‘La Causa’ Continues in South Texas

posted in: All news | 0

Like everyone else, the César Chávez revelations shocked us, maybe more so than others since we had worked with him for almost two decades. 

The stunning news did not just deliver a gut-punch betrayal but also immediate anxiety about the damage that the exposé of his dark side would do to the movement, to all those who, for decades, had worked and given their time and sweat to La Causa, including the United Farm Workers (UFW) organizers killed in California and Florida—the martyrs. 

We cannot ignore César’s influence, leadership, brilliant strategies, and inherent abilities to lead farmworkers. He united people across the country with the grape boycott, his position against violence, and his campaign for pesticide control. 

At the same time, we cannot condone his acts of hurting girls and women. We must acknowledge and reject this abuse. We need to support the victims and condemn the behavior of others in the movement who enabled or engaged in similar conduct. 

Our additional task is to help others, including ourselves, understand the movement and continue to back it. The movement is about people and what people do about justice. It is never about one person, no matter how iconic.

Two of us worked in the fields as children with our families. We know firsthand what the movement is about. We saw our parents’ sacrifices. We still feel those long days under the hot sun and how hard the work was. Bending and stooping all day harms bodies and shortens lives. All this for a pittance of the money that agribusiness and grocery stores reap from the labor. 

Rebecca Flores speaks at the 1979 Texas UFW convention as César Chávez listens. (The University of Texas at San Antonio Special Collections)

The great contradiction is that our society oppresses and mistreats the workers who keep us alive and put food on our tables with abysmal wages and working conditions. As civil rights leader Reverend Jim Lawson famously put it, “plantation capitalism” controls our lives. We are either the oppressed or the oppressors. There is no middle ground. 

Farmworkers in Texas have a history of almost 100 years of rising up when the boot on their neck is too heavy, only to be met by the brutality of the Texas Rangers in collusion with the growers.

They crushed the 1930s wildcat strike of 1,200 onion harvesters in Webb County for higher wages, led by La Asociación de Jornaleros. They did the same in 1966 with the Starr County melon strike to such a grotesque extent that the U.S. Supreme Court rebuked the Rangers for their state-supported brutality against workers and organizers.

The 1966 Starr County workers’ 500-mile march to Austin electrified South Texas and ignited the Chicano movement in Texas. People rallied to join the farm laborers as they marched through the small towns from the Valley to Corpus Christi and then San Antonio. Supporters along the way provided food and nighttime shelter. The march culminated with thousands rallying at the Capitol and demanding a just wage. 

The mid-70s saw another raft of wildcat strikes in fields across the Valley, Presidio, and areas of West Texas. However, Texas, being an anti-union state, hardens state power against the workers, and sufficient funds are not available to sustain an organizing campaign and strikes. There is a saying in the Valley that eight workers are waiting to replace someone terminated from a job. Whether the number is accurate, the reality is true, and the growers use it as a threat.

Those reality checks changed the nature of farmworker organizing in Texas and sent the movement in a different, and successful, direction. The UFW sent Fred Ross, Sr., to train organizers in the Valley. A contemporary of Saul Alinsky of Industrial Areas Foundation fame, Fred trained César and Dolores Huerta in house-meeting organizing to get the farm labor movement up and running in California. 

Fred trained Texas union staff in the art of house meetings and in organizing UFW committees in the colonias. Fred’s training lasted several weeks and turned the UFW into a South Texas powerhouse. In the house meetings, the workers, both men and women, spoke out about the conditions in the fields and became leaders of the union. 

Once organized, the committees began holding annual Valley-wide conventions beginning in 1979. For the workers, this was their first time participating in their own convention and having a voice in their future, rather than someone dictating their future for them. The convocations adopted legislative and organizing priorities for the coming year. 

After years of organizing from the late 70s through the mid-80s, the workers were able to pass legislation, securing workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, and the right to know about pesticide use in the fields, all crucial protections for farm laborers and from which Texas law had systematically excluded them. Pesticides were especially concerning for pregnant women workers.

Farm labor is the nation’s most dangerous occupation, alternating at times with construction, depending on the time of year. It is seasonal like construction. Nevertheless, farmworkers had none of the protections that construction employees and other laborers had. The separation point was ethnicity—racism. That was our winning argument in court when we sued as part of the organizing campaign.

