of Enron in 2001 discouraged its employees from questioning the company’s practices, leading to the biggest corporate collapse in U.S. history. The Challenger space shuttle disaster in 1986 came after warnings from engineers were repeatedly suppressed and ignored. The Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 inspired the term “groupthink” because it was such a clear example of how the desire for consensus overrode the concerns many had but kept quiet.

Each of these examples happened in our open democracy, at a time when dissent was uncomfortable but not dangerous. To the contrary, the absence of dissent was the danger.

This is why communities, organizations, businesses and governments benefit not only when dissent is allowed, but also when it is actively encouraged and cultivated. Even if a dissenting perspective isn’t correct or better, dissent brings different views to the fore so that they can be debated, and that improves and sharpens arguments, options and outcomes.

Free speech has always been a threat to power, though, which is why protecting it within our Constitution was so essential.

When an authority is actively suppressing or punishing speech itself, the space open to debate gets much smaller very quickly. That harms outcomes and raises risks. And that is where our country is heading today.

Elizabeth Shackelford is a program director with the Institute for Global Affairs and a foreign affairs columnist for the Chicago Tribune. She also is a distinguished lecturer with the Dickey Center at Dartmouth College. She was previously a U.S. diplomat and is the author of “The Dissent Channel: American Diplomacy in a Dishonest Age.” 

Related Articles


Andreas Kluth: The US assault on the UN rests on a tragic misunderstanding


Lisa Jarvis: Trump’s Tylenol briefing peddled junk science


Bret Stephens: Now the left cares about free speech again


Commentary: Why the government’s subversion of data is so dangerous


Noah Feldman: Blaming violence on free speech is a very old trick