Grupos legales apelan para que el gobierno federal reemplace fondos de SNAP robados

posted in: All news | 0

La demanda se presentó en nombre de varios neoyorquinos a quienes les vaciaron sus cuentas EBT mediante skimming, un tipo de fraude electrónico en el que se roban los datos de las tarjetas.

Una tienda en East Gun Hill Road, en el Bronx, sábado, 4 de octubre de 2025. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

Este artículo se publicó originalmente en inglés el 11 de febrero. Traducido por Daniel Parra. Read the English version here.

Una mañana de enero, Crystal Carrero fue a su supermercado habitual en Crown Heights. Pero cuando fue a pagar, el cajero le dijo que no había dinero en su tarjeta de Transferencia Electrónica de Beneficios (EBT por sus siglas en inglés).

“Imposible”, recuerda haber dicho, porque no había utilizado ninguno de los fondos y recientemente los había recibido: $923 dólares, sus prestaciones mensuales del Programa Federal de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria (SNAP por sus siglas en inglés), que ayuda a las familias con bajos ingresos a comprar alimentos.

Carrero, de 38 años, seguía atónita cuando regresó a su apartamento a revisar su cuenta. En seis transacciones diferentes realizadas en la madrugada su cuenta fue vaciada. El dinero que utilizaba para alimentar a sus dos hijos y mantener a su nieta había desaparecido.

Su tarjeta EBT había sido clonada (skimmed), un tipo de fraude electrónico en el que se roban los datos de la tarjeta. Miles de neoyorquinos han sido víctimas de este fraude en los últimos años, sin posibilidad de recuperar lo perdido. El gobierno federal ya no reembolsa los beneficios robados después de que la legislación que autorizaba esos reembolsos expirara en 2024.

A pesar del aumento de los robos de tarjetas EBT en todo el país en los últimos años, el Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA por sus siglas en inglés), que supervisa la normativa del SNAP, sólo reembolsa los robos de tarjetas físicas, no los fraudes por tarjetas clonadas. En 2023, un grupo de neoyorquinos a los que les robaron sus prestaciones del SNAP presentaron una demanda colectiva contra el USDA.

Un juez federal desestimó el caso en agosto, pero las dos organizaciones que representan a los neoyorquinos afectados, Legal Aid Society y Freshfields—un bufete de abogados internacional—presentaron una apelación la semana pasada.

Esencialmente, el caso se centra en si las normas que se crearon cuando aún se emitían cupones de alimento en papel se aplican a las nuevas formas de robo electrónicas, y cómo las protecciones estipuladas por el Congreso cuando se realizó la transición del papel a las tarjetas electrónicas se aplican en esta nueva era. Con los cupones de papel, el USDA sólo reembolsaba los cupones robados de la correspondencia, antes de que fueran recibidos.

“Pero si llevabas los cupones en el bolsillo y te los robaban de camino a la tienda, no se reemplazaban”, explicó Ed Josephson, abogado supervisor de Legal Aid. “La teoría era que, al menos, si los llevabas en el bolsillo, tenías cierto control sobre tus cupones y podías cuidarlos, pero obviamente no tenías ningún control cuando estaban en el correo”.

Hoy en día, clonar tarjetas permite a los estafadores acceder de forma remota a una cuenta comprometida, incluso inmediatamente después de que la cuenta recibe fondos. La demanda sostiene que esta estafa moderna es similar al robo de la correspondencia, ya que los beneficios se almacenan en una cuenta del gobierno y se roban antes de que el destinatario pueda ejercer control sobre estos.

Los demandantes también afirman que la normativa del USDA no cumple el requisito de “derechos similares” de la ley de la era del papel. Cuando el Congreso cambió de cupones de papel a tarjetas EBT hace décadas, dijo que se debían mantener los mismos derechos y que las normas para recuperar el dinero debían ser “similares” a las normas para los cupones en papel.

“Así que lo que argumentamos es que la intención del Congreso era que ningún grupo de beneficiarios del SNAP saliera perdiendo como resultado de la transición del papel al EBT”, dijo Josephson. “Y lo que ha hecho el USDA es excluir a esta enorme categoría de personas, que son las que pierden los beneficios antes de tenerlos, antes de recibirlos”.

El USDA no respondió a la solicitud de comentarios.

Josephson también dijo que la política de reembolso actual de la agencia es demasiado restrictiva e ignora por completo el clonado de tarjetas. Uno de los objetivos de la demanda, explicó, es que el USDA actualice o publique una nueva norma que tenga debidamente en cuenta las pérdidas por clonado.

El Congreso aprobó anteriormente un proyecto de ley que permitía cierto reembolso por las pérdidas por clonado de tarjetas ocurridas entre el 1 de octubre de 2022 y diciembre de 2024. Pero ya ha expirado.

Josephson dijo que este caso tardará varios meses más en resolverse. Mientras tanto, muchas personas siguen siendo víctimas y deben recurrir a los bancos de alimentos para llegar a fin de mes y compensar la diferencia, entre ellas Carrero.

