‘What Kind of Life Is This?’: Five Desperate Cubans Weigh Their Odds in Texas

posted in: All news | 0

It’s 3 a.m. in Austin and Rodríguez is still awake, the glow of his phone illuminating his face in the darkness. He refreshes the page again. A painting job appears—$150 for a day’s work. His finger hovers over the screen for just a second. Too long. By the time he taps, it’s already gone.

He’s been doing this for months now, ever since President Donald Trump canceled his work permit. Before that, he’d installed speakers at a Tesla facility north of town for 12 hours a day. And before that, he’d served drinks at a nightclub downtown, worked construction, and hauled furniture. 

These days, he takes whatever he can find, whenever he can find it, hoping someone will accept his expired documents. His American girlfriend helps when she can, but her brothers won’t even look at him. “Your boyfriend isn’t welcome until he gets his papers,” he said they told her.

Rodríguez, who asked to be identified only by his last name for fear of retaliation, is one of an estimated 125,000 Cubans now living in Texas. He is part of a wave who fled the island over the past five years, seeking safety. Instead, they found a U.S. immigration system that opens doors, then slams them shut: work permits canceled overnight and bureaucratic delays stretching for years.

The flow of Cubans to the United States became a flood after July 11, 2021, when thousands took to the streets demanding freedom. More than 850,000 arrived here from 2022 to September 2024. To manage the influx, the Biden administration created a humanitarian parole process in January 2023, allowing Cubans and others to apply online for legal entry and work permits while awaiting immigration court dates. Then, under Trump’s second administration, humanitarian parole programs were ended, stripping those permits and legal protections from more than half a million people.

The changes created shock waves, particularly among people who historically had benefited from the Cuban Adjustment Act—a Cold War-era policy created in the aftermath of the Cuban Revolution that promised many a relatively swift path to permanent residency after a year. Now, technicalities in that law and changes in U.S. policy have disqualified many new arrivals—even some with U.S. citizen relatives. Applicants are required to prove that they entered the country “properly.” They cannot have a prior deportation order or any criminal or immigration court record.

They’re effectively undocumented, and Trump’s ICE is on the hunt.

Here, five recent Cuban immigrants to Texas tell their stories. All agreed to speak on the condition of partial anonymity, fearing deportation or persecution for speaking out. The interviews were conducted in Spanish; quotes are translated. Some details in these accounts could not be independently verified, including expenses or interactions that occurred before the migrants reached the United States. These accounts are based on consistent testimony across interviews, documents migrants provided, and public records.

Rodríguez desperately searches job websites. Morales hides with her children. A 26-year-old who goes by the nickname “El Cubano” watches how the world moves without him. Ayala, a singer, keeps her voice warm on weekends, hoping for a future. None know if they’ll be able to stay or will be forced to leave. Meanwhile, Fernández, already deported, attempts to rebuild his life thousands of miles away in yet another country.

Back home in Cuba, others are waiting—and calculating whether it’s worth trying to follow them.

I. Nothing to Do in Austin

Back in Havana, Rodríguez sold beers at an Old Town bar to earn the $1,500 he needed to flee. 

The official bar drink prices were high, so he bought beer on the side for 25 pesos and resold it to tourists for 150 until he made enough for an airplane ticket to Nicaragua. Using advice posted by other migrants on a Cuban WhatsApp group, he traveled, walking most of the 1,800 miles to the Texas-Mexico border.

Along the way, he met a woman from Kenya who spoke no Spanish. Rodríguez knew English, so he translated and helped her navigate checkpoints and negotiate with drivers for a month of the journey. In return, she covered expenses. By the time they reached southern Mexico, he estimates she’d spent over $2,000 to help him—a stranger’s generosity in a landscape of exploitation.

Rodríguez spent eight months in Nuevo Laredo, waiting for an appointment scheduled through CBP One, an app the Biden administration launched in January 2023 to help process asylum applications. 

Two years later, on Trump’s first day back in office, the administration announced it would end CBP One’s appointment system. The app was later repurposed and replaced with CBP Home, a platform designed to facilitate self‑deportation reporting. 

While Rodríguez waited in limbo, a cousin in Florida offered to sponsor him for humanitarian parole. When approval arrived several months later, he finally crossed the border. 

Upon arrival in Austin in July 2023, he had no money, no contacts, and nowhere to stay. Within a month, he found work. Moving jobs, construction, bartending. Then came the car plant, each job a step toward stability. For nearly two years, he had a work permit, a driver’s license, a steady job, and a girlfriend.

