Putin says Russia’s nuclear-armed underwater drone was tested successfully

posted in: All news | 0

MOSCOW (AP) — Russia has conducted a successful test of a new atomic-powered and nuclear-capable underwater drone, President Vladimir Putin said Wednesday, declaring that the new weapon can’t be intercepted.

Putin’s statement, which comes three days after he praised a successful test of a new nuclear-powered cruise missile, appears to be another message to U.S. President Donald Trump that Russia is standing firm in its maximalist demands on Ukraine.

Speaking at a meeting with soldiers wounded in Ukraine, Putin said the Poseidon drone was tested while running on nuclear power for the first time Tuesday, describing it as a “huge success.” Poseidon is unmatched in speed and depth, he said, and “there is no way to intercept it.”

He said the nuclear reactor that powers Poseidon is “100 times smaller” than those on submarines, and the power of its nuclear warhead is “significantly higher than that of our prospective Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile.”

Putin first mentioned the underwater nuclear-powered drone in his 2018 state-of-the-nation address along with other prospective weapons. Russian media reported that Poseidon was designed to explode near coastlines and unleash a powerful radioactive tsunami.

Putin said that during Tuesday’s test, Poseidon traveled on nuclear power for the first time. He didn’t say where the trials were conducted or give any other details.

He also revealed new details about the Burevestnik cruise missile, saying its nuclear reactor is “1,000 times smaller” than one on a submarine.

On Sunday, Russia’s chief military officer, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, reported to Putin that an Oct. 21 test of Burevestnik was a complete success.

The missile covered 14,000 kilometers (8,680 miles) during a 15-hour flight using nuclear fuel and conducted maneuvers “demonstrating its high capabilities in evading missile and air defense systems,” Gerasimov said.

Putin has brandished Russia’s nuclear might repeatedly since sending troops into Ukraine in February 2022, declaring that Moscow was prepared to use “all means” to protect its security interests. He again turned to nuclear messaging since Trump has put a planned Budapest summit with Putin on hold and declared his first major sanctions against Russia since returning to the White House.

The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Asked on Reddit: Should I pay off loans or save?

posted in: All news | 0
The investing information provided on this page is for educational purposes only. NerdWallet, Inc. does not offer advisory or brokerage services, nor does it recommend or advise investors to buy or sell particular stocks, securities or other investments.

Over on Reddit, someone recently asked for help deciding whether or not to pay off student loans early. Should they get rid of the relatively low interest rate loans or keep paying the minimums and stay on an aggressive path to saving for the down payment on a house?

Related Articles


US stocks rise toward records as Wall Street waits for an announcement from the Federal Reserve


AI chipmaker Nvidia is the first $5 trillion company


Missing government data unlikely to sway Federal Reserve from rate-cut path


OpenAI may move forward with new business structure, partnership with Microsoft, regulators say


Elon Musk launches Grokipedia to compete with online encyclopedia Wikipedia

Respondents largely urged the poster to put the money into savings or investments, where they are likely to earn a return greater than the cost of interest on the student loans. The student loan interest rates in question ranged from 3% to 4.5%, while interest rates for a 30-year mortgage currently hover just above 6%.

Meanwhile, the average annual stock market return is around 10% (not accounting for inflation), as measured by the S&P 500 index.

Still, respondents also acknowledged that the decision is largely a personal one and can vary based on the specific situation and available rates.

We asked a few financial professionals for their take on the question: Pay off loans or save?

Before anything else, create an emergency fund

Experts turned the question around. Can you pay your bills if you get in a bind?

Creating an emergency fund for unexpected expenses is one of the most important parts of financial planning, says Zack Gutches, a certified financial planner and founder of True Riches Financial Planning in Denver.

As a result, he suggests focusing on building up at least several months’ worth of expenses before paying off debt or considering long-term savings goals.

“That emergency fund is the foundation of your financial house,” he says.

A couple with only one earner or a single person might even want to strive for up to six months’ worth of expenses, Gutches adds. You’ll want to be able to cover the big expenses, like mortgage or rent, car payments, utilities and other non-negotiables.

Start by saving an amount that works for your budget and aim to build up a larger emergency fund over time. Make sure you stay up-to-date on your student loan payments and any other debts while you save. Neglecting those can result in loan default.

Balance short-term savings against other goals

The next priority is to evaluate savings goals for expenses in the next three years, such as a home purchase or a new car, Gutches says.

The Reddit poster said they had been aggressively saving for a house and were concerned that dealing with the loan would delay that goal.

To reach short-term goals, you may want to prioritize funneling any extra cash into dedicated high-yield savings accounts instead of paying off low-interest debt, including student loan debt, Gutches says.

