By JACK DURA, Associated Press
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota judge has ordered Greenpeace to pay damages of $345 million, reducing an earlier jury award after it found the environmental group and related entities were liable for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company in connection with protests of an oil pipeline nearly a decade ago.
The award is roughly half the $667 million that a jury previously had awarded to the company, Dallas-based Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access.
State District Judge James Gion granted and denied Greenpeace requests to rule in its favor on various claims before recalculating the damages.
Energy Transfer said it intends to appeal the verdict “as we firmly believe that the original jury findings and damages awards for conspiracy and defamation are lawful and just.”
Related Articles
A ticking clock: How states are preparing for a last-minute Obamacare deal
Better than gold? $100,000 for US athletes who make the Winter Olympics and Paralympics
Food aid at risk of expiring as effort to fund SNAP benefits fails in Senate
Rozier and Billups will not receive NBA salaries while on leave in gambling cases, AP sources say
Character.AI is banning minors from interacting with its chatbots
The lawsuit stems from protests nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access oil pipeline and its crossing of the Missouri River near the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s reservation. The case would go next to the North Dakota Supreme Court.
In March, a nine-person jury found Netherlands-based Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA and funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc. liable for defamation and other claims brought by Energy Transfer.
The jury found Greenpeace USA liable on all counts, including conspiracy, trespass, nuisance and tortious interference with business relations. The other two entities were found liable for some of the total claims.
Damages totaled $666.9 million, divided in different amounts among the three Greenpeace organizations, who earlier planned to appeal.
The pipeline company accused Greenpeace of carrying out a scheme to stop the pipeline. Greenpeace attorneys said there was no evidence to back up the pipeline company’s claims.
Since the verdict, attorneys for the Greenpeace entities asked the judge to reduce the damages and to undo the verdict in their favor. Energy Transfer asked the judge to enter the judgment the jury found.
The lawsuit was filed in 2019 and went to trial earlier this year in state district court in Mandan, North Dakota.
In September, the judge denied a request from the pipeline company to stop Greenpeace International from continuing with an anti-intimidation lawsuit it filed in the Netherlands.
Leave a Reply