Then, under Trump’s orders, the Department of Homeland Security ended humanitarian parole programs that had allowed more than 500,000 immigrants to live and temporarily work in the United States—upending the lives of as many as 110,000 Cubans, 211,000 Haitians, 93,000 Nicaraguans, and 117,000 Venezuelans. Several organizations sued, buying Rodríguez and others a few more days. But, on May 30, the Supreme Court authorized the government to continue cancellations. Two weeks later, the notification went out: His status would be terminated.

That’s when everything fell apart for Rodríguez and many other immigrants living in the United States. Benefits granted under the parole program—such as driver’s licenses and work permits—were canceled for many, though some were able to stay or reapply under other programs, explained Pedro López, an immigration attorney based in Dallas, in an interview.

Now Rodríguez lives off dwindling savings. He has driven for Uber (by using someone else’s account to whom he pays “rent”), sometimes facing hostility even from other immigrants. One passenger, who described himself as Mexican, said Cubans “think they are hot shit” because they’ve long had an easier path to getting papers—even though the Cuban Adjustment Act never applied to all Cubans and many are now under active threat of arrest and deportation. 

His mother sends what she can from Cuba. But he sees himself as independent: He’s a 34-year-old who crossed four countries alone to get here. His late-night job searches continue, but now they’re just one piece of a larger uncertainty.

Recently, a police officer pulled him over while he was working. Rodríguez took a deep breath, rolled down the window, and placed both hands on the wheel. He’d prepared for this moment—he was dressed low-key, nothing that screamed “recent immigrant.” When the officer asked for documents, Rodríguez handed over his driver’s license without a word. An Uber customer, who sat in the back seat, spoke up: “Brother, leave him alone. He’s working. He hasn’t done anything.” The cop returned his license and walked away. Rodríguez rolled up the window, exhaled.

Rodríguez got lucky. Even though his driver’s license was unexpired, his immigration status could have put him in potential jeopardy. Trump’s decision to end parole programs meant that his license could have been listed as subject to cancellation in government databases. Any traffic violation could have been the first step to his removal.

“If they stop you even for some kind of traffic ticket, that can turn into a deportation case if you don’t have the right papers,” López said. The Cuban Adjustment Act specifies that Cubans who were “legally admitted or under parole in the United States and physically present for at least one year” can apply for permanent residency, but Cubans who entered under Biden-era parole policies now find themselves in a dangerous limbo.

Rodríguez applied in July 2024 and still hasn’t received a response. Processing times can vary from several months to more than a year, according to immigration attorney Florence Otaigbe, who works with Cubans and other immigrants at her practice in New Jersey. 

Wait times depend on the capacity of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which issued a policy memorandum in December pausing benefit requests submitted by nationals of 19 countries Trump has designated “high risk,” including Cuba. The memo also mandates a review of previously approved cases from the past five years. According to the Niskanen Center, the number of Cubans with applications for adjustment of status that had been delayed more than six months increased 140 percent from October 2024 to October 2025.

By themselves, pending applications like Rodríguez’s are flimsy shields, Otaigbe said. “If someone no longer has valid parole and no other status, then they are out of status,” she said. “Applying for adjustment … does not change anything.”

II. Software Engineer at a Dallas Taqueria

Morales spent the five years before she left Havana creating management software. She studied computer engineering, and she’d served as a university professor and worked in software production before founding her own business. Her husband set up a body shop. They owned a house, and she ran her company with a friend. Their life seemed on track, until Cuba fell apart. 

Then, she left it all to make tacos in Dallas. 

Before, she knew little about tacos. The 38-year-old—who has a degree from Cuba’s University of Informatic Sciences, the country’s top institution in her field—learned to adapt to the fast pace of a taqueria, the constant flow of orders, and the American expectations of speed and efficiency. She had to do whatever she could as an immigrant mom with two kids.

In Cuba, she’d feared for her children and fled for their future. What worried her most was “the lack of teachers in schools and the degradation of its culture, morals, principles.” Her oldest son, 8, had started saying Qué bolá, pura—a slang greeting to his mother—because that’s how his teacher spoke. At home, Morales and her husband tried to teach proper Spanish, literature, and manners: the old-fashioned education they’d received. But since everyone spoke street slang at school, the boy felt as though they also should do so at home.

Morales’ father had already lived in the United States for 10 years and had become a citizen. She figured her children would have a better future here. Otherwise, she’d probably still be in Cuba, “perhaps as a prisoner,” she said. As a busy working mom, she didn’t participate in the massive anti-government protests of July 2021, but she didn’t keep her mouth shut either. She’d always felt the revolution was a facade. 

Her father applied for parole for her and the children in 2023—their path to come to the United States—and it was approved in April 2024. Morales thought the humanitarian parole she and her children had received meant safety and an orderly path to legal residency. But that didn’t turn out to be true.

