Vikings vs. Bengals: What to know ahead of Week 3 matchup

posted in: All news | 0

What to know when the Vikings host the Cincinnati Benga;s on Sunday afternoon:

Vikings vs. Bengals
When: 12 p.m. Sunday
Where: U.S. Bank Stadium
TV: CBS
Radio: KFAN
Line: Vikings -2.5
Over/Under: 41.5

Keys for the Vikings

Minnesota Vikings quarterback Carson Wentz (11) warms up during the first half of an NFL football game against the Atlanta Falcons, Sunday, Sept. 14, 2025, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)

— Don’t put too much on Carson Wentz‘s plate. Never mind that he has logged 94 starts in his career. He signed with the Vikings less than a month ago, and thus, shouldn’t be relied upon to shoulder the load in the short term. There should be a healthy dose of Jordan Mason this weekend. He should have at least 20 carries. On the other end, the Vikings should be able to force turnovers with Jake Browning starting for the Bengals. Though he’s proven the ability to be a prolific passer, Browning has been known to throw interceptions.

Keys for the Bengals

— If the Bengals want to have a chance, they need to dominate with the pass rush. There’s a chance Trey Hendrickson will get to go up against either Walter Rouse or Blake Brandel at left tackle as Christian Darrisaw is listed as questionable. Ryan Kelly has been ruled out by the Vikings, meaning Michael Jurgens will make his first career start at center. There should be able opportunity for the Bengals to get after Wentz throughout the game. That could result in turnovers given Wentz’s track record.

Related Articles


The growth spurt that turned Carson Wentz into an NFL prospect


Vikings vs. Bengals picks: Carson Wentz or Jake Browning?


The Loop NFL Picks: Week 3


Max Brosmer is suddenly the backup for the Vikings. How is he staying ready?


Why veteran Carson Wentz might be the perfect quarterback for the Vikings right now

Adams Admin No-Shows at City Council Hearings, and What Else Happened This Week in Housing

posted in: All news | 0

The Adams administration declined to send agency representatives to two City Council hearings, inflaming councilmembers who hoped to get answers about the administration’s response to Trump’s budget cuts and a proposed housing project in the Bronx.

“Millions of New Yorkers are going to lose their health care and are going to go hungry and the Adams administration’s response is to stick their head in the sand,” City Councilmember Lincoln Restler said at Monday’s hearing. (John McCarten/NYC Council Media Unit)

The feud between City Hall and the City Council reached new heights this week, as the Adams administration declined to send agency representatives to two City Council hearings, inflaming councilmembers who hoped to get answers about the administration’s response to Trump’s budget cuts and a proposed housing project in the Bronx.

Thursday, NYC’s Health and Hospitals (H+H) officials were due to testify in support of their “Just Home” project that would build 58 units of housing for formerly incarcerated New Yorkers with significant health needs. The controversial project already went through years of public review and local resistance.

In an unusual move for a land use applicant, H+H delivered a letter to councilmembers Thursday saying the administration was now “actively reviewing” the project, which was slated for a building on the Jacobi Hospital campus. The Daily News reported that City Hall pulled its support for Just Home earlier this week, an abrupt reversal from even a month ago, when H+H said in a press release that it expected to break ground “in the next year.”

The livestream of Monday’s oversight hearing on federal budget cuts. (Screenshot)

“This is the second time this week that the city is being represented by empty chairs in this chamber,” said Councilmember Justin Brannan, before crumpling up the note.

Administration officials also declined to attend Monday’s oversight hearing on how federal cuts will affect New York City.

“The Adams administration has always taken decisive action whenever federal funds were reduced or at risk under both the current and previous federal administrations,” a spokesperson for City Hall told City Limits when asked about the absences.

“Our full written testimony will be submitted for the record, outlining in detail the steps we are taking to safeguard the city’s future. But let’s be clear: hours of hearings staged for political gain, without real purpose or impact, are a waste of taxpayer dollars and do a disservice to our constituents,” they added.

A spokesperson for City Hall pointed out that Diane Savino and Tiffany Raspberry, two Adams administration officials, did testify later in the hearing on Just Home. They said they tried to reschedule the hearing.

“Asking to change a hearing 24 hours before a hearing that was scheduled three weeks earlier, It just shows that this is all some sort of backroom deal,” said Brannan.