The local UFW then pressured the health department to require employers to provide portable toilets in the fields, along with drinking water and handwashing facilities. The fact that this effort took place in 1983 reflects the longstanding powerlessness and oppression of farm workers and the Mexican-American community in general. 

Monsignor George Higgins, labor activist and priest, with escort committee and Flores being received by delegates at 1979 convention (The University of Texas at San Antonio Special Collections)

In 1981, the legislature finally banned use of the 24-inch short-handle hoe (el cortito), a backbreaking, cruel holdover from the slave era. The purpose was to keep people bent over to make sure they kept busy weeding and thinning crops. If they stood to stretch, the assumption was they were not working hard enough. El cortito caused debilitating back problems and premature arthritis in workers who had to do stoop labor for long hours. 

These efforts involved intense political organizing, creative litigation, and stalwart legislative efforts by the workers. Crucial allies, like the Texas AFL-CIO, religious leaders, Mexican-American community leaders, and friends in the Legislature, all stepped in to help.

From the late 70s on, organizing in the colonias continued. House meetings yielded a series of lightning picket actions at fields to raise wages. Committees focused on improving conditions in the colonias, where most farmworkers reside. Because of direction from César, Dolores, Fred, and union leaders in South Texas like the Baltazar Saldaña family and Pedro de la Fuente, we worked together to successfully form a long-lasting UFW organization in the Valley.

Another movement change of direction occurred as 1993 approached, when Congress passed NAFTA, which caused even more hand-harvested crops to be relocated to Mexico, where American agribusiness could pay much lower wages and avoid protective laws for workers.

Early in the movement, the idea of a community union began to come into focus. It took hold in 1989 when La Unión del Pueblo Entero (LUPE), a nonprofit community organizing effort, formally became a reality. In 2003, LUPE opened its Texas doors at the farmworkers’ center in San Juan, as successor to the UFW’s farm labor efforts and became a dynamic promoter of justice throughout the Valley.

La Causa continues because people in Texas put their hearts into the movement. Even when it redirects itself from time to time, and even when it must grapple with deep harm caused by a major leader, the movement remains about justice by the people who suffer the most and for the people who suffer the most.

The post ‘La Causa’ Continues in South Texas appeared first on The Texas Observer.

A Black Cowboy Museum, Rebooted

posted in: All news | 0

Larry Callies ambles through the Black Cowboy Museum in downtown Rosenberg, southwest of Houston, sporting his straw Stetson and a pair of worn work boots. The founder and CEO of the museum, he’s spinning stories in his compelling, though perennially strained, voice. He leads visitors young and old—from Texas and across the globe—through this 900-square-foot space, which is tucked into a commercial strip center and chock-full of badges, boots, guns, and photos of Black cowboys riding bulls, roping calves, and busting broncos.

Over the decades, Callies has worked as a cowboy, singer, and postman. Born in the sleepy railroad town of Wharton, he began early, learning to rope and helping his father break horses on a local ranch. Later, he performed country music for about two decades with his Bronco Band before losing his voice to a neurological condition called vocal dysphonia.

These days, Callies keeps busy mostly as a storyteller. “My dream is to keep telling the history of Texas,” he told the Texas Observer. One framed newspaper headline in his collection summarizes his mission: “A Black Cowboy Confronts the Whitewashed History of the West.”

In middle age, Callies began collecting cowboy memorabilia as a hobby, then he decked the walls of his Rosenberg saddle shop with it. He founded the museum in 2017, because, he says, God told him to. He’s long since run out of room for myriad items: regalia from buffalo soldiers, an antique gun collection, and a large collection of badges, one of which reads “South Carolina Slave Patrol.”

Callies (Lise Olsen)

Now Fort Bend County officials are supporting a 9,000-square-foot facility—10 times larger—by providing land and funding. The Black Cowboy Museum’s $4-million building will soon rise in Bates Allen Park, 14 miles southeast of Rosenberg, in a park that originally was a Freedmen’s town called Kendleton (near the eponymous small city). They hope to open in 2027. 

Plenty of arguments have erupted in Texas recently over other historical initiatives and books that bear even a hint of diversity. But Fort Bend County Commissioner Dexter McCoy told the Observer that support for the museum here has been unanimous and steady.