After long shifts at the taqueria, Morales cleaned schools. Her husband had remained back in Havana, and her children cried every day. Her 4-year-old would say: “Mommy, take me to Cuba to see daddy.” They once visited a local park; the girl found it pretty, but her mind wandered. “Can we go down to sit on the beach? Because you know on the other side of the sea is my daddy.”

Morales initially saw signs of hope. The children attended a bilingual school and almost completely mastered English. Here, she figured, they could become academics or entrepreneurs and not meet her professional fate: Her mechanic husband always earned more in Cuba than she did as an engineer.

With her parole, Morales obtained a driver’s license and a work permit—though without a professional license, she couldn’t work in her field. Then, boom. In March 2025, the program ended. They fired everyone in her legal situation from the taco place. 

She started cleaning houses. Sometimes she worked at a beauty salon, receiving cash to help out or wash a client’s hair. She got so scared that she stopped driving, left her rental, and began to hide with the kids. She’s seen more of ICE in the media than on the streets, “but it’s instilled terror in the community.”

She applied for residency under the Cuban Adjustment Act in June 2025, but as of early 2026, she hadn’t yet received the crucial fingerprint appointment needed to pass a background check. 

When Morales realized she had only $43 left, she tried to donate blood and plasma. The first time, she felt nervous and ashamed. Her hands were shaking. She extended her arm, and the nurse stuck in the needle. When they gave her the money, she “didn’t know whether to buy food or pay a bill.” As she recalled this during an interview, she tried to laugh, but nothing came out. 

“Right now, I need any income, however small,” she said. She donated twice. They paid her $100 each time. “Sometimes I’d end up exhausted,” she said. “I’ve felt tremors, nausea, and weakness. I really wasn’t prepared to do it with the nutrition I had. Frankly, if I did eat the way I should, what they pay me barely would cover meals.”

Returning, however, is not an option. Her husband wasn’t approved by U.S. officials when the rest of his family got permission for parole, but he still wants out, and Cuba seems to be crumbling. The economy is in free fall, and there’s so much fear. She doesn’t want her children to go hungry, walk barefoot, or be forced into military service. She faces problems in the United States, but at least her kids have shoes.

For now, they’re effectively undocumented, and Trump’s ICE is on the hunt. So they hide.

III. Invisible in El Paso

“El Cubano” spends his time at home. He paces. He listens to music, studies English, walks a couple of blocks so he doesn’t rust, scrolls Facebook. He doesn’t work because he can’t. His 60-year-old father leaves every morning while he sleeps. He often feels like a parasite.

Now 26 years old, he crossed the Mexico-U.S. border with his parents in October 2024. But he was separated from them and locked in a tiny cell, nicknamed la hielera because Border Patrol keeps the air so cold it feels like an icebox. El Cubano—the rather literal moniker given him by his traveling companions—lost track of time, moving around in his thin shirt to attempt to keep warm. 

On the fourth day, he suffered a panic attack: difficulty breathing, tachycardia, fainting. He was wheeled out to an ambulance and injected with something that left him dazed. He was hospitalized, then released the next day without any documents. Officially, El Cubano didn’t seem to exist here.

He took a taxi and met up with his parents, who’d already been released. He visited government offices and attorneys, but without papers, no one offered assistance. He finally found a help center that assisted him with obtaining his immigration file—based on an A-Number, the code that identifies him in the U.S. immigration system. When the file arrived, he discovered he already had a deportation order.

That removal order had been issued in his absence without his knowledge.

Otaigbe explained the predicament. “A regular deportation order is one someone receives after being ordered to leave by a judge,” she said. Those can be issued “in absentia” if an immigrant misses court, but El Cubano’s situation is different: He was processed under what’s called “expedited removal, which can happen at the border or in other instances, without an opportunity to appear in court.” 


Advertisement

Because of the order, one attorney told him his case was too complex to take. Another explained his best option was to apply for asylum, the status often sought by refugees from the rest of Latin America. That’s the route he decided on, and he eventually found a lawyer to take the case. The Observer requested an interview with his attorney, but he declined via email.

El Cubano used to dream of being a trucker. He likes the road at night and the feeling of being alone. Plus, truckers make good money. He once hoped to start his own trucking firm in Texas. Now that sounds ridiculous. He can’t even get a dishwashing job. He wakes up late—because why get up early? He doesn’t drive. He doesn’t contribute. Some days, he doesn’t get up at all. His parents take care of him as if he were still a child. Nobody hires him. He feels like an observer of his own life. When he does go out, he sees the world moving and feels paralyzed. 

At first, he worried constantly about being deported. Now, nothing seems to matter. “What kind of life is this?” he asks. “I’m unemployed and all the time locked up in the house.” He sometimes feels his life has no purpose. 

