An unidentified flying object has crashed and exploded in Poland’s east

posted in: All news | 0

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — An unidentified flying object crashed into a cornfield and exploded in eastern Poland early Wednesday, the country’s news agency PAP reported.

Related Articles


NATO defense chiefs to hold a virtual meeting on security guarantees for Ukraine


Israel to mobilize tens of thousands of reservists for expanded Gaza operation


Today in History: August 20, first women invited to join Augusta National golf club


Mexico says there’s no agreement with DEA for new border enforcement collaboration


A record 383 aid workers were killed in global hotspots in 2024, nearly half in Gaza, UN says

Local police said they received reports of the crash around 2 a.m. and found burned metal and plastic debris at the scene, near the village of Osiny. As a result of the explosion, windows were broken in some houses but nobody was injured, PAP reported.

Poland’s Armed Forces Operational Command said Wednesday on social media that no violations of Polish airspace from neighboring Ukraine or Belarus were recorded overnight.

Officials initially said the explosion may have been caused by a part of an old engine with a propeller.

Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz later said the object was most likely a drone, adding that an analysis was underway to determine whether it was a military or smuggling one, PAP reported.

Lublin District Prosecutor Grzegorz Trusiewicz told reporters several investigators — both civilian and military — were examining the crash site.

“We have a lot of manpower, we have the army to help us. I hope that we will be able to finish the operation by the evening,” Trusiewicz said.

Since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago, there have been a number of intrusions into Polish airspace, raising alarm in the European Union and NATO member state and reminding people how close the war is.

Quick Fix: Sweet and Tangy Pork Kabobs with Corn on the Cob

posted in: All news | 0

By Linda Gassenheimer, Tribune News Service

For a quick and easy barbecue-style dinner, I prepared these flavorful pork kabobs under the broiler instead of on the grill. They cook in just minutes but still deliver that deliciously charred taste.

Related Articles


Is hefeweizen the original hazy?


Secrets for a great pasta salad


Five Weeknight Dishes: These are some seriously summery chicken breasts


Recipes: 3 tasty meat dishes to grill at your Labor Day weekend cookout


Milkshakes, malts, concretes, frappes and more: A (delicious) guide to frozen drinks

A simple sauce made from honey, mustard, and soy sauce adds a perfect balance of sweet and tangy flavors. It’s used both to glaze the pork and as a dipping sauce on the side. To round out this easy summer meal, I paired the kabobs with corn on the cob, quickly cooked in the microwave for a no-fuss finish.

HELPFUL HINTS:

Any type of mustard can be used.

Worcestershire sauce can be used instead of soy sauce.

COUNTDOWN:

Assemble ingredients.

Microwave corn and place on plates.

Make the kabobs.

SHOPPING LIST:

To buy: 2 ears corn on the cob, 1 small bottle honey, 1 small jar Dijon mustard, 1 small bottle reduced salt soy sauce, 3/4 pound pork tenderloin, 1 large red bell pepper and 1 can olive oil spray.

Staples: butter

Sweet and Tangy Pork Kabobs with Corn on the Cob

Recipe by Linda Gassenheimer

2 ears corn on the cob

1 tablespoon butter

olive oil spay

1/4 cup honey

1/4 cup Dijon mustard

1 tablespoon reduced salt soy sauce

3/4 pound pork tenderloin, cut not 1-inch cubes

1 red bell pepper cut into 2-inch pieces

2 skewers

Husk the corn and wrap each one in plastic wrap. Microwave corn on high for 5 minutes. Remove from microwave oven and set aside. They will be hot. Use tongs or a large spoon and fork. Remove the plastic wrap from the corn and place one on each plate. Spread the butter over the corn.

Preheat broiler. Line a sheet pan with foil and spray with olive oil spray. Combine mustard, honey and soy sauce in a bowl. Divide the mixture, pouring half into 2 small bowls or ramekins to be used as a dipping sauce. Coat pork kabobs with the remaining sauce by dipping the cubes into mixture. Wash, seed and cut red pepper into 2-inch pieces. Thread pork on skewers alternating with red pepper. Place skewers on the sheet pan and place in the boiler about 6 inches from the heat. Broil 3 minutes. Turn skewers over and broil 2 minutes. A meat thermometer should read 145 degrees. Place on two dinner plates and serve with the dipping sauce.

Yield 2 servings.

Per serving: 497 calories (25 percent from fat), 13.8 g fat (5.2 g saturated, 5.3 g monounsaturated), 124 mg cholesterol, 40.9 g protein, 57.2 g carbohydrates, 4.6 g fiber, 754 mg sodium.