“This is a very important project because it’s important to tell these stories,” said McCoy. As a Louisiana native who grew up in Fort Bend, he said: “I did not know about the consequential nature of people who look like me here.” 

On one wall at the museum is an enlarged copy of a faded photo, likely taken in the 1940s, that shows five Cowboys astride horses on a Fort Bend County ranch—four are Black. To Callies, that photo illustrates why this area is the perfect place for the museum: Before Emancipation and for decades later, most cowboys on Fort Bend ranches were Black, including on the ranch in the photograph, which later became the 20,000-acre George Ranch historical park. (Callies briefly worked at the historical park as a cowboy.)

As Callies tells visitors, the term “cow boy” arose from a racial slur coined in Texas under slavery: “House boys,” he explains, worked inside plantation houses, and “cow boys” worked the cattle. Much later, after Hollywood romanticized that term, it was adopted by cowboys of all races. 

Callies shares an unflinching and personal version of cowboy history: One exhibit includes a fat binder filled with genealogical information—including proof that some of his ancestors, born under slavery, were the illegitimate children of prominent Texas plantation owners. “Major James Kerr—you’ve heard of Kerrville?” he asks visitors. “It was named after him. He was a minister of the gospel; he had kids with slaves, and he wrote about it in his Bible.” And he was one of Callies’ forebears.

With the bigger museum, Callies will have more space for stories about figures like Bass Reaves, the legendary Black cowboy born in 1838 in Arkansas whose subsequent adventures as a U.S. marshal, and one of America’s first Black sheriffs, spawned the legend of the Lone Ranger.

His voice warms when he introduces young visitors to Texas Black cowboy heroes like Bill Pickett, a Travis County native and rodeo champion who invented a steer-wrestling technique called “bulldogging” that involves grabbing horns, twisting heads, and initially biting a steer’s sensitive snout or lower lip. Though Pickett died in 1932 of injuries from a rogue horse, other Black cowboys continue to ride in the 40-year-old rodeo that bears Pickett’s name.

Callies loves telling how his first cousin, Tex Williams, crossed color lines in the late 1960s to become the first Black teen to win the Texas State High School Rodeo championship. He starts the story by saying how Williams initially competed in all-Black rodeos against much older riders. “Tex was 14 in ’65,” he told visitors recently. “And Tex Williams was a champion. … Then he got the nerve to get into the all-white rodeo, and he won.”

At an annual banquet, Callies and his cohorts add cowboy heroes to the museum’s growing Hall of Fame. To qualify, honorees can’t just be rodeo stars, he said; each must have ranch ties or cowboy cred.

In 2025, the museum chose its first cowgirls: Acynthia Villery, a Bill Pickett Rodeo official and announcer who grew up riding, and Mollie Stevenson Jr., co-founder of the American Cowboy Museum on Houston’s historic Taylor-Stevenson Ranch, one of the nation’s oldest African American-owned ranches. 

A few months later, Villery found herself drafted to serve on the Black Cowboy Museum board. In an interview, Villery said she can’t wait for it to grow. She felt inspired by seeing oversize displays at the National Museum of African-American History in Washington, D.C., and a traveling exhibit at the Gene Autry Museum in California.

Over a cup of coffee, Villery expressed hope that she could convince musicians and Hollywood stars with Texas ties or cowboy cred to support modernized exhibits, which will require more funding than Fort Bend County has provided. The museum has already won a $25,000 grant from the BeyGood Foundation, begun by Beyoncé.

For Villery, some of the biggest thrills she gets from touring with the Pickett rodeo come when little kids exclaim: “Y’all real!” after seeing Black cowboys in action. Such moments can be amplified at this new museum—especially with more-interactive exhibits and demos. “It’ll allow us to be able to grow,” she said.

Somehow, amid everything else, Callies wrangles room in his crowded exhibition space to show young visitors how to rope using a small wooden sawhorse (really a “sawcalf”). In November, he hurled a lasso for a small boy named Ivan, who seemed delighted to watch though reluctant to rope himself (at least before spectators).

Along with his boots and hat, Callies wore an elaborate belt buckle that day—showing that he still has the stuff of a rodeo champ. He won that latest calf-roping buckle at the Fort Bend County rodeo in 2023, he told the Observer.

Then Callies chuckled, adding a coda to the tale. Turns out, he had a bit of a competitive advantage. As founder of the Black Cowboy Museum, he could enter the rodeo’s businessmen division: “Not many people that have a big business can rope,” he said. “They get somebody to do it, you know.”