Before Monday’s hearing, tenants rallied outside City Hall to call attention to Medicaid cuts and  expiring funding for emergency housing vouchers under the Trump administration.

“The big, beautiful bill is the single most devastating piece of legislation for the people of New York City in decades, and it is going to have enormous budgetary consequences by creating multi-billion dollar holes in the state and city budget,” said Councilmember Lincoln Restler, the governmental operations committee chair.

“And tragically, millions of New Yorkers are going to lose their health care and are going to go hungry and the Adams administration’s response is to stick their head in the sand.”

Here’s what else happened in housing this week—

ICYMI, from City Limits:

A contentious plan to demolish and rebuild NYCHA’s Fulton and Elliott-Chelsea Houses is moving ahead, with 120 households asked to move this fall to make way for construction. A number of those being relocated are seniors wary of the incoming changes, and what it means for their community ties.

“Think of New York not as an undifferentiated mass of buildings, but as a collective of people who add layers of depth to the story,” says Asad Dandia. Learn more about his neighborhood walking tours of the city.

There are dozens of vacant or underutilized lots along the Bronx River waterfront, and you can weigh in now on what they should be used for.

International students attending school in New York City face a sometimes unexpected hurdle to finding an apartment here: the need for a guarantor.

ICYMI, from other local newsrooms:

The head of a Queens-based construction company was sentenced to four years in prison for allegedly overcharging the city and submitting fake invoices for work related to homeless shelters, according to Gothamist.

A much-delayed vote on the future of the Brooklyn Marine Terminal in Red Hook, where officials are planning thousands of new apartments and other changes, is expected to take place Monday, The City reports.

Community advisory groups shot down developers’ bids to build casinos in Times Square and the west side of Manhattan, according to the New York Times.

“We’ll be looking to work closely with Mayor Mamdani, if he is the mayor on Nov. 4,” Jim Whelan, who heads the Real Estate Board of New York, told Crain’s.

Speaking of Zohran Mamdani: a new political action committee is looking to stir up support for the assemblymember and mayoral candidate among Black homeowners, City and State reports.

The post Adams Admin No-Shows at City Council Hearings, and What Else Happened This Week in Housing appeared first on City Limits.

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to strip legal protections from Venezuelan migrants

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an emergency order allowing it to strip legal protections from more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants.

Related Articles


Trump administration proposes selling nearly $6 billion in weapons to Israel


More than 400 arrests made in Chicago area operation so far, top immigration official says


Senate confirms Mike Waltz as Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations after months of delays


House approves resolution honoring Charlie Kirk, measure splits Democrats


US attorney whose office is investigating Letitia James is told he’s being removed, AP source says

The Justice Department asked the high court to put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that the administration wrongly ended Temporary Protected Status for the Venezuelans.

The federal appeals court in San Francisco refused to put on hold the ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen while the case continues.

In May, the Supreme Court reversed a preliminary order from Chen that affected another 350,000 Venezuelans whose protections expired in April. The high court provided no explanation at the time, which is common in emergency appeals.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued in the new court filing that the justices’ May order should also apply to the current case.

“This case is familiar to the court and involves the increasingly familiar and untenable phenomenon of lower courts disregarding this Court’s orders on the emergency docket,” Sauer wrote.

The result, he said, is that the “new order, just like the old one, halted the vacatur and termination of TPS affecting over 300,000 aliens based on meritless legal theories.”

President Donald Trump’s administration has moved aggressively to withdraw various protections that have allowed immigrants to remain in the country, including ending TPS for a total of 600,000 Venezuelans and 500,000 Haitians who were granted protection during Joe Biden’s presidency. TPS is granted in 18-month increments.

Congress created TPS in 1990 to prevent deportations to countries suffering from natural disasters, civil strife or other dangerous conditions. The designation can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary.

Chen found that the Department of Homeland Security acted “with unprecedented haste and in an unprecedented manner … for the preordained purpose of expediting termination of Venezuela’s TPS” status.

In denying the administration’s emergency appeal, Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote for a unanimous three-judge appellate panel that Chen determined that DHS made its “decisions first and searched for a valid basis for those decisions second.”

Nations ratify the world’s first treaty to protect international waters

posted in: All news | 0

By ANNIKA HAMMERSCHLAG, Associated Press

SEATTLE (AP) — The first treaty to protect marine diversity in international waters will come into force early next year after Morocco became the 60th nation to ratify the agreement Friday.