IV. The Soprano in Houston

Ayala, 26, is petite and slim, with tattoos, facial piercings, and a powerful voice. She was only 12 when a music teacher in her hometown in eastern Cuba first noticed that she kept hitting higher and higher notes without stopping—a feat usually attainable only by a trained lyric soprano.

Her parents enrolled her in voice, piano, and violin lessons. Soon she performed in theaters, plazas, and galas and appeared on television. At 14, she took on “Damisela Encantadora,” the classic waltz that Cuban composer Ernesto Lecuona created for the actress and operatic soprano Esther Borja, which demands elegance, long phrasing, and rhythm that few vocal artists can achieve. At 18, she entered the Higher Institute of Art in Holguín, her province, where only a handful of others could compete with her range. But she never graduated. 

Her father had already left for the United States, where he was briefly detained and then released with a federal form called an I-220A—to await an immigration hearing without legal status or a work permit. Like others released this way, he had to check in with ICE regularly. (Under Trump’s second administration, formerly routine check-ins have become increasingly dangerous: Starting in March 2025, ICE began detaining Cubans with I-220As at appointments, even some who had been compliant for years.)

Her father was unable to sponsor Ayala himself, so her aunt, a U.S. citizen living in Houston, petitioned for her to come under humanitarian parole in 2022.

She arrived in Texas that year. Her first job was at a Subway, stacking ham and cheese on bread. Later, she joined a golf ball factory, then worked at a pharmaceutical company as a pill-packer before returning to the golf ball factory. She wants to sing and knows of opportunities in the city: auditions and festivals. But her time is consumed by survival. The only thing she’s managed to do is join an amateur choir, with whom she practices on weekends.

Still, her biggest problem isn’t that she can’t perform onstage or that she spends nights packing golf balls. It’s that her father was swept up in Trump’s immigration dragnet. 

People admitted with I-220As cannot typically apply for permanent residency under the Cuban Adjustment Act, as López told the Observer. Their options are generally limited to applying for asylum or pursuing family petitions if they are related to a citizen or permanent resident. 

Ayala’s father lived and worked in Houston without incident until ICE detained him in November 2025.

She could barely communicate with her dad during his time in immigrant detention. They spoke only briefly by phone, long enough for her to know he was alive. She lacked money for a lawyer. Then, in December, he called from Cuba, and that’s how she learned they’d sent him back. It was as if both their lives had begun again. 

Back on the island, he’s looking for work and trying to adapt, though poverty has worsened. He hasn’t been able to do much for himself. He hasn’t wanted to talk. He’s depressed.

But Ayala still wants to stay. She works from 3 p.m. until midnight, feeling like a machine, and she prays that her fate won’t get tangled up like her father’s did.

On weekends, she attends choir practice. She keeps her voice warm. Just in case. She feels small in the United States, yet she also feels energized and wonders: What else could I do?

V. Ten Years Is a Lifetime

As of 2020, Fernández had been reporting regularly to the immigration office at 126 North Point Drive in north Houston for three-and-a-half years. The routine was simple: Type his name and A-Number into a machine, sign a form, obtain his next appointment date, and leave.

Fernández, now 29, arrived in Houston in 2011 as an adolescent through a family petition, and he quickly obtained his green card. But days after he turned 19, police found about 2 ounces of marijuana in his possession during a traffic stop. He completed probation, records show, and his misdemeanor charge was dismissed in 2018.

But two parallel court systems exist in the United States: criminal and immigration. And Fernández didn’t know that even with a green card an arrest can trigger deportation. Without knowing the risks, Fernández traveled to Cuba in 2019 to visit family. When he returned on January 4, 2020, immigration officers stopped him at the airport. That unauthorized trip became the trigger for a removal case.

Under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act of 1996, immigrants arrested for crimes of so-called moral turpitude—including misdemeanor drug possession—can be subject to deportation. But, historically, ICE has exercised prosecutorial discretion, often not prioritizing removal of people with older offenses—or whose charges were dismissed—and who were otherwise compliant.

Trump began his first term as president by vowing to increase deportations beyond levels achieved by President Barack Obama. He ended attempts to normalize relations with Cuba, but Cuba rarely accepted deportees during Trump’s first administration, so officials essentially converted Fernández’s legal residency into a deferred deportation order. In mid-2020, he was released from detention on the condition that he report regularly. He obtained a driver’s license and a work permit. He worked selling cameras and doing photo shoots on weekends, dreaming of opening his own studio.

Trump was 10 months into his second term as president when Fernández arrived for another check-in on October 3, 2025. The office seemed eerily empty to him. He typed his information into the machine as usual. Instead of receiving his next appointment, he recalls an officer telling him: “You’re going to be detained. We’re going to deport you.”

