States scramble to plug transportation funding holes

posted in: All news | 0

By Erika Bolstad, Stateline.org

States are scrambling for the money to fill potholes, plow roads, maintain bridges and pay bus drivers as they confront inflation- and tariff-driven cost increases and declining gas tax revenues.

States also face uncertain federal funding as the Trump administration reduces the size of government and zeroes out some Biden-era transportation programs. As the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act expires next year and Congress considers its next transportation funding bill, cities are clamoring for the federal government to bypass states and give cities a larger share of federal infrastructure money distributed by formula.

Drivers will have to pay higher vehicle registration fees and gas taxes to make up for the shortfalls. Long-planned construction projects and safety improvements will be delayed. And bus riders may see fewer routes and longer wait times.

The chaos in a pair of state legislatures on either side of the country illustrates the dire state of highways and transit systems – and might foretell a bumpy road ahead.

In Oregon, nearly 500 transportation employees, about 10% of the department’s workforce, might lose their jobs as state lawmakers consider a transportation funding bill in a special legislative session. The political balance is so delicate that lawmakers have delayed a vote on a $4.3 billion transportation package for more than two weeks while a Democratic state senator recovers from surgery; his vote is necessary to pass the funding measure, a tax increase that requires a supermajority. The Senate is now expected to vote on Sept. 29.

And in Pennsylvania, a budget impasse over transit funding between the state’s Republican-dominated Senate and Democrat-led House continues. Philadelphia’s transit system, SEPTA, has said it will reverse deep cuts that threatened a near-shutdown of the buses and trains in one of the country’s largest transit systems.

The move, approved by Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, allows the transit agency to shift $394 million from capital funding to operational expenses for the next two years.

Shapiro said he acted after he learned there was a 63% increase in late arrivals to Philadelphia schools when the service cuts began, according to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star.

“It was just clear to me that is not something we can allow to continue,” Shapiro said at a news conference.

Pandemic-era funding ends

Pennsylvania and other states are confronting the end of pandemic-era federal funding that kept transit systems afloat. The so-called fiscal cliff threatens to bring about fare hikes and service cuts to bus and rail systems in both big cities and rural America in the coming years. To address the shortfalls, many states are, like SEPTA, shifting money that was earmarked for capital investment toward operating expenses.

“It’s financial gymnastics,” said Joe Kane, a fellow at the left-leaning Brookings Institution who studies transportation issues. “We fundamentally as a country have a challenge in reliably and durably having a revenue source to pay for these improvements across the country. It’s put even more pressure on states and localities to cobble together the resources — however and wherever they can — to make up for some of those gaps.”

The funding crisis has been particularly drastic for the country’s transit systems, said Corrigan Salerno, a policy manager at Transportation for America, an advocacy organization for safe transit. Ridership hasn’t fully recovered from pandemic-era declines, he said, meaning that transit agencies aren’t collecting as many fares as they did before 2020. The cost of labor, parts, software and fuel to maintain and operate transit systems has exceeded inflation, too.

Without high-quality or frequent-enough service, buses and trains are unable to attract riders, he said. Service cuts and fare hikes can make the system less attractive to riders, as well as bring in less money from riders.

“And that’s really the nature of the fiscal cliff and the death spiral that transit agencies are really trying so desperately to avoid,” Salerno said. “Because once they have to make these service cuts to square their budgets, people are going to stop riding some of these systems.”

Chicago; San Francisco; Seattle; Tucson, Arizona, and the state of Rhode Island have all faced transit funding gaps in recent months, Salerno said. In North Carolina, voters will consider a ballot measure in November to increase a local sales tax to support transit and road improvements in Charlotte, the state’s biggest city. In California, local transit agencies are seeking temporary operating loans from the state.

Eliminating bus routes

In Oregon, lawmakers have been at work on a transportation bill for several years, but the funding crisis came to a head after the legislature failed to pass a new spending plan before the end of the regular legislative session in June.

The state’s Department of Transportation faced an immediate $300 million shortfall in the two-year budget cycle that began July 1. The transit agency for the Portland area, Tri-Met, announced it would eliminate up to eight bus lines as well as reduce the frequency of service on other lines as soon as November.