The post A Black Cowboy Museum, Rebooted appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Did Texas Republicans’ Restive Runoffs Imperil Their November Ballot? 

posted in: All news | 0

Heading into what is expected to be one of the most favorable cycles for Democrats in Texas in nearly a decade, the statewide Republican ticket retains two key anchors, Governor Greg Abbott and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, both of whom faced no real primary opposition this year. 

But the Republican primary electorate had plenty of work to do to fill out the balance of statewide (and downballot) nominations, determining the overall milieu of the Texas Grand Ol’ Party.

In broad strokes, the Republican intraparty dynamic was basically old-guard establishment hands trying to hold on or ascend, versus a batch of ambitious and uniquely hardline insurgents. The typical story, with the now-longstanding wild card of Trump’s kingmaking powers. In many cases, it took a bruising round of runoffs to determine the final lineup—and in almost all cases, the most problematic, extremist, unqualified, and Trumpian candidate won the day. 

Let’s start from the top. First, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton utterly demolished longtime U.S. Senator John Cornyn by nearly 30 points in their May runoff. Along the way, the Republican establishment lit over $120 million of pro-Cornyn campaign cash on fire, and the remnants of an old-line Texas Republican lineage were put to rest. Questions of morality, ethics, and political principles were sidelined by more important matters like hunting RINOs and suckling at Trump’s teat. This was a theme.

In the race to replace Paxton as AG, there was the runoff showdown between Congressman Chip Roy, a pugnacious budget hawk and tea party veteran, and state Senator Mayes Middleton, a silver-spoon oil heir-turned-right-wing political striver. On the issues, both talked about stopping the so-called “Islamification” of Texas and dismantling the radical left. But the real differences came down to experience and to Trump.  On the matter of legal pedigree, there was Roy, a former federal prosecutor who was once Paxton’s first deputy and who served as chief of staff to Senator Ted Cruz. Then there was Middleton, who just happens to have a law degree—and lots of money, which he used to purchase goodwill and political support over the years. On the other hand, Roy had come to blows with the Trump admin in Congress over various spending matters through the years, while Middleton used his wealth to dub himself “MAGA Mayes” and spend a ton of money casting Roy as anti-Trump. Despite a last-minute funding surge from an Amarillo megadonor to try and get Roy over the hump, Middleton’s self-funded wallet whippin’ ultimately carried the day, as the state senator won by about 10 points. 

Then there was the battle for the Texas Railroad Commission, which was previously just a parochial den of oil industry-captured government regulation but was made, by former Tarrant County GOP chairman (also, an oil heir) Bo French, into a battleground fought for through opinions on Sharia law and various other matters of concern to past and present fascists. Oil and gas? Well, clearly a lot of that is Muslim—and therefore must be deported. Despite some rather meager attempts by Governor Greg and Lieutenant Dan to save the incumbent Jim Wright, French eked out a victory—an outcome that should give a moment’s pause to any Texan who values the U.S. Constitution or democracy.

That fills out the statewide ballot. Paxton at the top, Abbott and Patrick perhaps providing some electoral buoyancy, MAGA Mayes for AG, the self-styled DOGE cutter Don Huffines for comptroller, a fascisty French man for Railroad Commission, and the incumbent Land Commish Dawn Buckingham. 

It’s a ticket filled with moral pockmarks and festering ethical boils, plus idolatry politics and unrepentant bigotry, and it’s a ticket made up of candidates backed by voters who were not so quietly divided—the sort that one could imagine leading to, dare I speak it, the first statewide Democratic win in the state in over 30 years. 

Further down the ballot, the trend continued with Texas Republicans putting their Trumpiest foot forward.  In the president’s bespoke congressional districts created last year, a bunch of Trump-annointed newbies with seemingly no prevailing principles other than loyalty to him won out. Ironically, that came at the expense of the Republican state reps who’d dutifully helped deliver those new districts—only to be snubbed by the president when they tried to run themselves. This list includes small government crusader and Deer Park state Representative Briscoe Cain, who was blown out by Alex Mealer in a runoff for outer Harris County’s new 9th Congressional District, and state Representative John Lujan, who lost to Carlos De La Cruz in the 35th, which includes part of Bexar County and surrounding red counties. (His sister is the Republican congresswoman in a neighboring district.) 

These candidates now join a current class of congressional candidates in Texas that includes right-wing “gunfluencer” Brandon Herrera, who prevailed with the scandal-driven resignation of more-moderate incumbent Tony Gonzales in the 23rd; a longtime GOP operative and Elon Musk lawyer Chris Gober, who won the primary to replace outgoing Republican Michael McCaul in the 10th; and Jon Bonck, a Trump-backed mortgage banker who will replace Wesley Hunt in the 38th. 

Most of these candidates will easily win their general elections in deeply Republican districts. Others, namely Herrera and De La Cruz, could face tough fights against Democratic candidates in somewhat less surefire districts.

The question for those who care about the fate and future of this state is, will these flawed and sundry characters on the ballot accumulate into a net electoral backlash? Are these Republicans, in reality, less electable than the average replacement? 

At the top of the ballot,Paxton will face off against the latest Democratic darling in James Talarico, whose platform of religious morality and basic decency, plus massive campaign coffers, seems to make for a lab-created foil for the ethically impaired state AG. 

There were several hundred thousand Republican voters who cast their votes for Cornyn in the primary and runoff. Most of those are diehard Republicans who will ultimately come home and cast votes for Paxton, even if with pinched noses. But a certain proportion of those will refuse to do so—and will either not vote or pull the lever for Talarico. If more of those do the latter than the former, then that is a clear formula for victory. It’s the formula that helped fuel Beto O’Rourke’s near-win back in 2018, when hundreds of thousands split their tickets between him and Abbott. 

The same dynamic could hold true down the ballot in less high-profile races, like that for railroad commissioner, wherein voters will be forced to choose between French and Democratic nominee Jon Rosenthal, an oil engineer and state representative from Houston who is decidedly more level-headed. And for comptroller, in which Huffines, who might just blow up the Texas state budget in the name of accelerationist austerity politics given the chance, will face experienced state Senator Sarah Eckhardt. Or in the once-swingy 23rd, which stretches from San Antonio to El Paso, where people will decide between Herrera, an extremely online meme and gun enthusiast, and Katy Padilla Stout, an attorney and former teacher. 

The stakes are high. If the Texas electorate acts like it has in the past few cycles, it will elect Republicans up and down the ballot—in every statewide office and in every feasible legislative district. But if they do so again this time, it will be a new, especially pernicious breed of Republican pols who will be taking hold of power.

The post Did Texas Republicans’ Restive Runoffs Imperil Their November Ballot?  appeared first on The Texas Observer.

They’re Mostly Anglo. They’re Largely from Austin. And They Just Might Have a Shot.

posted in: All news | 0

At long last, Texas Democrats have their statewide slate.

On Tuesday, the easy victories of Austin state Representative Vikki Goodwin for the lieutenant governor nomination and Dallas state Senator Nathan Johnson for attorney general completed the team that will attempt to take advantage in November of what seems to be the most promising year for Lone Star liberals in at least four cycles.

So, here are some reasons that might be a bad thing. 

First, this is a very white slate. Goodwin and Johnson join Austin state Representative Gina Hinojosa for governor and Austin state Representative James Talarico for senator in November’s top four ballot slots. 

That means three of the highest-profile quartet are Anglo. And, for the four remaining statewide executive-branch positions up for election—comptroller, land commissioner, agriculture commissioner, and railroad commissioner—all are Anglo save for Benjamin Flores, the land commish hopeful who adds a second Hispanic surname to the octet. Texas, by way of reminder, is a plurality-Latino state that also has the largest total Black population of any state (and which just saw a bruising March Senate primary that fractured along racial lines).

This is also—maybe you already noticed the trend in the honorifics—a very Austin-centric lineup. 

Three of the top four slots are held by state reps from the capital city—the bluest of Texas’ blue cities. The would-be comptroller, furthermore, is Austin state Senator Sarah Eckhardt. Texas, by way of reminder, is home to two mega-populous metros—and they are Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston. (There’s also a booming metro to the south, by the name of San Antonio.) 

On the other hand, here are some counterpoints.

By the standards of Texas Democrats, this is a highly qualified electoral offering. All four of the top candidates are currently sitting state legislators. And seven of the eight statewide executive aspirants hold state- or city-level elected office. In terms of experience—and willingness to risk something to run—this is a massive upgrade over any other recent election.