Within 30 minutes, ICE agents had handcuffed him and taken him to the Joe Corley Processing Center in Conroe—the same facility where he’d been held in 2020. After 27 days, Cuba again refused to accept him. This time, there would be no release home—ICE offered Mexico instead. Fernández signed the papers. They shackled him and put him on a prison bus. After a three-day journey through Texas and Mexico, authorities dropped him in Chiapas, near the Guatemala border, with only the clothes he was wearing.

ICE data reveals that Fernández’s removal reflects a broader trend: The pool of immigrants targeted for deportation has widened dramatically to include more people without any criminal convictions at all.

According to The Marshall Project, people with no criminal convictions accounted for two-thirds of the more than 120,000 deportations carried out between January and May 2025. Syracuse University researcher Austin Kocher, who analyzes ICE statistics through the Deportation Data Project, confirmed this trend: 92 percent of the growth in ICE detention over a period from September 21 to January was driven by immigrants with no criminal convictions. 

Now in exile, Fernández has been writing to photography studios, trying to rebuild. His parents care for his dog in Houston, and his friends at the camera store sometimes send funds to help him. His girlfriend remains behind; they’re attempting a long-distance relationship.

Technically, Fernández, like some other long-term former permanent residents who were deported, can apply for a waiver to return in 10 years. But to him, 10 years is a lifetime. 

“If I’m going to spend 10 years here, building my life, why would I want to go there and start all over again from zero?” 

Editor’s Note: Portions of the stories reported here were presented at the Instituto Prensa y Sociedad’s annual Latin American Conference of Investigative Journalism in 2025.

The post ‘What Kind of Life Is This?’: Five Desperate Cubans Weigh Their Odds in Texas appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Jesse Jackson Comes to Town

posted in: All news | 0

On February 19, two days after the death of the reverend and civil rights icon Jesse Jackson, the Observer’s longtime contributing photographer Alan Pogue emailed me a shot of Jackson shaking hands with Molly Ivins, our onetime co-editor and unofficial patron saint.

In the moments following the photo, Pogue said, Ivins injected some of her typical humor, acting as though Jackson’s squeeze had “squashed her knuckles,” which is captured in a separate, blurrier image. “Playing it for a laugh,” Pogue wrote. “That Molly, always the card.”

(From left to right) Hazel Overby, Molly Ivins, George Bristol, and Jesse Jackson in January 1995 (Alan Pogue)

I liked the picture, but, to run it here, I needed to suss out more of the context. Pogue’s contact sheet for the shoot in question provided a handwritten date—January 27, 1995—and the name of Austin artist Mercedes Peña. By sheer luck, I had worked with Peña some 20 years later (before I became a journalist) at Casa Marianella, a shelter for immigrants in Austin.

I called Peña, who remembered the photo’s setting without hesitation. Jackson and Ivins had shaken hands in the parking lot outside what was then Peña’s condo on West Sixth Street near the capital city’s downtown. Her partner, the developer and philanthropist Ed Wendler, had assembled a gathering of liberal luminaries with a personal goal of getting Jackson involved in a project to support a school in a Haitian slum, she said. (Pogue’s contact sheet does record the word “Haiti.”) 

Others who attended told me their memories of the occasion had understandably faded, but they did help me confirm the woman on the left as Hazel Overby, a longtime Austin Democratic Party and civil rights activist—also a leader of the Texas wing of Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition—who passed away in 2006 (two years after Wendler and a year before Ivins). In addition, the white man in the middle is George Bristol, then a Democratic political consultant, fundraiser, and advocate for public parks, who now lives in Fort Worth. (At press time, I have not identified the younger man partly visible over Jackson’s shoulder.)

No one could precisely recall why the civil rights leader was in town—though surely it wasn’t just for this gathering. 

According to the Observer and Austin American-Statesman archives, Jackson was in Austin on that date to speak at the funeral of John C. White, a former Texas agriculture commissioner and Democratic national chairman who advised the reverend during the latter’s 1988 presidential bid. At a Capitol service, Jackson delivered “a thunderous 30-minute eulogy,” the Statesman reported, before speaking again over White’s casket, down the road at the Texas State Cemetery.

Curious, I decided to check the Observer’s archive for coverage of the progressive, outsider reverend’s 1980s runs for the White House. Seven years before Pogue took the photo printed here, the Observer (not yet being a nonprofit) endorsed Jackson, praising his “progressive and humane political and economic agenda,” including his proposal to force private pension funds to invest in public works and his support for “the creation of a Palestinian homeland.” 

In the same issue, we printed a speech then recently given by Ivins. “Jackson is an interesting political problem for the Democratic party. The leadership of the Democratic party is terrified of him,” she said.

“My own reading is that it’s folly for the Democratic party to try to distance itself from Jesse Jackson. … He can bring into the political process voters no one else can.”

Jackson fell short, of course, in his bid to secure the Dems’ presidential nomination, but he did place a strong second in the Texas primary.