The high seas treaty is the first legal framework aimed at protecting marine biodiversity in international waters, those that lie beyond the jurisdiction of any single country. International waters account for nearly two-thirds of the ocean and nearly half of Earth’s surface and are vulnerable to threats including overfishing, climate change and deep-sea mining.

“The high seas are the world’s largest crime scene — they’re unmanaged, unenforced, and a regulatory legal structure is absolutely necessary,” said Johan Bergenas, senior vice president of oceans at the World Wildlife Fund.

Still, the pact’s strength is uncertain as some of the world’s biggest players — the U.S., China, Russia and Japan — have yet to ratify. The U.S. and China have signed, signaling intent to align with the treaty’s objectives without creating legal obligations, while Japan and Russia have been active in preparatory talks.

Ratification triggers a 120-day countdown for the treaty to take effect. But much more work remains to flesh out how it will be implemented, financed and enforced.

“You need bigger boats, more fuel, more training and a different regulatory system,” Bergenas said. “The treaty is foundational — now begins the hard work.”

Related Articles


Pakistan says its nuclear program can be made available to Saudi Arabia under defense pact


Efforts to punish Israel over Gaza grow in sports and cultural arenas


Estonia says 3 Russian fighter jets entered its airspace in ‘brazen’ incursion


US military strike off the coast of Venezuela disrupts life in impoverished fishing communities


EU chief urges bloc members to sanction Russia’s LNG exports

How it works

The high seas are home to an array of marine life and are crucial in regulating Earth’s climate — they absorb heat and carbon dioxide and generate half the oxygen we breathe. The treaty is also essential to achieving what’s known as the “30×30” target — an international pledge to protect 30% of the planet’s land and sea by 2030.

The treaty creates a legal process for countries to establish marine protected areas in those waters, including rules for potentially destructive activities like deep-sea mining and geoengineering schemes. It also establishes a framework for technology-sharing, funding mechanisms and scientific collaboration among countries.

Crucially, decisions under the treaty will be made multilaterally through what are known as conferences of parties, rather than by individual countries acting alone.

Within one year of the treaty taking effect, countries will meet to make decisions about implementation, financing and oversight, and only countries that ratify before then will have voting rights.

Concerns over enforcement

Some experts warn the treaty’s impact could be blunted if the most powerful players on the high seas remain outside it.

“If major fishing nations like China, Russia and Japan don’t join, they could undermine the protected areas,” said Guillermo Crespo, a high seas expert with the International Union for Conservation of Nature commission. “It will be interesting to see how the implementation of the treaty will work without those who have historically made the most use of high seas resources.”

The treaty does not create a punitive enforcement body of its own. Instead, it largely relies on individual countries to regulate their own ships and companies. If a ship flying a German flag violates the rules, for example, it’s Germany’s responsibility to act, said Torsten Thiele, founder of the Global Ocean Trust and an adviser on ocean governance and blue finance. That makes universal ratification essential, he said: “If somebody hasn’t signed up, they’ll argue they’re not bound.”

Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project, warned that some nations may now point to the treaty as a reason to delay or avoid conservation efforts within their own waters.

“There are countries that are using the process to justify inaction at home,” he said.

Without proper protections, marine ecosystems risk irreversible harm

Lisa Speer, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s international oceans program, said failing to protect the high seas could mean damage for any individual nation’s waters.

“Marine life doesn’t respect political boundaries. So fish migrate across the ocean,” Speer said. “Same with turtles, with seabirds, and a whole host of other marine life. And so what happens in the high sea can really affect the health and resilience of the ocean within national jurisdiction, within our coastal waters.”

Ocean exploration pioneer Sylvia Earle welcomed the ratification, but urged leaders not to see it as a finish line.

“This is a way station — not the end point,” she said. “If we continue to take from the ocean at the scale we presently are, and use the ocean as a dump site as we presently are, yes we’re putting the fish and the whales and the krill in Antarctica and the high seas at risk, but mostly, we are putting ourselves at risk.”

For small island nations like Vanuatu, the treaty marks a major step toward inclusion in decisions that have long been beyond their reach.

“Everything that affects the ocean affects us,” said Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu’s minister for climate change.

Follow Annika Hammerschlag on Instagram @ahammergram

The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment