Boat strikes, warships and Venezuela rhetoric raise questions about Trump’s goals

posted in: All news | 0

By BEN FINLEY, KONSTANTIN TOROPIN and REGINA GARCIA CANO, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has dispatched a fleet of American warships into the waters off Venezuela, bragged about fatal strikes on alleged drug boats and claimed Venezuela will pay an “incalculable” price if it won’t accept more people deported from the U.S.

Related Articles


Arizona judge blocks Trump administration from deporting migrant Guatemalan and Honduran children


Thune says a shutdown can still be avoided if Democrats ‘dial back’ their demands


Trump holds talks with Pakistan’s prime minister in the latest sign of warming relations


Trump to put import taxes on pharmaceutical drugs, kitchen cabinets, furniture and heavy trucks


Ex-FBI Director James Comey indicted after Trump pushes for prosecution of longtime foe

The unusual naval buildup off South America has stoked fears of invasion in Venezuela and speculation that Trump could try to topple its authoritarian president, Nicolás Maduro, who has lost support in his own country and faces charges of narcoterrorism in the U.S.

At the same time, experts say the flotilla isn’t big enough for a land offensive against a country twice the size of California. It all raises questions about U.S. intentions.

“Although the armada in the Caribbean is significant, it’s not what you would need to actually invade,” said Brian Finucane, a senior adviser with the International Crisis Group and a former State Department lawyer. He didn’t see Trump having “the stomach” for that big of a step, saying the president “likes performative military action, particularly strikes on supposed terrorists.”

The deadly boat strikes and naval buildup have raised questions in Congress and some countries about Trump’s goals in the region and whether they stretch beyond what he says is stemming the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. Some lawmakers and rights groups have questioned the legality of using deadly military attacks against alleged drug traffickers, while voicing concerns over how much force Trump may choose to deploy without congressional approval.

“We’ve recently begun using the supreme power of the United States military to destroy Venezuelan terrorists and trafficking networks led by Nicolás Maduro,” Trump said at the U.N. this week. “To every terrorist thug smuggling poisonous drugs into the United States of America, please be warned that we will blow you out of existence.”

Legal authorization for further force isn’t clear

If Trump decided to order missile strikes into Venezuela or small raids, which experts say would likely target drug cartels instead of the Maduro government itself, that would still be a major provocation.

“A quick strike against the Venezuelan Ministry of Defense or something just doesn’t really help you very much,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a retired Marine colonel. “It’s not going to overturn the regime. It’s not going to energize the opposition. And it just stirs up the hornet’s nest.”

Senators from both parties view the strikes as potential presidential overreach, while Democrats in the House and Senate have introduced War Powers Resolutions that would require a halt to military actions without further approvals.

Rep. Greg Casar, a Texas Democrat, said Trump “cannot be allowed to drag the United States into another endless war with his reckless actions.”

The Trump administration has claimed self-defense as a justification, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio arguing the drug cartels “pose an immediate threat” to the nation.

The administration has declared several drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, while congressional authorization for military force remains in effect for the so-called Global War on Terror. The administration could try to rely on that authorization, but it would most certainly face objections in Congress.

“Sinking the odd boat is a big deal, but it’s fairly consistent with the types of actions we’ve taken against terrorists without too much controversy,” said Bradley Martin, a senior policy researcher at RAND and a retired Navy captain.

“Start attacking camps, and pretty soon we’re at a level of force where there’s no legal underpinning for it,” Martin said. “Even with a large-scale raid, we’re starting to get past the point of self-defense.”

US forces in the Caribbean

The U.S. Navy has eight warships with over 5,000 sailors and Marines in the region: three destroyers, three amphibious assault ships, a cruiser and a smaller ship designed for combat in shallow waters, U.S. defense officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the ongoing situation in greater detail.

Destroyers and cruisers typically deploy with Tomahawk cruise missiles, which can strike targets hundreds of miles away. A U.S. Navy submarine, the USS Newport News, also is operating in the broader area of South America and is capable of launching the cruise missile, the officials said.

The amphibious assault ships are carrying nearly 2,000 Marines and a variety of Marine helicopters, Osprey tilt rotor aircraft and Harrier jets. The military planned to send 10 advanced F-35 stealth fighter jets to Puerto Rico, with some arriving last week, officials said.

Trump warns Venezuela

The White House has so far announced three fatal strikes against vessels it says were smuggling drugs bound for American communities. It claimed two came from Venezuela.

After posting a video of the latest strike last week, Trump shifted the conversation to the removal of Venezuelan nationals from the U.S.