Advertisement

The post Jesse Jackson Comes to Town appeared first on The Texas Observer.

In Diverse Southwest Houston, Longtime Incumbent Hubert Vo Forced into Runoff Row

posted in: All news | 0

At an office tucked in the corner of the Universal Shopping Center in Houston’s Alief area, among Vietnamese restaurants and immigration service offices, I met Democratic state Representative Hubert Vo to talk about the runoff election for House District 149. Instead of meeting at his district office a few streets away, we met at the office from which manages the shopping center. Nearing 70, he wore a light blue suit that seemed to engulf his small frame; he stooped slightly when he stood. 

Vo leafed back and forth through a prepared memo with talking points about his record. “I continue to keep the district growing in terms of the economy. … You can see it’s had a lot of changes from many years ago,” Vo said. 

Twenty-two years ago, Vo drove from office Talmadge Heflin, a powerful Republican incumbent who had voted against anti-hate crime bills and a proposal to make Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday a state holiday. After 20 years in office, Talmadge had become increasingly out of touch with his rapidly diversifying district while Vo made a targeted effort to court immigrant voters—and won by just 33 votes. 

At the time, he told Texas Monthly: “The Democratic party is the underdog party, and as immigrants, we are underdogs,” he says. “Sometimes when Vietnamese people achieve success here in the U.S., they forget how hard the road was to get here. We need to remember where we came from.” 

HD 149 is anchored in southwest Houston and also spans most of Alief along with portions of West Houston and Katy. It’s become one of the most internationally diverse districts in Texas: 44 percent of residents are foreign-born. Hispanics account for nearly 40 percent of the population. Black residents—both African Americans and immigrants—make up more than a quarter of the district. About one in six are Asian, and most are of the Vietnamese community. Today, just 14 percent of the district is white. Nearly one in five residents lives below the poverty line.

Vo’s own story of fleeing the fall of South Vietnam to the Communists, finding refuge in Houston, and then working his way up to become a successful business owner, resonated with the district’s heavily immigrant populace. After a few years of working in local restaurants and shops, he got into the computer wholesale business, became a millionaire, and bought up several McDonald’s franchises. He also owns some commercial and residential properties (where he’s been accused of being a slumlord in the past because of subpar health and building standards). 

These days, his critics say it’s Vo who’s out of touch with the district. After running unopposed in the Democratic primary for most of his 20 years in office, this cycle he faced three challengers: college professor Mink Jawandor, David Romero, a residential organizer in the district’s northern area, and Darlene Breaux, a former educator and activist who’s been a board member of Alief ISD since 2017. Breaux—with endorsements from the Texas AFL-CIO, The Houston LGBTQ+ Caucus, and a handful of local elected officials—bested Vo by just 9 votes, forcing a runoff contest, which is often a fatal outcome for legislative incumbents in Texas. 

Vo’s signature contribution to the community hailed from 2007 when he passed state legislation to create the International Management District, a business improvement district that collects taxes to finance security and infrastructure upgrades, credited with helping the area’s bustling restaurants, cafes, and shops. “It is growing economically, and also crime is way down,” Vo said. 

But the Houston Chronicle editorial board, which endorsed Breaux, wrote that Vo has “struggled to add to that accomplishment” of the International Management District and that “his wins in the Legislature could be called modest at best.” In 2021, Texas Monthly’sThe Best and Worst Legislators” feature designated Vo as “furniture”—a title reserved for the most inconsequential members of the Lege. The magazine skewered the passage of his one resolution to make April 21 “McDonald’s Virtual Legislative Day.” Two years before that, Vo had passed a resolution establishing a “Salad Day” and a day to “commend all Texas McDonald’s owners/operators for their role in furthering the economic vitality of the Lone Star State.”

When I asked about his recent legislative record, Vo read from his prepared memo, repeating talking points about bills he passed this last legislative session, including two laws that tighten access to unemployment benefits. 

Vo’s primary opponents told the Observer they felt that Vo was neglecting the district beyond the Vietnamese community in Alief. 

In 2023, state redistricting added an area north of Interstate 10 to House District 149 where Romero lives. He had decided to run in the Democratic primary this year “because we need a representative, somebody that actually represents our whole district, and not just the Alief side.” He formed the One Creek West neighborhood organization to represent residential communities north of I-10 in the district. 

Romero said simply getting sidewalks built in front of schools and homes has been an issue. He told the Observer he hasn’t been able to engage Vo in their community’s problems. “We work with elected officials, our police department, our constable, businesses, to keep our area clean and safe, working on flooding mitigation, things like that. Those are things that I believe he [Vo] should be doing. But every time we try to schedule something with him, there’s no response,” Romero said. 

