Other voices: That’s more Karl Marx than Ronald Reagan

posted in: All news | 0

President Donald Trump has apparently lost his taste for traditional American capitalism. His policies are creating what Chinese government officials might describe as a “socialist market economy with American characteristics.”

That is not a compliment.

Our country’s economic dynamism is rooted in a few hallowed principles. One is that the free market, meaning supply and demand, not government fiat, should set prices and production levels. We also require a light touch with regulation and taxes. Last, we have an independent central bank that sets interest rates based on objective economic indicators, not political goals. Investors here and abroad trust our Federal Reserve system because its decisions reflect reality.

American capitalism disdains centralized, state-directed economic planning and state-owned enterprises. The government should not try to directly mandate prices, production targets or interest rates. It shouldn’t take an ownership stake in private enterprises except in extreme situations.

Trump has done all those things. Some of his threats are silly, such as his vow to lower prescription drug costs by 1,500%. No one took that seriously. We hope.

More chilling are Trump’s ongoing attempts to drive out Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell, whom Trump elevated to that role. So far, Powell and his colleagues have resisted personal attacks and intense pressure to manipulate interest rates. We admire their professionalism and commitment.

In late August, Trump accused Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, of mortgage fraud and tried to fire her. She denied the allegation and has sued to keep her post. Trump’s action is an obvious attempt to intimidate Cook. (If he were concerned about public officials and alleged mortgage fraud, surely he would have asked Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to resign.)

Equally indefensible is Trump’s meddling in individual businesses.

TikTok was the first example. In January, Trump essentially suspended a law, passed with bipartisan support and upheld by the courts, that banned the Chinese-owned app unless it was sold to a U.S. owner. Lawmakers had legitimate concerns that the app posed risks to users’ privacy and to national security.

Trump said he could make a sale happen. He hadn’t, so he kept extending his original executive order, which allows the company to keep operating.

That was just the start of the president’s interference. Trump threatened Apple with additional tariffs on devices made overseas unless it brought more manufacturing to the United States. The U.S. Treasury wants a 15% cut of the revenue Nvidia and AMD earn from selling certain microchips to China that had previously faced export bans. The arrangement may not be legal.

The president urged the CEO of faltering chipmaker Intel to resign and strong-armed it into giving the U.S. a 10% ownership stake. According to news reports, the administration also may invest in major defense contractors.

We’re not convinced that the U.S. government should own more and more of the means of production. That’s more Karl Marx than Ronald Reagan. It’s creeping socialism.

— The Dallas Morning News

Related Articles


US attorney whose office is investigating Letitia James is told he’s being removed, AP source says


Federal judge tosses Trump’s $15B defamation lawsuit against New York Times


Trump’s moves against the media mirror approaches by authoritarian leaders to silence dissent


Trump asks Supreme Court to halt order letting transgender people choose passport sex markers


House passes a bill to avoid a partial government shutdown, but prospects in the Senate look dim

House approves resolution honoring Charlie Kirk with dozens of Democrats opposed

posted in: All news | 0

By JOEY CAPPELLETTI, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House overwhelmingly passed a resolution honoring conservative activist Charlie Kirk on Friday, but a significant number of Democrats voted against it, highlighting the deepening political divide in the wake of his assassination.

The resolution, which praised “the life and legacy” of Kirk, passed the Republican-controlled House with 310 votes in favor. While 95 Democrats supported the resolution, 58 voted against it and 38 voted “present,” effectively abstaining. Republicans had warned ahead of the vote that no one should oppose the measure, but many Democrats said they felt Kirk’s death had been politicized and that the resolution elevated views they disagreed with.

“Today’s resolution underscores the majority’s recklessness by choosing to author this condemnation and honoring on a purely partisan basis,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, a high-profile Democrat who voted against the resolution. “We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was.”

Related Articles


US attorney whose office is investigating Letitia James is told he’s being removed, AP source says


Federal judge tosses Trump’s $15B defamation lawsuit against New York Times


Trump’s moves against the media mirror approaches by authoritarian leaders to silence dissent


Harris stops biting her tongue in ‘107 Days,’ her book about last year’s campaign against Trump


Trump asks Supreme Court to halt order letting transgender people choose passport sex markers

Speaker Mike Johnson said that there was “no partisan language” in the resolution and that there was “no excuse” for anyone not to vote in favor of it.

“We are honoring someone who contributed greatly to the free marketplace of ideas and public discourse and who died in a disgraceful, horrific manner,” Johnson told reporters.

The vote capped a week of heightened tensions in Congress and across a nation grappling with Kirk’s assassination and the legacy he left behind. Many on the right have blamed the left for fostering a political climate that led to his death, pushing for more than condemnation and allowing little room for criticism of his views. In the days since, backlash to such criticism has led to firings — ranging from teachers to journalists — as conservative activists have launched aggressive pressure campaigns.

“No single member of the House Democratic caucus, not a single member, condones political violence in America,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Friday.

Earlier this week, the House narrowly declined to punish one of its own over commentary in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The Republican effort to censure Rep. Ilhan Omar came after she criticized Kirk’s views of gun ownership and race relations in the aftermath of George Floyd’s 2020 death in Minneapolis. After the vote fell short, President Donald Trump responded by calling Omar “terrible.”

While Friday’s resolution aimed to honor Kirk and denounce political violence, many Democrats took issue with its language. The text described Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, as someone who was “seeking to elevate truth, foster understanding, and strengthen the Republic,” and that he stood “as a model for young Americans.”

The resolution sparked intense internal debate among Democrats. While party leadership ultimately backed it, they did not push members to vote a certain way. Some lawmakers saw it as a political trap designed to force them into endorsing Kirk’s views.

“This Republican resolution was designed as a political ‘gotcha’ — trying to force every member of Congress to lift up the views of Charlie Kirk rather than simply condemning his assassination,” said Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal in a statement. “I cannot do that.”

Democratic Rep. Debbie Dingell of Michigan, who was among a few in the party to attend a vigil honoring Kirk at the Capitol earlier this week, said she supported the resolution “because his horrific killing, and this volatile time require all of us to reject violence, hate, and anger without hesitation.”

Many Republicans in Congress are set to travel to Arizona on Sunday for Kirk’s funeral. Johnson, who plans to attend the funeral, gave a long tribute on the House floor on Thursday, saying the the best way to honor Kirk was to “advance the principles that he advanced, and to adopt his approach.”

National Republican Campaign Committee spokesperson Mike Marinella said that Democrats are “so consumed by hatred and political violence that they couldn’t even bring themselves to support a resolution condemning the assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

Associated Press writers Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking in Washington contributed to this report.

Vikings vs. Bengals picks: Carson Wentz or Jake Browning?

posted in: All news | 0

Members of the Pioneer Press sports staff who cover the Vikings forecast Sunday’s game in Minneapolis against the Bengals:

DANE MIZUTANI

Carson Wentz #11 of the Minnesota Vikings warms up prior to the game against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field on Sept. 08, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)

Vikings 28, Bengals 27: The battle of the backups! Carson Wentz has started 94 games in the NFL. That experience will give Wentz the slight edge over Jake Browning this weekend, and thus, the Vikings the slight edge over the Bengals.

CHARLEY WALTERS

Bengals 17, Vikings 14: J.J. McCarthy out. Joe Burrow out. Kirk Cousins lurks. The Vikings are in trouble.

JOHN SHIPLEY

Bengals 14, Vikings 12: No one knows how good Carson Wentz will be on Sunday in his first start with the Vikings, but after last week it’s difficult to pick the Vikings.

JACE FREDERICK

Vikings 23, Bengals 14: Brian Flores’ defense — the Vikings’ best unit — is a good bet to intercept Jake Browning multiple times. So if Kevin O’Connell allows himself to go vanilla and repeatedly run Jordan Mason, the Vikings should breeze to a boring, yet comfortable victory.

Related Articles


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 3


Max Brosmer is suddenly the backup for the Vikings. How is he staying ready?


Why veteran Carson Wentz might be the perfect quarterback for the Vikings right now


The Loop Fantasy Football Report Week 3: Burrow’s turf toe pains many


Carson Wentz will lead the Vikings for now. Here’s a look at his most recent NFL starts.

Late Wild exec honored for service to American hockey

posted in: All news | 0

Of all of the losses suffered by the Minnesota Wild last season, none hit the team harder than the sudden passing of team executive Ray Shero in April.

Shero, 62, was a senior advisor for the team at the time of his passing. He won the 2008 Stanley Cup as general manager of the Pittsburgh Penguins.

On Friday, the NHL announced that Shero will be posthumously awarded the 2025 Lester Patrick Trophy for outstanding service to hockey in the U.S.

“His true legacy will be as a man who embodied the best of our game: fierce competition on the ice and welcoming fellowship off the ice,” NHL commissioner Gary Bettman said in a statement from the league. “Widely respected throughout hockey for his team-building acumen and eye for talent, he was even more beloved for how he treated everyone fortunate enough to have known him.”

Shero will be formally honored as part of the U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame Induction Celebration Dec. 10 in St. Paul. Ray Shero’s father, Fred Shero, was honored with the 1980 Lester Patrick Trophy.

Related Articles


Mizutani: Kirill Kaprizov’s contract dispute is a distraction, though Wild say otherwise


Kirill Kaprizov says he’s happy in ‘Minny’ as Wild camp begins


Wild coach John Hynes will be Olympic assistant


New Iowa Wild coach brings wealth of NHL and AHL experience


Jonas Brodin expected to miss Wild training camp