©2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Experts say rural emergency rooms are increasingly run without doctors

posted in: All news | 0

By Arielle Zionts, KFF Health News

EKALAKA, Mont. — There was no doctor on-site when a patient arrived in early June at the emergency room in the small hospital at the intersection of two dirt roads in this town of 400 residents.

There never is.

Dahl Memorial’s three-bed emergency department — a two-hour drive from the closest hospital with more advanced services — instead depends on physician assistants and nurse practitioners.

Physician assistant Carla Dowdy takes notes while treating a patient in the Ekalaka, Montana, hospital as nurse Willow Meyer works nearby. (Arielle Zionts/KFF Health News/TNS)

Physician assistant Carla Dowdy realized the patient needed treatment beyond what the ER could provide, even if it had had a doctor. So, she made a call for a medical plane to fly the patient to treatment at Montana’s most advanced hospital. Dowdy also called out medications and doses needed to stabilize the patient as a paramedic and nurses administered the drugs, inserted IV lines, and measured vital signs.

Emergency medicine researchers and providers believe ERs, especially in rural areas, increasingly operate with few or no physicians amid a nationwide shortage of doctors.

A recent study found that in 2022, at least 7.4% of emergency departments across the U.S. did not have an attending physician on-site 24/7. Like Dahl Memorial, more than 90% were in low-volume or critical access hospitals — a federal designation for small, rural hospitals.

The results come from the 82% of hospitals that responded to a survey sent to all emergency departments in the country, except those operated by the federal government. The study is the first of its kind so there isn’t proof that such staffing arrangements are increasing, said Carlos Camargo, the lead author and a professor of emergency medicine at Harvard Medical School. But Camargo and other experts suspect ERs running without doctors present are becoming more common.

Placing ERs in the hands of nondoctors isn’t without controversy. Some doctors and their professional associations say physicians’ extensive training leads to better care, and that some hospitals are just trying to save money by not employing them.

The American Medical Association, open to all medical students and physicians, and the American College of Emergency Physicians both support state and federal laws or regulations that would require ERs to staff a doctor around the clock. Indiana, Virginia, and South Carolina recently passed such legislation.

Rural ERs may see fewer patients, but they still treat serious cases, said Alison Haddock, president of ACEP.

“It’s important that folks in those areas have equal access to high-quality emergency care to the greatest extent possible,” Haddock said.

Other health care providers and organizations say advanced-practice providers with the right experience and support are capable of overseeing ERs. And they say mandating that a physician be on-site could drive some rural hospitals to close because they can’t afford or recruit enough — or any — doctors.

“In an environment, especially a rural environment, if you have an experienced PA who knows what they know, and knows the boundaries of their knowledge and when to involve consultants, it works well,” said Paul Amiott, a board member of the Society of Emergency Medicine PAs.

Nurse practitioner Alex Lovec examines Ben Bruski during a visit to the clinic at Dahl Memorial Healthcare Association in Ekalaka, Montana, for help with his allergies. (Arielle Zionts/KFF Health News/TNS)

“I’m not practicing independently” despite working 12-hour night shifts without physicians on-site at critical access hospitals in three states, he said.

Amiott said he calls specialists for consultation often and about once a month asks the physician covering the day shift at his hospital to come help him with more challenging cases such as emergency childbirth and complicated trauma. Amiott said this isn’t unique to PAs — ER doctors seek similar consultations and backup.

The proportion of ERs without an attending physician always on-site varies wildly by state. The 2022 survey found that 15 states — including substantially rural ones, such as New Mexico, Nevada, and West Virginia — had no such emergency departments.

But in the Dakotas, more than half of emergency departments were running without 24/7 attending physician staffing. In Montana it was 46%, the third-highest rate.

None of those three states have a program to train physicians as ER specialists. Neither does Wyoming or Idaho.

But Sanford Health, which bills itself as “the largest rural health system in the United States,” is launching an emergency medicine residency in the region. The Sioux Falls, South Dakota-based program is intended to boost the ranks of rural emergency doctors in those states, the residency director said in a news release.

Leon Adelman is an emergency medicine physician in Gillette, Wyoming, which, at around 33,800 residents, is the largest city in the state’s northeast. Working in such a rural area has given him nuanced views on whether states should require 24/7 on-site physician coverage in ERs.

