‘The Better Sister’ review: Estranged sisters reunite after a husband is murdered. Cue the intrigue

posted in: All news | 0

Jessica Biel and Elizabeth Banks star in the eight-episode Amazon series “The Better Sister,” about a wealthy woman and the estranged sister who comes barreling back into her world when her husband is murdered and her teenage stepson is charged with the crime.

Twenty-five years ago, this adaptation of Alafair Burke’s novel would have been an Ashley Judd movie with a tight, hour-45 running time: Part thriller and part mystery, as a woman comes to terms with the lies behind her upscale life. That kind of thing can be fun, if not especially deep, which is why streaming’s tendency to expand stories over multiple episodes undercuts the propulsion needed to keep everything frothy and moving with enough economy that you’re less likely to question whether any of it makes sense.

Biel plays Chloe, the impeccable, girl-bossified editor of a magazine who seemingly has it all. It’s a very thin characterization, but it does convey her supposed flawlessness. She’s married to Adam (Corey Stoll), a corporate lawyer, and is stepmother to Adam’s withdrawn teenage son Ethan (Maxwell Acee Donovan), but there’s a secret: Chloe is also Ethan’s aunt.

Adam’s previous wife was Chloe’s older sister, Nicky (Banks), whose marriage to Adam fell apart — and her parental rights were severed — when she was found face-down in the pool one day, zonked out on pills and booze, and her toddler son nearly drowned. But that’s too sordid a story for Chloe’s public image, so she’s portrayed herself simply as the stepmom who stepped up.

She and Adam travel in high-end circles, befitting their income and ambitions. Their New York apartment has a wraparound terrace. There’s also a house in the Hamptons, and that’s where Chloe finds Adam dead in a pool of blood. What the hell happened? Suddenly, Nicky, who Chloe has erased from her life, is back in the picture and causing havoc as the police investigate the murder and zero in on Ethan, who had tensions with his father. That’s one plot line.

Related Articles


BET Awards to celebrate 25th anniversary with major star power from Kendrick Lamar to Mariah Carey


ABC’s Terry Moran is suspended following his social media post calling Trump and Miller haters


Australian reporter hit by nonlethal round during live report from LA immigration protests


Movie review: ‘John Wick’ spinoff ‘Ballerina’ twirls beautifully but aimlessly


‘Stick’ review: Owen Wilson scores in a comedy about golf, mentorship and picking yourself up from your lowest lows

The more central (and interesting) narrative is the complicated relationship between Chloe and Nicky. Like Meghann Fahy in “Sirens,” Banks is playing a very actressy version of messy and down market, chewing the scenery as a working class addict who is crassness personified next to her sister, who oozes perfection, right down to her razor-sharp bobbed haircut. Kudos to Biel for bucking the trend of long, beachy waves; breaking from that homogeneity is refreshing to see on screen. Biel looks amazing in that bob and it also speaks to who Chloe is, a woman putting intense effort to an idealized exterior meant to mask a more unpleasant upbringing. Chloe’s ruse works for the most part. Even her ultra-fit physique telegraphs competence and control; it doesn’t matter that everything is falling apart behind closed doors because people rarely look past the surface. I’m focusing on the visuals because they’re doing more than Biel’s performance, which is serviceable if not especially gripping.

Adapted by Olivia Milch (daughter of David Milch) and Regina Corrado (whose credits include David Milch’s “Deadwood”), the series keeps you on your toes in terms of the whodunit, while plying you with the kind of aspirational lifestyle content that is so prevalent on television right now. No one is trustworthy. Is Chloe being played? By whom? By everyone? It’s hard to care because she’s presented as such a vacuous picture of faux feminist perfection at the outset.

Chloe’s patron saint is a glamorously formidable, well-connected power player embodied by a terrific and entertainingly slippery Lorraine Toussaint, who treats the role like an exercise in capturing something akin to “Dynasty”-era Joan Collins. I love everything about the performance. Is she Chloe’s friend or her worst nightmare? Then there’s Adam’s cravat-wearing boss, played by an equally slippery Matthew Modine. The cops keep turning up (an itchy Kim Dickens and the more watchful Bobby Naderi) and casting aspersions. And what are we to make of Ethan’s attorney (Gloria Reuben), who seems like she’s on the up and up, but is also close with a colleague of Adam’s (Gabriel Sloyer), and maybe that’s suspicious.