Deportation flights to Venezuela have continued despite the American warships. Facing pressure from the White House, Maduro did away this year with his longstanding policy of not accepting deportees from the U.S.

Still, Trump told the Venezuelan government in a post Sunday to immediately accept prisoners and “people from mental institutions.”

“GET THEM THE HELL OUT OF OUR COUNTRY, RIGHT NOW, OR THE PRICE YOU PAY WILL BE INCALCULABLE!” he wrote.

Asked by a reporter what he meant, Trump said, “You’re gonna have to figure that out.”

Some administration officials likely hope the U.S. military’s presence will cause Maduro to step aside or embolden his opponents, but it “isn’t likely to play out that way,” said Finucane of the International Crisis Group.

But Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, a Florida Republican, insisted that Maduro is down to three options:

“Get out, rot in jail for the rest of his life like Noriega, or end up like Soleimani (in ashes and in a plastic bag),” the lawmaker, an outspoken supporter of Venezuela’s political opposition, said in an interview he posted on social media.

Manuel Noriega was a Panamanian dictator ousted by the U.S. military in a 1989 invasion who spent in the following decades in prisons before his death. Qassem Soleimani was an Iranian general killed in a 2020 drone strike in Iraq ordered by Trump.

Maduro ‘activates’ militia

Maduro and other government officials have rejected claims that Venezuela is a crucial link in the drug trade. They also said the U.S. military’s operation is an attack on their sovereignty and part of an overthrow attempt.

FILE – Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro points at a map of the Americas during a new conference in Caracas, Venezuela, Sept 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Jesus Vargas), File

A key component of Venezuela’s defense is a civilian militia, with Maduro claiming 6 million of its members have been “activated.”

That figure could not be verified, but public support for the government has plummeted further after credible evidence showed Maduro lost last year’s presidential election.

The nation’s military gathered with Venezuelans in plazas, streets, ports and beaches recently as part of an effort that Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López said was meant to train the militia.

FILE – Venezuelan Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez speaks during military exercises in Caracas, Venezuela, Sept. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos, File)

In the state of La Guaira, which includes the country’s main airport, Gov. José Alejandro Terán said exercises included training on an anti-aircraft defense system.

“We have identified all the approach routes and built a roadblock defense system backed by a heavy artillery system,” he told state television.

Finley reported from Norfolk, Virginia, and Garcia Cano from Caracas, Venezuela. Associated Press writer Lisa Mascaro in Washington contributed to this report.

Arizona judge blocks Trump administration from deporting migrant Guatemalan and Honduran children

posted in: All news | 0

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — A federal judge in Arizona on Thursday temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from immediately deporting dozens of Guatemalan and Honduran children who came to the U.S. alone.

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Márquez in Tucson granted a preliminary injunction, citing concerns about the steps the government had taken to prepare to deport the children.

Related Articles


Trump holds talks with Pakistan’s prime minister in the latest sign of warming relations


Trump to put import taxes on pharmaceutical drugs, kitchen cabinets, furniture and heavy trucks


Ex-FBI Director James Comey indicted after Trump pushes for prosecution of longtime foe


Trump says he will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank


Trump signs executive order supporting proposed deal to put TikTok under US ownership

“The foundation of Defendants’ argument for their authority to transport Plaintiffs out of the United States is that Defendants are reuniting Plaintiff Children with parents abroad, but counsel could not identify a single instance of coordination between a parent and any government—American or Guatemalan,” she wrote.

The ruling extends the protection for the children living in shelters or foster care after Márquez issued a temporary restraining order over Labor Day weekend. The order was meant to keep the children from being removed until at least Sept. 26.

The lawsuit was filed by the Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project on behalf of 57 Guatemalan children and another 12 from Honduras between the ages 3 and 17.

The White House did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press requesting comment.

This lawsuit and a related one in Washington were filed in response to the Trump administration’s work to quickly deport Guatemalan migrant children.

Last month, the administration notified shelters — where migrant children traveling alone initially live after they cross the U.S.-Mexico border — that they were going to take them back to Guatemala and that they must be ready in a matter of hours. Many children got as far as boarding planes in Texas on the morning of Aug. 31 and were set to depart to Guatemala.

The Arizona lawsuit is asking for the government to give the children the chance to present their cases and have access to legal counsel. It also wants the children placed in the least restrictive setting that is in their best interest.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has pushed back, saying it is trying to reunite the children with their families, which is in the kids’ best interest and at the behest of the Guatemalan government.

Hungary’s Orbán tells Trump that dropping Russian energy would bring economy ‘to its knees’

posted in: All news | 0

By JUSTIN SPIKE, Associated Press

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said Friday that Hungary will continue to source fossil fuels from Russia despite demands from his ally U.S. President Donald Trump, and that he’d informed the president that dropping Russian energy would be a “disaster” for Hungary’s economy.