Adelman said he supports such laws only where it’s feasible, like in Virginia. He said the state’s emergency physicians’ organization pushed for the law only after doing research that made it confident that the requirement wouldn’t shutter any rural hospitals.

Camargo said some doctors say that if lawmakers are going to require 24/7 on-site physician coverage in ERs, they need to pay to help hospitals implement it.

Adelman said when instituting staffing requirements isn’t possible, states should create other regulations. For example, he said, lawmakers should make sure hospitals not hiring physicians aren’t refraining just to save money.

Related Articles


US pediatricians’ new COVID-19 shot recommendations differ from CDC advice


Even in states that fought Obamacare, Trump’s new law poses health consequences


Texas declares measles outbreak over


FDA’s new expert panels are rife with financial conflicts and fringe views


AI eroded doctors’ ability to spot cancer within months in study

He pointed to Vermont, where a report recommended that several of the state’s hospitals cut physicians from their ERs. The report was part of a mandated process to improve the state’s troubled health care system.

Adelman said states should also require PAs and NPs without on-site physician supervision to have extensive emergency experience and the ability to consult with remote physicians.

Some doctors have pointed to a case in which a 19-year-old woman died after being misdiagnosed by an NP who was certified in family medicine, not emergency care, and working alone at an Oklahoma ER. Few NPs have emergency certification, an analysis found.

The Society of Emergency Medicine PAs outlines training and experience PAs should have before practicing in rural areas or without on-site doctors.

Haddock said emergency physicians have seen cases of hospitals hiring inexperienced advanced-practice providers. She said ACEP is asking the federal government to require critical access and rural emergency hospitals to have physicians on-site or on call day and night.

Haddock said ACEP wouldn’t want such a requirement to close any hospital and noted that the organization has various efforts to keep rural hospitals staffed and funded.

Dahl Memorial Hospital has strict hiring requirements and robust oversight, said Dowdy, who previously worked for 14 years in high-volume, urban emergency rooms.

She said ER staffers can call physicians when they have questions and that a doctor who lives on the other side of Montana reviews all their patient treatment notes. The ER is working on getting virtual reality glasses that will let remote physicians help by seeing what the providers in Ekalaka see, Dowdy said.

An Ekalaka ambulance meets a medevac plane from Billings Clinic— which offers the highest level of care in Montana— at the municipal airport. (Arielle Zionts/KFF Health News/TNS)

She said patient numbers in the Ekalaka ER vary but average one or two a day, which isn’t enough for staff to maintain their knowledge and skills. To supplement those real-life cases, providers visit simulation labs, do monthly mock scenarios, and review advanced skills, such as using an ultrasound to help guide breathing tubes into patient airways.

Dowdy said Dahl Memorial hasn’t had a physician in at least 30 years, but CEO Darrell Messersmith said he would hire one if a doctor lived in the area. Messersmith said there’s a benefit to having advanced-practice providers with connections to the region and who stay at the hospital for several years. Other rural hospitals, he noted, may have physicians either as permanent staff who leave after a few years or contract workers who fly in for a few weeks at a time.

Mobile mammogram clinics make it easier for people in the Ekalaka, Montana, area to get care since their local facilities don’t offer the technology, which helps detect breast cancer. (Arielle Zionts/KFF Health News/TNS)

People eating at Ekalaka’s sole breakfast spot and attending appointments at the hospital’s clinic all told KFF Health News that they’ve been happy with the care they have received from Dowdy and her co-workers.

Ben Bruski had to visit the ER after a cow on his family ranch kicked a gate, smashing it against his hand. And he knows other people who’ve been treated for more serious problems.

“We’ve got to have this facility here because this facility saves a lot of lives,” Bruski said.

©2025 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Annual fees over $500? Here’s when they make sense

posted in: All news | 0

High-end credit cards are nothing new. American Express has been catering to a discerning crowd since the 1960s, while airlines began partnering with Visa and Mastercard in the 1980s to launch airline credit cards for loyal travelers.

Related Articles


Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here’s what to know


Target picks an insider to lead the struggling company when CEO Brian Cornell steps down next year


Trump administration vying to own a big stake in Intel after SoftBank’s $2 billion bet on company


Minnesota sues TikTok, alleging it preys on young people with addictive algorithms


Burnsville Macy’s site sells for $4M after closing earlier this year

Cards with triple-digit annual fees are becoming more common, with even several “midmarket” cards upping fees to around $150. But that’s pocket change compared to premium card annual fees of $500 or more.