Mink Jawandor ran for similar reasons. He came as a refugee from Sierra Leone 30 years ago to the Alief area and now teaches government at Houston City College. “Only Asiatown is developing, “Jawandor said.” “The other parts of the communities are not developed.” 

Both Romero and Jawandor are supporting Breaux. 

As a school board member who’s served as president of the body since 2023, Breaux said she helped navigate Alief ISD through difficult times, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the budget crisis caused by Governor Greg Abbott withholding state education funding increase in 2023. She says she’s also helped pass more than $520 million in bond projects for improvements for the district. 

As she told me over coffee at a Starbucks on the outskirts of Alief, Breaux said the biggest concerns in the district are for safety, workforce training, and healthcare. While she didn’t concretely describe what priorities she would pursue in the state legislature, Breaux said she’s been hitting the streets, listening and speaking to people in all parts of the district. 

“I had to make sure that I’m reaching all areas of our district,” Breaux said. “I’m out in the community and talking to all the demographics, they have some real concerns. They want some representation that they could communicate with and would be out there for them.” 

It’s her background in education that will help carry her in the race, Brandon Rottinghaus, professor of political science at the University of Houston, told the Observer. “Vo has been a stalwart among the Asian American community, and that’s carried into victory for several years, but the Democratic coalition is changing,” Rottinghaus said. “She’s an education-first candidate, and that’s something that is front of mind for a lot of voters.” 

Vo said he’s counting on Vietnamese representatives and media to turn out the votes for him to beat Breaux. “The Asian community needs to turn out more,” Vo said. He said he first ran in 2004 because the Vietnamese community “was not strong enough to stand on their own by themselves,” and always had to “ask for favors to help us with this and that.” Nowadays, “The Vietnamese community is very much organized,” he said. 

But some leaders of Vo’s own community have soured on him. 

Peter Pham, the chairman of the Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce of Houston, which represents nearly 100 member businesses, told the Observer he’s not sure he’ll vote for Vo. Besides showing up at one of the organization’s events three years ago, Pham said Vo “never shows up; never says anything.” 

Bryan Chu, the president of the Vietnamese Community of Houston and Vicinities, a cultural and social service organization, told the Observer he’s planning to vote for the Republican candidate Dave Bennett. Chu said he stopped inviting Vo to the organization’s events since Vo stopped engaging after the first few years he got into office. Chu himself challenged Vo as the Republican candidate back in 2016 but was easily defeated. “The Vietnamese community is very sick and tired of him,” Chu said. “A lot of people wonder how he keeps getting elected. 

In response to criticism about his lack of visibility and public engagement, Vo said, “I’m always available and people know me. …Every time we have any meetings in the district, I’m there. I was there.”

And yet, despite a serious threat to his hold on elected office, he appears to be largely absent from the campaign trail. His social media accounts have made no mention of his reelection effort throughout the primary and into the runoff. Nor, his opponents say, has he shown up for any Democratic town halls or endorsement meetings. 

So is this Vo’s time to go? 

Even with the incumbent’s lethargic campaign, expectations of very low turnout makes the runoff fight difficult to gauge—just 11 percent of the district’s registered voters showed up in the primary, and even fewer are likely to show up for the late May showdown.  

The post In Diverse Southwest Houston, Longtime Incumbent Hubert Vo Forced into Runoff Row appeared first on The Texas Observer.

The Aesthete from Archer

posted in: All news | 0

The ironies that affix themselves to the life and literature of Larry McMurtry are best exemplified by the title of his autobiographical meditation on storytelling, Walter Benjamin at the Dairy Queen, wherein the eponymous German cultural critic, who warned of the dehumanizing dangers of mechanical reproduction, is imagined at the fast-food eatery beloved by Texans and responsible for the Dilly Bar.

Despite the blue jeans and cowboy boots McMurtry wore to accept his 2006 Oscar for best adapted screenplay for Brokeback Mountain, the Pulitzer Prize-winning writer of Lonesome Dove did not consider himself a cowboy, and he spent the bulk of his literary life letting readers know that.

Now, David Streitfeld’s masterfully paced and carefully researched biography, Western Star: The Life and Legends of Larry McMurtry—out this March from Mariner—paints the picture of an artist at odds with the materials at hand, a writer whose every attempt at illustrating the reality of his region was met with misreading.

As a kid born into a cattle-ranching family in Archer City in 1936, not only did McMurtry care nothing for cows and only tolerate horses, but he was also a bookish child, terrified even of chickens, who would sneak off to read Don Quixote in solitude.

“When Larry thought about cowboys, he thought about his family,” writes Streitfeld, who goes on to note that McMurtry wrote his most celebrated work, Lonesome Dove, to understand his father, Jeff, a cowboy who came of age in a time that no longer needed cowboys.