The dynamic between the sisters may be predictable, but it works. When Chloe gets an iced organic matcha, Nicky gives her a look like, “Are you for real?” Their bickering, at turns tense and mildly funny, is where the show is at its best, when Biel and Banks aren’t being asked to play types, but to connect on a more fundamental level.

“The Better Sister” — 2 stars (out of 4)

Where to watch: Amazon

Nina Metz is a Tribune critic.

Dozens of states sue to block the sale of 23andMe personal genetic data without customer consent

posted in: All news | 0

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia on Monday filed a lawsuit in bankruptcy court seeking to block the sale of personal genetic data by 23andMe without customer consent. The lawsuit comes as a biotechnology company seeks the court’s approval to buy the struggling firm.

Related Articles


Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public


Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public


Crypto’s hottest new trend: publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin


Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement


Video game performers on strike for almost a year over AI issues reach a tentative deal

Biological samples, DNA data, health-related traits and medical records are too sensitive to be sold without each person’s express, informed consent, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a news release about the lawsuit. Customers should have the right to control such deeply personal information and it cannot be sold like ordinary property, it said.

23andMe customers use saliva-based DNA testing kits to learn about their ancestry and find long-lost relatives. Founded in 2006, the company also conducted health research and drug development. But it struggled to find a profitable business model since going public in 2021. In March it laid off 40% of its staff and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the Eastern District of Missouri, raising concerns about the safety of customer data.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals said last month it aimed to buy the company for $256 million. Regeneron said it would comply with 23andMe’s privacy policies and applicable law. It said it would process all customer personal data in accordance with the consents, privacy policies and statements, terms of service, and notices currently in effect and have security controls in place designed to protect such data.

A court-appointed, independent consumer privacy ombudsman was due to examine the proposed sale and how it might affect consumer privacy and report to the court by Tuesday.

Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public

posted in: All news | 0

By JENNIFER PELTZ

NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors in Harvey Weinsteinn’ssex crimes retrial appear to be moving past some interpersonal tensions and focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretch into a fourth day Tuesday.

At the end of Monday’s session, jurors requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein.

During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein’s lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she “compartmentalized” the pain he caused her.

Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he’s accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola.

Weinstein didn’t testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers.

Weinstein was one of the movie industry’s most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges.

The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times.

One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Monday began with two jurors giving contrasting takes on the atmosphere in the deliberation room.

First, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were “pushing” others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein’s past and going beyond the charges.

The foreperson didn’t specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017.

Related Articles


Dozens of states sue to block the sale of 23andMe personal genetic data without customer consent


Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public


Crypto’s hottest new trend: publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin


Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement


Video game performers on strike for almost a year over AI issues reach a tentative deal

Another juror soon asked to speak to the court. In her estimation, things were “going well” and jurors were ”making headway.” By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was “making good progress.”

Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola’s allegation was added last year, after New York state’s highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial.

Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles.

The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.

Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public

posted in: All news | 0

By JENNIFER PELTZ

NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors in Harvey Weinsteinn’ssex crimes retrial appear to be moving past some interpersonal tensions and focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretch into a fourth day Tuesday.

At the end of Monday’s session, jurors requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein.

During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein’s lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she “compartmentalized” the pain he caused her.

Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he’s accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola.

Weinstein didn’t testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers.

Weinstein was one of the movie industry’s most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges.

The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times.

One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Monday began with two jurors giving contrasting takes on the atmosphere in the deliberation room.

First, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were “pushing” others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein’s past and going beyond the charges.

The foreperson didn’t specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017.

Related Articles


Dozens of states sue to block the sale of 23andMe personal genetic data without customer consent


Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public


Crypto’s hottest new trend: publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin


Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement


Video game performers on strike for almost a year over AI issues reach a tentative deal

Another juror soon asked to speak to the court. In her estimation, things were “going well” and jurors were ”making headway.” By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was “making good progress.”

Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola’s allegation was added last year, after New York state’s highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial.

Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles.

The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.