A falta de cambios a nivel federal, algunos estados han intervenido para implementar el uso de tarjetas modernas con chip, que son más seguras. El mes pasado, la gobernadora Kathy Hochul anunció la tan esperada actualización de las tarjetas EBT de Nueva York para incluir chips, algo por lo que los defensores han presionado durante mucho tiempo.

La Oficina de Asistencia Temporal y por Discapacidad del estado (OTDA por sus siglas en inglés), que administra el SNAP en Nueva York, publicó el año pasado una convocatoria de propuestas para que un nuevo proveedor de tarjetas EBT llevara a cabo el cambio. La oficina no proporcionó una fecha de implementación ni los costes estimados del cambio, pero dijo que la gobernadora quiere implementarlo lo antes posible, y se espera más información pronto.

“Dado que los programas de nutrición financiados con fondos federales, como el SNAP, están siendo objeto de ataques en Washington, la gobernadora Hochul se ha centrado en proteger los dólares de los que dependen los neoyorquinos y en garantizar que puedan acceder a los recursos necesarios para mejorar su situación y la de sus familias”, dijo un portavoz de la OTDA en un comunicado.

La OTDA instó a los usuarios a que estén atentos a la clonación cuando utilicen las tarjetas, a cambiar el PIN con frecuencia, a comprobar que los terminales de las tiendas no tengan teclados o lectores de tarjetas sueltos, a bloquear la tarjeta cuando no la utilicen y las transacciones fuera del estado a través de la aplicación (disponible en Apple App Store y Google Play Store) o del sitio web ebtEDGE.

Para ponerse en contacto con el reportero de esta noticia, escriba a Daniel@citylimits.org. Para ponerse en contacto con la editora, escriba a Jeanmarie@citylimits.org.

The post Grupos legales apelan para que el gobierno federal reemplace fondos de SNAP robados appeared first on City Limits.

Russia hosts Cuban foreign minister and urges US not to blockade Cuba

posted in: All news | 0

MOSCOW (AP) — The Cuban foreign minister visited Moscow on Wednesday as the island faces blackouts and severe fuel shortages worsened by a U.S oil embargo.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez held talks with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov and was set to meet later in the day with President Vladimir Putin.

Related Articles


Envoys signal no breakthrough on bridging Russia and Ukraine’s political and military differences


Today in History: February 18, Veteran FBI agent accused of spying for Russia


What climate change means for Greenland’s traditional Inuit lifestyle and the world


Lunar New Year prayers, robots and festivities usher in the Year of the Horse


A look at Ramadan and how Muslims observe the holy month

Lavrov urged the U.S. to refrain from blockading Cuba, which has struggled to import oil for its power plants and refineries after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened any nation that sold oil to Cuba with tariffs.

“Together with most members of the global community, we are calling on the U.S. to show common sense, take a responsible approach and refrain from its plans of sea blockade,” Lavrov said during the talks with Rodriguez.

He promised that Moscow will “continue supporting Cuba and its people in protecting the country’s sovereignty and security.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also noted that “Russia, like many other countries, has consistently spoken against the blockade of the island.”

“We have our relations with Cuba, and we value these relations very much,” Peskov told reporters. “And we intend to further develop them — of course, during difficult times, by providing appropriate assistance to our friends.”

Asked whether sending fuel to Cuba could derail a recent warming of ties with Washington, Peskov responded that “we don’t think these issues are linked.”

Putin has praised Trump’s efforts to mediate an end to the conflict in Ukraine, and Moscow and Washington have discussed ways to revive their economic ties.

Venezuela, one of Cuba’s main oil suppliers, stopped selling crude to the island in January after the U.S. captured then-President Nicolás Maduro in a pre-dawn raid and flew him to New York to face drug trafficking charges.

Mexico also cut off oil shipments to Cuba in January, after Trump issued the tariff threat.

Russia’s Izvestia news outlet last week cited the Russian embassy in Havana as saying that Moscow was preparing to send humanitarian fuel shipment to Havana in the near future. On Monday, Russian ambassador to Cuba, Viktor Koronelli, said that Moscow was looking into details of organizing assistance to Cuba but offered no specifics.

Cuba’s fuel shortages already have forced Russian tourist companies to halt the sales of package tours to the island after the Cuban government said that it will not provide fuel to planes that land on the island.

Public health, green groups sue EPA over repeal of rule supporting climate protections

posted in: All news | 0

By MATTHEW DALY

WASHINGTON (AP) — A coalition of health and environmental groups sued the Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday, challenging its determination last week that revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change.

Related Articles


Many Democrats are still down on the Democrats, a new AP-NORC poll finds


Late-night host Stephen Colbert isn’t backing down from public dispute with CBS bosses


Judge blocks deportation of Palestinian activist who led protests at Columbia


Trump administration backs Kalshi, Polymarket as states move to ban prediction markets


Pennsylvania man cleared after 43 years in prison for murder denied bail during deportation fight

A rule finalized by the EPA on Thursday rescinds a 2009 government declaration known as the endangerment finding that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare. The Obama-era finding is the legal underpinning of nearly all climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet.