One exception to that rule is if the debt is weighing down your mental health, Gutches adds. If it’s causing anxiety and worry, you might want to prioritize paying it off.

Pay off debt before increasing spending

There are other reasons to tackle what you’ve borrowed before prioritizing a new financial goal.

Paying off debt early can keep you from spending what you should save (but maybe won’t), says Jessica Smith, CFP and co-founder of Vitality Wealth in the Boise, Idaho area.

“If you’re just going to spend it, then the more optimal thing is to pay off the debt,” she says.

Similarly, Smith says, if you’re carrying high-interest credit card debt, that’s another reason to put the money toward paying off the debt early.

Try to do a little bit of both

How about a middle ground?

Ideally, you can try to put some money toward paying off the debt and some toward savings, so you’re working toward both financial goals at the same time.

“Often, we think of the decision as black and white, but for a lot of folks, you can do both,” Gutches says.

This could involve dividing the amount you can save each month in two. Put one half into a high-yield savings account and the other toward outstanding debt, for example.

“The decision is individual and unique to each person. There’s no right or wrong answer,” Gutches adds.

It could make perfect sense for one person to put their savings into an account earmarked for a future house down payment while another applies the cash to outstanding debt. In both cases, they are achieving their individual goals.

Reddit is an online forum where users share their thoughts in “threads” on various topics. The popular site includes plenty of discussion on financial subjects like financial priorities, so we sifted through Reddit forums to get a pulse check. People post anonymously, so we cannot confirm their individual experiences or circumstances.

Kimberly Palmer writes for NerdWallet. Email: kpalmer@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @kimberlypalmer.

US stocks rise toward records as Wall Street waits for an announcement from the Federal Reserve

posted in: All news | 0

By STAN CHOE, Associated Press Business Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. stocks are hanging around their records on Wednesday as Wall Street waits to hear from the Federal Reserve in the afternoon about what it will do with interest rates.

Related Articles


Asked on Reddit: Should I pay off loans or save?


AI chipmaker Nvidia is the first $5 trillion company


Missing government data unlikely to sway Federal Reserve from rate-cut path


OpenAI may move forward with new business structure, partnership with Microsoft, regulators say


Elon Musk launches Grokipedia to compete with online encyclopedia Wikipedia

The S&P 500 rose 0.3% in early trading. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 193 points, or 0.4%, as of 9:35 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.7% higher. All three indexes are coming off their latest all-time high.

The bond market was also relatively still as the countdown ticked to the announcement from the Fed. The widespread expectation is that it will announce the second cut of the year to its main interest rate in hopes of helping the slowing job market. More important will be whether the Fed gives hints about whether it will keep cutting at its next meeting in December.

The U.S. stock market has surged to records in part because of expectations for continued cuts to rates, which would help make stock prices look less expensive than they’ve become. But the Fed has warned that it may have to halt the cuts if inflation accelerates beyond its still-high level, because lower rates can worsen inflation.

Making an already tough course for Fed officials more difficult is the U.S. government’s shutdown. That has delayed important updates on the economy that would normally help guide the Fed’s decision-making process.

In the meantime, the deluge continues of big U.S. companies reporting how much profit they made during the summer. The pressure is on to deliver growth because that’s another way they can quiet criticism that their stock prices shot too high in recent months.

Caterpillar rallied 9.3% after reporting stronger profit and revenue for the latest quarter than analysts expected. CEO Joe Creed said Caterpillar saw resilient demand, as customers bought more equipment, even with a “dynamic environment.”

CVS Health rose 3.1% after topping analysts’ expectations for the latest quarter, despite big losses related to its decision to reduce openings of new primary care clinics in the future. CEO David Joyner said the” company has “stabilized operations.”

Teradyne soared 19% after the company, which makes automated test equipment and advanced robotics systems, likewise reported a stronger profit than analysts expected. CEO Greg Smith credited strength related to artificial-intelligence applications and said “AI-related test demand remains robust.”

Nvidia, meanwhile, was the strongest force lifting the S&P 500 after rising 4.9%. It became the first company valued at $5 trillion on Wall Street, just three months after the AI darling was the first to break through the $4 trillion barrier.

They helped offset a 3.3% drop for Mondelez International, even though it reported stronger results than analysts expected. The company, whose brands include Oreo cookies and Toblerone chocolate, has been dealing with record-high inflation for the cost of cocoa. It expects challenging conditions to continue in some markets, though it hopes that price increases are moderating for cocoa.

In stock markets abroad, indexes were mixed in Europe following a stronger finish in Asia.

Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 jumped 2.2% to another record. South Korea’s Kospi rose 1.8% after President Donald Trump met with South Korea’s leader following his visit in Japan.

Stocks rose 0.7% in Shanghai ahead of a meeting between Trump and China’s leader, Xi Jinping. The world’s two largest economies have been locked in an escalating trade war, with Washington imposing high tariffs and tightened technology controls and China retaliating with curbs on rare earth shipments, one of its key sources of leverage.

In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury edged down to 3.98% from 3.99% late Tuesday.

AP Business Writers Matt Ott and Elaine Kurtenbach contributed.

City Hall Misses Deadline to Comply With Council Law Requiring Migrant Shelter Surveys

posted in: All news | 0

Lawmakers say the legislation is intended to help the city better respond to the needs of the nearly 34,000 migrants still in its shelter system. “There’s honestly no excuse,” said City Councilmember Alexa Avilés, who chairs the Council’s Immigration Committee. “We have a very large population that it’s tending to, and they haven’t disappeared. They are still here.”

A woman and her daughter staying at one of the city’s hotel shelters for families early last year. In recent months, the city has closed most of those facilities, as the number of new arrivals declines. (Ado Talwar/City Limits)

Under a local law passed last year, the city was required to survey migrants in the shelter system about their workforce development and health needs, and share the results in a report for the City Council by Sept. 30.

But almost a month later, the Adams administration has yet to submit those findings—and has not yet started administering the surveys, City Limits has learned.

“The development of studies of this magnitude takes time and deliberate coordination across multiple city agencies to ensure that the survey is accurate, rigorously distributed and yields the necessary and reliable results needed,” said a spokesperson for the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH), one of the two city agencies tasked with conducting the surveys.

Councilmembers and immigrant advocates criticized the delay, saying the legislation is intended to help the city better respond to the needs of migrants in its care. While the number of new arrivals has been decreasing for months, there are still nearly 34,000 in the shelter system, most of them families with children. 

“[I’m] incredibly frustrated by all of this. There’s honestly no excuse, other than lack of interest in being able to meet the mandates of the law,” said City Councilmember Alexa Avilés, who chairs the Council’s Immigration Committee. “We have a very large population that it’s tending to, and they haven’t disappeared. They are still here.”

Under the bills passed last year, two city agencies were tasked with conducting the surveys: The Department of Health is responsible for surveying migrants’ about their long-term health needs, chronic conditions, and access to healthcare as part of Local Law 74.

The Mayor’s Office of Talent and Workforce Development, created by the Eric Adams administration in 2022 through an executive order, is in charge of surveying their economic opportunities and workforce development obstacles under Local Law 73.

The surveys should have been given to case managers and on-site shelter staff 11 months ago, in November 2024, according to the legislation. The results were supposed to be provided to the commissioner of these agencies no later than May 31, 2025.

“We are diligently working with our agency partners and we’re happy to share that the survey will be live within the next few weeks,” a DOHMH spokesperson said, though did not provide an exact date or other details.

“In addition to time, projects of this magnitude require careful reflection of the community we are attempting to reach and how we can reach them without increasing the fear and worry they may already be experiencing,” the spokesperson said.

Over the last few months, federal agents have increased arrests as part of the Trump administration’s ongoing immigration crackdown, including at New York City courts and on the streets. They recently arrested people outside the Row Hotel, a city-operated emergency migrant shelter, and targeted vendors on a busy street in Chinatown

At the same time, the city has been shutting down its network of emergency shelters for migrants as fewer new arrivals enter the system. The majority of migrant families are now housed in traditional shelter sites run by the Department of Homeless Services. 

“The mayoral administration is inexplicably behind by nearly a year to develop and distribute these surveys amongst the city’s newest immigrants who have now mostly exited city shelters,” a City Council spokesperson said in a statement. “This failure is a squandered opportunity to learn from the latest wave of migration to New York City.”

The execution of the surveys is not the only Council law the Adams administration has delayed: another bill to allow people to report poor conditions in vacant apartments in their building has still yet to be implemented. City Hall has also refused to carry out a package of laws expanding the city’s rental voucher program, a dispute now playing out in court.

“The city’s inability to complete a survey among a now small number of asylum-seekers who remain stuck in our shelter system showcases the failure of this administration to prioritize the needs of our most vulnerable populations,” Carlos Arnao of the New York Immigration Coalition said in a statement to City Limits. “We urge Mayor Adams to take proactive steps to comply with the law during the remaining months of his lame-duck administration.”

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Daniel@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post City Hall Misses Deadline to Comply With Council Law Requiring Migrant Shelter Surveys appeared first on City Limits.