Hungary remains one of the only countries in Europe to continue purchasing Russian oil and natural gas following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. But Trump, an admirer of the long-serving Hungarian leader, earlier this month called on all NATO countries including Hungary to cease purchasing Russian oil, since he believes the Russia-Ukraine war would end if they did so.

In comments to state radio on Friday, Orbán said he recently told Trump that that dropping Russian energy imports would be an economic “disaster” for Hungary.

Related Articles


Today in History: September 26, Biosphere 2 stay begins in Arizona


Trump holds talks with Pakistan’s prime minister in the latest sign of warming relations


Microsoft reduces Israel’s access to cloud and AI products over reports of mass surveillance in Gaza


Apple says EU’s sweeping digital rules delay new features for Europeans and seeks their repeal


Trump says he will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank

“I told the U.S. president … that if Hungary is cut off from Russian oil and natural gas, immediately, within a minute, Hungarian economic performance will drop by 4%,” Orbán said. “It means the Hungarian economy would be on its knees.”

Despite three years of efforts by European Union countries to wean off of Russian energy supplies — an effort to deprive President Vladimir Putin of revenue that helps fuel the war in Ukraine — Hungarian officials have insisted that geographical and infrastructural constraints make it nearly impossible to transition to using fossil fuels supplied from the West.

However, other countries in the region, including the similarly landlocked Czech Republic, have managed to fully cease their purchases of Russian oil since Moscow launched its invasion. Slovakia, which neighbors Hungary, has also maintained its Russian energy imports.

Yet despite pressure from the EU and the Trump administration, Orbán, widely considered the EU leader with the closest relationship to the Kremlin, said Friday that when it comes to energy sources, “It is clear what is in Hungary’s interest and we will act accordingly.”

Hungary and the United States, he said, “are sovereign countries. There is no need for either of us to accept the arguments of the other. America has its arguments and interests, and Hungary does too.”

European defense ministers are holding ‘drone wall’ talks as airspace violations mount

posted in: All news | 0

By LORNE COOK, Associated Press

BRUSSELS (AP) — Defense ministers from European countries with borders close to Russia and Ukraine held talks on Friday about building a “drone wall” to plug gaps in their defenses following several airspace violations.

Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland have been working on a drone wall project, but in March, the European Union’s executive branch rejected a joint Estonia-Lithuania request for funds to set one up.

Ukrainian soldiers prepare to launch an Avenger UAV drone in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2025. ( AP Photo/Yevhen Titov)

Since then, Europe’s borders have been increasingly tested by rogue drones. Russia has been blamed for some of the incidents, but denies that anything was done on purpose or that it played a role.

NATO jets scrambled on Sept. 10 to shoot down a number of Russian drones that breached Polish airspace, in an expensive response to a relatively cheap threat. Airports in Denmark were temporarily closed this week after drones were flown nearby.

EU Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius chaired Friday’s talks. The meeting, via video-link, included those countries plus officials from Bulgaria, Denmark, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, along with representatives from Ukraine and NATO.

The aim is to establish what equipment those countries have to counter drone intrusions, what more they might need to plug any gaps along NATO’s eastern flank, and for Kubilius work out where EU funds might be found to help the effort.

Related Articles


Today in History: September 26, Biosphere 2 stay begins in Arizona


Trump holds talks with Pakistan’s prime minister in the latest sign of warming relations


Microsoft reduces Israel’s access to cloud and AI products over reports of mass surveillance in Gaza


Apple says EU’s sweeping digital rules delay new features for Europeans and seeks their repeal


Trump says he will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank

The focus is on improving the detection and tracking of small and hard-to-spot drones, and coming up with a joint way to respond to any intrusions. EU leaders will discuss the meeting conclusions at a summit in Copenhagen on Wednesday.

While the effort will initially focus on the eastern flank closest to Russia and Ukraine, the commission hopes that the initiative will be taken up by other countries across the 27-nation bloc.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said earlier this month that Europe “must heed the call of our Baltic friends and build a drone wall.”

“This is not an abstract ambition. It is the bedrock of credible defense,” von der Leyen told EU lawmakers.

It should be, she said, “a European capability developed together, deployed together, and sustained together, that can respond in real time. One that leaves no ambiguity as to our intentions. Europe will defend every inch of its territory.”

Von der Leyen said that $7 billion would be earmarked to set up a drone alliance with Ukraine, whose armed forces are using the unmanned aerial vehicles to inflict around two-thirds of all military equipment losses sustained by Russian forces.