It’s also possible that none of the above quibbling matters a whit. Because perhaps the best news for the Texas Democratic Party was delivered Tuesday courtesy of Republican voters.

In a nearly 30-point rout, Attorney General Ken Paxton, propelled by a late Trump nod, vanquished incumbent U.S. Senator John Cornyn to seize the Texas GOP’s top ballot position come November. While early polling didn’t always show a wide electability gap between the two Republican men, there are times when one must trust one’s lyin’ eyes.

This is about more than Paxton’s sordid string of past scandals as compared to Cornyn’s relatively clean past. This is about a fairly straightforward question: If the (narrow) path to victory for Talarico depends on ticket-splitting between him and Governor Greg Abbott—which the conventional analysis says it does—then who was the GOP candidate more likely to repel an Abbott voter? 

An Abbott-Talarico-sized door needed to open, and it’s simply much easier to imagine voters stepping through it when they’re presented with the walking ethical nightmare and 110-percent pot-committed Trump minion that is the state’s sitting attorney general. (Now, if Abbott himself enters the danger zone this year, we’re talking about another, more historic scenario with much greater implications for the actual lives of Texans, but for now I’m going to leave such speculation stranded between these parentheses.) It’s worth noting, as well, that the last time Texas saw a somewhat competitive midterm—in 2018—Paxton notably underperformed the other statewide Republicans outside of Ted Cruz.

Talarico could be strong enough, and Paxton should be weak enough, that another five months of terrible news for Trump and Republican rule just might bring the senatorial finish line beneath a blue wave’s high-water mark. 

That’s a lot of conditional clauses amounting to this: It is now plausible that hope is not delusional. (For any non-Texan readers out there, this is actually a very bold claim I’m making here.)

Meanwhile, a few rungs down, GOP voters also nominated Bo French over incumbent Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright. French is what you might delicately call a promoter of fascist beliefs. Or, rather, the man is a fascist. But even the staunch opposition of Abbott and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick couldn’t stop the Paxton ally from seizing the nod, creating another possible soft spot.

Facing a difficult midterm year, Texas’ hardcore Republican electorate voted its highly questionable conscience rather than playing the electability-seeking pundit. If this tiny and zealous assemblage doesn’t pay the price for this decision in November, then we all will.

In assorted downballot Democratic news, the rising Houston star Christian Menefee easily prevailed in his congressman-versus-congressman showdown with the 78-year-old Al Green. And in two other congressional matchups also created by the GOP’s mid-decade scrambling of the electoral map, Colin Allred regained a position in the U.S. House at the expense of Congresswoman Julie Johnson, and a candidate widely condemned as antisemitic was defeated by a Blue Dog Democrat for the redrawn 35th Congressional District—a San Antonio-area seat that the GOP plans to flip but that could be in play in a blue-wave scenario.

In the Rio Grande Valley, the Bernie Sanders-backed Julio Salinas prevailed in a McAllen-area state House runoff for the seat previously held by the conservative Dem Bobby Guerra, and Ozzie Ochoa earned the nod for the Cameron County-based state House District 37—which Dems fumbled away back in 2022. Both of these South Texas districts went for Trump in 2024, so their fate this year will be part of a broader story of whether this region swings back toward the Democrats. Also hanging in the balance of regional Latino opinion are the 35th, mentioned above, and the U.S. House seats represented by Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez—all of which were around plus-10 for Trump in ’24. And, as a reach, there is the 23rd Congressional District, a plus-15 Trump seat for which the GOP has nominated an extremist Youtuber (for completeness’ sake, Bobby Pulido is also challenging Monica De La Cruz for the plus-18 Trump 15th).

In Austin, progressive labor candidate Montserrat Garibay prevailed over a former city council member in the race to replace Gina Hinojosa in the state House. Up in Dallas, incumbent state Representative Venton Jones easily prevailed against a runoff challenger, but over in Houston, longtime state House member Hubert Vo joined Tarrant County-based representative and colleague Chris Turner—who was ousted in the March primary—in falling prey to both a strong intraparty opponent and the vicissitudes of a changing district.

The post They’re Mostly Anglo. They’re Largely from Austin. And They Just Might Have a Shot. appeared first on The Texas Observer.