High annual fees get a mixed reaction from consumers. A NerdWallet survey, conducted online by The Harris Poll, found that 57% of Americans say no annual fee would be important to them if they were applying for a new credit card.

At the same time, the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Credit Card Satisfaction Study found that cardholders paying an annual fee of $500 or higher are less satisfied with the reasonableness of that cost, but they’re more satisfied with the overall card experience than those paying an annual fee under $500.

“So much of the card perception and satisfaction is based on the return or the value that the consumer feels like they’re getting from the product,” says John Cabell, managing director, payments intelligence at J.D. Power.

Compared with cards with lower fees, premium cards offer many additional benefits that can help justify the cost. Depending on your needs and spending habits, high-fee cards may or may not be a better deal for you.

When to consider a high-fee card

You travel often

Premium credit cards typically offer travel-related perks, such as annual travel credits worth hundreds of dollars and free visits to airport lounges. You may also get a few travel-adjacent benefits, like the ability to book a reservation at a popular restaurant for a special dinner on vacation, or access to ticket presales for concerts and sporting events.

If you’re not a frequent traveler, other cards can be more rewarding for those close-to-home purchases — groceries, food delivery, gas or public transit for your daily commute, or streaming service subscriptions. If these expenses make up the bulk of your spending, a cash-back card could be a better fit.

The card’s other perks match your habits

Increasingly, premium cards are offering coupon book-style credits. You pay the annual fee, and then chip away at it by making certain purchases that earn statement credits.

These credits can be offered as one annual discount, or they may be divided into smaller semi-annual or monthly credits.

Often, they apply only for a purchase at a specific merchant, such as a discount on the membership fee for a certain fitness club. Or you may get a credit for something broader, such as a collection of participating restaurants in several cities.

If you were already spending money on an eligible purchase, your card is giving you a valuable discount. But if you buy something expensive just to get a little money back, you’re still spending a lot of money.

You get good value out of your points

You probably didn’t sign up for an expensive card just to save $10 a month on ridesharing. Let’s acknowledge the most compelling reason: the enormous welcome bonus that will knock hundreds of dollars off the cost of a future vacation.

In some cases, redeeming for travel is how you get the most value out of your points. Some cards allow you to transfer your points to one of their airline or hotel partners, which can be a highly valuable way to cash in your rewards.

But if you redeem in other ways — like for cash back, gift cards or merchandise — point values can vary and may be lower.

When to stick to a lower-fee card

You have credit card debt

As appealing as premium credit cards can be, if you have credit card debt, hold off on applying for one. The amount you’re paying in interest is going to wipe out the value of your rewards pretty quickly.

“Where that math works is best for people who are transacting and who are not paying interest on that credit card, because that’s a real drain,” Cabell says.

Let’s see how this math can play out. According to NerdWallet’s 2024 Household Credit Card Debt study, the average U.S. household with revolving credit card debt owed $10,815 as of June 2025. If you carried a debt of this amount and paid an interest rate of 22% (just under the average credit card interest rate of 22.25%, according to Federal Reserve data as of May 2025), you’d spend more than $2,300 in a year on interest payments.

It’s unlikely you’ll be able to recoup that cost with a card’s sign-up bonus and a few statement credits. (And, again, to earn those statement credits, you have to spend money just to get a portion of it back.)

A balance transfer credit card, or a lower-interest personal loan, could help you save on interest as you pay down credit card debt.

You’re not the card’s target audience

If you’re not loyal to a specific airline, that airline’s card likely isn’t for you. If you’re not a luxury traveler, you won’t use a credit toward stays at five-star hotels. If you live in a small or midsize city, credits for merchants located in a major city a two-hour drive away are going to be difficult to benefit from.

Many of these perks are aspirational in nature. Who doesn’t imagine a stay in an overwater bungalow in French Polynesia, while they book two nights at a midrange hotel next to a strip mall for a friend’s wedding?

It’s OK to dream, but don’t let fantasy get in the way of whether a card fits your reality.

You want simple benefits

Perhaps what you’re looking for in a card is straightforward: a solid welcome bonus, rewards categories that align with your spending, and points you can redeem easily. No struggling to remember which card to use for what purchase, and no lengthy lists of statement credits you’ll forget to use.

If you want a card that’s a tool and not a homework assignment, some premium cards are just not for you. There are options where using just one or two annual credits will wipe out the fee, which could be doable. But if a card’s features overwhelm you, you’re not going to get value out of them.

Sara Rathner writes for NerdWallet. Email: srathner@nerdwallet.com.