Western Star: The Life and Legends of Larry McMurtry

If McMurtry’s magnum opus was an attempt at figuring out his father, it was an attempt also aimed at demystifying all that his father’s world represented.

Lonesome Dove, which was first conceived as a film script in 1972, was intended to give voice to the dispirited and displaced character of the cowboy and by extension the myth of the Old West.

“I thought I had written about a harsh time and some pretty harsh people, but, to the public at large, I had produced something closer to an idealization; instead of a poor-man’s Inferno, filled with violence, faithlessness and betrayal, I had actually delivered a kind of Gone with the Wind of the West,” McMurtry wrote in the introduction to the 2000 edition of the novel.

McMurtry cushions his failure to decenter the core of the Western myth, which he identifies as the belief that cowboys are brave and free, by deciding in the same introduction that the Western myth was “essentially unassailable.”

In a kind of happy defeat, he notes: “Readers don’t want to know and can’t be made to see how difficult and destructive life in the Old West really was. Lies about the West are more important to them than truths, which is why the popularity of the pulpers—Louis L’Amour particularly—has never dimmed.”

But it was not just the “pulpers” whom McMurtry took critical shots at.

“BY NECESSITY, I INVENT.”

In his 1981 Texas Observer article “Ever a Bridegroom: Reflections on the Failure of Texas Literature,” the author, who in 1986 would try to turn Archer City into a mecca for bibliophiles by bringing his legendary Booked Up store to his hometown, attacked iconic Texas writers such as Katherine Anne Porter, Bud Shrake, Bill Brammer, and John Howard Griffin as being woefully overrated. 

As Streitfeld notes, McMurtry felt that “Texas novelists and Texas critics were stuck on the range,” despite the fact that “the people and the stories were in the cities.” The essay, modeled somewhat on a section of Norman Mailer’s Advertisements for Myself, “is a plea for taking Texas books seriously, even if the ultimate judgment on nearly all of them is negative,” Streitfeld says.

McMurtry was already known at the time for criticizing the work of famed folklorist J. Frank Dobie, who was for many the summit of Texas literary culture, in an essay provocatively called “Southwestern Literature?,” wherein he disregarded the bulk of Lone Star lit by concluding that “The material is here, and it has barely been touched.” 


Advertisement

The juiciest parts of McMurtry’s willfully literary life—his trips to Boystown, the notorious red-light district in Nuevo Laredo; his collection of erotica; his penchant for emotional three-ways; his long friendship with Diane Keaton and short affair with Cybill Shepherd—all take a back seat in the new biography to the truest theme in McMurtry’s life: his unyielding faith in the truth of fiction.

In Western Star, all moments of comedy, terror, and romance are tied to aspects of the literary world.

Unrequited love takes the form of fruitless pining over his literary agent, Dorothea Oppenheimer. Adventure comes in the form of book-scouting road trips. And an absolute identity crisis arises in 1991 when McMurtry realizes, post-heart surgery, that he cannot concentrate enough to read or write.

This all works well enough, for while McMurtry’s artful articulation of small-town stagnation in The Last Picture Show as well as the sociopathic sensibilities of ranch life in Horseman, Pass By were easily usurped into cinema, where nuance was blunted, the complicated compromise McMurtry suffered in selling Texans what they wanted was always addressed in his fiction.

In his picaresque 1970 masterpiece Moving On, a character named Charlie Rawlins, who sells much-sought-after relics from a Texas now passed, confesses to dealing in fraud: “You know there’s six thousand antique stores in Texas alone, not to mention Arkansas and Louisiana? Where you gonna find that many kerosene lamps and wagon wheels? I tried to buy some rusty old branding irons from a man the other day and the son of a bitch wanted five dollars a piece. … I can make ’em for two and a half, already rusted.”

The in-joke regarding the manufacturing of myth is as postmodern as anything Pynchon might have penned in V. or the Crying of Lot 49. 

An unimpeachable stylist, McMurtry ventured further into mythmaking himself when he tried his hand at nonfiction. According to Streitfeld, all the quotes in a 1964 Texas travel piece for Holiday magazine were invented, and it’s unclear if McMurtry even made the drive he describes. 

“I have this compulsion to fictionalize,” McMurtry confessed in a 1976 Dallas Morning News article. “And I don’t make a good journalist, either. I just can’t stick to the facts. By necessity, I invent.” 

Corralling a talent that was extraordinary to the point of coming off as casual, refusing to be reined in by the rude reality of its surroundings, is a feat. The character of Larry McMurtry as depicted in Western Star sets a stylish standard for serious Texas writers while offering an aspirational example of how all artists can aesthetically observe their surroundings without ever being bound by the strictures of their state.

The post The Aesthete from Archer appeared first on The Texas Observer.