The repeal eliminates all greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and trucks and could unleash a broader undoing of climate regulations on stationary sources such as power plants and oil and gas facilities, experts say.

The legal challenge, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, asserts that the EPA’s rescission of the endangerment finding is unlawful. The 2009 finding supported common sense safeguards to cut climate pollution, including from cars and trucks, the lawsuit says. Clean vehicle standards imposed by the Biden administration were set to “deliver the single biggest cut to U.S. carbon pollution in history, save lives and save Americans hard-earned money on gas,” the coalition said in filing the case.

After nearly two decades of scientific evidence supporting the 2009 finding, “the agency cannot credibly claim that the body of work is now incorrect,” said Brian Lynk, a senior attorney at the Environmental Law & Policy Center.

“This reckless and legally untenable decision creates immediate uncertainty for businesses, guarantees prolonged legal battles and undermines the stability of federal climate regulations,” Lynk said.

The case was brought by groups including the American Public Health Association, American Lung Association, Alliance of Nurses for a Healthy Environment and Physicians for Social Responsibility, along with environmental groups such as the Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club.

The suit named EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and EPA itself as defendants.

President Donald Trump said in announcing the repeal that it was “the single largest deregulatory action in American history, by far,” while Zeldin called the endangerment finding “the Holy Grail of federal regulatory overreach.”

The endangerment finding “led to trillions of dollars in regulations that strangled entire sectors of the United States economy, including the American auto industry,” Zeldin said. “The Obama and Biden administrations used it to steamroll into existence a left-wing wish list of costly climate policies, electric vehicle mandates and other requirements that assaulted consumer choice and affordability.”

Environmental groups described the move as the single biggest attack in U.S. history against federal authority to address climate change. Evidence backing up the endangerment finding has only grown stronger in the 17 years since it was approved, they said.

Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is legally required to limit emissions of any air pollutant that causes or contributes to “air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. EPA that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act and told EPA to determine, based on the science, if that pollution endangers human health and welfare. EPA made that determination in 2009, which led to new standards for vehicles. It built on that finding when issuing other standards.

The EPA’s own analysis found that eliminating the vehicle standards will increase gas prices and force Americans to spend more on fuel, advocates said.

EPA’s repeal of the endangerment finding, along with the elimination of safeguards to limit vehicle emissions, “marks a complete dereliction of the agency’s mission to protect people’s health and its legal obligations under the Clean Air Act,” said Dr. Gretchen Goldman, president and CEO at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“This shameful and dangerous action … is rooted in falsehoods, not facts, and is at complete odds with the public interest and the best available science,” Goldman said. Heat-trapping emissions and global average temperatures are rising — primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels — contributing to a mounting human and economic toll across the world, she said.

US star Mikaela Shiffrin wins slalom to break 8-year Olympic drought

posted in: All news | 0

CORTINA D’AMPEZZO, Italy (AP) — Mikaela Shiffrin’s eight-year Olympic medal drought is over.

The American skiing standout put in two dominant runs to win the women’s slalom at the Winter Games on Wednesday by 1.50 seconds.

The race isn’t officially over yet, with dozens of lower-tier racers still to take the course. But Shiffrin is the leader after the fastest 30 skiers from the first run.

World champion Camille Rast was in silver medal position and Anna Swenn Larsson in third.

After delivering an exquisite second run to build on her 0.82-run lead from the morning, Shiffrin stopped in the finish area to take it all, slowly squatted and was embraced by the other medalists.

Related Articles


Olympic men’s hockey: Sweden advances to quarterfinal against U.S.


Olympic curling: Team USA beats Denmark, one win from securing semifinal


Ukraine skeleton racer Heraskevych gets $200,000 gift to support his career after Olympic DQ


Elana Meyers Taylor nearly lost hope. Her team, her husband and the Spurs helped her to Olympic gold


Russian woman carried Ukraine placard at Winter Olympics opening ceremony

Then all the emotion came out: Shiffrin pumped her fists to the crowd and then was fighting back tears as she approached her mom and coach, Eileen.

Maybe it was a release of all the pressure on Shiffrin, for many the greatest Alpine skier of all time, who had failed to win an Olympic medal since a gold and silver in Pyeongchang in 2018.

A nightmarish 0-for-6 performance in Beijiing was followed in Cortina d’Ampezzo with an 11th place in the giant slalom and a fourth-place finish with Breezy Johnson in the team combined, in which Shiffrin placed 15th in the slalom portion.

Her first gold came in the slalom as a fresh-faced teenager in Sochi 12 years ago, so her Olympic journey has come full circle in her favorite event.

AP Olympics: https://apnews.com/hub/milan-cortina-2026-winter-olympics