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, a Democrat, announced this summer that the state would lay off 483 transportation workers and close a dozen maintenance facilities. Among those who may lose their jobs are programmers who maintain software for Driver & Motor Vehicle Services, and maintenance workers who stripe roads, clear brush, and clean up graffiti and debris.

Kotek pushed back the layoffs after House lawmakers passed a new funding plan during a special session that began in September. But if the Senate fails to approve the measure, the layoffs are scheduled for Oct. 15.

The transportation package would raise the state gas tax by six cents a gallon, increase vehicle title and registration fees, and temporarily double a statewide payroll tax for transit from 0.1% to 0.2%, according to the Oregon Capital Chronicle.

The legislation would allow the payroll tax to sunset in 2028, a move that critics warn will force the state, once again, to confront how to avoid cuts to bus service. It also requires electric vehicle drivers to pay a mileage fee to support road maintenance, a move that could dampen EV sales, but that captures some of the gas tax revenue lost to the transition to electric cars.

Without new funding in Oregon, local road departments will continue to face impossible choices that lead to reduced services and delayed implementation of safety projects, said Lamar Wise, the political director for Oregon AFSCME, the union representing 850 road workers, engineers and surveyors in the state. Failure to increase taxes and fees means asking fewer workers “to do more with less,” putting their safety and the driving public at risk, Wise told a legislative committee in August, as it considered the transportation package.

“It is about keeping our roads safe and ensuring that the public can count on reliable transportation in every corner of the state,” Wise said.

In Portland, the state’s largest city, it’s impossible to absorb more cuts to service, Mayor Keith Wilson told the same panel. If lawmakers don’t pass a spending plan, the city will likely lose 50 transportation staffers who repair streetlights, upgrade traffic signals and manage construction projects. The city bureau has faced cuts each of the past seven years, Wilson said.

“If you drive down the streets of Portland, or ride on a bus or a bike, the roads under your tires are crumbling,” he said.

But Jake Seavert, a county commissioner in Union County, a rural county of 26,000 in Eastern Oregon, told lawmakers that his constituents object to the spending plan, particularly the increase in fuel taxes and registration fees. The hike in annual registration fees places an undue burden on businesses and rural families who require multiple vehicles, he testified.

Oregon’s Department of Transportation must look for efficiencies, Seavert said, a nod to the Trump administration’s lacerating cuts to federal jobs and spending.

“Do more with less,” Seavert said.

©2025 States Newsroom. Visit at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

How to navigate social media trends without derailing your budget

posted in: All news | 0

By ADRIANA MORGA

NEW YORK (AP) — Did you buy a new pink dress to watch the Barbie movie, only to never wear it again? An Oura ring because your favorite TikTok influencer had it? A new pair of baggy jeans because ’90s fashion is making a comeback?

Related Articles


Your Money: Should you tell your children how much you have?


Working Strategies: Making the case for bachelor degrees


$40,000 vacations inspire finance pros to become travel agents


Trump’s trade battle with China puts US soybean farmers in peril


FAA restores Boeing’s ability to certify Max jets for flight more than 6 years after fatal crashes

Niche trends fueled by social media can influence your shopping decisions. Participating often brings some happiness and a sense of community, but the problem comes when you do it so often that you’re not using your money to achieve your financial goals, or worse, you get into debt, said Erika Rasure, chief financial wellness advisor for Beyond Finance, a financial services company.

Whether it’s coastal grandma or clean girl aesthetic, microtrends can take a significant toll on already-strained budgets as prices rise and Gen Z struggles to pay off debt.

If you find yourself overspending to participate in microtrends, here are some expert recommendations:

Pause before purchasing

Before you click “buy” on TikTok Shop, it’s best if you take some time to reflect, said Jennifer Seitz, head of education for Greenlight, a financial literacy app for families. Pausing before a purchase can help you discern if the item is something you really want or a fleeting craving.

“Think if you want to put it in a schedule pause, whether it’s 24 hours or even a couple of days if it’s a larger expense,″ Seitz said.

Participating in personal challenges can be a good way to get in the habit of making purchases more deliberate. Back in 2022, Alyssa Barber participated in the no-buy year challenge, where she pledged to stop buying non-essential items for a year.

Barber shares sustainable practices with over 370,000 followers on TikTok, where one of her recurrent themes is how to stop impulse buying. Barber said the challenge gave her perspective on how much she was spending on things she didn’t need. Since then, she has changed her spending habits, focusing mainly on experiences.

Know your spending values

Taking a value-based spending approach can help you decide if you should participate in a trend you see online, Rasure said.

If, for example, you want to build an emergency fund, having this goal in mind while shopping can help avoid unnecessary spending.

Quynh Van, a 27-year-old UX designer from Minneapolis, was surprised by the number of ads on TikTok when she created an account after a four-year break from social media. And while being influenced by the ads is inevitable, she believes overspending comes in part from users not having defined goals.

“When you don’t know who you are or what you like, you’re so driven by over-consumerism and lifestyle creep because you don’t have your values in order,″ Van said.

Rasure recommends using your financial values as a guiding principle for your spending decisions. If you’re not sure of your values, allocate some time to map them out according to your life goals.

Create barriers to spending

If a purchase is one click away, it can make it easier to spend large amounts of money. If you consciously make it a little harder to pay for an item, you can spend more mindfully, Seitz said.

“Just that action of needing to input your payment information rather than just that simple click can help you give to really stop and think about purchases before moving ahead with them,” she added.

To add barriers, you can remove your credit card details from your computer browser or social media and disable Apple Pay on your phone.

Think of it as an act of self-care

Finances are closely tied to emotions, and often, they evoke negative feelings such as shame or guilt. However, reframing them as an act of self-care can help you spend mindfully, Rasure said.

“It can help you create boundaries around what you value spending money on, helps you choose intentionally and it feels more like freedom instead of restriction,″ she said.

Your spending habits in the present can help your future financial situation. This mindset can inspire you when you’re tempted to overspend on the newest trending electronic or fashion item.

Engage with trends with moderation

It can be OK to engage with trends if they bring you positive feelings, Rasure said.

Van decided to participate in the matcha trend, but with moderation. For Barber, physical media, such as old records, DVDs, and cassettes, is on her list of non-negotiable expenses, as she loves collecting these items.

“Trends and engaging them, engaging in them really should spark that happiness or contentment, not the debt that can go with them,” Rasure said.

The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.

Literary pick for week of Sept. 28

posted in: All news | 0

Novelist Sinclair Lewis, perched on a balcony of his room overlooking Unter Den Linden, in Berlin, on Jan. 3, 1931. Lewis lived in Berlin while a foreign correspondent there. The 35th Sinclair Lewis writers conference will be held Oct. 4, 2025, in Sauk Centre, Minn. (Associated Press)

The 35th annual Sinclair Lewis writers conference Saturday in Sauk Centre, home of the first American author to win the Nobel Prize, will be bittersweet. Jim Umhoefer, who’s organized and facilitated the event since 1990, is stepping down after moving to Iowa.

The happy news is that this year’s event honoring the author of “Babbitt,” “Main Street,” “Arrowsmith” and more than 50 other books will feature poet/bread baker Danny Klecko as keynote speaker. He will be joined by Leif Enger discussing the joys and need for writing revision, Brenda Hudson explaining how writers can tell their own story, and Lillie Gardner with tips on writing dialogue. Klecko, author of 16 books of poetry, will talk about “Arrowsmith” vs. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby,” tracing the trajectory of the two novels celebrating their centennial year.

Umhoefer, a travel writer and photographer who has written more than 350 travel pieces published in a wide variety of publications, is proud of the work he’s done as founder of this long-running writers conference and as former president of the Sinclair Lewis Foundation.

“I have gained as much out of the event over the years as anyone,” said Umhoefer, who notes that the conference has hosted some of Minnesota’s best authors. Its aim is to mentor writers, as Lewis did.

“Sinclair Lewis was a mentor and inspiration to many novelists, such as Frederick Manfred and Jack London. His realistic satirical writing style influenced a generation of writers, including Kurt Vonnegut, John Updike and Tom Wolfe,” Umhoefer wrote to the Pioneer Press. He quotes Lewis, who did not view writing as a mysterious or elite process, but rather as hard work: “It is impossible to discourage the real writers — they don’t give a damn what you say, they’re going to write.”

The conference at Sauk Centre high school costs $85, including lunch and breaks. Seniors and college students get in for $80 and high school students attend free. For details, go to sinclairlewisfoundation.org.

Related Articles


Readers and writers: Mary Lucia’s memoir leads list of thought-provoking nonfiction


Literary calendar for week of Sept. 28


Don’t be scared to say the wrong thing (or nothing) at a funeral


Hard pass. Cold brew. Dad bod. Merriam-Webster adds over 5,000 words to ‘Collegiate’ dictionary


Five things to know about the Julia Child exhibit at the MN History Center

Cory Franklin: The dark reality behind the Chinese president’s hot-mic moment about transplanted organs

posted in: All news | 0

During a recent military parade in Tiananmen Square in Beijing, Russian President Vladimir Putin was caught on a hot mic saying to Xi Jinping, his Communist Chinese counterpart, “Human organs can be continuously transplanted. The longer you live, the younger you become, and (you can) even achieve immortality.” Xi responded: “Some predict that in this century humans may live to 150 years old.”

Currently, there is no credible medical basis to suggest that continual organ transplantation can reverse the aging process, but when the two most important totalitarian leaders in the world consider this prospect, we should listen because there may be more going on than meets the ear. The overtones are ominous, and the conversation takes on added significance in the wake of a report by the United Kingdom’s Daily Telegraph that the Communist Chinese Party, or CCP, is opening six medical facilities for organ transplantation in the Xinjiang autonomous region by 2030.

Xinjiang is set to become the organ transplant destination center for privileged CCP members, wealthy Chinese nationals and well-heeled international clients. Transplant teams of surgeons, anesthesiologists and related medical personnel are being recruited to serve the elite clientele, who will pay exorbitant sums to receive an organ — money added to the coffers of the CCP.

Xinjiang is a large remote area in western China, far from the metropolitan hubs of the East. Why was it selected as the organ transplant center? Likely because of a basic principle of organ transplantation: It is far more efficient to bring organ recipients to where the donor organs are rather than transport organs long distances and risk they will not be serviceable. (This is especially true of perishable key organs such as the lungs, liver and heart.) And Xinjiang is home to large numbers of Uyghurs, a persecuted Muslim minority, who are apparently a convenient source of readily available organs.

At least half a million Uyghurs are estimated to be in prisons or detention centers in Xinjiang and, if reports from international agencies can be believed, they are the victims of forcible organ harvesting — the practice of removing organs from victims without their consent. They will likely become unwilling organ donors serving a burgeoning new medical industry in China. There have been credible reports for over a decade that the CCP has been killing prisoners in this isolated region and removing their organs. Reports suggest that in some cases, the prisoners are still alive when their organs are removed, and some of them may be imprisoned merely as a pretense to securing their organs.

In America, little attention has been paid to the practice of forcible organ harvesting. It was barely noted in the American news media that in May, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Stop Forced Organ Harvesting Act of 2025, imposing sanctions on anyone who takes part in stealing human organs or facilitating forcible organ donation.

U.S. Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., made it clear this legislation was directed at the CCP and Xi: “Every year under General Secretary Xi Jinping and his Chinese Communist Party, tens of thousands of young women and men — average age 28 — are murdered in cold blood to steal their internal organs for profit or to be transplanted into communist party cadres — members and leaders.”

Consider the enormity of the hot mic conversation between Putin and Xi in Tiananmen Square, which reveals the absurd logical extension and utter barbarity of the totalitarian socialist state. Even the most nefarious villain in a James Bond movie would not consider snatching the organs of a powerless imprisoned minority population. Sometimes, truth really is stranger than fiction.

Related Articles


Solomon D. Stevens: Let’s have an argument!


Mitchell, Boettke: Make America capitalist again


Elizabeth Shackelford: Commentary: Why we need dissent


Andreas Kluth: The US assault on the UN rests on a tragic misunderstanding


Lisa Jarvis: Trump’s Tylenol briefing peddled junk science

It is a chilling proposition, but the organs of the Uyghur prisoners in Xinjiang are not their own; those organs belong to the state. And if the hot mic conversation is any indication, they belong to the venal leaders of the state in their quixotic quest to cheat death.

Dr. Cory Franklin is a retired intensive care physician and the author of“The COVID Diaries 2020-2024: Anatomy of a Contagion as It Happened.” He wrote this column for the Chicago Tribune.